• 제목/요약/키워드: artistic practice

검색결과 94건 처리시간 0.022초

운임(雲林) 예찬(倪瓚)의 사상(思想)과 그의 문인화(文人畵) 경계(境界) (Unlim Yechan's Thoughts and his literati paintings land)

  • 권윤희
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제6권4호
    • /
    • pp.419-427
    • /
    • 2020
  • 예찬은 중국 원말 사대가의 한 사람이다. 그는 이민족의 지배를 받은 시대적인 환경하(環境下)에서 자신의 독특헌 예술세계룰 구축하였다. 그의 화론인 흉중일기(胸中逸氣)는 동양 전통사상인 유(儒), 불(佛), 선의(禪) 영향으로 이루어진 정신적인 산물이다. 일기사상(逸氣思想)은 도가적(道家的)인 청담(淸淡)이나 허무(虛無), 무위사상(無爲思想)의 영향으로 문인(文人) 사대부(士大夫) 사이에 일어난 자연에 대한 새로운 자각이다. 이는 세속을 초월하여 일어났으며 남종 문인화(文人畵)의 이론적인 토대가 되었다. 예찬(倪瓚)의 일필(逸筆)은 흉중(胸中)의 일기(逸氣)를 그리는 방법이다. 이는 그가 오랫동안 노력하고 실천한 가운데 얻어진 문인화 경계이다. 예찬(倪瓚)은 생활의 체험 속에서 깨달은 선의(禪) 오경(悟境)으로 시서일체(詩書一體), 시선일치(詩禪一致)의 높은 경지를 실현하였다. 그의 예술정신은 흉중일기로 대변되는 탈속원진(脫俗遠塵), 일소부주의 고답(高踏), 시서일체(詩書一體)의 높은 경지를 표출하였다. 이를 통하여 그는 원말(元末) 명초(明初)의 화단에 독창적인 문인화(文人畵) 세계를 구축하였다.

과연 비엔날레는 세계화의 전도사인가? (Biennale is a Preacher for the Globalization of Art?)

  • 최태만
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제3호
    • /
    • pp.85-106
    • /
    • 2005
  • As biennale exhibitions has been expanded into all of the world since 1990s, these trends of blockbuster exhibitions have caused several problems. For instance, some major curators monopolized most global size exhibitions despite of a variety of cultural and historical backgrounds. Besides, due to a strong connection between these curators and their own artists, the young emerging artists' opportunities tend to be reduced as a result of the power game. In addition, major curators' power have influence on the exhibition style as well as on the theme itself. Some artists who did not involved that kind of huge scale exhibitions dispute that the direction of the exhibition is concentrating on the curator's interest instead of artists or viewers. Although these dissatisfactions could not portray correctly the process of organizing and managing system of a biennale exhibition, those biennale exhibitions held in recent have shown tautologic discourses without any passion and positive attitude direct to the exploitation of our society as a vanguard. In the process of comparing several kinds of biennale exhibitions, I could find that some artists who participated several biennale exhibitions at the same time did not present their creative vision, although the triumph of an exhibition was typically measured by the amount of visitors. Thus, the aim of this article is to prove that the biennale can show us new cultural discourse as well as progressive method of understanding our times. Is biennale producing the real 'global standard'? If biennale has done it, could this global standard present upto-date paradigm for the unique exhibition system? Is biennale providing an useful opportunity for the understanding and communicating of contemporary art through the recontextualization which is pronounced by the publicity of curator and organizing committee? How can we find the distinctive strategy from each biennale exhibition including Venice Biennale? Biennale, as a blockbuster exhibition, always requires a degree of hype, otherwise it would not be a special event and would not attract a big enough audience. It is the actual reason why major biennale exhibitions seem to be similar artistic events. Unfortunately, it seems that the excess of biennale exhibitions might bring about the lack of contents. In this case, the biennale syndrome would being a kind of the center of poverty, in spite of the visual splendor. After all, following the global standard may not be a matter of great importance now. What really matters is how each biennale exhibition which started under the different conditions can search their own identity.

  • PDF

중국 문혁기 모범극(樣板戱)의 시각이미지 - <홍등기(紅燈記)>의 혁명영웅상을 중심으로 (Visual Image of a Yangbanxi (Chinese "Model Play") Dating from the Cultural Revolution Period in China - With the Focus on Images of Revolutionary Heroes in the Beijing Opera The Red Lantern)

  • 문정희
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제5호
    • /
    • pp.197-215
    • /
    • 2007
  • Yangbanxi("model plays") symbolize the Cultural Revolution(1966~1976) in China. The Eight Model Revolutionary Works include five Chinese Modern Peking Operas, namely, Taking Tiger Mountain by Strategy(智取威虎山), Harbor(海港), Shaijabang(沙家浜), The Red Lantern(紅燈記), and Raid on the White Tiger Regiment ; (奇襲白虎團), ballets such as The Red Detachment of Women(紅色娘子軍) and The White-Haired Girl(白毛女) ; and a symphony: Shajiabang(沙家浜). On April 24, 1967, Chinese leaders, including Mao Zedong, saw a performance of The White-Haired Girl. Yanbanxi was performed in Beijing between May 24 and June 15 the same year. The Red Lantern was designated as a work for the proletarian classes by Jiang Qing(Mao Zedong's third wife and the most influential woman in China) and spread nationwide. It was also made into a film to be enjoyed by many people. The modern Chinese operas went a long way in their creation of visual images of revolutionary heroes. The Red Lantern, in particular, came to be regarded as the most representative revolutionary opera. In the course of such a process, Jiang Qing used Yangbanxi as a political tool for compelling the people to worship and pledge their allegiance to Mao in an effort to turn the Cultural Revolution into a class struggle on behalf of her husband. During the Cultural Revolution period, artists were made to associate with workers, farmers and soldiers based on the idea of advocating revolutionary arts for the proletarian classes. The characters in The Rend Lantern were portrayed as heroes from the proletarian classes according to the demands of the era. Chinese leaders set forth the principles of artistic expression, stressing three important factors: politics, heroes, and heroic acts, which were to be applied to all the visual arts, including Yangbanxi. This paper attempts to present a new view of fine arts during the Cultural Revolution in China by focusing on the productive significance of a leading style of a specific era in the past. To that end, this paper sheds light on products made in conformance with political instructions, stressing the importance of revolutionary heroes in The Red Lantern.

  • PDF

마그리트 회화와 라캉의 주체론 - 응시, 세계와의 조우 (Magritte's drawings and Lacan's Subject theory: Gaze, Encounter with the world)

  • 백진화
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제5호
    • /
    • pp.7-24
    • /
    • 2007
  • The subject is connected with a structure named "The Symbolic" to Lacan, but he denied that the subject is explained simply as a fruit of language and "Other". From his point of view, passing through Subject, De-formation and Crack over it is designated as foundation of generation and creation rather than our destined defect. It should not be understood that subject of "The Real" is a concept of the subject free itself from restraint of "The Symbolic". However, this does not mean he asserts "Subject" is something incapable of being controlled by the unknown power. The problem is that this autonomous existence meets inside of it with something "more than one's own self" by "circulating around itself" like a permanent star. This is the indication of a "stranger in the middle of my privacy", or "extimit$\'{e}$", a coined-word by Lacan. Perhaps "Subject" is nothing more than the name of distance of object which is "too hot" to come close, and of this circulating movement. It's because of this object that the real subject stands against generalization and the subject can't be restored to any place in symbolic order-even though it is empty. The part which is told from Lacan's structural theory, that is to say, an importance to Lacan is that his Subject theory is not suggested or denied as a manual structure. On the contrary, it is a study of the relationship between the settled symbol that included in "real subject which is a unconscious one" and the symbolic subject hold- that is a metaphysical subject in general meaning. In Lacan's enlarged concept of subject beyond symbolic reality, it is noticeable that it gives justifiability to the union of a medium of different nature in artistic expression. We can recognize that the unconscious world is a living space which enables it to be a "condition of human being", not something dark under the surface of water through Magritte's(Rene Magritte, 1898~1967) surrealistic works. In other words, Magritte's art secures a core dimension of human nature through a mysterious gap of conscious and settled space. Magritte's drawings often evokes strange and unsettling feelings in people who view his paintings. This is because routine objects are found in "unsuitable" places from which we usually find them in our everyday lives. "Reality" in Magritte's paintings makes it aware that it is a strained field of concealment and disclosure basically between truths, and we can learn that his behavior to overturn to paint in-visible things is finally an effort to restore the "real subject" to the viewer's reality. In other words, such reversion arouses a nostalgic desire for the objects existing in their original appearance as they are - natural condition that our gaze had not been distorted yet by anamorphic stains. - and the state when we are conscious of them normally. Such desire offers an opportunity for us to get out of mental depression rather than operates to us as an abnormal crack. It's a successive process of effort to search for lost subject and Paradise Lost facing up to reality of subject human that is to be a subject of world and life are ousted from their place by structure and authority of culture.

  • PDF

예술가와 공학자의 협업 모델: '예술과 기술의 실험' 그룹 (Collaboration between Artists and Engineers: 'Experiments in Art and Technology' Group)

  • 임산
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제5권4호
    • /
    • pp.79-85
    • /
    • 2019
  • '예술과 기술의 실험' 그룹은 20세기 중반, 예술적 세계와 그 바깥의 영역까지 아우르며 거대한 상호 학제적인 실험을 전개하였다. 이러한 활동의 실제적인 동력은 서로 다른 오래된 학문적 관습의 경계를 가로지르며 창의적 가능성을 확장해온 예술가와 공학자의 협업이었다. 공학자 빌리 클뤼버와 프레드 발트하우어, 그리고 예술가 로버트 라우센버그와 로버트 휘트먼이 1967년에 공동 설립한 '예술과 기술의 실험' 그룹은 물질, 기술, 공학이 동시대 미술에 적용 가능한 여러 가능성을 선구적으로 수행하였다. 이들의 활동은 사회에서의 예술과 기술의 기능을 새롭게 성찰함으로써 궁극적으로 동시대 세계와의 유기적 관계성을 지니는 새로운 미학을 개발시키는 방법론을 개발해 나갔다는 점에서 그 학문적 연구의 의의를 가질 수 있다. 이에 본고에서는 우선, '예술과 기술의 실험' 그룹이 등장하게 된 사회문화적 맥락을 예술과 기술의 운동의 차원에서 살핀 후, 그룹의 다양한 프로젝트들을 검토함으로써 예술가와 공학자의 협업이 예술적 표현의 확장뿐만 아니라 예술과 공학과 사회 사이의 새로운 상호적 관계성을 생산하는 데 공헌하였음을 확인한다. 이러한 논의를 통해 동시대의 융합 담론에서 필요로 하는 구체적인 협업의 방법론의 한 모델로서 참조하고자 한다.

바이섹슈얼 라이팅(Bisexual Lighting)의 영상 표현 연구 (A Study on Image Representation of Bisexual Lighting)

  • 교이나
    • 트랜스-
    • /
    • 제11권
    • /
    • pp.119-142
    • /
    • 2021
  • 영상은 이미지를 전제로 하는 문화적 실천이다. 영상이미지를 통해 관객은 일상이 아닌 새로운 것을 체험하기를 갈망한다. 영상이미지의 구성 요소는 많지만 그중에 시각적 표현인 색채가 큰 역할을 담당하고 있다. 컬러영화가 등장하기 시작하면서부터 색채는 영상예술의 중요한 구성요소로서 끊임없이 발전하고 혁신적인 영상미술 디자인에서 중요한 역할을 하였다. 영화인들은 1895년 영화가 흑백으로 탄생할 때부터 색채에 대한 관심이 있었다. 이 두 가지 색채로 더 이상 시청자를 만족시키지 못했기 때문에 필름에 색채를 입히는 등 더 많은 색채를 영화 속에서 표현하려고 노력했다. 영상에서의 색채는 표현의 기법이면서도 정신과 사상으로 이해할 수 있다. 색채가 단순히 그냥 존재하는 것이 아니라 인간심리에 강하게 작용하고 있음에 일러주는 것이기도 하다. 색채는 영화 언어의 일부로, 색채언어는 영화 속에서 영화의 사상적 주제를 표현하거나 선명한 캐릭터를 묘사할 수 있으며, 사람들에게 더 직관적으로 메시지를 전달할 수 있다. 본 연구는 색 조명 방식 혹은 배색 방안인 바이섹슈얼 라이팅을 대상으로, 그의 기본적인 색채 구성요소, 즉 핑크색, 파란색 및 보라색이 갖고 있는 색채 특성을 이해해 색채를 통해 인간심리가 어떤 영향을 받고 있는 지에 대해 분석하고 바이섹슈얼 라이팅이 영상에서 나오는 장면들을 결합해 구체적인 사례분석을 했다. 이를 통해 바이섹슈얼 라이팅이 영상에서 색채 속성을 이용해 표현한 색채 언어가 무엇이고 바이섹슈얼 라이팅이 어떻게 색채를 통해 인간심리와 상호 작용하는지를 탐색하였다.

Psychological and Pedagogical Features the Use of Digital Technology in a Blended Learning Environment

  • Volkova Nataliia;Poyasok Tamara;Symonenko Svitlana;Yermak Yuliia;Varina Hanna;Rackovych Anna
    • International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
    • /
    • 제24권4호
    • /
    • pp.127-134
    • /
    • 2024
  • The article highlights the problems of the digitalization of the educational process, which affect the pedagogical cluster and are of a psychological nature. The authors investigate the transformational changes in education in general and the individual beliefs of each subject of the educational process, caused by both the change in the format of learning (distance, mixed), and the use of new technologies (digital, communication). The purpose of the article is to identify the strategic trend of the educational process, which is a synergistic combination of pedagogical methodology and psychological practice and avoiding dialectical opposition of these components of the educational space. At the same time, it should be noted that the introduction of digital technologies in the educational process allows for short-term difficulties, which is a usual phenomenon for innovations in the educational sphere. Consequently, there is a need to differentiate the fundamental problems and temporary shortcomings that are inherent in the new format of learning (pedagogical features). Based on the awareness of this classification, it is necessary to develop psychological techniques that will prevent a negative reaction to the new models of learning and contribute to a painless moral and spiritual adaptation to the realities of the present (psychological characteristics). The methods used in the study are divided into two main groups: general-scientific, which investigates the pedagogical component (synergetic, analysis, structural and typological methods), and general-scientific, which are characterized by psychological direction (dialectics, observation, and comparative analysis). With the help of methods disclosed psychological and pedagogical features of the process of digitalization of education in a mixed learning environment. The result of the study is to develop and carry out methodological constants that will contribute to the synergy for the new pedagogical components (digital technology) and the psychological disposition to their proper use (awareness of the effectiveness of new technologies). So, the digitalization of education has demonstrated its relevance and effectiveness in the pedagogical dimension in the organization of blended and distance learning under the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. The task of the psychological cluster is to substantiate the positive aspects of the digitalization of the educational process.

인도네시아 현대미술에 있어서의 설치미술 - 미디엄과 사회적 공간을 위한 탐색 (Installation Art In Indonesian Contemporary Art; A Quest For Medium and Social Spaces)

  • A. 릭릭 쿠스마라
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제5호
    • /
    • pp.217-229
    • /
    • 2007
  • Many historical research and facet about modern art in Indonesia which formulating background of contemporary Indonesian Art. Indonesian art critic Sanento Yuliman states that Modern art has been rapidly developing in Indonesia since the Indonesian Independence in 1945. Modern Art is a part of the super culture of the Indonesian metropolitan and is closely related to the contact between the Indonesian and Western Cultures. Its birth was part of the nationalism project, when the Indonesian people consists of various ethnics were determined to become a new nation, the Indonesian nation, and they wished for a new culture, and therefore, a new art. The period 1960s, which was the beginning of the creation and development of the painters and the painters associations, was the first stage of the development of modern art in Indonesia. The second stage showed the important role of the higher education institutes for art. These institutes have developed since the 1950s and in the 1970s they were the main education institutes for painters and other artists. The artists awareness of the medium, forms or the organization of shapes were encouraged more intensely and these encouraged the exploring and experimental attitudes. Meanwhile, the information about the world's modern art, particularly Western Art; was widely and rapidly spread. The 1960s and 1970s were marked by the development of various abstractions and abstract art and the great number of explorations in various new media, like the experiment with collage, assemblage, mixed media. The works of the Neo Art Movement-group in the second half of the 1970s and in the 1980s shows environmental art and installations, influenced by the elements of popular art, from the commercial world and mass media, as well as the involvement of art in the social and environmental affairs. The issues about the environment, frequently launched by the intellectuals in the period of economic development starting in the 1970s, echoed among the artists, and they were widened in the social, art and cultural circles. The Indonesian economic development following the important change in the 1970s has caused a change in the life of the middle and upper class society, as has the change in various aspects of a big city, particularly Jakarta. The new genre emerged in 1975 which indicates contemporary art in Indonesia, when a group of young artists organized a movement, which was widely known as the Indonesian New Art Movement. This movement criticized international style, universalism and the long standing debate on an east-west-dichotomy. As far as the actual practice of the arts was concerned the movement criticized the domination of the art of painting and saw this as a sign of stagnation in Indonesian art development. Based on this criticism 'the movement' introduced ready-mades and installations (Jim Supangkat). Takes almost two decades that the New Art Movement activists were establishing Indonesian Installation art genre as contemporary paradigm and influenced the 1980's gene ration like, FX Harsono, Dadang Christanto, Arahmaiani, Tisna Sanjaya, Diyanto, Andarmanik, entering the 1990's decade as "rebellion period" ; reject towards established aesthetic mainstream i.e. painting, sculpture, graphic art which are insufficient to express "new language" and artistic needs especially to mediate social politic and cultural situation. Installation Art which contains open possibilities of creation become a vehicle for aesthetic establishment rejection and social politics stagnant expression in 1990s. Installation art accommodates two major field; first, the rejection of aesthetic establishment has a consequences an artists quest for medium; deconstruction models and cross disciplines into multi and intermedia i.e. performance, music, video etc. Second aspect is artists' social politic intention for changes, both conclude as characteristics of Indonesian Installation Art and establishing the freedom of expression in contemporary Indonesian Art until today.

  • PDF

창의적 사고와 아이디어 생성에 영향을 미치는 사회문화요인들에 대한 탐색 (Sociocultural Factors Leading to Creative Thinking and Idea Generation)

  • 이선영;김정아
    • 교육심리연구
    • /
    • 제31권4호
    • /
    • pp.767-794
    • /
    • 2017
  • 창의성은 사회문화적 맥락에서 발현되고 형성되는 사회적 산물이다. 창의적 수행과 결과물에 영향을 미치는 문화 요인들은 초국가문화, 국가문화, 직업문화, 조직문화에 따라 다르다. 그러나 그동안 수행된 창의성 연구의 대다수는 사회 및 문화요인들을 주된 주제로 다루지 않았다. 극히 드물지만 문화와 창의성 간의 관계를 탐색한 연구들은 대부분 개인주의와 집단주의와 같은 초국가문화의 특성들만을 다루면서 동서양 문화권에서 개인이 보이는 창의성 수준 간 차이를 제시하고 있을 뿐 영역 특수성을 고려한 창의성이나 이것에 직, 간접적으로 영향을 미치는 직업이나 조직 문화의 특성 등을 간과하였다. (초)국가 문화처럼 거시적 관점이 아닌 보다 미시적인 관점에서 창의성을 연구하는 것은 독창성과 유용성을 창의성의 주요 능력으로 간주하는 오늘날의 창의성에 대한 개념적인 이해와 맥을 같이 한다. 본 연구는 문화와 창의성간의 관계를 규명하기 위해서 창의적 사고와 아이디어 생성에 영향을 미치는 사회, 문화적 요인들을 초국가와 국가문화를 포함하는 가치문화와 직업과 조직 문화로 구성된 관습문화로 구분하여 관련 문헌들을 심도 있게 검토하였다. 초국가 및 국가 문화의 특성으로 각각 개인주의와 집단주의, 예술친화적인 사회분위기와 다문화 경험 등을 논의하였고, 관습문화에 포함된 직업 및 조직 문화의 경우, 창의성의 두 가지 핵심 능력인 독창성과 유용성간의 균형을 중시하는 건축 영역을 중심으로 살펴보았다. 문헌분석결과, 창의적 사고와 아이디어 생성에 영향을 미친 문화적 요인들은 관습 문화와 가치 문화에 따라 다르게 나타났으나 연구 결과들이 일관적이지 못한 한계를 보였다. 저자들은 논의한 선행연구의 문제점들을 문화에 대한 다차원성 고려 부족, 국가문화와 창의성 간 관계 규명의 어려움, 개인 또는 집단 창의성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 차별적인 인식의 필요성, 관습과 가치문화에 대한 인위적인 구분 등으로 요약하였고 이를 후속 연구들을 위한 제언과 함께 논의하였다.

한국미술에서의 동양성 개념의 출현과 변형 (Birth and Transformation of the Concept of "Oriental-ness" in Korean Art)

  • 정형민
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제1호
    • /
    • pp.109-144
    • /
    • 2003
  • Orientalness is a concept that expresses the collective identity of the Orient in relation to the West. The concept itself is mutable and defined by the relationship between the two regions at different points in time. Changes in the concept depend on a number of factors, such as cultural influence, the political balance of power between the two regions, and on the interpretative scheme that defines the relationship. In addition, the geographical notion of the concept evolves culturally, socially and politically. During this process, Oriental-ness becomes Oriental-ism at times. I will attempt to survey and measure the progression of Orientalness from its emergence in early 17th century to its subsequent transformation in modern Korea as reflected in art theory and art works. The recognition of the comparative characteristics of Oriental art began when the Orient was exposed to the art of the West in the late Ming dynasty during the early 17th century. The changes in the artistic climate in China affected the late Chosun. I will start with a brief introduction of this time and the birth of Orientalness. The concept gradually changed during the period of Enlightenment(開化期) towards the end of the 19th century, and during the colonial period( 1910-1945) it took on a new form. Establishment of the concept of "Orient"as a single, unifying concept spanning across cultures and national boundaries has been attributed to late Meiji period Japan, whose intention at that time is believed to have been to build a pan-Asia(亞細亞) empire with Japan at its commanding center. It has been stressed that the real motive behind the formation of one single cultural unit, where the shared common written language was Chinese and Confucianism and Taoism were the common metaphysical traditions, was to build one political unit. When the notion of a geographical unit of Asia was replaced by the concept of Asia as a cultural and political unit, a massive growth of interest and discourse were provoked around the concept of Orientalism. When Orientalism was being formulated, Korea automatically became member of "one Asia" when the country became colonized. For Koreans, the identity of the Orient had to be defined in cultural terms, as the political notion of a nation was non-existent at that time. The definition of identity was pursued at two levels, pan-Asian and local. If Orientalism was an elite discourse centered in pan-Asian philosophical and religious tradition, localized Orientalism was a popular discourse emphasizing locality as the byproduct of natural geographic condition. After the liberation in 1945 from colonial rule, a thrust of movement arose towards political nationalism. Two types of discourses on Orientalism, elite and popular, continued as central themes in art. Despite the effort to redefine the national identity by eradicating the cultural language of the colonial past, the past was enduring well into the present time. As discussed above, even when the painting themes were selected from Korean history, the tradition of using history painting as a manifestation of political policy to glorify the local identity had its founding during the Meiji period. The elevation of folk art to the level of high art also goes back to the colonial promotion of local color and local sentiment. Again, the succession of the past (colonial) ideal was defended as the tradition assumed a distinct modern shape that was abstract in style. The concept of the "Orient" is of relative and changing nature. It was formulated in relation to Western culture or civilization. Whatever the real motive of the adoption of them had been, the superiority of the Orient was emphasized at all times. The essence of the Orient was always perceived as the metaphysical tradition as a way to downgrade Western culture as materialistic. This view still prevails and the principle of Orient was always sought in Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism. Even when Orientalism was employed by imperialist Japan in an effort to establish her position as the center of the Orient, the spiritual source was still in Chinese philosophy and religion. In art also, the Chinese literati tradition became the major platform for elite discourse. Orientalism was also defined locally, and the so-called local color was pursued in terms of theme and style. Thus trend continued despite the effort to eradicate the remnants of colonial culture long after liberation. These efforts are now being supported politically and also institutionalized to become the aesthetic ideal of the modern Korean art.

  • PDF