• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2023년도 가을학술발표대회논문집
• /
• pp.55-56
• /
• 2023

The number of defect disputes occurring in apartment houses is increasing year by year, and among them, disputes caused by defects in tiles account for 28.2% of the total, which is an important defect in tiles. A representative tile defect in the defect dispute is the lack of tile backfill. Another dispute occurred that the standards for each organization are different as the 100% standard of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's building construction standard and 80% standard of the Architectural Institute of Korea's Building Technology Guidelines. In this study, it was analyzed the relationship between the amount of tile backfill and the amount of tile defects based on 100 defect litigation court appraisal documents. It was observed that the amount of defect in tile works tended to decrease as the amount of tile backfill increased. By presenting an appropriate amount of mortar to fill behind tiles in a defect dispute, the effect of reducing the defect dispute can be expected.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to contribute to solution of the defect dispute in apartment house in advance. We want to propose the improved devices in defect problems by investigating the money that exacted from the practical business of the inspection company and the money that a judge gave a decision in a civil court in 50 cases of the lawsuit to requesting the guarantee against defects and the improved schemes of the applied rate by analyzing the diagnosis money of each applied years about the term of warranty liability in 40 cases of the lawsuit separately from that. As the result, we have to reflect the defect of non construction and error construction on apartment building defects, which recognizes very important factor when we compute the defect repair warranty money and it needs to be rearranged the applied ratio in guarantee peried of housing law practically.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2017년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.146-147
• /
• 2017

Recently, as the living standards of residents in apartment houses continued to improve, the dispute of post management have also increased. one of the Issue, Concrete Cracks comprised high percentage of dispute. Especially, between criteria the cost of repairing defect and the judgement of defect isn't clear, they are a lot of dispute in this regard. Even though lots of the criteria about Inter-layer crack is existed by judging defects, In a court, they are judging their own criteria about Inter-layer crack. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze Defect Judement Standard both MOLIT and Court, and to provide the Improvement for Defect Judgement and Repair Method of Inter-layer concrete crack.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.137-158
• /
• 2003

The rapid growth of electronic commerce increases the potential for conflicts over contracts which have been entered into online(e.g. about price, late delivery, defects, specifications...). Using arbitration as a dispute resolution alternative is becoming increasingly popular especially in cases involving intellectual property rights and technology disputes since speed and secrecy are essential. The use of online dispute resolution(ODR) mechanisms to resolve such e-commerce conflicts is crucial for building business, consumer confidence and permitting access to justice in an online business environment. However, the use of the Internet and the World Wide Web in dispute resolution has an impact on the types of communication implied in the relevant processes(negotiation, mediation and arbitration). This paper deals with legal issues with respect to the practice of online arbitration. The paper begins with a brief introduction to the theories behind arbitration. These sections will be followed by a discussion on the specifics of online arbitration and the problems the process faces online arbitration by the legal community.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2021년도 가을 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.200-201
• /
• 2021

According to the dispute cases filed for claiming the collective defect repair fees, inter-layer concrete joints turned out to be the most frequently disputed item. For this reason, this study selects the inter-layer concrete joints to further analyze the primary causes and details of each dispute case. From the results of this study, three primary causes of the disputes are found, which are 1) the absence of standard specifications for construction quality control and management after construction; 2) the absence of established standards for repair when construction defects are found. In order to prevent construction defects in inter-layer concrete joints, this study provides three suggestions including 1) the current standard specifications for inter-layer concrete joints should be further specified by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2) a construction defect should be judged according to the compliance to the standard specifications; and 3) a clear and institutional protocol needs to be established for defect repair in cases that new public apartment houses have been judged to have defects.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.81-91
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 조경공사 하자판례를 조사하여 하자소송의 일반적 분석, 공종별 판결 결과, 하자유형별 판결결과를 분석하고 하자분쟁을 완화하기 위한 조경공사 하자처리 개선방안을 제안하는 것이다. 본 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 2000년대 들어 조경공사와 관련된 하자소송이 증가하고 있으며, 소송 기간은 1심의 경우 603일, 2심의 경우는 550일로 나타나 사용자와 시공자 모두에게 심각한 시간적 경제적 손실을 초래하고 있다. 2. 감정금액 대비 인용금액이 1심의 경우 52.0%, 2심의 경우 57.3%, 전체적으로는 53.6% 수준으로 감정금액이 과다하게 책정되는 경향이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 공종별 하자판결 결과는 조경수목식재가 전체 하자 발생 공종의 75%에 달하여 주요한 쟁점으로 나타났으며, 사용자인 원고의 승소율이 77%에 달하여 시공자들의 하자이행에 심각한 부담으로 나타났다. 4. 하자유형별 판결 결과에서는 사용자의 유지관리 부실로 인한 하자가 28%를 차지하고 시공자인 피고의 승소율이 64%로 높게 나타나 사용자의 유지관리 책임이 중요하게 부각되었다. 이러한 문제를 개선하기 위해서는 하자를 줄일 수 있도록 정확한 시공을 하고, 적절한 유지관리를 시행하도록 해야 하며, 부적기 식재 및 천재지변에 의한 피해 등 하자면책규정, 공종별 하자판정기준, 하자이행절차 등을 포함하는 조경공사 하자판정 및 처리기준을 마련해야 한다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.629-635
• /
• 2011

Retentions are generally considered to be intended to act as a powerful tool to incentivize contractors/subcontractors to remedy defective work in cases of non-performance. This study attempts to establish the extent to which retentions can be used for this purpose by investigating case law connected with insurance and defective work. One of the significant questions is whether retentions are sufficient to deal with construction defects or value of retentions in the rectification of defects is illusory. The cost to repair a defect may vary depending on a number of components including type, cause, magnitude and the construction stage at which the defect occurs. It is expected that a review of existing cases on defective workmanship will provide an insight on the issues and whether retentions are effective in their intended function. In order to establish their functionality, the study described in this paper investigated 6 construction insurance cases to identify the critical issues and the causes of dispute. It was found that the nature and the cause of defects were different in each case. It was also established that certain defect types not covered by insurance may be covered by retentions - potentially one of the key uses of a retention strategy. It is expected that the findings will assist in forming a view on the quantum of money that may be required paving the way for a first time understanding on a rational basis for setting up retention regime.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.71-94
• /
• 2020

When a dispute or conflict occurs, standard methods for resolving them include resolution by trial or resolutions outside of courts. An alternative dispute resolution method called ADR that aims at remedying disputes instead of filing lawsuits is used commonly throughout the world, including the US and China. ADR, which is a remedy method outside of courts, includes negotiation, arbitration, or mediation between the concerned parties, and the arbitration system has several advantages. The Lemon Law is a consumer protection law of the United States that was enacted in 1975. This law prescribes that when specified quality standards are not met repeatedly due to defects in vehicles or electronic products, the manufacturer must provide exchanges or refunds to consumers. Korea also enacted a newly revised automobile management act, the Korea "Lemon Law," on January 1, 2019, which allows consumers to receive exchanges or refunds from the manufacturer if the same malfunction repeatedly occurs after purchasing a new automobile. There have recently been many cases of large fires occurring while driving import vehicles, causing huge public rage; therefore, interest is being focused on the revised automobile management act. Part 5-2 of the automobile management act was newly added to implement automobile exchange or refund arbitration systems. It is desirable to utilize the arbitration system to smoothly resolve automobile-related disputes that have recently increased significantly, and it is thus being used frequently for practical purposes.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2016년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.263-264
• /
• 2016

Since 2000s in Korea, apartment building tended to become goods or assets rather than houses. Therefore, conflicts between supplier and consumer were aggravated, and the defect dispute has been increased rapidly. This dispute enlarges to defect lawsuit and it is social and economical matter. The landscape work in apartment building is main work for a resident that appearance and convenient facility which lawn, tree, fountain, chair, playground, and etc. A number of defects surround landscape work are important issue in defect lawsuit, but, a related research is a minority, and a regulation is incomplete. Therefore, this study is basic study for standard of landscape defect type. As case study on defect lawsuit, draw a landscape defect type in apartment building.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.129-139
• /
• 2021

신축 공동주택 보급률이 상승하면서 입주민 개인별 자산의 관리적 측면과 함께 품질에 관한 관심이 높아져 공동주택 품질과 관련된 분쟁이 급격하게 증가되고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 분쟁을 저감할 목적으로 관리주체가 제소하는 집단하자보수비 청구 소송을 확인하여 가장 빈번하게 분쟁이 발생된 콘크리트의 층간이음부와 관련하여 각 사건별로 층간이음부가 차지하는 비중과 쟁점을 분석하였다. 그 결과 분쟁 발생의 원인에는 첫째, 표준시방서가 부재한 점, 둘째, 보수공법에 대한 표준이 없는 점, 셋째, 공동주택의 공통적인 사항이나 법원에서는 이를 관대한 개념에서 배상 범위를 인정하고 있는 점에 있음이 확인되었다. 이에, 하자예방을 위해서는 첫째, 층간이음부 시공에 대한 국토교통부의 표준시방서가 개정되어야하고, 둘째, 표준시방서 이행 여부에 따라 하자판정이 진행되어야 하며, 셋째, 하자로 판정 시 명확한 하자보수공법이 적용될 수 있는 제도개선이 필요한 부분임을 확인할 수 있었다.