• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.147-169
• /
• 2009

This paper deals with disputes incurred from the CISG provisions in relation with the conformity of goods with a view to finding the general way of approach made by the court and arbitration tribunal in the case laws for the interpretation of CISG based on 6(six) cases thereon. Throughout this study, it has been noted that the German Supreme Court devoted most in creating the general principle of CISG interpretation in relation with national compulsory law of regulation applicable on the conformity of goods. It was New Zealand mussels case in which the German supreme court decided that the exporting country's compulsory law of regulation would be applied in determining the conformity of goods. Furthermore, German supreme court added that CISG does not place an obligation on the exporter to supply goods, which conform to all statutory or other public provisions in force in the import state unless the same provisions exist in the export State as well, or the importer informed the exporter about such provisions existing in the import state, or the exporter had knowledge of the provisions due to special circumstances. It is stipulated in CISG that the goods conform with contract if they are fit for the purpose for which goods of the same description would ordinarily be used. When questions arise concerning matters governed by the CISG that are not expressly defined in the CISG, the question is to be settled in conformity with general principles on which the convention is based. Only when such a general principle cannot be found may the tribunal turn to other sources such as UNIDROIT Principles, Principles of European Contract Law and Lex Mercatoria, etc. Interpretation of CISG should be autonomous, in the sense that it should not depend on principles and concepts derived from any national legal system. Even where a CISG rule is directly inspired by domestic law, the court should not fall back on its domestic law, but interpret the rule by reference to the CISG with a view to its international character and to the need to promote uniformity in its application and the observance of good faith in international trade.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.45-62
• /
• 2006

This research is carried out to inspect the Apartment Management System of Japan, to examine the similarities and differences between the Korean Apartment Management System and the Japanese Apartment Management System. First, as the basis law of apartment management, there exists the Building Unit Ownership Act, the Promotion Law fur Adequate Mansion Management of Japan, the Housing Law, Housing Execution Law and Rule of Korea. Second, the Association of Apartment Owners, an organization of owners of apartments in Japan and the Commission of the Representatives of the Occupants in Korea become the subject of maintenance. The Japan structure is made of the Assembly, the Director and the President. The Korean structure is made of Regular and Temporary Conferences and elected Officers(1 president, at least 2 directors and at least 1 inspector). The Commission of the Representatives of the Occupants and the Organization of Owners of Apartments make bylaws and diverse maintenance rules. Third, the foremost reason why the Korean structure of maintenance of apartments is less efficient than Japan is because of the small number of people dispatched to the living-environment maintenance team and their short terms. It is necessary to grow professionals related to this sector and to have enough public servants that specialize in this. Fourth, although it is compulsory to make long term plans for maintenance based on the Housing Law, because the reserve fund is decided by the maintenance rule(with no compulsory standards of reservation) of each apartment, it is difficult to reserve an adequate amount of reserve fund. So as in the example of the state of Hawaii in America, based on long term plans for maintenance, an execution rule of the Housing Law should be made which enforces to reserve at least 50 percent of future maintenance expenses.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.343-405
• /
• 2009

This paper is to discuss essential business of hospital business. While the labor world and ILO made continuous recommendation for improvements towards the compulsory arbitration system along with the controversy over unconstitutionality of the system, the Constitutional Court ruled that the system is constitutional on December 23, 1996(90hunba19) and on May 15, 2003 (2001hunga31). Despite this decision from the Constitutional Court, there has been much controversy over whether the compulsory arbitration system infringes the rights of collective action against the principle of trade union & labor relations adjustment which allows Commissioner of the Labor Relations Commission to decide on submission of arbitration by virtue of his/her authority in case where industrial disputes take place in the essential public-service businesses. The revision on the above provision was closely examined from the year 2003 and an agreement was made on the abolition of the compulsory arbitration system and the introduction of essential business with a grand compromise among labor unions, employers and the government on September 11, 2006 followed by revision(Essential business system enacted on January 1, 2008) of the Trade Union & Labor Relations Adjustment Act on December 30 in the same year. Accordingly, in order to perform the essential business, parties to labor relations must have an agreement or obtain a decision by the Labor Relations Commission before taking industrial actions. This paper firstly examined the concept of essential public-service businesses and essential business, legal meaning of essential business, procedures for making agreement and decision and legal effects. Secondly it intensively explored a theory against the principle of the legality which was raised from some part of society. In other words, it is claimed that a theory against the principle of the legality is not consistent with the rule of legislation and some abstract wording is against void for vagueness doctrine because part of crime constitution requirements is delegated to the Presidential Decree or to consultation among parties to labor relations. But analysis on the rule of legislation and void for vagueness doctrine reflected in the decision by the Constitutional Court led that argument for a theory against the principle of the legality is not reasonable. Close examination was done on a formal act of essential business agreement and necessity of prior agreement before submission of decision to the Labor Relations Commission which might have difficulties in performing work. In addition, an example agreement on hospital essential business is attached to help you understand this paper better.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.163-177
• /
• 2020

There are several ways to implement charter parties in the operation of the vessel. Under the time charter party, the charterer borrows the vessel from the shipowner and uses the vessel to benefit his business. The time charter party's legal relationship can be divided into internal and external relationships. This article deals with an internal relationship. The legal matters between the shipowner and charterer are regulated by the agreement. The NYPE is the most widely circulated type of time charter party. According to the NYPE, navigational matters fall upon the shipowner while business matter falls upon the time charterer. There are vague parts in interpreting NYPE articles. NYPE Art. 8, called the employment clause, is one of them. The Master employed by the shipowner should follow the order of the charterer. Whether the charterer has the right to order the Master of the vessel to follow the navigating route recommended by him was addressed in the Hill Harmony case by the UK Supreme Court. The court was affirmative. Under the Ocean Victory case, whether the time charterer has an obligation to order the Master to go out to escape heavy weather from the berth at the port was at issue. The Japanese lower court decided negatively. There is a tendency that many countries insert default rule in the maritime law to apply it to the case at issue in a case where there is no agreement. It serves the enhancement of legal stability; China, Japan, and Germany are such countries. The author thinks that Korea should follow the above three countries' revision of their maritime law.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.167-198
• /
• 2011

최근 우리나라는 2020년 Business-As-Usual(BAU) 대비 30%를 감축하는 탄소배출 감축안을 목표로 설정하였다. 탄소배출 감축목표 달성의 한 방편으로 탄소배출권 거래제가 논의되고 있는 상황이지만, 탄소배출권 거래제를 실시하기 위해서는 가장 먼저 초기 탄소배출권의 배분문제가 해결되어야 한다. 본 연구에서는 탄소배출권 초기배분방식 결정이 우리 경제에 어떠한 영향을 미칠 수 있는가를 중심으로 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 협조적 게임이론인 bankruptcy problem에서의 배분방법을 적용해 배출권을 각 산업별로 배분하였다. 산업별 이산화탄소 배출량은 에너지 통계와 산업연관표를 결합한 하이브리드 산업연관표를 이용해 추계하였다. 세 가지 분배방법에 따른 경제적 파급효과 분석에는 녹색성장회계(green growth accounting) 방식이 적용되었다. 분석결과, 2005년~2007년 기간 동안 우리나라의 연평균 경제성장률은 약 4.36%로 추계되는데, Proportional rule에 의한 배분에 의하면 4.03%, Constrained Equal Awards rule에 의한 배분에서는 4.23%, 마지막으로 Constrained Equal Losses rule에 의한 배분으로는 3.67%로 추산되었다. 따라서 경제성장률 측면에서 보면 Constrained Equal Awards rule에 의한 초기 탄소배출권 배분이 가장 바람직한 것으로 분석된다. 이처럼 초기 배출권의 산업별 배분방식이 어떻게 결정되느냐에 따라 경제에 미치는 파급효과가 매우 상이하게 나타나기 때문에 탄소배출권 도입 및 시행을 위해서는 산업 수준의 연구결과를 반영해야 하며, 각 산업의 특성을 고려해야 할 것으로 보인다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.481-498
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 우리나라 고등학교 수학과 교육과정 개선을 위해 일본, 대만, 홍콩, 핀란드, 중국의 고등학교 수학과 교육과정을 분석하여 시사점을 도출하였다. 수학교육의 목표 측면에서는 논리적 사고, 수학의 활용, 수학적 탐구의 인지적 목표와 자신감과 용기, 성취감, 수학의 가치에 대한 정의적 목표를 교육과정에서 선정하는 것을 고려할 수 있었다. 고등학교 과목의 이수 경로는 진로에 따른 선택 과목 구성이나 과목 간 계열 설정을 생각해볼 수 있었다. 교육내용 측면에서는 외국의 필수 내용이지만 우리나라 교육과정에서 누락된 삼각함수 공식이나 상관관계를 우리나라에서도 다루는 방안을 고려해볼 수 있었다. 마지막으로 문서 체제에서 교육 내용의 범위와 설명을 친절하게 하고 교육과정 모형을 시각화하여 제시하는 방안을 제안하였다.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.59-81
• /
• 2020

Purpose - This study analyzes the scope of due diligence and risks of banks and K-Sure in trade finance covered by EFF focusing on Moneual case, one of the latest and biggest trade finance fraud cases in Korea. Also, we suggest anti-fraud measures in trade finance on the part of banks and K-Sure in order to give them a desirable way of due diligence and reasonable risk management of export insurance. Design/methodology - Based on Moneual case of trade finance fraud, this study employs the methodology of an extended literature review and analysis of court decisions. Findings - Seoul High Court of Korea failed to decide whether K-Sure was wholly obliged to pay the insurance against the banks' EFF claims, but issued a compulsory mediation order, judging that both the banks and K-Sure were responsible by 50:50. The court may have judged that both the parties had lacked their due diligence in the trade finance. It is quite difficult for trade finance providers to manually investigate whether the transaction is suspected of trade finance fraud, so digitalization of trade finance which can facilitate the prevention and detection of trade fraud needs to be realized quickly. Since there has been no international rule available for open account trade finance up till now, clearly stipulated EFF terms on the exporter's genuine export obligation might have protected K-Sure from the disaster. Originality/value - This study investigates the due diligence of the banks and K-Sure in Moneual case which few researchers have considered, to the best of our knowledge. This study also suggests several practical methods (including block chain) to prevent complicating trade finance fraud amid increasing use of an open account, and further offers reasonable risk management of EFF employing international factoring rule which is also related to problematic open account trade finance.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.143-152
• /
• 2012

조달청은 2016년부터 공공공사 전 사업으로 BIM 발주를 확대할 계획이어서 BIM 설계의 중요성이 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라, BIM 설계의 품질을 확보하는 방안 법규검토의 중요성 또한 증가하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 장애인 노인 임산부 등의 편의증진보장에 관한 법률을 대상으로 실무의 건축계획 과정에서 빈번하게 검토되는 항목을 중심으로 최적화된 룰셋 정의서를 개발하였다. 법규조항을 선정하는 과정으로는 프로젝트 법규검토서를 활용한 빈도 분석, 함수화 가능도 분석, 모델 검토 가능성 분석을 제시하였다. 모델 검토 시나리오 작성에 따라 룰셋 정의서를 개발하였으며, 실제 프로젝트에서 구현을 통해 적용성 및 정합성 분석을 수행하였다. 본 연구를 수행한 결과, 자동법규검토에서는 경제성 및 활용성을 확보할 수 있는 항목의 선정이 중요함을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후 연구에서는 대상 법규 조항 선정의 항목 세분화가 필요하며, 실무자 검증을 통해 좀 더 실질적인 항목 도출이 요구된다. 또한 자동법규검토에서 발생할 수 있는 모델링 요구사항, 소프트웨어 간 호환성 문제 등의 변수를 확인하고 룰셋의 논리를 검증하는 사례 연구가 수행되어야 한다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.394-398
• /
• 2019

Education on the physician continues with undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, and continuous medical education. The countries such as the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, German, and others are required to undergo training in the clinical field for 2 years after completing the national medical examination, and to become doctors after passing the clinical practice license test. Korea can obtain a medical license and become a clinical doctor at the same time if it passes written and practical tests after completing 6 years of undergraduate medical education or 4 years of graduate school. About 90% of medical school graduates replace clinical practice with 4-5 years of training to acquire professional qualifications, but this is an option for individual doctors rather than an extension of the licensing system under law. The medical professional qualification system is implemented by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on the regulation. In fact, under the supervision of the government, the Korean Hospital Association, the Korean Medical Association, and the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences progress most procedures. After training and becoming a specialist, the only thing that is given to a specialist is the right to mark him or her as a specialist in marking a medical institution and advertising. The government's guidelines for professional training are too restrictive, such as the recruitment method of residents, annual training courses of residents, dispatch rule of the residents, and the quota of residents of training hospitals. Although professional training systems are operated in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, most of them are organized and operated by public professional organizations and widely recognize the autonomy of academic institutions and hospitals. Korea should also introduce a compulsory education system after graduating from medical education and organize and initiate by autonomic public professional organization that meets global standards.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.111-130
• /
• 2014

상법 제742조 제2항은 피해자 보호를 위해 책임보험계약의 경우 보험자에 대한 제3자의 직접청구권을 전면 허용하고 있다. 한편 선주는 선박의 운항과정에서 발생될 수 있는 각종 책임과 비용을 담보받기 위하여 선주상호보험조합과 선주상호보험계약을 체결하게 되는데, 본 계약규정에는 제3자의 직접청구권을 배제하는 소위, 선지급조항이 규정되어 있다. 최근 서울중앙지방법원은, 화주에게 보험금을 지급하고 대위권을 취득한 적하보험자가 선주상호보험조합을 상대로 직접청구권을 행사한 사안에서, 상법상 선지급조항의 효력에 대한 판단을 내렸다. 동 법원은 제3자의 직접청구권은 피보험자인 선주의 선주상호보험조합에 대한 보험금청구권이 아니라 제3자가 선주상호보험조합에 대하여 가지는 손해배상청구권이며, 상법 제742조 제2항에 규정된 직접청구권은 피해자 보호를 위해 인정된 강행규정이므로 이를 배제하는 보험계약규정상 선지급조항은 무효라고 판시하였다. 이번 판결은 하급심 판결이면서 분쟁금액도 소액이지만, 피해자이자 제3자인 화물이해관계자가 선주의 책임보험자인 선주상호보험조합에 대하여 직접청구권을 행사할 수 있는지와 선주상호보험조합이 피해자에게 책임보험계약상 각종 항변권을 주장할 수 있는지에 대한 최초의 판결로서 학계와 실무계에 시사하는 바가 크다. 따라서 본 논문의 목적은 해상보험업계에서 지도적 위치에 있는 영국법과 비교 분석을 통해 선주상호보험조합에 대한 적하보험자의 직접청구권의 법적 성질과 선지급조항의 효력이 주된 쟁점이 되었던 서울중앙법원 판결의 타당성을 평가하고, 향후 법률상 분쟁을 예방하기 위한 상법의 개정방향을 제시하는 것이다. 본 논문은 제3자의 직접청구권은 보험금청구권이므로 선지급조항이 유효하다는 입장에서 대상판결을 비판하고, 상법도 직접청구권이 보험금청구권이라는 점을 명확히 하도록 개정되어야 한다고 주장한다.