• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.18-31
• /
• 2018

도로를 주행하는 위험물질 수송차량 사고는 재난형태의 심각한 피해를 야기하므로 해외국가들은 이미 오래전부터 위험물질 수송차량의 안전관리를 위하여 관련 법 제도를 구축하고 체계적인 관리를 수행해오고 있다. 최근 국내에는 인제양양터널, 금정산터널 등 10km이상의 초 장대터널이 고속도로 상에 개통되고 있으며, 화학기술의 발전과 함께 다양한 종류의 위험물질 유통량이 증가하고 있다. 그러나 위험물질 수송차량 안전운행과 관련된 법 제도는 여전히 부재하며, 이들을 관리하기 위한 체계적인 정책방안도 구체화되지 않은 실정이다. 위험물질 수송차량의 사고위험성을 인식하고, 도로관리자를 위한 체계적 관리방안을 구축하여 도로 안전성을 확보하는 것은 중요한 과제이다. 따라서 본 연구는 안전한 고속도로 위험물질 수송차량 운행을 위하여 국내 고속도로 터널통행규제에 대한 타당성을 분석함으로써 도로관리자를 위한 관리 방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 도로 위험물질 수송차량 관련 법 개정과 위험물질수송차량 최적경로 도출을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제2권
• /
• pp.31-67
• /
• 1990

One of the first issues which arose in the evolution of air law was the determination of the vertical limits of airspace over private property. In 1959 the UN in its Ad Hoc Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, started to give attention to the question of the meaning of the term "outer space". Discussions in the United Nations regarding the delimitation issue were often divided between those in favour of a functional approach ("functionalists"), and those seeking the delineation of a boundary ("spatialists"). The functionalists, backed initially by both major space powers, which viewed any boundary as possibly restricting their access to space(Whether for peaceful or military purposes), won the first rounds, starting with the 1959 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space which did not consider that the topic called for priority consideration. In 1966, however, the spatialists, were able to place the issue on the agenda of the Outer Sapce Committee pursuant to Resolution 2222 (xxx1). However, the spatialists were not able to present a common position since there existed a variety of propositions for delineation of a boundary. Over the years, the funtionalists have seemed to be losing ground. As the element of location is a decisive factor for the choice of the legal regime to be applied, a purely functional approach to the regulation of activities in the space above the Earth does not offer a solution. It is therefore to be welcomed that there is clear evidence of a growing recognition of the defect inherent to such an approach and that a spatial approach to the problem is gaining support both by a growing number of States as well as by publicists. The search for a solution of the problem of demarcating the two different legal regimes governing the space above the Earth has undoubtedly been facilitated, and a number of countries, among them Argentina, Belgium, France, Italy and Mexico have already advocated the acceptance of the lower boundary of outer space at a height of 100km. The adoption of the principle of sovereignty at that height does not mean that States would not be allowed to take protective measures against space activities above that height which constitute a threat to their security. A parallel can be drawn with the defence of the State's security on the high seas. Measures taken by States in their own protection on the high seas outside the territorial waters-provided that they are proportionate to the danger-are not considered to infringe the principle of international law. The most important issue in this context relates to the problem of a right of passage for space craft through foreign air space in order to reach outer space. In the reports to former ILA Conferences an explanation was given of the reasons why no customary rule of freedom of passage for aircraft through foreign territorial air space could as yet be said to exist. It was suggested, however, that though the essential elements for the creation of a rule of customary international law allowing such passage were still lacking, developments apperaed to point to a steady growth of a feeling of necessity for such a rule. A definite treaty solution of the demarcation problem would require further study which should be carried out by the UN Outer Space Committee in close co-operation with other interested international organizations, including ICAO. If a limit between air space and outer space were established, air space would automatically come under the regime of the Chicago Convention alone. The use of the word "recognize" in Art. I of chicago convention is an acknowledgement of sovereignty over airspace existing as a general principle of law, the binding force of which exists independently of the Convention. Further it is important to note that the Aricle recognizes this sovereignty, as existing for every state, holding it immaterial whether the state is or is not a contracting state. The functional criteria having been created by reference to either the nature of activity or the nature of the space object, the next hurdle would be to provide methods of verification. With regard to the question of international verification the establishment of an International Satelite Monitoring Agency is required. The path towards the successful delimitation of outer space from territorial space is doubtless narrow and stony but the establishment of a precise legal framework, consonant with the basic principles of international law, for the future activities of states in outer space will, it is still believed, remove a source of potentially dangerous conflicts between states, and furthermore afford some safeguard of the rights and interests of non-space powers which otherwise are likely to be eroded by incipient customs based on at present almost complete freedom of action of the space powers.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2020

전 세계적인 코로나19의 확산으로 인해, 진단시약 등과 같은 감염병 의료 및 의료기기 신제품이 비약적으로 개발·출시되고 있으며, 이의 빠른 수급을 위해 각 국가들은 수입규제를 완화하거나 신속한 인·허가를 위한 정책을 펼치고 있다(NIDS, 2020). 반면, 신종 감염병과 관련 없는 신개발 의료기기의 경우 오히려 시험검사 등 지연 및 취소되는 사례가 발생하고 있는 등 여전히 엄격한 인·허가규제를 통해 시장에 진출하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 의료기기신제품이 시장에 진출하면서 마주하게 되는 정부소관법률에 특화하여 규제강도 영향요인을 도출하고 규제강도를 분석하여 규제대응 프레임워크를 제안하였다. 연구방법은 문헌연구, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis(FMEA)기법 적용, 전문가인터뷰(1차):아이디어수집, 전문가인터뷰(2차) : 타당성검증의 방법으로 진행하였으며, FMEA기법의 적용프로세스를 통해 우선 규제단계별 영향요인의 발생영향도와 규제사무 유형별 부담영향도를 곱하여 규제요인의 중요도를 구하고, 규제영향 심각도를 곱하는 방식으로 규제강도 정량화방법을 제시하였다. 시사점은 최근 해외 주요 국가들 및 우리나라 정부가 코로나19에 따른 신개발의료기기의 신속한 인·허가를 위한 특별규제정책 및 완화정책을 펼치며 적극적으로 대응하고 있는 시점에 본 연구에서 제안된 프레임워크를 통해 향후 기존 의료기기 신제품의 인·허가 정책 규제프로세스에도 보다 적극적이며 선제적인 대응이 될 수 있도록 규제의 개선방향과 규제대응 방안이 이루어지길 기대한다.