• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.59-68
• /
• 2010

최근 무치악 부위를 대신하여 광범위하게 식립되고 있는 치과용 임플란트는 높은 임상 성공률을 보이고 있으나 실패 가능성은 늘 존재하며 이는 예기치 않은 경우가 많다. 임플란트의 실패과 관련하여 여러 가지 요인들이 거론되고 있으나, 아직 논란의 여지가 있다. 본연구에서는 서울 보훈병원에서 2005-2006년에 하악 구치부위에 임플란트를 식립한 212명의 환자, 총 358개의 임플란트를 대상으로 환자의 연령, 임플란트 식립 부위, 시스템, 직경과 길이, 골이식 유무에 따른 생존율을 비교하였다. 각 요소에 따른 생존율을 SPSS chi-square test를 이용한 multi-variable analysis를 시행하여 관련성을 검증하였다. 연구 결과 3년간 98.3%의 누적 생존율을 보였으며, 조사한 요인 중 임플란트 직경만이 임플란트 생존율과 관련성이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 넓은 직경의 임플란트가 주로 대체(rescue) 임플란트 혹은 골질이 좋지 않은 부위에 사용되는 경우가 많은 것이 원인으로 작용한 것으로 사료된다. 향후 임플란트의 성공과 관련하여 명확한 지표를 제공할 수 있는 지속적인 연구가 필요할 것이다.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.535-542
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate survival rate of implant and bone formation, to analyze failure contribution factor. Material and Methods: A total of 52 consecutive patients(35 male, 17 female, mean age 49 years) with 104 osseous defects were treated during the period from October 2004 to June 2007 with a simultaneous or staged GBR approach using non-resorbable or resorbable membranes combined with autogenous bone grafts or xenograft(Bio-Oss, Bio-cera, BBP). Result: A total of 32(30,8%) of 104 GBR-treated sites failed the bone formation and a total of 5(5.6%) of 89 implants were removed. Early exposure of the membrane has significantly affected bone formation(p<0.05). Non-resorbable membrane showed more exposure of the membrane and low success rate of bone formation than resorbable membrane(p<0.05). There were no difference between success rate of bone formation and using autogenous bone or graft materials. There were no statistically significant difference between success rate of bone formation and smoking or using PRP. Mandible showed more success rate of bone formation than maxilla(p<0.05). Conclusion: Early exposure of the membrane, membrane type and maxilla/mandible type have influence on success rate of bone formation during GBR.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.278-288
• /
• 2014

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 상악 및 하악의 완전 무치악 및 부분 무치악 부위에 식립된 골유착성 임플란트의 보철 전 초기 생존율 및 생존과 관련된 요소를 평가하고 실패를 야기하는 요인에 대해 알아보는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 2004년부터 2013년까지 770명의 환자에서 총 2158개의 골내 임플란트를 식립하였다. 임플란트의 소실과 환자의 연령 및 성별, 식립 위치, 임플란트 시스템, 길이 및 직경, 그리고 골이식 방법과의 연관성을 평가하기 위해 임상적 비교를 시행하였다. 결과: 임플란트 식립 위치에 따라 상악 전치부에서 98.23%, 상악 구치부 96.97%, 하악 전치부 97.85%, 하악 구치부 98.75%의 임플란트 생존율을 보였다(P < 0.05). 임플란트의 종류 및 표면처리 기법은 임플란트 생존율과 특이성을 보이지 않았다. 임플란트 매식체의 직경에 따라 3.0 mm 이하의 임플란트에서 100%, 3.0 - 3.5 mm 97.09%, 3.5 - 4.0 mm 98.19%, 4.0 - 4.5 mm 98.29%의 생존율을 보였고, 5.0 mm 이상의 직경을 가진 넓은 폭경의 임플란트에서 75%의 비교적 낮은 생존율을 보였다(P < 0.05). 임플란트 매식체의 길이에 따라 9 - 11 mm 및 11 - 13 mm의 길이를 가진 임플란트에서 각각 98.12% 및 98.17%의 높은 생존율을 보였으나 통계학적 유의성을 가지진 못하였다. 골이식술의 방법에 따라 상악동 골이식술을 단독으로 시행한 부위에서 임플란트 생존율은 89.05%, 골유도 재생술을 단독으로 시행한 경우 98.28%, 상악동 골이식술과 골유도 재생술을 동시에 시행한 경우 98.34%, 골이식술이 동반되지 않은 경우 99.28%의 생존율을 보였다(P < 0.05). 결론: 이번 연구에서 임플란트 식립 후 최종 보철물 시적 전 초기단계에서의 임플란트 생존율은 임플란트의 식립위치, 임플란트 매식체의 직경, 그리고 골이식 방법과 관련이 있었다. 이러한 결과에 따라 각각 상악 구치부, 5.0 mm 이상의 넓은 임플란트, 그리고 상악동 골이식술을 단독으로 시행한 부위에서 현저하게 낮은 생존율을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제55권11호
• /
• pp.766-776
• /
• 2017

This clinical study was conducted to evaluate the clinical effects of a concave neck of external connection type implant fixture designed for platform switching on the peri-implant tissue responses. Two types of implants with different neck designs were implanted in 20 patients. For the experimental group, the bioseal(BS) implant fixtures with 's' shaped concave profile on the neck were used, and non-bioseal(NBS) implant fixtures with a straight profile on the neck were used as control(Total of 40 implants, NBS: n = 19, BS: n=21). During the one-year period after implant placement, implant survival rate, marginal bone resorption, bleeding, plaque, and complications were evaluated. The survival rate of NBS and BS group was 94.74% and 90.48%, respectively. There was no significant difference on marginal bone resorption, bleeding and plaque between the two groups (P>.05). Within the limits of the present study, implants with a concave neck design showed similar clinical results to implants with a straight neck design on the peri-implant tissue responses. Longitudinal clinical studies are necessary to confirm more effective clinical results.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.169-176
• /
• 2003

Background: Although dental implantation has become widespread and acceptable treatment for dental prosthodontics, maxillary posterior jaw region is often complicated by the pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and physiological resorption of the alveolar bone. When this occurs, the residual bone between the floor of the sinus and the crestal ridge is inadequate for the placement of implants. The sinus elevation procedure provides a way to increase the amount of available bone and to allow the placement of longer implants. Materials & methods: We studied 11 patients requiring the implant placements and the maxillary sinus elevation simultaneously from 1996 to 2003 in our clinic. Nine patients were males and two patients were females, aged from 39 to 72(mean=51.6). Four patients had medical compromised states; angina pectoris, diabetes, hypertension, hepatitis. Patients didn't show any pathologic findings clinically or radiographically. We studied the success and survival rate of implants, factors increasing the osseointegrating capacity of implants. Results: The success rate of osseointegration of implants was 93%. At least 6 months after loading on implants, the survival rate of implants was 78.5%. Autogenous bone graft and adequate residual bone height(>6mm) increased survival rate of implants. Conclusion: Successful implant placement with maxillary sinus elevation mainly depends on sufficient residual bone height, healthy maxillary sinus, autogenous bone graft.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.337-343
• /
• 2010

Purpose: By reviewing literature on the subject, we compared the survival rate of implants placed in various graft materials used for maxillary sinus augmentation. Materials and Methods: The search protocol used the Pubmed electronic database, with a time limit from 1998 to 2009. Keywords such as 'sinus lift,' 'sinus augmentation,' 'sinus floor elevation,' 'sinus graft,' 'bone graft,' 'implants,' 'oral implants,' and 'dental implants' were used, alone and in combination, to search the database. We selected articles and divided them into three groups by type of graft materials: Group 1. Autogenous bone group: autogenous bone alone; Group 2. Combined bone group: autogenous bone in combination with bone substitutes; and Group 3. Substitute group: bone substitutes alone or bone substitute combinations. Results: We selected 37 articles concerning a total of 2,257 patients and 7,282 implants; 417 implants failed. The total implant survival rate (ISR, %) was 94.3%. In Group 1, 761 patients and 2,644 implants were studied; 179 implants failed and the ISR was 93.2%. In Group 2, 583 patients and 1,931 implants were studied; 126 implants failed and the ISR was 93.5%. In Group 3, 823 patients and 2,707 implants were studied; 112 implants failed and the ISR was 95.9%. Conclusion: Implants inserted in grafts composed of bone substitutes alone or in grafts composed of autogenous bone in combination with bone substitutes may achieve survival rates better than those for implants using autogenous bone alone (P<0.05).

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제47권6호
• /
• pp.411-426
• /
• 2021

Combining different procedures to reduce the number of surgical sessions and patient discomfort in implant placement and sinus floor elevation has been recommended, and evidence supports good outcomes. The aim of this study was to review the results of clinical studies on sinus floor elevation through extraction sockets and simultaneous immediate posterior implant placement. An electronic search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to find English articles published in or before August 2020. A manual search was also performed. Titles, abstracts, and the full-text of the retrieved articles were studied. Thirteen studies met our eligibility criteria: 6 retrospective case series, 3 case reports, 2 prospective cohort case-series, 1 prospective case series, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Overall, 306 implants were placed; 2 studies reported implant survival rates of 91.7% and 98.57%. The others either did not report the survival rate or reported 100% survival. Sinus floor elevation through a fresh extraction socket and simultaneous immediate implant placement appears to be a predictable modality with a high success rate. However, proper case selection and the expertise of the clinician play fundamental roles in the success of such complex procedures.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.808-814
• /
• 2011

Purpose: Despite wide clinical use of breast implants, there is continued concern about the lifespan of these devices. The causes of explantation were infection, deflation of implant and patient's want. The deflation of saline-filled breast implant was related to strength and durability of implant shell. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical durability of saline-filled breast implant through the analysis of duration until deflation occurred, causes, incidence and influencing factors. Methods: Retrospective analyses were conducted on clinical records for 19 cases of deflation of saline-filled breast implant from 201 cases of breast reconstruction with saline-filled implant between May 1995 and June 2011. The authors had been analyzed the causes of deflation, survival duration, symptom, sign, nipple excision, volume of implant, saline filling, method of reoperation, breast cancer stage and combined capsular contracture. Results: The causes of deflation were attributed to the cases that cannot be evaluated the causes in 15 cases, fall down in 1 case, mammography in 2 cases, accidental needle injury in 1 case. Mean survival duration was 4 years and 5 months. The duration of survival was less than 1 year for 5 cases, 1 year to 10 years for 10 cases, more than 10 years for 4 cases. The volume between 201 and 250 cc of deflated breast implant was rated as high by 14.0 percent. The deflation rate of underfilled implants was 11.4 percent, adequate filled implants was 9.3 percent. None of overfilled implant was deflated. The deflation of smooth surface implant was 5 of 152 cases. Textured implant was 14 of 49 cases. The capsular contracture of non-deflated breast implant was 28 of 182 cases and that of deflated breast implant was 6 of 19 cases. Conclusion: The patients who underwent saline-filled breast implant implantation should be informed that their implant could deflate. The analysis of clinical durability and causes of deflation in breast implant was important for the prediction and prevention of reopeation. The authors could suppose the causes of deflation of saline-filled breast implant through history, duration of survival, inspection of the shell of implant.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.2-7
• /
• 2014

Implants have been widely used in restorative treatment for patients who have undergone head and neck cancer surgery. With the development of combination treatment of head and neck cancer, radiotherapy has been a common means of therapy. However, it could induce various changes in hard and soft tissues and reduce the success and survival rate of the implants. Some research, using either animal models or clinical studies, have shown that certain strategies could be used for improving the survival rate of implants. In this review, we discussed the changes in both hard and soft tissues, which may reduce the survival rate of the implants, and the proposed methods for improving the survival rate of patients after radiotherapy.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.413-423
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The presented study aims to evaluate the effects of osteoporosis on dental implants by analyzing a 12-year cumulative survival rate of implants placed in patients with osteoporosis. Methods: 37 patients with history of osteoporosis were selected from a pool of dental implant patients treated at the Department of Periodontology in Yonsei University Hospital between 1993 and 2007. The cumulative survival rate is quantified using data collected from 164 placed implants in the selected 37 patients. Results: 3 out of the 164 implants failed and the cumulative survival rate was observed at 95.1%. The survival rates of the implants according to patients' age were 97.41% (<60) and 100% ($60\leq$). The lower survival rate was directly proportional to younger age, and this relationship is statistically significant (P<0.05). The survival rates of implants according to diagnostic criteria were 95.45% (osteopenia) and 98.59% (osteoporosis; 2 out of 142 implants placed in osteoporosis patients failed). The difference in the two survival rates is statistically significant (P<0.05). The survival rates according to the region of implants do not have statistically significant difference. The survival rates according to the different length and diameter of the implants do not have statistically significant difference. The survival rates of implants accompanied and not accompanied by bone augmentation were 92.11% and 100%, respectively. The difference in the two survival rates is statistically significant (P<0.05). The survival rates of implants placed in patients with and without history of medication for osteoporosis treatment are 96.67% and 99.04%, respectively. The difference in the two survival rates is statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: A high cumulative survival rate of dental implants, similar to one found in non-osteoporosis patients, is observed in osteoporosis patients, indicating the possibility that placing dental implants on patients with osteoporosis can be considered with high treatment predictability.