• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제34권5호
• /
• pp.437-445
• /
• 2015

Objective: The aims of this study are to investigate the trends of intellectual property in order to identify the ergonomic approaches on musculoskeletal disorders, harmful factors of musculoskeletal disorders, and to find the potential applicability of motion capture technology. Background: Ergonomic posture assessment tools often showed interrater variance, though the usage is easy and practical in industrial fields. Moreover new technologies such as motion capture showed the potential applicability in posture assessment. So ergonomists and practitioners became interested in the intellectual properties on musculoskeletal disorder and motion capture technology. Method: Intellectual properties were collected with the combination of keywords such as ergonomic, musculoskeletal disorder, and motion capture using the KIPRIS (Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service). Collected intellectual properties were classified into ergonomic area and non-ergonomic area, except unexamined intellectual properties. This study investigated the trend of application of intellectual properties and the probability of using motion capture technology. Results: Few intellectual properties with ergonomic approach on musculoskeletal disorders were founded, despite many products for rehabilitation and sports. One hundred twenty five patents in 1105 patents on musculoskeletal disorders and 138 patents in 1908 patents on motion capture technology were classified into the patents that ergonomic approach can be applied. The patents related to ergonomics area are rapidly increasing after 2010, and there are good opportunities for ergonomists to apply the patents. Conclusion: This study found opportunities on novel methodology in detecting the harmful factors of musculoskeletal disorders, and that the motion capture technology is applicable in ergonomic posture assessment. Application: The results of this study can help ergonomists prepare the ergonomic patents, and can show the potential use of motion capture technology in detecting the harmful posture of musculoskeletal disorders.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.165-188
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 1981년부터 2014년까지 128개 국가를 대상으로 한국과 투자대상국의 지적재산권이 한국의 해외직접투자에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 첫째, 한국의 지적재산권과 이의 종류인 특허권과 상표권, 의장권 모두 해외직접투자에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, 투자대상국의 지적재산권은 특허권을 제외하고 해외직접투자에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤다. 셋째, 지적재산권을 투자대상국에서 활용하기 위한 해외직접투자가 투자대상국의 지식을 습득하기 위한 해외직접투자보다 더 유의하였다. 넷째, 주로 개도국인 고성장 국가에 대해서는 한국의 지적재산권이, 주로 선진국인 저성장 국가에 대해서는 투자대상국의 지적재산권이 더 큰 영향을 미쳤다.

• 한국의상디자인학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.5-21
• /
• 2001

The intellectual properties right are becoming very critical issues in domestic fashion industries and also international trade. Although it is true that intellectual properties rights are commonly infringed in fashion industry, none of researches has been done for this matter. The present study is to analyze the patterns of infringement by case analysis, which was limited to trademark and trade dress. As a result, in case of trademarks, counterfeiting was relatively clear case, but it is generally investigated by prosecutes whereas the judgement of similar trademark has been taken by legal lawsuit. In case of industrial design(trade dress) most of disputes were related to textile design and modified Korean tradition dress. Reflecting the short history of protection of intellectual properties rights many informations and legal regulations should be established by te government and by the association of fashion related industry.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.133-149
• /
• 2014

대학은 교육을 통한 인재육성과 더불어, 사회적 가치를 창출할 수 있는 새로운 지식 및 아이디어를 창출하는 것을 주요한 목적으로 한다. 이러한 지적 자원은 비단 교수들이 생산하는 논문에 국한되지 않으며, 학생들로부터 창출되는 창의적인 아이디어, 독창적 문제인식 및 솔루션을 포괄하고 있다. 대학에서 창출되는 주요한 지적자원은 학술적인 지식인 '논문', 교육적 용도의 '강의자료', 텀프로젝트, 공모전 등을 통해 창출되는 창의적 형태의 '아이디어', 그리고 법적인 지적재산권이 확보된 '특허'등이 있다. 그러나, 이러한 대학의 지적 자원은 대부분 강의실 이외의 공간으로 유통되지 못하고 있으며, 대학 내에서조차 체계적으로 관리되지 못한다. 본 연구는 인문사회계열의 대학에서 창출되는 다양한 형태의 지적 자원을 기업에 유통시키고, 이를 통하여 대학의 인적자원이 기업에 연계될 수 있도록 하는 새로운 형태의 시스템 플랫폼을 제안한다. 즉, 대학의 지적자원을 실제로 이를 활용할 기업에게 시스템적으로 유통시킬 수 있는 방안을 연구하였으며, 이와 더불어 대학에서 배출되는 우수한 인재들의 정보를 기업에 함께 전달하여, 산학연계를 공고히 할 수 있는 시스템의 플랫폼을 설계하였다. 이를 위해, 본 연구에서는 시스템의 주요 사용자인 학생 및 교수, 그리고 기업의 실무담당자 총 100명에 대한 사용자 요구도를 조사하고, 이를 토대로 대학의 지적/인적자원에 대한 유통플랫폼 및 이에 대한 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스 (Graphic User Interface) 프로토타입을 구성하였다. 마지막으로, 제안된 플랫폼을 효과적으로 운영할 수 있는 방안에 대한 정책적 시사점을 제안하였다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘텐츠학회 2003년도 추계종합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.72-78
• /
• 2003

본 논문에서는 지적재산권의 보호를 위한 기술적 방법론의 고찰과 지적재산권의 대표적 형태인 예술품의 표절 검출에 대한 새로운 방법론을 제안하고자한다. 본 논문에서는 이를 위해 프로그램 소스 코드로부터 표절을 감정하는 기술적 방법론에 대한 고찰과 자연어 형태로 쓰여진 글에 대한 표절 형태와 이를 감정하기 위한 기술적 방법들에 대해 살펴보고자 한다. 또한 미술품이나 고문헌등에 대한 저작자의 진위 여부 및 표절 감정은 저자뿐만 아니라 소장자의 재산가치 평가 및 문화재 관리측면에서 대단히 중요한 문제이기 때문에 이를 기술적으로 처리하기 위한 방법론을 제안하고자 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.27-46
• /
• 2011

In the intellectual based society of the 21th century, intellectual property of nation and enterprise management has been the key element of nation's competitiveness and development. Therefore in countries like Korea, China, and many other countries, intellectual property of advancement strategy are being constructed and intellectual properties are protected at national level. Top priority task of protecting the intellectual property is to efficiently resolute intellectual property right disputes. Considering the nature of intellectual property right and arbitrage system, arbitration to solve intellectual property disputes is realistically the best method. However, not all cases of them are qualified. In order to relieve the intellectual property disputes through arbitration, qualification must be obtained. During the process, generally and globally, intellectual property right dispute is evaluated by three parts, intellectual property right contract dispute, intellectual property right violation dispute, and intellectual property right validity dispute. Based on UN's "Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Agreement" in 1958, June 10th, in New York, both arbitrage organization and judgment can be approved in both Korea and China countries. However, as of today, there is a big gap of arbitration qualification between two countries, which can be troublesome if intellectual property right disputes arise. For instance, in Korea, intellectual property right contract disputes and intellectual property right violation disputes are both generally accepted as arbitration qualification. However for intellectual property right validity dispute, arbitration qualification is only accepted for non-registered intellectual property as in copyright entity. It does not apply to other registered intellectual property right as in patents. In China, arbitration qualification is accepted for intellectual property right contract dispute, and also accepted for intellectual property right violation dispute to copyrights but restricted to others. As for intellectual property right validity dispute, arbitration qualification is completely denied. Therefore, when there is an intellectual property right dispute between Korea and China, the biggest problem is whether China will accept arbitrage judgments made in Korea. Theoretically, arbitrage judgement made in Korea should be also accepted in China's court. However, considering the criticism of China's passive nature of arbitration qualification for its own local intellectual property right disputes, it's very unlikely they'll actively accept arbitrary judgment made in foreign countries. Korea and China must have a more open minded approach for intellectual property disputes and arbitration qualification. Base on WTO's Intellectual Property Right Agreement, it's being defined as private right. Therefore, sovereign principle should be the basic principle of solving intellectual property right disputes. Currently, arbitration qualification is expanding internationally. So both Korea and China must also follow the trend expand the arbitration qualification with a more open minded and forward looking approach, for the good of intellectual property disputes.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.21-34
• /
• 2020

The paper looks at protecting copyright owners in Nigeria: a panacea for intellectual development. A descriptive survey design was adopted in carrying out the study. The sample size for the study was 112. Three research objectives guided the study. The study utilized a self-developed questionnaire for data collection. A total of 112 copies of the questionnaire were distributed to librarian and lecturers, out of which 108 copies were duly filled and returned, representing 96.4%. The collected data was arranged in frequency and analyzed using percentage and mean score. The findings revealed that protection of copyright will encourage creators of intellectual works, and that if authors are well remunerated there is likelihood of adequate availability of various publications to meet information needs of Nigerians. The result showed that the right to intellectual properties is one of the ways to encourage intellectual development. The finding revealed that copyright protection provides security for intellectual product and does not negatively affect the availability of intellectual materials. Based on the research findings, it was recommended that owners of intellectual property deserve good earnings for their intellectual works in order to promote Knowledge proliferation and availability so as to meet the reading needs of the citizens at the various levels. The study also recommended that all cases relating to copyright violation in our courts should be summarily dealt with. The study advocated that the provision on the punishment should be reviewed such that it could deter people from infringing on authors rights.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.59-68
• /
• 1998

신 정부의 새 정부 100대과제중 정보화 분야에 관한 발표 내용을 살펴보면, 2002년까지 전국 모든 지역에서 시내요금으로 인터넷을 쓸 수 있는 인터넷 전용망을 구축하고 2010년까지 32조원을 투자해 전국에 ‘초고속통신망(공식명칭은 새 빛 망)’을 구축할 것이며 위성방송수신기, 영상 소프트웨어 등 위성산업을 활성화하여 모든 방송의 디지털화를 유도한다는 것이다. 시장통합과 정보통신 기반 구축에 따르는 국제적 쟁점을 살펴보면 무엇보다도‘표준설정’과‘지적재산권’(intellectual property)보호가 국제질서와 국내제도의 조화되는 측면에서 중요한 현안이 되고 있다. 인간의 창작물로써의 저작물들은 정보화 시대를 맞이하여 비트 화되고 멀티미디어 화되고 있는 상황이다. 시뮬레이션이 지배하는 현대사회에서 정보는 기호화되면 누구나 가까이 접하게 됨으로써 이미지 기호의 수집과 합성은 윤리적 관점을 떠나 하나의 미래를 제시해 줄 것이다. 단지 포스트모던 시대에서 원본과 복제물의 차이와 의미가 소멸 될 것이라는 우려와 함께 문제는 저작자의 지적소유권과 권익을 어떻게 설정할 것인가가 문제이다. 이러한 상황을 접하면서 정보화 시대에서의 디지털의 이론적 개념과 사진이 디지털 화되는 과정을 통해 정보의 공유 성을 제시하고 그 윤리성을 추출해보며, 비주얼 이미지의 컴퓨터 그래픽적 합성을 포스트모던 시대의 이미지 합성 관점에서 살펴보고, 21C를 맞이하는 초고속통신망 시대의 지적 소유권에 관한 고찰을 통해서 문제점을 파악함으로써 궁극적으로 이미지 창출자로서의 앞으로 우리가 나아가야 할 방향과 저작권자의 권익을 도출해 보고 져했다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제20권
• /
• pp.455-470
• /
• 1993

In recent years, the intellectual property rights (IPR) are increasingly becoming trade goods and the subject of international trade negotiations. During the past decades, intellectual properties earned critical importance for economic development in both developed and developing countries. Developed countries, headed by the United States, that recognize the economic value of the IPR in the world market are aggressively seeking for universal protection of IPR throughout the world. Intellectual properties have unique qualities that distinguish them from other tangible goods. Most importantly, they are public goods created on the basis of knowledge and information accumulated throughout human history and shared by different cultures. However, there is a growing tendency that the quality of public goods are being etched away as the property concept in IPR expands. In this paper, I discuss how copyright and patent laws incorporated the concept of property right as natural right to one's intellectual creations in early formation of the laws in Europe. I argue that copyright law and patent law are the historical products resulting from political, economic, and ideological factors interacting in a certain society. A history of copyright and patent points to that the intellectual property rights as natural lights of authors and inventors as argued by developed countries in international disputes, are not universal, but unique historical products. Copyright and patent laws have been shaped and developed as regulatory measures by governments to promote and control industries by providing authors and inventors with monopoly incentives. Since property right was used as a regulatory device it was restricted. This is to enhance the distribution of knowledge and information rather than to ensure the property right as an absolute right.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.43-53
• /
• 2007

Recently, controversy over intellectual property rights for protecting genetic resources and traditional knowledge has been emerging. Very active debates and global discussions are being carried out in various international organizations for possible approaches to be taken for these properties, and for the fair and equal sharing of the benefits from these intellectual properties. There is a need to evaluate adopting a sui generis system which is being pushed by developing nations, or adopting a policy which will guaranteee benefit sharing such as sharing royalties from marketing final products, technical transfers, capacity building, and participating in research activities. Also, it is very important to examine the legal issues concerning genetic resources based on Convention on Biological Diversity for the fair and equal sharing of the benefits with developing nations, at the same time assuring developed nations of access to genetic resources.