• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.335-344
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 B 교육대학교의 2학년 심화과정 4개반 109명을 대상으로 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성에 대해서 4주간 강의를 하였다. 초등예비교사들은 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성에 대해 강의를 들은 후 2주간의 현장교육실습을 다녀왔다. 초등예비교사들이 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성을 위해 자료선택, 과정안과 수업의 연계 정도 등에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 연구자는 초등예비교사 4명과 함께 설문 문항에 대해 검토·심의하여 설문을 완성하였다. 과학과 교수·학습과 정안 작성과 관련한 설문은 8문항으로 수업과정안 작성시 선호하는 참고자료, 학습에서 관심단계, 과학과 수업과정안과 수업의 성공여부, 과학과 선호모형, 단위시간에서 평가방식, 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성을 위한 자신의 노력, 본 강좌 내용이 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성과 수업에 어떤 도움이 되는가 등으로 구성하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 초등예비교사들이 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성시에는 교사용 지도서를 가장 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 과학과 교수·학습 단계에서는 전개단계를 매우 중요하다고 인식하고 있다. 셋째, 초등예비교사들은 과학과 교수·학습과정안이 수업의 성공 여부에 높은 상관이 있다고 여긴다. 넷째, 수업은 학생의 수준과 교사의 능력, 적합한 수업계획이 가장 영향을 미친다고 하였다. 다섯째, 초등예비교사들은 탐구학습 수업모형을 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 여섯째, 40분 단위의 수업에서 평가는 보고서 및 활동지를 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 일곱째, 교수·학습과정안은 수업의 연관성이 높으므로 열심히 연구하고 공부할 것이라고 밝혔다. 여덟째, 교수설계 원리에 근거한 과학과 교수·학습과정안 작성법은 매우 유익한 것으로 해석된다.

• 호스피스학술지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.29-45
• /
• 2007

People in the end of life and their families suffer in their physical disease and other aspects as a whole person. They need hospice care to palliate their total suffering in physical, emotional, social and also spiritual aspect through professional hospice team. To care their whole personal needs, hospice team must be a multi-discipline team which consists of medical doctors, nurses, social workers, pastors and volunteers. Recently those who die in hospice palliative care unit have trend to increase more than in home year by year. So it is necessary to develop the nursing intervention program to be performed by multi-discipline team approach for in-patient of hospice palliative care unit. The purposes of this study were to develop of wholistic hospice nursing intervention program for inpatient of hospice palliative care unit. The subjects of study were collected from 30 patients those who were over 18 years old and admitted in hospice palliative care unit of S hospital in P city with agreement in hospice palliative care in their terminal disease. The period of data collection was from December 15, 2003 to March 15, 2004. The result were as follows : 1. The result of Wholistic Hospice Nursing Program's development was as follow : A Wholistic Hospice Nursing Program was developed by me in this study is one of the service program for hospice palliative care unit. It was named as ‘Rainbow Program’ to be approached easily by hospice patients. The purposes of it are to improve the quality of life of the terminal patients with their dignity, to help them live in abundant and meaningful in their lives, to care them in peaceful in dying process with understanding them in whole personal, and also to palliate the grief and suffering of the bereaved. It was provided by hospice professionals(nurses, medical doctors, social worker, pastors, art therapists) and volunteers those who were educated in hospice for multi-diciplinary team approach to collaborate with each role play I 20-30 minuters of each through visiting their rooms individually and a place of hospice palliative care unit of S hospital in P city. The subjects of it were the terminal patients those who admitted hospice palliative care unit and their familes. with agreement in hospice palliative care in their terminal disease. The characteristics of it were multi-disciplinary team approach, whole personal care, individual care and total care according to their needs in their condition. The contents of it were pain control, symptom control, counseling patient, counseling family, hair cutting, hair shampooing, bed bath, recreation, taking a walk, event of culture(screen, recital, festival of praises, exhibition and so on), pastoral counseling, ritual service in bed, praying, service in bed, sing a worship praise, listening to the music, sharing remembrance of life, individual visiting music service(sing and praying), meditation Bible, art therapies(dance and drawing), social worker's counselling, confessing and sharing love and thanksgiving. The experimental group subjects participated in Wholistic Hospice Nursing Program which takes 120 minutes per session, total 10 sessions(total 1,200 minutes) altogether. In conclusion, this Wholistic Hospice Nursing Intervention can be used actively for whole personal well-being of the patients in hospice palliative in hospice palliative care unit and also applied in hospice practice as an useful model of multi-disciplinary team approach by hospice professionals.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.61-101
• /
• 2014

This study investigates when and how disagreements in online customer ratings prompt more favorable product evaluations. Among the three metrics of volume, valence, and variance that feature in the research on online customer ratings, volume and valence have exhibited consistently positive patterns in their effects on product sales or evaluations (e.g., Dellarocas, Zhang, and Awad 2007; Liu 2006). Ratings variance, or the degree of disagreement among reviewers, however, has shown rather mixed results, with some studies reporting positive effects on product sales (e.g., Clement, Proppe, and Rott 2007) while others finding negative effects on product evaluations (e.g., Zhu and Zhang 2010). This study aims to resolve these contradictory findings by introducing preference heterogeneity as a possible moderator and causal attribution as a mediator to account for the moderating effect. The main proposition of this study is that when preference heterogeneity is perceived as high, a disagreement in ratings is attributed more to reviewers' different preferences than to unreliable product quality, which in turn prompts better quality evaluations of a product. Because disagreements mostly result from differences in reviewers' tastes or the low reliability of a product's quality (Mizerski 1982; Sen and Lerman 2007), a greater level of attribution to reviewer tastes can mitigate the negative effect of disagreement on product evaluations. Specifically, if consumers infer that reviewers' heterogeneous preferences result in subjectively different experiences and thereby highly diverse ratings, they would not disregard the overall quality of a product. However, if consumers infer that reviewers' preferences are quite homogeneous and thus the low reliability of the product quality contributes to such disagreements, they would discount the overall product quality. Therefore, consumers would respond more favorably to disagreements in ratings when preference heterogeneity is perceived as high rather than low. This study furthermore extends this prediction to the various levels of average ratings. The heuristicsystematic processing model so far indicates that the engagement in effortful systematic processing occurs only when sufficient motivation is present (Hann et al. 2007; Maheswaran and Chaiken 1991; Martin and Davies 1998). One of the key factors affecting this motivation is the aspiration level of the decision maker. Only under conditions that meet or exceed his aspiration level does he tend to engage in systematic processing (Patzelt and Shepherd 2008; Stephanous and Sage 1987). Therefore, systematic causal attribution processing regarding ratings variance is likely more activated when the average rating is high enough to meet the aspiration level than when it is too low to meet it. Considering that the interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity occurs through the mediation of causal attribution, this greater activation of causal attribution in high versus low average ratings would lead to more pronounced interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity in high versus low average ratings. Overall, this study proposes that the interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity is more pronounced when the average rating is high as compared to when it is low. Two laboratory studies lend support to these predictions. Study 1 reveals that participants exposed to a high-preference heterogeneity book title (i.e., a novel) attributed disagreement in ratings more to reviewers' tastes, and thereby more favorably evaluated books with such ratings, compared to those exposed to a low-preference heterogeneity title (i.e., an English listening practice book). Study 2 then extended these findings to the various levels of average ratings and found that this greater preference for disagreement options under high preference heterogeneity is more pronounced when the average rating is high compared to when it is low. This study makes an important theoretical contribution to the online customer ratings literature by showing that preference heterogeneity serves as a key moderator of the effect of ratings variance on product evaluations and that causal attribution acts as a mediator of this moderation effect. A more comprehensive picture of the interplay among ratings variance, preference heterogeneity, and average ratings is also provided by revealing that the interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity varies as a function of the average rating. In addition, this work provides some significant managerial implications for marketers in terms of how they manage word of mouth. Because a lack of consensus creates some uncertainty and anxiety over the given information, consumers experience a psychological burden regarding their choice of a product when ratings show disagreement. The results of this study offer a way to address this problem. By explicitly clarifying that there are many more differences in tastes among reviewers than expected, marketers can allow consumers to speculate that differing tastes of reviewers rather than an uncertain or poor product quality contribute to such conflicts in ratings. Thus, when fierce disagreements are observed in the WOM arena, marketers are advised to communicate to consumers that diverse, rather than uniform, tastes govern reviews and evaluations of products.

• 벤처혁신연구
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.63-81
• /
• 2023

본 연구의 목적은 대학교 재학생을 대상으로 포토보이스 질적 연구방법을 활용하여 대학생이 인지하는 환경, 환경장벽, 친환경 행동의 모습을 파악하고자 하였다. 포토보이스 방법론을 활용하여 대학생의 시각으로 바라본 친환경행동의 동인과 행동의 모습을 공유하고 그에 관한 의미를 고찰하는 과정을 통해 친환경행동의 실천적 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 환경이라는 대 주제 하에 참여자들이 직접 선정하여 다루게 된 3가지 하위 주제는 '내가 생각하는 환경이란', '나에게 환경장벽이란', 그리고 '나의 친환경 행동이란' 등으로 주제별 참여자가 일상생활 중 직접 촬영하여 선별한 사진을 통하여 자신의 생각을 표현하고 타인의 의견을 청취하여 공유하였다. 이러한 연구의 결과는 첫째, 연구 참여자들은 환경에 대하여 '낭비', '불편함', '미세먼지=환경오염', '위선태도' 등으로 직접 촬영하여 선정한 사진의 의미를 부여하였다. 둘째, 연구 참여자들은 환경장벽에 대하여 '비가시성', '무관심', '사회적시선', '비효율성', '강제성' 등으로 선택된 사진의 의미를 부여하였다. 마지막으로, 연구 참여자들은 친환경행동에 대하여 '리사이클', '에너지절약', '재사용' '일회용품 사용 줄이기' 등으로 선택된 사진을 의미화 하였다. 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 V-A-B모델의 확인과 소비자는 개인이 가진 가치와 태도, 그리고 행동이 위계관계를 구성한다는 점을 확인하였으며, 소비자의 일상생활에서 친환경 행동을 실천하는데 방해 요인이 분명 존재하고 있으며, 친환경적 소비 행동을 실천하기 위한 불편함 혹은 비편리성을 해소할 수 있는 방안이 필요하다는 연구의 시사점를 제시하였다.