• Title/Summary/Keyword: evidential modal

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Introducing Judge of Evaluation for the Analysis of Subjective Adjectival Predicates, Modals, and Evidentials in Korean (기준 판단자의 도입과 주관성 형용사, 양상, 증거성)

  • Yang, Jeong-Seok
    • Language and Information
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.119-146
    • /
    • 2015
  • Within the field of Korean linguistics, it has been observed that subjective adjectival predicate constructions are characteristic of imposing 'coreference constraint' on the higher and lower subjects, while evidential -te- constructions imposing 'non-coreference constraint' on them. I interpret these constraints as dependency constraints between higher and lower judge-sensitive semantic predicates, and investigate the interactions among subjective adjectival predicates, evidential -te-, and modal -keyss- in Korean. The paper ultimately argues for the necessity to add a new indexical element, the judge of evaluation(Lasersohn 2005, Stephenson 2007), to the traditional set of indices that were confined to the world and the time.

  • PDF

Reconsideration of the Linguistic Category of Mediation in Language: a Comparative Approach between French and Korean (언어의 '매개작용' 범주 고찰: 프랑스어와 한국어 비교 연구)

  • Suh, Jungyeon
    • Cross-Cultural Studies
    • /
    • v.46
    • /
    • pp.297-325
    • /
    • 2017
  • In this paper, I would like to reconsider the evidential category (or the mediation category) in languages with language specific values, especially in Korean and French evidentials. We tried to analyze how the evidentials are represented in both languages including their linguistic markers (grammatical, lexical or discursive) and their semantic meanings. According to the precedent studies from the general linguistic point of view, we would like to reconsider the semantic meanings of both languages' grammatical markers, the so-called Korean retrospective marker '-te-' and French conditionals in the framework of the enunciative operation theory suggested by $Descl{\acute{e}}s$ & $Guentch{\acute{e}}va$ (2000), which proposed to classify the type of discourse by the language-independent description tools conceived after the enunciation theory suggested by Bally (1965), Benveniste (1956), Culioli (1973). Through this approach, we would like to contribute to establishing the linguistic basis not only for the general linguistic research to determine the invariant meaning of linguistic evidentials and their system, but also for the applied linguistics to the language engineering field.