• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.17-22
• /
• 1988

Computer based instruction in the elementary science curriculum will be played an important role through the fifth curriculum reform from the 1989 school year. This is essential for the science instruction because the strategies on the problem-solvings and inquiry approaches can be utilized for the science classroom. Computer education can be thought as the education about the computer and the education using the computer. Of them the education using the computer means the computer assisted instruction(CAI) what is called all the possible activities using the computer in the classroom. Student achievement as the result of CAI depends on the learning activities of students and the instructional techniques and strategies of teachers using the computer. However, computer based education to enhance the student achievement is pointed out the lacks of the standardized Korean alphabet code and the compatibility of qualified software. These problems will be relieved according to the coding for the Korean alphabet of SUPER PILOT program language.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권5호특별호
• /
• pp.487-494
• /
• 2005

The purpose of study was to introduce and propagate the children's verses as the teaching/learning strategies in science education far elementary students and teachers. 238 pre-service teachers, 140 in-service teachers and 602 elementary students wrote the own verses and read colleague's verses with respect to science. In this situation, the writing was considered as creation and the reading was reception and appreciation for the verses. When they wrote the verses, the themes were not restricted except that they were related to science. Mostly, the subjects were something about science concepts, scientific phenomena or experimental instruments, etc. In addition, this study investigated the merits and demerits of the reading/writing activities of children's verses as the teaching/learning strategies in science classroom.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.303-312
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 학교 과학 수업의 탐구활동 과정에서 어떤 규범이 형성되며 그러한 규범이 탐구 수행에 어떠한 영향을 주는지를 분석하고, 이를 토대로 학교 과학 탐구를 실행하는 과정에서 직면하는 여러문제들에 대해 고찰하는 것이다. 초등학교 고학년 두 학급의 탐구활동 사례를 중심으로 수업 관찰, 학생과 교사 면담, 설문지 등의 다양한 출처를 통해 자료를 수집하였다. 먼저, 교실 규범에 대한 이론적 범주로서 생활규범, 범교과 학습규범, 과학탐구 학습규범의 세 가지 범주를 구축하고, 각 범주의 하위 규범들을 귀납적으로 추출하였다. 더불어 각 규범들의 유형과 특징, 그리고 수업 및 탐구 수행에 미치는 영향을 함께 분석하였다. 교실 규범에 대한 분석을 토대로 학교 과학탐구의 실행 과정에서 직면하는 실질적인 문제로서 첫째, 집단적인 탐구 수행이 갖는 구조적인 어려움, 둘째, 탐구수업의 여러 국면에서 다르게 구현되는 교사의 권위, 셋째, 범교과적인 교육적 가치와 과학 탐구에서의 가치와의 갈등을 확인하였다. 끝으로 이러한 특징들이 학교 과학탐구의 실질적 실행과 교실 현상을 문화적으로 이해하는 데에 있어서 갖는 의미와 시사점에 대해 논의하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.211-226
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to investigate science teachers' understandings about scientific argumentation in the classroom. Seven structured interview protocols were developed, asking the definition of scientific inquiry, the differentiation between scientific inquiry and hands-on activity, the opportunity of student argumentation, explicit teaching strategies for scientific argumentation, the critical example of argumentation, the criteria of successful argumentation, and the barrier of developing argumentation. The results indicate that there are differences and similarities in understandings about scientific argumentation between two groups of middle school teachers and upper elementary. Basically, teachers at middle school define scientific inquiry as the opportunity of practicing reasoning skills through argumentation, while teachers at upper elementary define it as the more opportunities of practicing procedural skills through experiments rather than of developing argumentation. Teachers in both groups have implemented a teaching strategy called "Claim-Evidence Approach," for the purpose of providing students with more opportunities to develop arguments. Students' misconception, limited scientific knowledge and perception about inquiry as a cycle without the opportunity of using reasoning skills were considered as barriers for implementing authentic scientific inquiry in the classroom.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.506-513
• /
• 2006

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of school safety education for children to increase their safety behavior. Method: The participants were 262 fourth graders enrolled in S elementary school located in Anyang city. The participants were randomly assigned to three groups. For the first experimental group, school safety education was provided for both children and parents. For the second experimental group, safety education was provided only for the children. For the control group, no treatment was given. Result: The first experimental group showed the highest increment on the classroom safety activities score. The first experimental group also had the highest increment on the outside-the-classroom safety activities score. Further, the first experimental group showed the highest increment on the traffic safety activities score. Conclusion: Safety education in the elementary school is very effective to ensure children are protected from school and traffic accidents. Also safety education can be more effective if safety related parent education programs are provided to parents. Therefore safety education should be provided systematically for both children and their parents to prevent childhood accidents.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.198-205
• /
• 2013

For assessing classroom environment, numerous instruments were developed and reported the survey results for science students in science education. In this study I translated Constructivist Learning Environment Scales (CLES) were into Korean versions for elementary school teachers, and measured the reliability. The subjects were randomly selected from three departments of an University of Education in a metropolitan city. All of them were 110 students, who would be elementary school teachers. According to the survey results, pre-service teachers for elementary school have recognized constructivistly for learning environments in an actual forms. In a scale of student negotiation they have most constructivistly recognized learning environment, and moderately in scales of relevance, uncertainty and critical view while they have seldom constructivistly recognized in a scale of shared control. Also Korean version CLES would be an reliable instruments for constructivist assessing learning environments.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.261-272
• /
• 2008

This study focused on explicitly instructional effects about NOS(Nature of Science) of sixth grade students. Participants were 28 sixth grade students. Data sources included classroom observations of the explicit NOS science lessons, questionnaire, and interviews. 5 students among the participants were selected for the interviews. Date were analyzed for finding the changes of students' thoughts. Before the instruction, the majority of participants held naive views of NOS, but after the instruction, the majority of participants held informed views of NOS. Developing informed conception of NOS within curriculum is necessary to growth of science education.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.201-246
• /
• 2019

정보통신기술은 교육을 큰 위기에 빠트리는 위험물질 취급을 받기도 하고, 위기에서 구원하는 구원자로 비추어지기도 한다. 한국 정부는 2011년 스마트교육 정책을 통해 정보통신기술을 적극 공교육의 학교들로 끌어들여 교육을 혁신하고 인재대국을 건설하겠다고 발표했다. 스마트교육은 타블렛 PC나 노트북과 같은 기기를 활용하여 수업을 진행할 수 있는 표준 교실 모델을 정립해 각 학교에 확산, 정착시키고자 했다. 이 논문은 스마트교육 정책이 꿈꾸었던 스마트교실이 실제 교육 현장에서는 어떤 마찰을 일으켰는지 분석한다. 이를 위해 스마트교육 정책의 방향과 이상을 분석하고, 실제로 스마트한 교실 환경을 구축하고 있는 학교 세 곳에 방문해 시설 견학 및 심층 인터뷰를 수행했다. 스마트교육 정책이 제안한 이상적 교실은 모델하우스처럼 깔끔한 공간에 스마트폰처럼 다양한 기능을 한 번에 갖춘 패키지였지만 일상적으로 보통 교실처럼 활용되기 어려웠다. 각 학교는 모델을 수용하는 대신 규모, 지역 특성, 학생들과 교사의 사회경제적 상황, 교사의 경험, 기존 인프라의 유무 등의 요인들이 조합되는 방식에 따라 각자의 방식으로 "스마트"해졌다. A 초등학교에서는 기계가 학교의 공간을 길들여 자신만의 공간을 만들어내는 한편 이동을 위해서는 학교의 규칙에 따르게 되었다. B 초등학교에서는 학교 전반을 아우르는 인프라가 만들어지지는 못했지만 선생님의 경험에 힘입어 조직화했으며, C 초등학교에서는 특정 교실에 밀집되어 선생님의 전문성을 증진시켰다. 스마트교실의 구성하고 있던 기기들은 분해되고, 맥락에 맞게 재조합되어 각 학교의 교실들을 "스마트"하게 만들었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.334-346
• /
• 2012

For teachers' conceptions and understandings are critical to their decision making and classroom practice, this study attempts to understand pre-service elementary teachers' views and practices of science inquiry during peer teaching practice. Fifteen 4th year university students in teacher education program participated in peer teaching practice. Their teaching and reflective discussion were video and audio recorded and written lesson plans were collected for data analysis. Five science teacher educators individually looked into the data and shared their comments and interpretations on pre-service teachers' views and practice. The study findings suggest that pre-service teachers emphasized the importance of providing students with motivating resources in the beginning of lesson, employing certain inquiry teaching models, the process of predicting and dis/proving via experiment, and teachers' minimal intervention as the important features of inquiry teaching. Science teacher educators emphasized that it is critical to help children understand inquiry questions in the beginning of inquiry process, to be mindful of children's problem solving and critical thinking rather than following instruction models or simply going through prediction and test process. They also commented that teachers' guidance could lead a good inquiry process in classroom practice, not always interfering students' inquiry. Based on the findings, the study suggests science teacher educators need to understand what and how pre-service teachers view and practice science inquiry teaching and consider these as useful resources where they can start effective teaching for pre-service teachers at the university level.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.181-192
• /
• 2013

이 연구에서는 과학적 추론의 기본 논리 전개가 연역, 귀납, 귀추라는 관점을 토대로 초등과학 수업 담화에서 교사와 학생이 만들어가는 과학적 추론의 흐름의 양상을 탐색하였다. 3달에 걸친 13차시의 초등학교 4학년 활동 중심의 과학 수업 담화를 주 자료원으로 하여 과학적 추론의 흐름의 양상을 분석 및 해석한 결과, 총 3개의 과학적 추론의 양상이 나타났다. 연구 결과로서, 연역적 추론(담화 단편 1개), 귀납적 추론(담화 단편 1개), 귀추적 추론(귀추-연역적 추론, 담화 단편 2개)이 질적으로 해석되어 제시되었다. 연구의 결과는 첫째, 초등과학 담화에서 추론이 명시적이고 암시적으로 전개되고 있다는 경험적 자료를 제공하였다. 둘째, 교사와 학생의 상호주관성의 형성에 따라 추론의 완성도를 높일 수 있는 가능성을 보여주었다. 셋째, 학생의 추론 전개에서 추론 내용에 대한 배경 지식이 매우 중요하다는 점을 보여주었다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 과학 교육 및 연구에 대한 시사점과 제언이 논의되었다.