• 제목/요약/키워드: mental health social welfare expert

검색결과 5건 처리시간 0.017초

정신건강예방관리 전문직 직무교육 프로그램 개발 (Development of the Expert Education Program for the Management of Mental Health Prevention)

  • 박성미;이효영;임혁;채은희;김혜숙
    • 보건의료산업학회지
    • /
    • 제6권2호
    • /
    • pp.219-234
    • /
    • 2012
  • Mental health service facilities implement an effort to meet the increased mental health demands. However, no specific 'mental health expert education program' have been offered yet. This study aimed to develop of the expert education programs which are general programs(GP), and specific programs(SP) for the management of mental health prevention in 3 kinds of facilities, psychosocial rehabilitation centers, homeless facilities, and domestic violence counselling facilities. Data were gathered from the service providers by structured questionnaire, and experts related with mental health by delphi study. We surveyed the management status and present expert programs. Consequently, domains of the education programs were extracted. As results, we identified the type of provider's job & demands for education. Thus, we gained the informations for developing the expert education programs in mental health facilities. GP were composed by 3 domains and 9 programs, and SP were composed by 3 programs each facilities. This study should be helpful in expanding the government educational operations related with mental health prevention areas. Eventually, community mental health will be promoted and socio-economic burdens by mental health problems will be lessened. In addition, it will be a basic evidence for developing specialized programs in a mental health prevention system foundation.

정신건강사회복지 전문가의 비대면 정신건강 모바일 서비스 플랫폼 개발 및 상담 경험에 관한 자문화기술지 (An autoethnography on the Development and counseling Experience of Non-face-to-face Mental Health Mobile Service Platform of Mental Health Social Welfare expert)

  • 이솔지
    • 사물인터넷융복합논문지
    • /
    • 제8권5호
    • /
    • pp.63-70
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구는 연구자가 정신건강사회복지 전문가로서 신개념의 전문적인 정신건강 모바일 서비스 플랫폼을 개발하고 상용화시켜 새로운 도전을 하기까지의 전 과정에서의 실제경험을 질적연구방법인 자문화기술지를 통해 자료를 수집하고 분석한 연구이다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 우리나라 국민들 중에는 정신건강 이슈에 직접 노출되어 전문적인 의료서비스를 받아야 하는 사람들도 있으나 치료적 개입 수준을 요하지는 않지만 일반적인 정신건강 서비스에 대한 욕구를 가진 대중들 또한 상당히 많다는 것이다. 둘째, 현대사회의 특성을 고려하고 특히 코로나-19와 같은 감염병 팬더믹 상황에서 모바일을 활용한 다양한 정신건강 서비스 플랫폼을 선호하는 대중들이 많아 지고 있다는 것이다. 셋째, 전 세대에서 가족문제, 스트레스, 대인관계, 직업 등에서의 정신건강 관련 이슈들을 많이 호소하고 있고 이와 같은 문제들이 우울이나 불안, 중독 및 외상후스트레스장애 등의 정신병리와 연관되어 자해나 자살사고와 같은 또 다른 정신건강 문제들과 잣은 빈도로 언급되고 있다는 것이다. 넷째, 청소년들이 다양한 정신건강관련 이슈들에 노출되어 있다는 것과 무엇보다 자해 및 자살사고와 같은 심각한 정신건강 문제들을 호소하고 있었다. 다섯째, 전문적인 정신건강 서비스를 전달하는데 있어 모바일 기기를 통한 온라인에서의 서비스 제공과 오프라인에서의 서비스 제공이 가능한 역량을 갖춘 정신건강전문가들이 필요하다는 것이다. 마지막으로 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 향후 정신건강서비스 제공과 관련한 정책 및 실천적 제언과 후속 연구에 대한 방향성을 제언하였다.

일본 정신보건복지센터의 운영체계 및 시설유형 분석연구 (1) (A Study on the Management System and the Facility Type of Mental Health and Welfare Center in Japan (1))

  • 임은정;채철균
    • 의료ㆍ복지 건축 : 한국의료복지건축학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제20권4호
    • /
    • pp.57-65
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose : Mental health service desire has been diversified according to the increase of economic level and rapid social change. Mental Health and Welfare Center(MHWC) is a provider of mental health services in Japan. This is a basic stage study which will suggest the architectural planning guidelines for MHWC. Methods : Data were collected through literature research, field surveys, and expert interviews to 69 MHWC in Japan. 1) Research for the policy and legal aspects of mental health support system. 2) Research for structural aspects of MHWC: Characteristics of establishment, management, and regional factors. 3) Research for the physical environment aspects of MHWC: Classification and evaluation of MHWC's Type by locational characteristics in Japan. Results : The result of this study can be summarized into three points. The first one, Mental Health and Welfare Center's service has being expanded to suicide, depression and stress from chronic mental illness, to reflect social needs. The second one, The average population of area installed at Mental Health and Welfare Center was 2,307,570 person, and average area of the regions were $5,745m^2$. The third one, Mental Health and Welfare Center is divided into single-structure type and combine-structure type. And combine-structure type is divided into medical-combine type, welfare-combine type, and public-combine type.

저소득 여성 한부모가족 사례관리 실천 경험 연구 (Experimental Study on Low-income Single-Parent Family Case Management)

  • 강기정;박수선
    • 가족자원경영과 정책
    • /
    • 제17권1호
    • /
    • pp.39-61
    • /
    • 2013
  • This paper analyzed the experience of case management experts and single mothers in managing the cases, as the useful approach for family enrichment of a low-income single parent family. The analysis included five case managements and interview with three case management experts for single-parent families. Four of the five cases have been in progress at present. According to the analysis, the main appeals for single-parent families were economy and basic life, physical and mental health, family and social relationships, and child care and education. Furthermore, the interview with the case management experts identified the difficulty in managing single-parent family cases, especially those cases with complicated demands and problems, barriers to expert management, and required support for family enrichment. Finally, this paper analyzed the implementation process of case management for single-parent families in a specific area, meaning that the results of this paper do not represent all single-parent families. Moreover, the analyzed reports were specific to the case management implementation process. Thus, the contents, which were not recorded in the reports, were not fully reflected, and the in-depth analysis of multilateral aspects was restricted.

  • PDF

Resetting the Evaluation Indicators for School Garden Education Service

  • Hong, In-Kyoung;Yun, Hyung-Kwon;Jung, Young-Bin;Lee, Sang-Mi;Lee, Choon-soo
    • 인간식물환경학회지
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.245-256
    • /
    • 2021
  • Background and objective: The vitalization of urban agriculture has increased various forms of experience-based education using school gardens, which raised the importance of school gardens in terms of value as well as the need to develop an implementation system for education-based agricultural experience service using school gardens. Thus, we reset the evaluation indicators from the previous study to establish objective evaluation indicators that enable quantitative comparison of school garden education services. Methods: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and direct question (DQ) surveys were conducted on 20 experts from October 12 to 19, 2020 after establishing the purpose and subjects of evaluation, and then the weights were calculated using the Expert Choice 2010 program. Results: First, we analyzed the problems of the previous indicators by categorizing the performance indicators and comparing and verifying them with six requirements of valuation. Then, we added 'welfare values' and established sub-indicators accordingly. The importance of value indicator in AHP was in the order of education values (0.544), health values (0.182), welfare values (0.164), environmental values (0.062), and economic values (0.049). The importance of environmental and economic values was relatively low, less than 0.1. The importance of sub-indicators was highest in cultivating character (0.144), followed by enhancing ecological sensitivity (0.141) > promoting mental health (0.134) > cultivating agricultural literacy (0.120) > improving social skills (0.104). And mitigating climate change in environmental values was lowest (0.009). Increase in income was the lowest (0.036). This can be regarded as the expression of change to increase the educational effect based on collective life and the connotative meaning of 'school'. In the case of DQ, the AHP weight and order were the same, but the environmental and economic values were relatively low, and the result was different from AHP weight. For sub-indicators, the importance in DQ was highest in promoting mental health (0.136), followed by promoting physical health (0.085), ]cultivating character (0.082), social integration (0.072), and enhancing ecological sensitivity (0.071). After reviewing related experts, we came up with 5 evaluation indicators and 16 sub-indicators for school garden education service, which are objective evaluation indicators that enable quantitative comparison. Conclusion: In the future, we will validate the socioeconomic values of school garden education services and contribute to revitalizing school gardens by establishing policy alternatives for effective operation and management of school gardens.