• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.287-293
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. To compare the dimensional accuracy of three impression techniques- a separating foil impression, a custom tray impression, and a stock tray impression. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A machined mandibular complete-arch metal model with special modifications served as a master cast. Three different impression techniques (n = 6 in each group) were performed with addition-cured silicon materials: i) putty-wash technique with a prefabricated metal tray (MET) using putty and regular body, ii) single-phase impression with custom tray (CUS) using regular body material, and iii) two-stage technique with stock metal tray (SEP) using putty with a separating foil and regular body material. All impressions were poured with epoxy resin. Six different distances (four intra-abutment and two inter-abutment distances) were gauged on the metal master model and on the casts with a microscope in combination with calibrated measuring software. The differences of the evaluated distances between the reference and the three test groups were calculated and expressed as mean (${\pm}SD$). Additionally, the 95% confidence intervals were calculated and significant differences between the experimental groups were assumed when confidence intervals did not overlap. RESULTS. Dimensional changes compared to reference values varied between -74.01 and $32.57{\mu}m$ (MET), -78.86 and 30.84 (CUS), and between -92.20 and 30.98 (SEP). For the intra-abutment distances, no significant differences among the experimental groups were detected. CUS showed a significantly higher dimensional accuracy for the inter-abutment distances with -0.02 and -0.08 percentage deviation compared to MET and SEP. CONCLUSION. The separation foil technique is a simple alternative to the custom tray technique for single tooth restorations, while limitations may exist for extended restorations with multiple abutment teeth.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.317-328
• /
• 2006

Purpose: This study was performed to measure the accuracy of adjustable dental impression trays by a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer. Materials and Methods: Metal stock tray and adjustable stock trays were used for 40 stone casts(10 casts each) duplicated a resin master model of mandible and maxilla. The type IV dental stone was poured in a allginate impressions and allowed to set for one hour. The casts were digitized using an optical digitizer. The distance between the reference points were measured and analyzed on the graphic image of 3-D graphic software (CATIA version 5.0). The statistical significance of the differences between the groups was determined by a two-way ANOVA. Results: There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the adjustable stock tray and the master model except anterior arch width of the upper arch and the diagonal arch length and arch length(one side) of the lower arch. Conclusion: The adjustable stock trays showed clinically acceptable accuracies of the study casts produced by them.

• 제어로봇시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.300-304
• /
• 2010

This study was performed to development a dental three-dimensional laser scanning system and measure the accuracy of new adjustable upper dental impression tray. The metal stock, individual, and new adjustable stock trays were used for 30 stone casts(10 casts each) duplicated a resin master model of maxilla. The dental stone was poured in a vinyl polysiloxane impressions and allowed to set for on hour. The master model and the duplicated casts were digitized using an dental scanning system. The distance between the reference points were measured and analyzed on the graphic image of 3D graphic software of CATIA. The statistical significance of the differences between the groups was determined by a two-way ANOVA. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the adjustable stock tray and the master model except only anterior arch width on the upper arch. The adjustable upper stock tray showed clinically acceptable accuracies of the study cast produced by them.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of reproduction of stone casts made from complete-arch impressions using different trays. The trays used were : 1) nonperforated custom tray, 2) perforated custom tray, 3) nonperforated Rim-Lock tray, 4) perforated stock tray. Impressions were made from an dentulous acrylic resin model with metal inserts in first premolars and second molars. Transverse distance, sagittal distance and diagonal distance were measured using 4 landmarks. Measurements were made by using 3 dimensional measuring machine. The impression material used was an addition silicone. Impressions were poured at once with a Type IV dental stone. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and student t-test with a sample size of five. The results were as follows : 1. There were statistical differences in amount of dimensional change in according to the tray types. In amount of mean dimensional change, perforated custom tray was the first smallest, nonperforated custom tray was the second, nonperforated Rim-Lock tray and perforated stock tray were the largest. 2. There were statistical differences in amount of dimensional change between nonperforated custom tray and nonperforated Rim-Lock tray, and between perforated custom tray perforated stock tray. 3. There were satistical differences in amount of dimensional change between nonperforated custom tray and perforated custom tray, but there was not a statistical difference between nonperforated Rim-Lock tray and perforated stock tray. 4. There was not a statistical difference in amount of dimensional change between upper and lower arch in all tray types.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.48-54
• /
• 2010

연구 목적: 보편화된 임플란트 치료의 장기적인 성공을 위해서는 임플란트와 상부 보철물의 연결 시 완전한 수동적 적합을 이루는 것이 중요하며, 이를 위해서는 정확하게 인상 채득하는 것이 필요하다. 이 연구에서는 임플란트 고정체 수준 인상 채득 방법 중 인상체 제거 후 인상용 코핑이 인상체에 남아있는 open tray 인상법과 구강 내에 남아있는 closed tray 인상법, 그리고 인상 채득 시 사용될 수 있는 여러 트레이에 대해 비교 연구해 보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험 모형은 하악 악궁 형태로 열중합형 아크릴릭 레진을 이용하여 제작하였고, vertical gap을 관찰할 20 mm 간격의 기준 구조물을 제작한 후 이를 이용하여 실험 모형에 임플란트 유사체를 매몰하였다. 실험군은 트레이 레진으로 제작한 개인 트레이, 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이 그리고 금속 기성 트레이 등의 3가지 트레이를 이용하였고, closed tray 인상법과 open tray 인상법의 2가지 인상 채득법에 따라 5개 군으로 나누었다. 그리고 위치에 따른 오차를 관찰하기 위해 시편 모형을 전치부, 구치부로 다시 나누어 총 10개의 실험군을 구성하였다. 1군당 총 9개의 시편을 제작하였고, 시편에 기준 구조물을 한 쪽 지대주만 20 Ncm으로 고정시킨 후 관찰하는 1-screw test를 이용하여 반대쪽의 임플란트 유사체와 지대주와의 gap을 입체 광학 현미경을 이용하여 관찰하였다. 1시편당총6부위를 측정하였고, 3회씩 측정하여 동일한 결과를 얻었을 때 수치를 기록하여 통계 처리하였다. 결과: Closed tray 인상법 사용 시 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이와 개인 트레이 간에 유의한 차이를 보였지만, open tray 인상법 사용 시 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이와 개인 트레이 간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 이용한 인상 채득 시 open tray 인상법과 closed tray 인상법 간에 유의한 차이를 보였고 (P<.05), 폴리카보네이트 트레이를 이용한 closed tray 인상법을 개인 트레이를 이용한 open tray 인상법과 비교 시 전치부, 구치부 모두에서 유의한 차이를 보였다 (P<.05). 결론: 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 사용 시에는 open tray 인상법이 더 추천되는 바이며, 생체 외 실험의 한계성에 유의해야 하며, 정확한 임플란트 고정체 수준 인상 채득에 대해 더 많은 연구가 필요하다고 사료된다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.433-445
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 주모형으로부터 인상체를 제거한 후 인상용 코핑이 인상체 내에 남아있는 개방형 트레이 인상법의 이용 시, 인상용 코핑의 연결고정에 따른 효과와 인상 채득 시 사용될 수 있는 수종의 트레이가 주모형의 정확성에 미치는 영향에 대해 비교 연구해 보고자 하였다. 자가중합형 트레이 레진으로 제작한 개인 트레이, 플라스틱 금속 복합 트레이 그리고 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이 등의 3종류의 트레이가 사용되었고, 각 트레이 마다 인상용 코핑의 연결고정 여부에 따라 두 개의 군으로 나누었다. 이렇게 나누어진 총 6개의 군에서 각 실험군당 10개의 시편을 제작하였다. 임플랜트 유사체와 지대주 사이에 발생한 수직오차의 측정에는 1-screw test법을 이용하였다. 1시편 당 총 6부위를 측정하였고, 3회씩 측정하여 동일한 수치를 나타낼 경우에 기록하여 통계 처리하였다. 인상용 코핑의 연결고정 여부와 상관없이 개인 트레이군, 플라스틱 금속 복합 트레이군 그리고 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이군 사이에 유의한 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 하지만 개인 트레이, 플라스틱 금속 복합 트레이 그리고 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 이용하여 인상 채득한 경우 패턴 레진으로 연결고정한 군이 비연결고정 군보다 더 정확한 결과를 보여주었다 (p<0.05).

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.453-465
• /
• 2005

Purpose: This study was performed to measure the accuracy of adjustable dental impression trays by a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer. Materials and methods: The metal stock, individual, and adjustable stock trays were used for 60 stone casts(10 casts each) duplicated a resin master model of mandible and maxilla. The type IV dental stone was poured in a vinyl polysiloxane impressions and allowed to set for one hour. The master model and the duplicated casts were digitized using an optical digitizer. The distance between the reference points were measured and analyzed on the graphic image of 3-D graphic software(CATIA version 5.0). The statistical significance of the differences between the groups was determined by a two-way ANOVA. Results : There were no significant differences between the accuracies of the adjustable stock tray and the master model except only anterior arch width on the upper arch and the diagonal arch length and arch length on one side of the lower arch. Conclusion: The adjustable stock trays showed clinically acceptable accuracies of the study cast produced by them.