• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.131-148
• /
• 2000

Above all, the ability to solve problems must be emphasized as a basic skill of mathematics, but it is neglected when we teach. In this study, learning task means ［same meaning］ ［same form］ ［same technique］, so I tried to extend mathematical scholastic ability of the students as an extensional problem solving that is a basic element of mathematics. The purpose of this study is the investigation of level type learning, using the basic learning elements to extend thinking ability. From the constructed hypothesis as follows and then implement it. I selected basic learning elements from an analyzed textbook and then task learning material was created for each level type learning. The problem solving ability will be extended through the level type learning of the small group, using the level type learning task material. The conclusions this study are as follows. The level type learning in small group learning, using and making level type learning material, having basic learning elements in analysed text are. Basic learning content is understood clearly and deeply, so, fundamentally, it is effective in achieving the problem solving in mathematics. It is an effective method to achieve the meta-cognitive faculty because achieved the expected method of solving problems and resulted in the true learning of content.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.77-89
• /
• 2020

Population-level learning has traditionally been used to provide an explanation for the underlying mechanism of industry change. But it has yet to examine the impact on strategic decisions such as market entry. This conceptual paper aims to provide an insight into how population-level learning affects entry likelihood by acting as a tool for interpreting population-level changes. We study this in the context of the fast-paced mobile gaming industry where population-level information is salient and develop a set of propositions with regard to the likelihood of entry.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.157-166
• /
• 1999

Compared with other subjects, mathematics has great differences in achieve-ment. In hope of solving this problems, most schools try the level-movement learning. Although they say it may have some effect because of its homogeneous group, the level groups still have differences in achievement in their students abilities. So, this study aims to present an appropriate tasks for the advanced, intermediate and beginner groups and to help self-directed learning by selecting an appropriate tasks for the students' own level. To achieve thiese goals, a great deal of level tasks were developed and given to the students. After lettins them an select appropriate tasks for their own level and perform self-directed learning, the tasks were measured carefully for their interest, attitude and achievement in learning. Consequently, we tried a new method to improve uniformity and to turn teacher-centered learning into student-centered learning. The following is the conclusion to this study. First, self-directed learning based on the selection of level tasks has meaningful effects on learning achievement in mathematics, especially for the beginner group. Second, though the above method did not improve an interest for mathematics, but was very effective in the improvement of learning attitudes.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 1999

This study aims at identifying the effect of problem posing on the academic achievement in high school mathematics. As subjects of the study, two classes of first grade in high school were selected. One of them was treated with problem posing learning, the other was treated with learning-in-a-body. Each has 40 students and was also divided into two groups(high- level and low-level) according to their learning-level. Two instruments were used for this study. One was the teaching-learning method developed by the researcher. The other was TTCT(Torrance Test of Creative Thinking). The 't-test' was used for this study and the significant level of test was within 5 percent. The results of this study are as follows: 1. The group with problem posing learning showed significantly higher academic achievement(learning-ability) than the one with learning-in-a-body. 2. There was no significant difference in the academic achievement(creativity) between the two groups. But there was significant difference in the creative factors. 3. There was no significant differences in the academic achievement between high-level-groups in each group. 4. There was significant difference in the academic achievement (learning-ability) between low-level groups in each group. And there was significant difference in the creative factors. On the basis of the results above, the following conclusions could be made. The problem posing learning method was more effective in the academic achievement in highschool mathematics than learning-in-a-body. Especially low-level group was more effective than high-level group. These facts implies that it is more effective for a teacher to adopt the problem posing learning considering the students' learning-levels.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.39-53
• /
• 2016

This study aimed to understand students' learning in elementary science classes in terms of participatory perspective. Participatory perspective is based on the participationist views on learning. Based on the participatory perspective, this study used two concepts of participationism: 'the changes of learning on commognition' of Sfard (2007) and 'the identity' of Wenger (1998/2007). Based on these concepts, four episodes of an elementary science class were analyzed. The results showed that students carried out their learning from objective-level learning to meta-level learning. And students defined who they are by identifying and negotiating scientific meaning during the learning. These results showed students become members of science community through their participations in science class.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.226-236
• /
• 2022

We compared and analyzed the changes in students' science grades and their effects on science grades by level (upper, middle, and lower) according to non-face-to-face and face-to-face teaching-learning. 66 students from A Middle School in Gyeongsangnam-do were selected for the study. As a result of analyzing the change in science grades according to the teaching-learning type, the average score of science grades by non-face-to-face teaching-learning was lower than the corresponding score of science grades of face-to-face teaching-learning. As a result of comparing the level of understanding of learning content according to the evaluation type (paper-written, study-paper) in non-face-to-face and face-to-face teaching-learning, the average scores of science grades by paper-written and study-paper evaluations in non-face-to-face teaching-learning were significantly low. In addition, as a result of comparing the effect on science grades by level according to the teaching-learning type, the average score of science grades of lower-ranked students in non-face-to-face teaching-learning was relatively low.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.77-90
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 온라인 문제기반학습에서 학습자의 학습행태에 따른 학습유형을 파악하고 각 학습유형의 특징을 조사하여 효과적인 온라인 문제기반학습 설계를 위한 시사점을 도출하기 위해 수행되었다. 본 연구를 위해 6주 동안 K대학에서 운영된 문제기반학습 프로그램에 참여한 1,341명의 초·중학생의 온라인 활동 데이터가 수집되었고, 이를 통하여 학습자들의 학습행태를 나타내는 48개의 변인이 추출되었다. 추출된 변인은 학습자들의 학습유형을 구분하기 위한 계층적 군집분석 기법에 활용되었으며, 구분된 학습유형에 따라 학습행태와 학업성취도 측면에서 어떠한 차이가 있는지 비교·분석하였다. 그 결과, 학습자의 온라인 학습유형은 학습참여 수준에 따라 '고수준 학습참여형(군집 1)', '중수준 학습참여형(군집 2)', '저수준 학습참여형(군집 3)'으로 구분되었다. 또한, 학습참여 수준이 높은 군집이 높은 학업성취도를 얻은 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 온라인 문제기반학습을 효과적으로 설계·운영하기 위한 시사점을 제시하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2000

Compared with other subjects, mathematics has great differences in achievement. In hope of solving this problems, most schools the level-movement learning. Although they say it may have some effect because of its homogeneous group, the level groups still have differences in achievement in their students abilities. So, this study aims to present an appropriate tasks for the advanced intermediate and beginner groups and to help self-directed learning by selecting an appropriate tasks for the students' own level. To achieve thiese goals, a great deal of level tasks were developed and given to the students. After lettins them an select appropriate tasks for their own level and perform self-directed teaming, the tasks were measured carefully for their interest attitude and achievement in learning. Consequently, we tried a new method to improve uniformity and to turn teacher-centered learning into student-centered teaming. The following is the conclusion to this study. First self-directed teaming based on the selection of level tasks has meaningful effects on learning achievement in mathematics, especially for the beginner group. Second though the above method did not improve an interest for mathematics, but was very effective in the improvement of learning attitudes.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.109-132
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to survey the learning strategies and learning styles of the undergraduates in international e-trade simulation education. The set of learning strategies are investigated and the analysis is made how learning styles could affect the learning strategies. The subjects of this study were 112 undergraduates majored in international trade and their classes were using e-trade simulation. It is found that the undergraduates' learning strategy level is not high because the simulation education is not common yet in e-trade classes. The levels of self-efficacy and positive attitudes have high level whereas the expression strategy has the lowest. Strong results were not found among undergraduates' learning styles by each of the 11 strategies except two cases. One is that the undergraduates who had experiences of e-learning have higher level of social strategy than those of non e-learning experience group. The other is that the more the students spend the time in the simulation class, the more they have positive attitudes. This study supports that the simulation can increase the effectiveness of e-trade learning.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.395-422
• /
• 2014

인문계 ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$고등학교 1학년 1개 반 35명을 실험집단으로 다른 1개 반 35명을 비교집단으로 선정하였다. 실험집단은 수준별 학습지를 활용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형을 한반이고 비교집단은 일반적인 수업인 교과서 중심의 수업을 한 반이다. 본 연구에서는 고등학교 수학 수업에서 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형을 위해서 수준별 학습지를 개발한다. 그리고 개발한 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 고등학생의 학습능력을 향상시키는 것에 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 연구문제를 구체적으로 다음과 같이 설정하였다. 첫째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 학업성취도를 향상시킬 수 있는가? 둘째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 수학 학습태도를 향상시킬 수 있는가? 셋째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형에 대한 학생들의 반응은 어떠한가? 이다. 본 연구의 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 학업성취도가 향상되었다. 둘째, 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 수학 학습태도의 변화에 도움이 됨을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형에 대하여 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 의미 있는 반응을 나타냄을 알 수 있었다.