• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 1998.03a
• /
• pp.15-19
• /
• 1998

The arthroscopic treatment may prove to be the desirable method, but this arthroscopic technique cannot be appliable to all surgeons and all patients, It should be determined on the base of type of lesion, effectiveness of arthroscopic procedure, and the surgeon's skill. The Key to an excellent result in arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff lesion is doing a proper diagnosis, well-established arthroscopic technique and following through a well-designed rehabilitation program.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.110-116
• /
• 2016

Background: Arthroscopic surgical repair is a better intervention than non-operative (conservative) treatment for patients with shoulder dislocations. This systematic review determined the numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) and relative risk reduction (RRR) associated with arthroscopic surgical repair versus non-operative treatment in reducing recurrence rates among patients with first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations. Methods: We searched Google Scholar, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL from inception in 2015. All articles had to compare arthroscopic surgical repair and non-operative treatment and be written in English. We used the total number of subjects and the number of recurrent dislocations within each treatment to calculate the NNT and RRR for each study and the pooled data. Results: Six articles were selected and all clearly demonstrated that the arthroscopic surgical repair was more effective than non-operative treatment in reducing the recurrence episodes. The pooled NNT was 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]=NNT to benefit 1.50-2.13) and the pooled RRR was 86.0% (95% CI=77.0%-92.0%) among individuals who underwent arthroscopic repair. The average follow-up time was 56 months. Conclusions: A Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy level of evidence of 1 with a grade A recommendation supports the use of arthroscopic surgical repair over non-operative treatment in prevention of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations. We suggest that sports medicine practitioners consider the patients' age, occupation, and physical activity level when making a clinical decision.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.6-11
• /
• 1998

Shoulder is a common site for calcific deposit and is frequently asymptomatic. There is a general agreement that calcific tendinitis should be initially treated nonoperatively and excision reserved for cases unresponsive to the conservative measures. There are several reports that arthroscopic excision of symptomatic calcific deposit is proved to be efficient in the calcific tendinitis refractory to nonoperative management. The results of arthroscopic treatment of chronic resistant calcific tendinitis of the shoulder in eleven patients were evaluated. Each patient had shoulder pain for more than one year prior to the arthroscopic surgery. The average age of the patients was 48 years(range 35-70). Arthroscopic calcium removal and subacromial bursectomy was performed in all patients. Arthroscopic acromioplasty was additionally done in four patients. The results turned out to be good in nine patients with full range of motion and complete pain relief. One patient with full motion and occcasional episodes of pain was satisfactory. One patient with persistent pain was unsatisfactory which converted to satisfactory six months later after subacromial injection. So we conclude that the arthroscopic treatment is a reasonable alternative in treatment of the chronic calcific tendinitis resistant to conservative treatment.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.263-266
• /
• 2024

We present a case of calcific tendinitis in the shoulder, where calcifications were observed within both the tendon and the adjacent bone. At the time of acute onset, radiographs (including a plain radiograph) and magnetic resonance imaging revealed calcific tendinitis with intraosseous migration. The patient's symptoms did not improve after 5 months of conservative treatment. The patient underwent arthroscopic debridement of the calcific deposits, and the defect was repaired using the double-row repair technique. The patient's symptoms improved 3 months after arthroscopic treatment. We share our unusual experience with arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of chronic calcific tendinitis with intraosseous migration.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.40-45
• /
• 1998

Multidirectional instability of the shoulder joint is an unusual entity which is not yet well understood. Traditionally recommended treatment is non-operative, but recently arthroscopic treatment has been performed. This is a retrospective review of 20 patients who had multidirectional instability, who had been treated with arthroscopic capsular shift(7 cases), and arthroscopic treatment using Ho:YAG laser(l3 cases) at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital from July, 1988to February, 1997. Results of this study were as follows: 1. In five patients who were treated with arthroscopic anterior capsular shift only, all cases had redislocation of the shoulder joint. But there was no redislocation in two patients who were treated with arthroscopic anterior and posterior capsular shift. 2. ln three patients who were treated with laser-assisted capsular shift only, all cases had redislocation of the shoulder joint. But there was only one redislocation in ten patients treated with laser-assisted capsular shrinkage and capsular plication. Ho: Y AG laser has been found to be a safe and efficacious adjunct to many arthroscopic shoulder procedures. We had satisfactory results by combining a transglenoid capsular shift with laser-assisted capsular shrinkage. Arthroscopic laser-assisted capsular shrinkage and capsular plication is a one of recommendable treatment options in multidirectional instability of the shoulder joint.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.13-27
• /
• 2003

In the past, the report of shoulder instability undergoing open shoulder stabilization had satisfactory outcomes of greater than 90%. However, the functional loss of open procedure is severe in abduction and external rotation especially. Current arthroscopic techniques for shoulder instability result in success rate equal to open surgical procedure when the labrum is properly fixed to the glenoid rim using suture anchors, the capsule is tightened, and associated bony and soft tissue pathology is addressed. The arthroscopic surgery facilitates the view within shoulder joint for more accurate diagnosis, reduces operating time, minimises postoperative pain, reduces operative morbidity, improves shoulder function, and provides the possibility to perform other procedure simultaneously. However, to accomplish a successful arthroscopic stabilization procedure and to prevent complications, numerous advanced arthroscopic skill must be mastered. Although the arthroscope provides means to visualize new lesions, the pathomechanism and biomechanical explanation is not clear yet. Further studies are necessary to develop for shoulder reconstruction.

• Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.25-31
• /
• 2021

The open Broström procedure is considered the surgery of choice for treating chronic lateral ankle instability. The role of arthroscopy has gained popularity in the surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability, partly for the ability to manage the intra-articular pathology combined with ankle instability. Arthroscopic techniques can be divided broadly into the arthroscopic-assisted Broström technique and arthroscopic all-inside ligament repair. The clinical results of these arthroscopic techniques are similar to open procedures. The arthroscopic technique may be an excellent alternative to the open Broström procedure in treating chronic lateral ankle instability when applying the appropriate indications.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.38-43
• /
• 2013

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of arthroscopic treatment for infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to investigate the factors affecting the outcomes. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 17 cases which underwent arthroscopic treatment to treat infection after TKA. After confirming infection by hematologic examination and analysis of joint fluid, we performed arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy and irrigation with normal saline mixed with antibiotics. Through routine examination after operation, we checked failure of treatment or recurrence of infection. If there is no recurrence until 2 years after the operation, we considered it as a success of treatment. Results: Of the 17 cases taken arthroscopic treatment, 13 cases were treated successfully with primary arthroscopic treatment only, but 4 cases had to undergo re-operation because of persistence or recurrence of infection. Analyzing the factors affecting the results, we found that symptom duration of the re-operation group is longer than the treated group after arthroscopy (p<0.05). Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment can be effective when we performed appropriate selection of patients, careful and extensive arthroscopic irrigation and debridement, and suitable use of antibiotics. However, we have to do early arthroscopic surgery as soon as possible when infection after TKA is suspected.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.56-60
• /
• 2013

Calcific tendinitis of rotator cuff is a common disease which could be the cause of shoulder pain, and frequently occurs in supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor in descending order. Calcific tendinitis of subscapularis is rare and arthroscopic treatment of that has also been rarely reported. So, we report a case of arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendinitis of subscapularis with excellent result.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.256-263
• /
• 2016

Although arthroscopic surgery has been used conventionally, it has not been widely adopted yet due to the risks of complications, including nerve damage, technical difficulties, and limited indications. As shown in other joints, however, the use of an arthroscope will gradually increased in the elbow joint ('Arthroscopy always wins'). Herein, arthroscopic treatments and arthroscopic ulnar nerve decompression will be discussed in cases of elbow osteoarthritis.