• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.5-22
• /
• 1994

1984년에 발행된 本誌 第6輯에 필자는 당시의 한국초록서비스의 技術現況에 대하여 조사한 결과를 발표한 바 있다. 그로부터 10년이 지난 금년에 필자는 다시 類似한 範圍와 內容의 조사를 행하여 한국초록서비스의 變化 또는 발전의 實相을 밝혀 보려고 한다. 금년 조사의 실제적 意圖는 초록서비스의 주요 道具인 이 나라 초록지의 발전과정을 10년이라는 비교적 긴 기간에 걸쳐서 觀察하고 그 持續的 특성이 어떤 것인지를 定義하려는 데 있다. 한 나라 초록지의 일반적 특성을 어느 해에 實行한 한번의 조사결과에 기초하여 定義하기는 어렵다. 韓國抄錄서비스의 기술현황을 조사한 결과 부분은 금년 여름 "한국문헌정보학회지" 발표하였으므로(최성진, 1994) 여기서는 지난 10년 동안에 관찰된 한국초록지의 일반적 특성에 대해서만 制限的으로 살펴보려고 한다. 그러나 本稿의 論議가 대부분 위의 記事와 같은 資料에 根據한 것이므로 그것을 참고하면 이해에 도움이 될 것이다. 硏究開發投資가 해마다 증가하여 최근 한국에는 많은 연구보고문헌 이 생산 축적되고 있지만 그것을 각분야 연구자와 기술자들에게 신속히 알려서 효과적으로 이용하게 해야 할 초록지는 그 種數도 적고 내용 또한 贊弱한 형편이다. 한국초록지의 내용을 충실히 하고 이용자 들에게 硏究速報媒體로서 더 유용하게 하려면 먼저 그 일반적 특성이 어떤 것이며 長點과 短點은 어떤 것인지를 定義할 필요가 있다. 本稿는 그러한 定義를 試圖하려는 것이다. 情報奉仕는 그것을 출현시킨 국가의 전통과 관습에 따라 조금씩 다른 모양으로 발전한다. 결과적으로 각국의 정보봉사나 그 도구인 초록지의 형태에도 多少間에 差異가 나타난다. 本稿는 그러한 觀點에서 世界의 普遍的 抄錄誌 形態에서 벗어나는 韓國抄錄誌의 特性을 밝히는 데 論議를 集中시키려고 한다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제24권
• /
• pp.9-51
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study is twofold: to investigate into general characteristics of the abstracting services in Korea and to discuss general directions of development of the abstracting services in the country. This study is designed to achieve the purpose by gathering and analysing data related to the abstracting journals published in the past ten years and by comparing the results with similar data gathered by the investigator in 1984. The major conclusions made in this study is summarised as follows. (1) Researchers and professionals working in limited numbers of subject fields are benefited by abstracting services of recent achievements in research and development in Korea. Those in most of the fields have essentially no abstracting services of such achievements. Even many researchers and professionals in the limited numbers of the fields that have some elementary abstracting services are not informed of research results in their fields because the abstracting journals are scattered in many narrow subjects and in many cases, the abstracting journals only cover publications in some specific forms and kinds. (2) Abstracting journals of general subjects, which are supposed to be of more or less help to the researchers in the subject fields that have no abstracting journals of their own, have rapidly increased in number in the past ten years. Most of such abstracting journals carry thesis and dissertation abstracts, and the rest those of research papers published in specific places, in specific forms, by specific institutes, and of reports of research projects sponsored by specific foundations. These abstracting journals are not of the kind that comprehensively provide general readers with current awareness of publications of research results in Korea. (3) Most of the abstracting journals existing in Korea are published by institutions of higher education and research institutes, and the rest by commercial publishers, industrial firms, libraries, information centers, government agencies, research foundations, learned societies, etc. Those which publish many titles are small in number and those publish one or two titles are large in number. The former is largely made up of institutions of higher education and research institutes. (4) Ten years ago, there was not a single publishing house that produced abstracting journals. Three commercial publishing houses now produce abstracting journals. As this change occurs, centers of excellence are founded and competitive elements are introduced in abstracting services. This change, in turn, is expected to improve quality of the other abstracting journals in Korea. (5) The abstracting journals published in Korea are classified by type into those of dissertations, research papers, journal articles, patent specifications in that descending order. The fact that Master's and doctoral dissertation abstracts are dominating in Korea is due to the irrational practice of publishing those abstracts at many institutions. (6) Most of the abstracting journals existing in Korea are published by national or government-supported research institutes in order to publicise their own research outputs. Their coverage of literature is normally narrow, and naturally their value to users is limited. (7) The abstracting journals published in Korea increased in number at the rate of $77.8-100\%$ every five years in the past twenty-five years. Most of the abstracting journals that ceased to be published during the period survived for two years. (8) Korean is the desirable language for the abstracting journals designed to be distributed within Korea. About half of the abstracting journals published in Korea is printed in Korean and the other half in foreign languages, and in Korean with foreign languages. All the abstracting journals in foreign languages are printed in English xcept one, which is printed in Japanese. (9) Some twenty percent of the abstracting journals in Korea is published monthly, bimonthly, and quarterly. Others are published annually, biannually, and irregularly. The latter may not function properly as a current-awareness tool due to long intervals between their issues. It is particularly undesirable that about half of the abstracting journals in Korea is published irregularly. Most of the abstracting journals published in Korea are distributed freely to individuals and institutions selected by the publishers. (10) The abstracting journals published by the use of computers increased drastically in the past ten years. The abstracting journals produced by the conventional type-setting method will probably disappear In Korea in another ten years to come. Automation of the production of abstracting journals does not simply mean technical, economic improvement of publishing processes but availability of machine-readable databases that can be used for other purposes, including the generation of other publications and the provision of machine literature searching capabilities. Necessary steps should be taken for this important development that is occurring in the abstracting services in Korea.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제3권
• /
• pp.287-316
• /
• 1999

Cyberspace permits us to more beyond traditional face-to-face, mail and telephone surveys, yet still to examine basic issues regarding the quality of data collection: sampling, questionnaire design, survey distribution, means of response, and database creation. This article address each of these issues by contrasting and comparing traditional survey methods(Paper-and-Pencil) with Internet or Personal Computer networks-mediated (Screen-and-Keyboard) survey methods also introduces researchers to this revolutionary and innovative tool and outlines a variety of practical methods for using the Internet or Personal Computer Networks. The revolution in telecommunications technology has fostered the rapid growth of the Internet all over the world. The Internet is a massive global network and comprising many national and international networks of interconnected computers. The Internet or Personal Computer Networks could be the comprehensive interactive tool that will facilitate the development of the skills. The Internet or Personal Computer Networks provides a virtual frontier to expand our access to information and to increase our knowledge and understanding of public opinion, political behavior, social trends and lifestyles through survey research. Comparable to other technological advancements, the Internet or Personal Computer Networks presents opportunities that will impact significantly on the process and quality of survey research now and in the twenty-first century. There are trade-offs between traditional and the Internet or Personal Computer Networks survey. The Internet or Personal Computer Networks is an important channel for obtaining information for target participants. The cost savings in time, efforts, and material were substantial. The use of the Internet or Personal Computer Networks survey tool will increase the quality of research environment. There are several limitations to the Internet or Personal Computer Network survey approach. It requires the researcher to be familiar with Internet navigation and E-mail, it is essential for this process. The use of Listserv and Newsgroup result in a biased sample of the population of corporate trainers. However, it is this group that participates in technology and is in the fore front of shaping the new organizations of interest, and therefore it consists of appropriate participants. If this survey method becomes popular and is too frequently used, potential respondents may become as annoyed with E-mail as the sometimes are with mail survey and junk mail. Being a member of the Listserv of Newsgroup may moderate that reaction. There is a need to determine efficient, effective ways for the researcher to strip identifiers from E-mail, so that respondents remain anonymous, while simultaneously blocking a respondent from responding to a particular survey instrument more than once. The optimum process would be on that is initiated by the researcher : simple, fast and inexpensive to administer and has credibility with respondents. This would protect the legitimacy of the sample and anonymity. Creating attractive Internet or Personal Computer Networks survey formats that build on the strengths of standardized structures but also capitalize on the dynamic and interactive capability of the medium. Without such innovations in survey design, it is difficult to imagine why potential survey respondents would use their time to answer questions. More must be done to create diverse and exciting ways of building an credibility between respondents and researchers on the Internet or Personal Computer Networks. We believe that the future of much exciting research is based in the Electronic survey research. The ability to communicate across distance, time, and national boundaries offers great possibilities for studying the ways in which technology and technological discourse are shaped. used, and disseminated ; the many recent doctoral dissertations that treat some aspect of electronic survey research testify to the increase focus on the Internet or Personal Computer Networks. Thus, scholars should begin a serious conversation about the methodological issues of conducting research In cyberspace. Of all the disciplines, Internet or Personal Computer Networks, emphasis on the relationship between technology and human communication, should take the lead in considering research in the cyberspace.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.239-252
• /
• 2008

2008년 2월말 현재 국내에서 가정과교육관련 박사학위 논문은 20편이 발표되었다. 이 연구의 목적은 가정과교육을 발전시키고 활성화시키기 위해서 지금까지 국내에서 발표된 가정과교육관련 박사학위 논문의 주제별, 방법별 연구 동향을 분석해 보고 이에 터하여 앞으로의 발전방향을 모색해 보고자 하는데 있다. 본 연구의 연구 대상은 2008년 4월 한 달간 국립중앙도서관, 국회도서관, 한국교육학술정보연구원, 가정교육전공 박사를 배출할 수 있는 고려대 동국대 서울대 중앙대 한국교원대학교 도서관 등의 홈페이지를 검색해서 나온 논문 중에서 일반적인 가정 내에서의 교육이나 일반 가정학 교과내용을 제외한 가정교육 학위논문 총 20편이다. 가정과교육 관련 박사논문의 연구주제는 가정과교육의 주요개념 및 관점, 가정과 교육과정, 가정과 교수 학습, 가정과 교사역량, 기타 5가지로 분류하였다. 가정과교육 관련 박사논문의 연구방법은 조사연구, 문헌연구, 사례연구, 교육자료 개발, 평가도구 개발, 측정, 적용 등으로 구분하여 살펴보았다. 본 연구의 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정과교육관련 박사학위 논문들은 교육과정에 제시된 목표나 성격을 규명하거나 교사의 역량 강화 등 가정과 교육의 정체성을 찾기 위한 주제가 많았다. 그 다음은 가정교과의 교육과정이나 교수 학습에 관한 주제가 뒤를 이었다. 둘째, 가정과교육관련 박사학위 논문에서 사용한 연구방법은 연구주제와 관련이 깊었다. 연구방법별 동향에서는 문헌연구와 조사연구가 가장 많았고, 자료개발이나 도구개발, 사례연구 등의 연구방법은 상대적으로 적은 부분을 차지하였다. 셋째, 연도별 경향을 보면 90년대 박사학위 관련 논문이 5편에 불과했으나 2000년 이후 현재까지 15편으로 증가하여 최근에 가정교육 관련 박사학위 논문이 양적으로 증가하고 있었다. 현재 박사학위 과정을 수료했거나 재학 중인 가정과 교사 수를 감안해 볼 때 가정과교육 박사학위 논문은 더욱 늘어날 것으로 전망된다. 지금까지 발표된 박사학위 논문을 정리한 이 연구 결과는 앞으로 진행될 학위논문 준비를 위한 기초자료로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.