• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.485-491
• /
• 1998

한국 생물 영재 학생들의 국제적 수준과 생물 영재 교육 프로그램의 필요성을 탐색하기 위하여 전국 각 고등학교 대표 학생들 중 선발된 30명과 국제생물올림피아드 참가 학생간의 성적을 비교하였다. 이론 분야를 세포 생물학, 식물 해부 및 생리학, 동물 해부 및 생리학, 행동학, 유전과 진화, 생태학, 분류학 및 미생물학 등 8개 영역으로 구분하여 1998년 1월과 3월, 2회에 걸쳐 이론 평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과 한국 생물 영재 학생들은 생물 전 영역에 걸쳐 국제생물올림피아드 참가자보다 성적이 낮은 것으로 나타났으며, 특히 행동학과 분류학 영역에서 크게 뒤떨어지는 것으로 조사되었다. 한국대표 급 상위 4명은 동메달 수상 수준에 해당하였으나, 행동학과 분류학 영역에서는 메달 수상자보다 훨씬 뒤떨어지는 것으로 나타났다. 그러므로 생물 영재 학생들을 위한 이론 강의와 탐구적 활동을 포함한 교육 프로그램이 필요하다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.142-152
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to identify the differences in eye movement pattern shown in shown in classification process between the scientifically gifted and general students in elementary schools. The subjects for the research consisted of 16 gifted students in special education center for the gifted at Seoul National University of Education and 22 general students at G elementary schools. The tasks consisted of four hierarchical biology classification tasks and one non-hierarchical tasks. SMI's Eye Tracker (iView $X^{TM}$ RED) was used to collect eye movement data while the Begaze software analyzed the task performing process and eye movements. The findings of this study were twofold. First, there was a significant difference in students' fixation duration by students' academic achievement level. Gifted students spent little time on scanning details and found the features successfully. Second, the process of the classification is different by students' academic achievement. General students spent more time to gaze the salient features not relevant features. They had a difficulty to find the element to classify.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.369-381
• /
• 2020

This study aims to analyse the relationship between multiple intelligence and scientific creativity of science-gifted elementary students focusing on the subject of biology. For this, 37 science-gifted fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center at an Office of Education conducted a multiple intelligence test. In addition, researchers collected science-gifted students' results of scientific creativity activity at the botanical garden field trip. The main findings from this study are as follows: First, strong intelligence was logical-mathematical intelligence for gifted students, and weak intelligence was found to be naturalistic intelligence for them. Second, there was no significant correlation in the relationship between multiple intelligence and scientific creativity of science-gifted students. Third, as a result of independent two sample t-test for each intelligence and scientific creativity scores divided into the upper and lower groups, only verbal-linguistic intelligence statistically differed significantly at the level of p<.05 (t=2.13, df=35, p=0.04). Fourth, as a result of conducting a two-way analysis to see if there were any interaction effects, verbal-linguistic and visual-spatial, logical-mathematical and visual-spatial, logical-mathematical and bodily-kinesthetic, and visual-spatial and musical-rhythmic intelligence all showed significant values at the level of p<.05 level in interaction effects on originality element comprising scientific creativity. Fifth, an analysis of students with high naturalistic intelligence showed that their scores of scientific creativity tasks conducted at the botanical garden field trip were all lower. Based on the results of this study, this study discussed the implications of scientific creativity learning linking multiple intelligence in primary science education and gifted education.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.463-496
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to analyze the mathematical creativity and computational thinking of mathematically gifted elementary students through a convergence class using programming and to identify what it means to provide the convergence class using Python for the mathematical creativity and computational thinking of mathematically gifted elementary students. To this end, the content of the nine sessions of the Python-applied convergence programs were developed, exploratory and heuristic case study was conducted to observe and analyze the mathematical creativity and computational thinking of mathematically gifted elementary students. The subject of this study was a single group of sixteen students from the mathematics and science gifted class, and the content of the nine sessions of the Python convergence class was recorded on their tablets. Additional data was collected through audio recording, observation. In fact, in order to solve a given problem creatively, students not only naturally organized and formalized existing mathematical concepts, mathematical symbols, and programming instructions, but also showed divergent thinking to solve problems flexibly from various perspectives. In addition, students experienced abstraction, iterative thinking, and critical thinking through activities to remove unnecessary elements, extract key elements, analyze mathematical concepts, and decompose problems into small components, and math gifted students showed a sense of achievement and challenge.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.697-713
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 2011년도 광역시 소재 대학교 부설 과학영재교육원의 수학 및 과학영역별 중학교 1, 2학년 89명을 대상으로 영재의 특성을 조사하는 데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 다중지능, 자기조절학습능력, 개인성향 조사지를 실시하였으며, 교과영역별 특징을 분석하였다. 먼저 과학영재와 수학영재 모두 자기이해지능이 강점지능으로 나타났으며 논리수학지능이 약점지능으로 나타났다. 과학영역별로 물리영재와 지구과학영재는 공간지능이 강점지능으로 나타난 반면 화학영재와 생물영재는 자기이해지능이 강점지능으로 나타났다. 자기조절학습능력의 경우, 수학영재와 과학영재는 선행연구결과의 일반학생의 자기조절학습능력보다 높게 나타났으며 교과영역에 상관없이 인지전략과 동기전략이 높은 경향을 보였다. 과학영재와 수학영재의 개인성향은 교과영역에 상관없이 개별 특성이 다양하여 광범하게 분포하는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 특정지능에서 강점을 보인 학생들 사이에서도 자기조절학습능력 및 개인성향에서 서로 다른 특성을 보였다. 결론적으로 수학영재는 자기이해지능이, 과학영재에서 물리와 지구과학은 공간지능이, 생물과 화학은 자기이해지능이 강점지능으로 나타나는 특징이외에는 교과영역에 따른 차이보다는 개인별 다중지능, 자기조절학습능력 및 개인성향에서 뚜렷한 차이가 있는 것으로 고찰되었다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.123-143
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 과학영재교육원 사사교육 대상자들의 지능과 창의력의 수준을 분석하고, 이러한 결과가 사사교육 선발고사와 연관이 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 과학영재교육원 두 분과(생물분과: n=19, 물리분과: n=21)의 학생들을 대상으로 지능검사(WAIS, RAPM)와 창의력검사(TTCT-언어, TTCT-도형)를 실시하였으며, 검사점수와 사사교육 선발점수 사이의 상관도를 분석하였다. 검사결과 사사교육 대상자들의 지능수준이 매우 높은 것으로 나타났다(WAIS IQ>98%). 반면, 이들의 창의력수준은 지능수준에 비해 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 사사교육 선발점수와 지능점수 및 창의력점수 사이의 상관도 분석결과 생물분과의 선발고사는 WAIS 및 TTCT-언어와 양의 상관도를 보였으며, 물리분과의 선발고사는 RAPM과 양의 상관도를 나타내었다. 이러한 결과는 과학영재교육원 사사교육 대상자들이 지능수준은 매우 높은데 비해 일반적 창의력수준은 그에 미치지 못하며, 사사교육 선발고사는 높은 지적 능력을 기반으로 하여 해결할 수 있는 문제들로 주로 이루어져 있음을 보여준다. 과학 분야의 우수한 성과물 산출을 위해서는 높은 지능에 못지않게 창의력이 요구된다는 점에서, 과학영재의 창의력 평가에 관해 좀 더 심도 있는 연구가 이루어질 필요가 있다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2004

Although over - 600 students in Incheon has been participated in the gifted education programs under the colleges and Office of Education Department every year, it is reported that the number of teachers have insufficient teaching abilities in primary, advanced, and after-advanced gifted classes. The Gifted Education Research Institute in Incheon University introduced R&E activities for the improvement of teachers' abilities in science research and student guiding. Professors in science department conducted the R & E activities to select the research thesis. The professors and the guidance teachers decided the directions of the research, and the guidance teachers who learned from the professors taught 3-5 students to practice the research. Five professor-teacher-student research teams in math, physics, chemistry and biology conducted the research after school and during the vacation for 7 months. The results of the research were submitted to the journals of research activities and the result papers were presented to the seminar. On this research, the possibilities and the difficulties of the R&E activities based of the journals of research activities, oral presentation and the research results reports were analyzed with a purpose of improving the professionalism of the science gifted teachers. Although the professors proposed many difficulties or problems about the R&E activities, the teachers reported that the R & E activities he1ped them to improve their research activities and student guiding techniques. The teachers acquired more knowledge on the principles of the science related areas than before. Moreover, they thought it was very meaningful experience in using the science related instruments, guiding the students' research and writing the research reports. The students also gave the positive responses with the increased interests in new science studies and with the experience of learning the way of research.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.491-504
• /
• 2011

과학영재 학생의 과학학습에 대한 개념을 알아보기 위해 COLS와 ALS 설문지를 이용하여 비교, 분석하였다. 과학영재 학생은 일반 학생과 과학학습에 대한 개념에 차이를 보이는데, 과학영재 학생은 과학학습을 과학 지식을 얻고, 과학 지식 구조를 확장해 나가고, 세상을 보는 새로운 관점을 얻는 활동이라고 인식한다. 과학영재 학생은 성별과 과목 선호도에 따라 과학학습에 대한 인식 및 접근방법에 의미 있는 차이는 보이지 않았다. 이 연구의 결과는 과학영재 수업을 위한 교재와 교수법에 도움이 될 것으로 예상한다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.382-398
• /
• 2020

This study aims to analyze the relationship between scientific content knowledge of science-gifted elementary students and their expression of scientific creativity, and the characteristics of divided groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity. A science-gifted program was implemented to 33 forth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea. The method of evaluating scientific knowledge was divided into well-structured paper-pencil test (asking specific and limited range of content knowledge of plants) and ill-structured descriptive test (stating all the knowledge they know about plants) to find out which methods were more related to scientific creativity. In addition, in order to find out the characteristics of each group according to the level of scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity, students were required to answer a questionnaire about their own self-perception of scientific knowledge and scientific creativity and how to obtain scientific knowledge. The main results of this study are as follows. First, Both well-structured paper-pencil test (r=.38) and ill-structured descriptive test (r=.51) results of elementary science gifted students were significantly correlated with scientific creativity. Second, As a result of the regression analysis on scientific creativity of science-gifted elementary students, both the knowledge measured by the two evaluation methods have the ability to explain scientific creativity. Third, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and their expression of scientific creativity, and the result showed that the higher the knowledge of science, the higher the scientific creativity. Fourth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type LL students of all 13 students (53.8%, 7 students) answered 'I have little knowledge of plants because I have little interest in them.' Fifth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type HH students of all 15 students (40%, 6 students) answered 'I think my science creativity is high through my experience of scientific creativity. Sixth, the responses to the Questionnaire revealed that 'reading' was the most popular way to obtain scientific knowledge, with 27 out of total 33 students choosing it. In particular, all 18 students from Type HH (high scientific knowledge and high scientific creativity) and Type HL (high scientific knowledge and low scientific creativity) - those with high scientific knowledge - gave that response. On the basis of this research, we should explore practical teaching methods and environment for gifted students to improve their scientific creativity by revealing the nature of the factors that affect scientific creativity and analyzing relationship between knowledge and scientific creativity.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.801-828
• /
• 2011

중학교 과학영재 담당교사의 수업을 관찰하여 Pedagogical Content Knowledge(PCK)의 요소를 분석하고, 요소간의 관련성을 알아보았다. 연구 대상은 대도시 지역의 중학생 대상 영재교육원에서 과학을 가르치는 교사 4명이었으며, 전공은 각각 물리, 화학, 생물, 지구과학이고 2명은 전임교사, 2명은 겸임교사였다. 또한 전임교사들은 영재학생들만 가르쳤고, 겸임교사들은 보통 일반학생들을 가르쳤고, 특별히 주 1회 영재학생들을 가르쳤다. 수업관찰, 반구조화된 인터뷰를 실시하였으며, 문서자료를 수집하여 질적으로 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 과학영재담당교사의 PCK 요소의 몇 가지 특징이 나타났다. 교사들의 과학교수지향은 PCK의 요소들과 긴밀하게 상호작용하고 있었다. 교사들의 교육과정지식은 교사에 따라 상이했지만, 학습유형의 선택은 교사의 영재 교육 및 수업의 목표와 관련되어 있었다. 또한 이러한 교육과정 지식은 학생에 대한 이해의 영향을 받았다. 교사들은 교육과정지식과 학생에 대한 이해에 따라 수업에서 서로 다른 교수전략을 사용하고 있었다. 또한 PCK의 요소들의 관계는 밀접했으며 방향성을 가지고 있었다. 이러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 PCK의 요소와 관계성을 설명하기위해 사면체 모델을 제안했다.