• 경영과학
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 2010

A lot of researches find negative volatility risk premium in options market. We can make a trading profit by exploiting the negative volatility premium. This study proposes negative volatility risk premium hypotheses in the KOSPI 200 stock price index options market and empirically test the proposed hypotheses with intra-day short straddle strategy. This strategy sells both at-the-money call option and at-the-money put option at market open and exits the position at market close. Using MySQL 5.1, we create our database with 1 minute option price data of the KOSPI 200 index options from 2004 to 2009. Empirical results show that negative volatility risk premium exists in the KOSPI 200 stock price index options market. Furthermore, intra-day short straddle strategy consistently produces annual profits except one year.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.157-169
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to examine the volatility of bitcoin, diagnose if bitcoin are a systematic risk asset, and evaluate their effectiveness by estimating market beta representing systematic risk using GARCH (Generalized Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroskedastieity) model. First, the empirical results showed that the market beta of Bitcoin using the OLS model was estimated at 0.7745. Second, using GARCH (1, 2) model, the market beta of Bitcoin was estimated to be significant, and the effects of ARCH and GARCH were found to be significant over time, resulting in conditional volatility. Third, the estimated market beta of the GARCH (1, 2), AR (1)-GARCH (1), and MA (1)-GARCH (1, 2) models were also less than 1 at 0.8819, 0.8835, and 0.8775 respectively, showing that there is no systematic risk. Finally, in terms of efficiency, GARCH model was more efficient because the standard error of a market beta was less than that of the OLS model. Among the GARCH models, the MA (1)-GARCH (1, 2) model considering non-simultaneous transactions was estimated to be the most appropriate model.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.71-82
• /
• 2015

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate risk price implied from the pricing kernel of Korean stock distribution market. Recently, it is considered that the quantitative easing programs of major developed countries are contributing to a reduction in global uncertainty caused by the 2007~2009 financial crisis. If true, the risk premium as compensation for global systemic risk or economic uncertainty should show a decrease. We examine whether the risk price in the Korean stock distribution market has declined in recent years, and attempt to provide practical implications for investors to manage their portfolios more efficiently, as well as academic implications. Research design, data and methodology - To estimate the risk price, we adopt a non-parametric method; the minimum norm pricing kernel method under the LOP (Law of One Price) constraint. For the estimation, we use 17 industry sorted portfolios provided by the KRX (Korea Exchange). Additionally, the monthly returns of the 17 industry sorted portfolios, from July 2000 to June 2014, are utilized as data samples. We set 120 months (10 years) as the estimation window, and estimate the risk prices from July 2010 to June 2014 by month. Moreover, we analyze correlation between any of the two industry portfolios within the 17 industry portfolios to suggest further economic implications of the risk price we estimate. Results - According to our results, the risk price in the Korean stock distribution market shows a decline over the period of July 2010 to June 2014 with statistical significance. During the period of the declining risk price, the average correlation level between any of the two industry portfolios also shows a decrease, whereas the standard deviation of the average correlation shows an increase. The results imply that the amount of systematic risk in the Korea stock distribution market has decreased, whereas the amount of industry-specific risk has increased. It is one of the well known empirical results that correlation and uncertainty are positively correlated, therefore, the declining correlation may be the result of decreased global economic uncertainty. Meanwhile, less asset correlation enables investors to build portfolios with less systematic risk, therefore the investors require lower risk premiums for the efficient portfolio, resulting in the declining risk price. Conclusions - Our results may provide evidence of reduction in global systemic risk or economic uncertainty in the Korean stock distribution market. However, to defend the argument, further analysis should be done. For instance, the change of global uncertainty could be measured with funding costs in the global money market; subsequently, the relation between global uncertainty and the price of risk might be directly observable. In addition, as time goes by, observations of the risk price could be extended, enabling us to confirm the relation between the global uncertainty and the effect of quantitative easing. These topics are beyond our scope here, therefore we reserve them for future research.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.107-118
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 원유시장을 대상으로 위험-수익 관계와 시장 공포, 불확실성, 주식시장, 해상운임지수 사이의 연관성을 검증하기 위해 2002년 1월부터 2022년 6월까지 일별자료를 이용하여 분석하였다. 본 연구를 위해 위험-수익 관계는 TVP-EGARCH-M 모형을 적용하였으며, 시장 공포, 불확실성, 주식시장, 해상운임지수와의 관계를 분석하기 위해 웨이블릿 일치성 모형을 이용하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 시간 가변적 위험-수익 관계 결과에 따르면, 원유시장도 높은 수익률과 높은 위험과 관련이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 상관관계와 그랜져 인과관계 분석결과, 위험-수익 관계와 VIX, EPU, S&P500, BDI 사이에서 약한 상관관계가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 EPU, S&P500과 위험-수익 관계에서 양방향 인과관계가 존재하지 않는 것으로 나타났지만 VIX와 BDI는 위험-수익 관계에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 웨이블릿 일관성 결과를 보면, 위험-수익 관계와 VIX, EPU, S&P500, BDI 간의 관계 정도는 시간 가변적인 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 위기기간(금융위기, 코로나19) 전후에 서로 간의 관계가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 장기에 연관성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 위험-수익 관계는 VIX, EPU와는 양(+)의 관계, S&P500, BDI와는 음(-)의 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 시장참여자가 의사결정을 할 때 경제적인 환경 변화를 잘 인식해야 할 것이다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.71-88
• /
• 2024

Purpose - This study provides an overview of existing research and practices related to market risk premiums(MRP), and empirically estimates the MRP in Korea, particularly using the related option prices. We also seek to improve the current MRP practices and explore alternative solutions. Design/methodology/approach - We present the option price-based MRP estimation method, as proposed by Martin (2017), and implement it within the context of the Korean stock market. We then juxtapose these results with those derived from other methods, and compare the characteristics with those of the United States. Findings - We found that the lower limit of the MRP in the Korean stock market shows a much lower value compared to the US. There seems to be the possibility of a market crash, exchange rate volatility, or a lack of option trading data. We investigated the predictive power of the estimated values and discovered that the weighted average of the results of various methodologies using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is superior to the individual method's results. Research implications or Originality - It is required to explore various methods of estimating MRP that are suitable for the Korean stock market. In order to improve the estimation methodology based on option prices, it is necessary to develop the methods using the higher-order(third order or above) moments, or consider additional risk factors such as the possibility of a crash.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.207-223
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 국내 금융회사중 내부모형을 승인받아 사용하고 있는 국내 은행의 실제 위험유형별 자료를 이용하여 시장위험과 신용위험간 관계를 고려한 통합위험을 측정하였으며, 이를 통하여 위험유형간 분산효과가 존재하는지 검증해 보았다. 검증방법은 법규상 규제자본과 내부모형을 통해 산출되는 시장위험과 신용위험의 단순 합산 및 위험액 자체에 직접 임의의 상관관계를 고려하는 단순통합모형을 이용하여 비교 검증하였다. 실증분석 결과, 다음과 같은 사실들을 확인할 수 있었는데, 먼저 내부모형은 시장위험에서는 평균적으로 규제자본에 비해 40.4%, 신용위험은 45.4%의 분산효과를 보였으며, 통계적으로도 유의한 차이를 보였다. 이는 내부모형의 경우 하위 위험요인간 분산효과로 인하여 규제자본에 비해 필요자본이 작아진 다는 것을 의미한다. 다음으로 실무에서 이용하는 위험액 자체에 임의의 상관관계를 적용하여 산출한 단순 통합위험을 경제적 자본의 대용치인 내부모형의 단순합산과 비교해 본 결과 분산효과는 크지 않았으며, 통계적으로도 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 은행의 시장위험이 신용위험에 비해 규모면에서 과소하여 분산효과가 크게 나타나지 않는 것으로 설명할 수 있다.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.45-65
• /
• 2019

Purpose - As the well-known Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm implies, risk structure of a corporation may affect its risk management activity and the activity may in turn determine its performance. Depending on its goal, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) can shape its risk structure, risk management and its performance. Under this assumption, we investigate the relationship between the goals of FDI and risk management for the first time in academics. Design/methodology - This empirical research uses a survey of 279 current Korean enterprises' FDIs in China with the recently developed business risk quadrant model. Companies are classified into either a market- or an efficiency-seeking group, to identify how each group perceives and manages risks, and values the performance of risk management. Also, we apply integrated risk management method that multinational corporations have introduced in China, then verify the mediating effect between risk factors and performance. Findings - Our research shows the FDIs can expose themselves to differing risk structure although risk management activities simply represent the level of empowerment given to local management by headquarter due to limit of sample size despite diversity of risk and risk management tools. To sum, market seekers are found to have more strategic risk (revenue related risk) than efficiency seekers with financial risk (cost related risk). The market seekers can manage their risk by empowering their local organisation while the efficiency does the opposite ways. The risk management appears to be successful in general. Originality/value - Previous studies on small and medium enterprises' FDIs to China have concentrated on the analysis of entry determinants, withdrawal factors and individual risk management. Meanwhile, this research establishes enterprise-wide risk factors faced by the companies that advance into China, according to the method of the classification by ERM and verifies if they could synthetically improve performance through risk corresponding measures.

• 플랜트 저널
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.56-63
• /
• 2010

While the local plant market is reducing its volume, the plant market over the world since 2000s is rapidly expanding. The nation's construction companies, aggressively dedicated in launching out overseas plant market, increase the volume of orders in that sector, but there also are much difficulty in the project management as those projects ordered are gradually large scaled with more cutting-edge high-tech requirements along with comparatively higher risk. Though the local construction companies have developed their own types of measures to analyze the risk evaluation putting into practice, the specialized decision-making model for the overseas plant market or the risk measure understandable easily and applicable practically is not yet shown. This paper aims at providing the methodology to evaluate the risk by way of constructing the risk evaluation process in order to induce risk measuring elements through appropriate indexing system. Furthermore, through studying the risk management system, it aims to seek for a thorough risk management method from beginning of the project to the end.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2006년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.67-73
• /
• 2006

발주자의 다양한 요구를 충족하고 제한된 예산과 공기 내에서 성공적인 사업 수행을 위해 Design-Build, CM at Risk 등 대체발주방식이 발생 ${\cdot}$ 발전 해 왔다. 기존의 설계시공분리방식으로는 사업 수행의 효율성 제고에 한계가 있어 경쟁력 제고와 다양한 발주방식 제공의 일환으로 CM at Risk 방식의 국내 도입을 고려 해 볼 시기이다. 본 연구는 미국 CM at Risk 시장의 동향, 규모 및 현황과 더불어 대상 사업의 특성, 미국 100대 CM at Risk 수행업체의 특성, 타사업수행방식과의 사업성과 비교, 공공사업 적용을 우한 법제화 현황을 살펴보고, 이러한 분석을 바탕으로 국내 도입에 따른 전제조건과 적용 가능성을 타진 해 본다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권8호
• /
• pp.25-31
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this paper is to examine a financial distress premium in the emerging market. A risk-return trade-off of negative book equity (NBE) and distress firms is empirically analyzed using data from the Stock Exchange of Thailand. This research employs Ohlson's (1980) bankruptcy model as a measurement of distress risk. The results indicate that distress firms outperform solvent firms in the Thai market and deny distress anomaly often found in the developed market. Fama-Frech (1993) three-factor model and Carhart (1997) four-factor model verify the existence of a distress premium in the Thai capital market. Risk-seeking investors demand greater compensation for bearing risks of distress firms' going concern. This paper provides fresh evidence that default risk is a significant explanatory factor in pricing stocks in the emerging market. Also, this study sheds light on the role of NBE firms in asset pricing. Most studies eliminate NBE firms from their sample. However, NBE firms yield superior average cross-sectional returns, albeit with higher volatility. Investors are rewarded with distress risks associated with NBE firms. The outperformance of NBE firms is statistically significant when compared to the overall market. The NBE premium disappears when factoring size, value, and momentum in time-series analysis.