• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2020년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.117-118
• /
• 2020

The masonry structure is constructed by cement mortar binding material of brick objects and uses reinforced hardware (connected hardware or wall tie) together when building. However, over time, the corrosion of reinforced steel and the deterioration of joint mortar as well as bricks cause the risk of collapse. In particular, when the externally decorated brick wall is installed on the concrete girder for each floor, the angle bracket is not constructed or corroded, the full-layer weight load is applied to the wall of 0.5B, which is an example of full-scale or collapse. The purpose of this study is to provide numerical information on the reinforcement design by experimentally studying the structural performance of concrete reinforcement brackets that reinforce the vertical load of the exterior wall.

• 한국정밀공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정밀공학회 2012년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.985-986
• /
• 2012

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.64-68
• /
• 1975

• 한국정밀공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정밀공학회 2011년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1119-1120
• /
• 2011

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2016

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the static (SFF) and kinetic frictional forces (KFF) in sliding mechanics of hybrid bracket systems that involve placing a conventional bracket (CB) or active self-ligating bracket (ASLB) on the maxillary anterior teeth (MXAT) and a passive SLB (PSLB) on the maxillary posterior teeth (MXPT). Methods: The samples consisted of two thoroughbred types (group 1, anterior-CB + posterior-CB; group 2, anterior-ASLB + posterior-ASLB) and four hybrid types (group 3, anterior-CB + posterior-PSLB-type 1; group 4, anterior-CB + posterior-PSLB-type 2; group 5, anterior-ASLB + posterior-PSLB-type 1; group 6, anterior-ASLB + posterior-PSLB-type 2) (n = 13 per group). After maxillary dentition alignment and maxillary first premolars removal in the stereolithographically-made typodont system, a $0.019{\times}0.025$-inch stainless steel wire was drawn through the right quadrant of the maxillary arch at 0.5 mm/min for 5 min. The SFF and KFF were measured with a mechanical testing machine and statistical analyses were performed. Results: Four different categories of SFF and KFF were observed among all groups (all p < 0.001). Group 1 demonstrated the highest SFF and KFF; groups 4 and 3 were second and third highest, respectively. The fourth category included groups 2, 5, and 6. Placing PSLBs on the MXPT resulted in significant SFF and KFF reductions in cases with CBs on the MXAT, but not in cases with ASLBs on the MXAT. Conclusions: These data might aid in the development of a hybrid bracket system that enables low-friction sliding of an archwire through the MXPT.

• 한국강구조학회 논문집
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.563-572
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 편심 브라켓이 설치된 온도프리스트레싱 강재보의 하중저항 성능에 관한 실험적 연구이다. 본 연구에서 제안한 강재보는 편심 브라켓을 이용하여 온도프리스트레싱 강판을 편심 설치하여, 기존 온도프리스트레싱 강재보 보다 도입되는 프리스트레스 및 단면강성을 증대 할 수 있다. 제안하고자 하는 공법의 검증을 위하여 편심 브라켓이 설치된 강재보, 온도프리스트레싱 강재보 등에 대한 정적하중 재하시험을 실시하여 강재보의 하중저항 성능을 비교 평가하였다. 또한 재료비선형성을 고려한 강재보의 구조해석을 실시하고 소성이론에 근거한 극한하중평가를 통하여 실험결과의 타당성 및 실설계에 대한 적용성을 검토하였다. 본 연구결과를 통하여 편심 브라켓이 설치된 온도프리스트레싱 강재보가 기존 온도프리스트레싱 강재보 보다 증가된 보강강판의 편심효과로 강성, 항복하중 및 극한하중이 모두 증가됨을 확인하였다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.1495-1501
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 동력전달 장치인 추진축이 차량 주행중 상하운동에 따라 생기는 자재이음의 내구성에 대한 강도 해석을 하였다. 유니버설 조인트에서의 최대 등가 응력과 전변형량은 요크 부분에서 $1.3177{\times}10^3$Pa및 $3.6148{\times}10^{-4}$m로 크게 나타났다. 'SAE bracket', 'SAE transmission' 및 Sample history'의 불규칙 피로 하중들 중에서는 하중의 변화가 극심한 SAE bracket'의 경우가 사용 가능 수명이 15951 Cycle 정도로 가장 짧은 것을 볼 수가 있고 하중의 변화가 가장 완만한 Sample history'에서 사용가능 수명이 $2{\times}10^7$ Cycle 정도로 가장 긴 것을 알 수 있었다. 피로 하중의 빈도수로서는 SAE Bracket history'가 80% 정도로서 가장 높게 나타나 파손의 가능성이 큼을 알 수 있었고 Sample history'가 5%로서 가장 낮게 나타났다. 그리고 구속 조건을 가하여 한 Harmonic response 해석에서의 최대 변위는 58Hz에서 일어났다. 이러한 진동수에서의 최대 변위는 0.00261m가 되었다. 본 연구의 결과를 종합하여 동력전달 장치인 추진축에 응용한다면 그 파손 방지 및 내구성을 예측하는데 활용이 클 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제49권2호
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2019

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the static (SFF) and kinetic frictional forces (KFF) of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket (CAD/CAM-LB) with those of conventional LB (Con-LB) and Con-LB with narrow bracket width (Con-LB-NBW) under 3 tooth displacement conditions. Methods: The samples were divided into 9 groups according to combinations of 3 LB types (CAD/CAM-LB [Incognito], Con-LB [7th Generation, 7G], and Con-LB-NBW [STb]) with 3 displacement conditions (no displacement [control], maxillary right lateral incisor with 1-mm palatal displacement [MXLI-PD], and maxillary right canine with 1-mm gingival displacement [MXC-GD]; n = 6/group). While drawing a 0.016-inch copper or super-elastic nickel-titanium archwire with 0.5 mm/min for 5 minutes in a chamber maintained at $36.5^{\circ}C$, SFF and KFF were measured. The Kruskal-Wallis method with Bonferroni correction was performed. Results: The Incognito group demonstrated the highest SFF, followed by the 7G and STb groups ([STb-control, STb-MXLI-PD, Stb-MXC-GD] < [7G-MXC-GD, 7G-MXLI-PD, 7G-control] < [Incognito-MXLI-PD, Incognito-control, Incognito-MXC-GD]; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in SFF among the 3 displacement conditions within each bracket group. Within each displacement condition, the Incognito group demonstrated the highest KFF, followed by the 7G and STb groups ([STb-control, STb-MXLI-PD] < Stb-MXC-GD < 7G-MXLI-PD < [7G-control, 7G-MXC-GD] < [7G-MXC-GD, Incognito-MXLI-PD, Incognito-control] < [Incognito-control, Incognito-MXC-GD]; p < 0.001). MXC-GD exhibited higher KFFs than MXLI-PD in the same bracket group. Conclusions: The slot design and ligation method of the CAD/CAM-LB system should be modified to reduce SFF and KFF during the leveling/alignment stage.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.270-281
• /
• 2021

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the changes in friction between orthodontic brackets and archwires coated with aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), titanium nitride (TiN), or chromium nitride (CrN). In addition, the resistance of the coatings to intraoral conditions was evaluated. Methods: Stainless steel canine brackets, 0.016-inch round nickel-titanium archwires, and 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwires were coated with Al₂O₃, TiN, and CrN using radio frequency magnetron sputtering. The coated materials were examined using scanning electron microscopy, an X-ray diffractometer, atomic force microscopy, and surface profilometry. In addition, the samples were subjected to thermal cycling and in vitro brushing tests, and the effects of the simulated intraoral conditions on the coating structure were evaluated. Results: Coating of the metal bracket as well as nickel-titanium archwire with Al₂O₃ reduced the coefficients of friction (CoFs) for the bracket-archwire combination (p < 0.01). When the bracket and stainless steel archwire were coated with Al₂O₃ and TiN, the CoFs were significantly lower (0.207 and 0.372, respectively) than that recorded when this bracket-archwire combination was left uncoated (0.552; p < 0.01). The friction, thermal, and brushing tests did not deteriorate the overall quality of the Al₂O₃ coatings; however, some small areas of peeling were evident for the TiN coatings, whereas comparatively larger areas of peeling were observed for the CrN coatings. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the CoFs for metal bracket-archwire combinations used in orthodontic treatment can be decreased by coating with Al₂O₃ and TiN thin films.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제29권5호
• /
• pp.599-611
• /
• 1999

금속 브라켓의 결합강도에 영향을 미치는 요소인 브라켓 기저부의 형태와 결합 부위에 적용되는 힘의 특성에 대해 알아보고자 연구를 시행하였다. 형태가 다른 5종의 금속브라켓의 기저부와 결합강도 측정후 접착파절양상을 stereoscope and scanning electron microscope를 통해 관찰하고 결합 부위에 적용되는 힘은 전단결합강도, 인장결합강도, 전단/인장복합결합강도로 구분하고 결합강도를 비교하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 브라켓 기저부 형태에 따른 모든 군에서 전단결합강토(SBS)가 제일 컸으며, 인장결합강도(TBS)는 SBS의 50%정도 수준이었고 전단/인장복합결합강도(S/TBS)는 전단결합강도(SBS)의 30%정도이었다. 2. 브라켓의 결합강도는 Micro-Loc base가 가장 크고($SBS:22.86{\pm}1.37kgf,\;TBS:11.37{\pm}1.43kgf,\;S/TBS:6.69{\pm}0.34kgf$), Integral base가 가장 작았다($SBS:10.52{\pm}1.27kgf,\;TBS:4.27{\pm}1.08kgf,\;S/TBS:2.94{\pm}0.58kgf). 3. 단위면적당 결합강도 비교시, Integral base가 가장 작았고(p<0.05), 전단결합강도와 인장결합강도에서는 Micro-Loc과 Chessboard base간의 차이가 없었으며 (p>0.05), Non-Etched Foil Mesh와 Micro-Etched Foil Mesh base간의 전단결합강도와 인장결합강도는 차이가 없었으나, 전단/인장복합결합강도에서는 Micro-Etched Foil Mesh base가 Non-Etched Foil Mesh base보다 더 크게 나타났다. 4. 전단, 인장, 전단/인장복합결합강도 측정후 접착파절은 브라켓/레진 계면에서 일어나 ARI score가 작게 나타났다.