Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

Implant Survival Rates of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: a Literature Review of Graft Materials

상악동 거상술시 이식재의 종류에 따른 임프란트의 예후와 성공률

  • Lim, Hyoung-Sup (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Ji-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 임형섭 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김수관 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오지수 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.03.22
  • Accepted : 2010.06.21
  • Published : 2010.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: By reviewing literature on the subject, we compared the survival rate of implants placed in various graft materials used for maxillary sinus augmentation. Materials and Methods: The search protocol used the Pubmed electronic database, with a time limit from 1998 to 2009. Keywords such as 'sinus lift,' 'sinus augmentation,' 'sinus floor elevation,' 'sinus graft,' 'bone graft,' 'implants,' 'oral implants,' and 'dental implants' were used, alone and in combination, to search the database. We selected articles and divided them into three groups by type of graft materials: Group 1. Autogenous bone group: autogenous bone alone; Group 2. Combined bone group: autogenous bone in combination with bone substitutes; and Group 3. Substitute group: bone substitutes alone or bone substitute combinations. Results: We selected 37 articles concerning a total of 2,257 patients and 7,282 implants; 417 implants failed. The total implant survival rate (ISR, %) was 94.3%. In Group 1, 761 patients and 2,644 implants were studied; 179 implants failed and the ISR was 93.2%. In Group 2, 583 patients and 1,931 implants were studied; 126 implants failed and the ISR was 93.5%. In Group 3, 823 patients and 2,707 implants were studied; 112 implants failed and the ISR was 95.9%. Conclusion: Implants inserted in grafts composed of bone substitutes alone or in grafts composed of autogenous bone in combination with bone substitutes may achieve survival rates better than those for implants using autogenous bone alone (P<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Pietrokovski J : The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 34 : 456, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90166-3
  2. Misch CE : Treatment planning and implant dentistry. Misch Implant Institute, 1985.
  3. Misch CE, Judy KWM : Classification of partial edentulous arches for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 4 : 7, 1987.
  4. Sailer HF : A new method of inserting endosseous implants in totally atrophied maxillae. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 17 : 299, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(89)80057-5
  5. Tatum H : Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin North Am 30 : 207, 1986.
  6. Boyne PJ, James RA : Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 38 : 613, 1980.
  7. Simsek B, Simsek S : Evaluation of success rates of immediate and delayed implants after tooth extraction. Chinese Med J 116 : 1216, 2003.
  8. Marx RE : Autogenous grafting in oral and maxillofacial surgery : Philosophy and particulars of autogenous bone grafting. Oral Maxillofac Surg North Am 5 : 599, 1993.
  9. Marx RE, Stevens MR : Morbidity from bone harvest in major jaw reconstruction : A randomized trial comparing the lateral anterior and posterior approaches to the ileum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48 : 196, 1988.
  10. Block MS, Kent JN, Kallukaran FU et al : Bone maintenance 5 to 10 years after sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56 : 706, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90801-1
  11. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J : Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 : 52, 1998.
  12. Kaptein MLA, de Putter C, de Lange GL et al : Survival of cylindrical implants in composite grafted Maxillary sinuses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56 : 1376, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90396-2
  13. Van Den Bergh JPA, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Krekeler G et al : Sinus floor elevation and grafting with autogenous iliac crest bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 9 : 429, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090608.x
  14. Watzek G, Weber R, Bernhart T et al : Treatment of patients with extreme maxillary atrophy using sinus floor augmentation and implants: preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27 : 428, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80031-3
  15. Buchmann R, Khoury F, Faust C et al : Peri-implant conditions in periodontally compromised patients following maxillary sinus augmentation: a long-term post-therapy trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 10 : 103, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100204.x
  16. Leonardis DD, Pecora GE : Augmentation of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulfate : one-year clinical report from a perspective longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 869, 1999.
  17. Keller EE, Tolman DA, Eckert SE : Maxillary antral-nasal inlay autogenous bone graft reconstruction of compromised maxilla : a 12-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 707, 1999.
  18. Khoury F : Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation : a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 557, 1999.
  19. Lekholm U, Wannfors K, Isaksson S et al : Oral implants in combination with bone grafts. A 3-year retrospective multicenter study using the Branemark implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28 : 181, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80134-9
  20. Peleg M, Mazor Z, Garg AK : Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 549, 1999.
  21. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Wegscheider W et al : Retrospective analysis of Frialit-2 implants in the augmented sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20 : 255, 2000.
  22. Van Den Bergh JPA, ten Bruggenkate CM, Krekeler G et al : Maxillary sinusfloor elevation and grafting with human demineralized freeze dried bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 11 : 487, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005487.x
  23. Wannfors K, Johansson B, Hallman M et al : A prospective randomized study of 1- and 2-stage sinus inlay bone grafts : 1-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 : 625, 2000.
  24. Bahat O, Fontanessi RV : Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21 : 221, 2001.
  25. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H et al : Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants : results after 12-24 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 279, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003279.x
  26. Tawil G, Mawla M : Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide) : a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 : 713, 2001.
  27. Engelke W, Schwarzw¨aller W, Behnsen A et al : Subantroscopic laterobasal sinus floor augmentation (SALSA) : an up-to-5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 135, 2003.
  28. Philippart P, Brasseur M, Hoyaux D et al : Human recombinant tissue factor, platelet-rich plasma, and tetracycline induce a high-quality human bone graft : a 5-year survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 411, 2003.
  29. Rodriguez A, Anastassov GE, Lee H et al : Maxillary sinus augmentation with deproteinated bovune bone and platelet rich plasma with simultaneous insertion of endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 61 : 157, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50041
  30. Stricker A, Voss PJ, Gutwald R et al : Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone grafts to enable placement of SLA-surfaced implants: preliminary results after 15-0 months. Clin Oral Implants Research 14 : 207, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140211.x
  31. Valentini P, Abensur D : Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone : a clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 556, 2003.
  32. Hallman M, Zetterqvist L : A 5-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80 : 20 mixture of bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 6 : 82, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00030.x
  33. Itiurriaga MTM, Ruiz CC : Maxillary sinus reconstruction with calvarium bone grafts and endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 344, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.013
  34. Hallman M, Nordin T : Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants : a retrospective study in 50 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 222, 2004.
  35. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K : A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentatin with a 2 : 1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 339, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  36. Schwarz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E : The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 75 : 511, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511
  37. Butz SJ, Huys LW : Long-term success of sinus augmentation using a synthetic alloplast : a 20 patients, 7 years clinical report. Implant Dent 14 : 36, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000156650.17744.90
  38. Ewers R : Maxilla sinus grafting with marine algae derived bone forming material : a clinical report of longterm results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 1712, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.020
  39. Simunek A, Cierny M, Kopecka D et al : The sinus lift with phycogenic bone substitute. A histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 : 342, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01097.x
  40. Karabuda C, Arisan V, Hakan O : Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus. J Periodontol 77 : 1991, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060102
  41. Becktor JP, Hallstrom H, Isaksson S et al : The use of particulate bone grafts from the mandible for maxillary sinus floor augmentation before placement of surface-modified implants : results from bone graftgin to delivery of the final fixed prosthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Sur 66 : 780, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.008
  42. Minichetti JC, D'Amore JC, Hong AY : Three-year analysis of tapered screw vent implants placed into maxillary sinuses grafted with mineralized bone allograft. J Oral Implantol 34 : 135, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[135:TAOTSV]2.0.CO;2
  43. Bornstein MM, Chappuis V, von Arx T et al : Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures : 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 19 : 1034, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01573.x
  44. Chaushu G, Mardinger O, Calderon S et al : The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla. J Periodontol 80 : 422, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080451
  45. Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G et al : Implants success in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone : a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 : 316, 2009.
  46. Torres J, Tamimi F, Martinez PP et al : Effect of plateletrich plasma on sinus lifting: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 36 : 677, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01437.x
  47. John NK, Michael SB : Augmentation of maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone for placement of endosseous implants : A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51 : 1203, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80289-7
  48. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S et al : Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. Clin Oral Impl Res 11 : 217, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003217.x
  49. Feinberg SE, Fonseca FJ : Biologic aspects of transplantation of grafts, in Fonseca RJ, Davis WH(eds). Reconstructive Preprosthetic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders 1986.
  50. Urist MR : bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150 : 893, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  51. Loukota RA, Isaksson SG, Linner ELJ et al : A technique for inserting endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla in a single stage procedure. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 : 46, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90136-7
  52. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL et al : Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants : Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 36 : 151, 1992.
  53. McAllister BS, Cogan AG, Hollinger JO : Eighteen-mouth radiographic and histologic evaluation of sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone in the chimpanzee. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 361, 1999.
  54. Buck BE, Melinin TI, Brown MD : Bone transplantation and human immuno-deficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop 240 : 129, 1989.
  55. Bell WH : Resorption characteristics of bone and bone substitutes. Oral Surg 17 : 650, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(64)90372-X
  56. Shetty V, Han TJ : Alloplastic materials in reconstructive periodontal surgery. Dent Clin North Am 35 : 521, 1991.
  57. Ouhayoun JP, Shabana AHM, Issahakian S et al : Histological evaluation of natural coral skeletal as a grafting material in miniatureswine mandible. J Mat Sci : materials in medicine 3 : 222, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713454
  58. Yukna RA : Synthetic bone grafts in periodontics. Periodontology 2001 : 92, 1993.
  59. Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L et al : Systematic Review of Survival Rates for Implants Placed in the Grafted Maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24 : 565, 2004.
  60. Tong D, Rioux K, Drangsholt M et al : A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 : 175, 1998.
  61. Tidwell JK : Composite graft of the maxillary sinus fot placement of endosteal implants. Int J Oral Maxilliofac Sur 21 : 204, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80219-X