• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.161-182
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this paper is to examine the applicability of the UNIDROIT Principle in international commercial arbitration. For this purpose, I have studies the basic two characters of this Principles: One is of general rule(principle); Another is of international and commercial character. According to CISG, questions concerning matters governed by the CISG which are not expressly settled in it are to be settled in conformity with the general principles, so this Principles will cover many questions which are not expressly settled in the applicable law, by gap-filing, analogy or usage. In the preamble of this Principles, there are five cases in which the Principles shall be applied or may be applied. If the disputes are submitted to the any national court, the application of this Principles would be restricted because of the mandatory rules of national, international or supranational origin. But the disputes are submitted to arbitration, the arbitrator would have more discretional powers to apply the Principles than the judge. The reason is that in the arbitration, the arbitrators do not bear obligation to act in conformity with the law applicable by virtue of the rules of rules of private international law. I also examined the applicability of the Principles in cases which there are no mentions in preamble: When the international arbitrators choose the Principles; When the arbitrators decide ex aequo et bono; When the both parties have not chosen the governing law; When there are gaps in domestic law chosen by the parties; When the applicable domestic law is insufficient. In all these cases, the Principles may be applied more easily and conveniently in arbitration than in litigation. Thus to envisage the application of this Principle in international arbitration, first both parties in international commercial contracts should incorporate this Principle as a governing law in their contracts, and second, the arbitrators should try to apply this Principles in their arbitrations by choice, analogy, general principles or usage.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.1-29
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 호주와 캐나다, 네덜란드 등 우리보다 외국인 유학생 교육에 적극적인 자세로 참여해 온 국가들의 외국인 유학생 교육기관 인증제의 세부 특징들을 고찰하고 이를 상호 비교 분석하여 우리나라의 외국인 유학생 교육 질 보장 체계 확립을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제공하는 것을 목표로 하여 수행되었다. 3개국의 사례 비교 분석 결과, 3개국 모두 규제 중심의 과거 자세에서 벗어나 보다 상업적 관점에서 외국인 학생의 유치와 효과적인 교육을 인증제의 주된 목표로 삼고 있었고, 이같은 목표에 따라 외국인 유학생에 대한 교육기관의 교육 역량 및 서비스 능력 개선이 인증제의 구체적인 내용을 구성하고 있었다. 또한 국제화라는 추세가 전세계적으로 중요한 변화임에는 분명하지만 적어도 인증제에서는 국제화 자체가 질 보장의 목표와 동일시되지 않는다는 점도 확인하였다. 이와 같은 비교 분석 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구는 올해 시행 4년차에 돌입하는 '외국인 유학생 유치·관리 역량 인증제'의 정책 목표를 분명히 하고 교육기관들의 실질적인 교육 역량 강화를 유도할수 있는 정량·정성적 평가기준을 설정할 것을 제안하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.19-47
• /
• 2015

International arbitration is an increasingly popular means of alternative dispute resolution for cross-border commercial transactions. The primary advantage of international arbitration over court litigation is enforceability. An international arbitration award is enforceable in most countries in the world. Especially, statistics indicate of ASEAN such as Malaysia and Singapore that the vast majority of defeated companies comply with the terms of international arbitral awards against them or settle soon after the award is rendered. Unlike Malaysia and Singapore, in Indonesia, there are several grounds for refusal of enforcement of an award including where both the nature of the dispute and the agreement to arbitrate do not meet the requirements set out in the Arbitration Law. Because Indonesia does not acknowledge decisions of foreign courts, theoretically they could enforce an international arbitral award which was set aside by the court in the seat of arbitration. This paper introduces the legal system and cases of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in ASEAN, especially Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Secondly, by comparing their law and cases, the paper emphasized the international suitability and global fitness in involved in recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.139-161
• /
• 2009

필자가 세계에서 최초로 국제항공우주재판소(ICASL)의 설립을 제안한 것은 어디까지나 필자 개인의 학문적이고 실용적인 의견에 불과하다. 항공기, 인공위성, 우주선의 추락 또는 충돌 등으로 인하여 인적 또는 물적 손해가 발생되는 항공우주사고의 특성은 (1)전손성(全損性: all or nothing), (2) 순간성(Augenblick), (3) 지상종속성(항공우주관제계 등), (4)손해의 거액성, (5) 국제성 등이 있음으로 육상의 자동차, 기차사고 등과 해상의 선박사고 등과는 다른 특성을 지니고 있다. 따라서 국제항공우주법분야의 사건들을 신속하고 공정하게 처리하기 위하여서는 지역(대륙)별로 국제항공우주법분야에 조예가 깊은 전문가, 교수 및 법조인들 가운데 UN산하 국제민간항공기관(ICAO)의 이사회 및 총회와 UN우주평화적이용위원회(COPUOS)의 법률분과위원회 및 총회에서 다수결로 선출된 14명의 판사들로 구성된 국제항공우주재판소의 설립이 필요하다. 현재 국제재판소로는 네덜란드 헤이그에 있는 (1) 국제사법재판소(ICJ), 독일 함부르크에 있는 (2) 국제해양재판소(ITLS), 헤이그에 있는 (3) 국제형사재판소(ICC), 룩셈브르크에 있는 (4) 유럽공동체재판소(CEC)와 프랑스의 스트라스부르크에 있는 (5) 유럽인권재판소(EHRC) 등이 있으며 이들 재판소의 기능을 개별적으로 살피어 볼 때에 주로 국제법, 국제해양법, 국제형사법, EU법, 유럽인권법 등에 관련된 사건들을 재판한 후 판결을 내리고 있다. 상기 5개 재판소의 설립근거는 각 재판소의 설립에 관계된 국제조약 내지 제정법(statute :정관)에 근거하고 있다. 상기 국제항공우주재판소의 설립 근거가 되는 조약초안에는 (1) 본 재판소의 설립목적, (2) 판사의 선출방법, (3)판사의 임기, (4) 판사의 의무와 권한, (5) 심의회, (6) 재판관할, (7) 청문회, (9) 판결의 방법(주문과 이유 등), (10) 제소기한 등을 삽입하여야만 된다. 국제항공우주재판소는 ICAO 및 UNCOPUOS의 주된 사법기관으로서 법인격을 향유하며 9년 임기의 판사들은 재선이 가능하다. 국제항공우주재판소의 소재지는 대한민국의 서울 또는 기타 도시로 한다. 국제항공우주재판소를 설립하기 위하여서는 설립근거가 되는 국제조약과 세부적인 절차법 (정관: 定款등)의 제정이 필요하다고 본다. 국제항공우주재판소의 설립은 항공우주법 사건에 대한 재판의 기준을 설정하고 재판의 공정성과 신속성을 도모하는데 크게 기여하게 되리라고 본다. 국제항공우주재판소의 창설은 판례법의 축적으로 인하여 국제항공우주법을 통일을 시키는데 촉매적인 역할을 하게 될 것이며 "세계통일법 (unification of the law in the world)"을 형성시키는데 일익을 담당하게 될 것이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.7-25
• /
• 2002

Owing to a tremendous progress of information technology we have faced a great change of a society. This change has happened to almost all of a society. As a result intangible goods are also included as a major concern in international trade. We may say U.S. is one of the countries transaction of software is the most flourishing. I have tried to classified the cases of software transaction in U.S. into five groups. As a result I have known the UCC had been applied to the almost transaction of standard software. However UCC had not been applied to custom software and data processing. In these days UCITA which is very similar to a previous proposal UCC 2B has been presented. This is a contract law that would apply to computer software, multimedia products, and databases. It has been designed to create a uniform commercial contract law for those products. Now therefore we should make observation of a tendency about transaction of software in U.S. The reason is that we pay attention to the symbol and dormant power of U.S. in international trade.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.14-20
• /
• 2010

Korean Cultural Content Industry is developing creative cultural content based on internationally acknowledged manufacturing capacity, however, in order to become cultural industry with international competitiveness, it has to be planned and made in OMSU way. This research studied and analyzed successful cases of cultural content digital restoration and excellent cases of OSMU-type that has been developed and supported by Korean Culture and Contents Agency. This study suggests the direction of growth on the basis of movement of cultural content industry and cultivating plan of human resources.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2022

Kinship is a permanent relationship which is likely to impact the regulations adopted by the legislator to deal with crimes involving close relatives. Accordingly, the title "Impact of Kinship on a Criminal Case" is intended to highlight the legal provisions related kinship, regarding such case, and the procedures associated therewith; as the legislator takes kinship into account, particularly with respect to the procedures related to crimes between relatives; and it is the legislator's aim to protect such relation.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제21권
• /
• pp.129-151
• /
• 2003

Nowadays even if environment of international commercial transaction is changing quickly municipal law could not meet with such change accordingly. So far, however, efforts towards unification have prevailingly taken the form of binding instruments, such as non-national or supranational legislation, international conventions or international model laws. Among them, the UNIDROIT Principles with parties' autonomous and yet non-binding character do not only meet the substantive requirements of a true law merchant. In addition they also counter some of the main points of criticism against the modern lex mercatoria. As such the Principles constitute a cornerstone in the lex mercatoria debate and may become the heart of the new lex mercatoria. The purpose of this article is to ask whether there could be applied the Principles in international commerce. For the purpose it is to investigate when the Principles are applied in international commerce and how effectively the Principles are applied for the decision in international commercial disputes. Even though the Principles are used for reference by parties involved for the voluntary regulation of their contract, it is sufficiently expected that the Principles are to be a stepstone of uniform contract law in international commerce. Until now cases of appling the Principles are not satisfied with its expectation as a source of non-legislative means of unification or harmonization of law. Given the party's autonomy in the contract, this is among other things because business parties are strongly tend to observe their national laws in their international commerce. And also, even though there are a number of neutral and uniform regulations for international commercial contracts, parties do not often recognize their usefulness with being up to expectation. In order to explore the applicability of the Principles a number of cases of ICC International Court of Arbitration and others are quoted.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제25권7호
• /
• pp.989-998
• /
• 2016

In this study, we analyzed the content and compensation factors of 337 cases of national environmental disputes from five recent years (2000~2014). Causes of damage were noise-vibration in 234 cases (69%), sunlight in 48 cases (14%), air pollution in 19 cases (6%), water pollution in 15 cases (4%), odor in 13 cases (4%), and others factors in 8 cases (3%). Sources of damage were construction in 224 cases (66%), structures in 36 cases (11%), vehicle on road in 31 cases (9%), industry in 18 cases (5%), environmental facility in 11 cases (3%), livestock facility in 6 cases (2%), and other sources in 11 cases (3%). From the results of logistic regression analysis, important factors associated with compensation were found to be damage amount, damage distance, zoning districts, source, and administrative disposition.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제44권
• /
• pp.57-84
• /
• 2009

This Study attempts to compare and analyze on Principle of Change Circumstances under th CISG, PICC and PECL which are covered international commercial contract. In many international commercial contract, time is very important because delays in performance are sanctioned heavily by substantial penalty clauses. When change in circumstances affects contract performance, the contract will often not be suspended or terminated. Therefore, principle of change circumstances is being prepared of fluidity of contract environment and its effect in general. Taking into consideration the problems relating to the renegotiation or adaptation in the cases of radical change of circumstances where the CISG applies, it is suggested that the contracting parties should make clear their intentions, that is, whether they will provide for the possibility of renegotiation where the price of goods has been altered by inserting a hardship clause or for the possibility of mutual discharge from liability in the cases of economic impossibility or hardship by inserting a force majeure clause. Such provision will be desirable especially in situations where there is a long term contract, the price of goods sold tends to fluctuate in the international commerce, or where especially in contracts subjected to arbitration, the parties subject their contract to legal sources or principles of supranational character. Therefore, this study has shown that the hardship provisions in the CISG, PICC and PECL has similarities to each a validity defense and an excuse defense. it was provisions that CISG governs this issue in Article 79, PICC Article 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3 and PECL Article 6.111.