• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.83-103
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 중앙기관과 지방기관 간의 정보공개심의회 운영과 심의회 결과의 차이가 있는지 보고자 하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 지방기관은 중앙기관에 비해 대면회의의 개최 빈도가 높고 외부위원이 더 많이 구성된 심의회의 개최가 많아 더 바람직한 형태의 심의회를 운영하였으나, 심의회 결과는 상대적으로 차이가 덜 하였다. 둘째, 중앙기관과 지방기관 간의 심의회 결과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 차이가 있었다. 중앙기관의 심의회는 회의형태에, 지방기관의 심의회는 위원구성에 따라 심의회 결과에 차이가 나타났다. 섯째, 중앙기관의 심의회는 정치적 환경으로서 참여정부에서 이명박 정부로의 교체에 따른 회의형태와 심의회 결과에 큰 차이가 있었으나 지방기관은 특별한 영향을 받지 않았다. 따라서 중앙기관과 지방기관의 심의회 운영과 결과는 차이가 있으며 각기 다른 방식으로 접근이 필요할 것이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.699-733
• /
• 2000

This article analyzes the state-of-play of WTO dispute settlement for first four and a half years. Remarkable points found on this analysis are as follows: First, the Quad consisting of the United States, the European Community (EC), Canada and Japan has participated in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism more frequently than any other WTO member. Second, among developing country members some leading countries such as Korea, Brazil and India have relied actively upon the mechanism to claim and defend their rights and obligations under the WTO rules. Third, bilateral dispute settlements generally have been preferred to multilateral dispute settlements by the panel or Appellate Body. Fourth, observation of the Appellate Body proceedings well shows WTO members' strategy to use every process available to them. Fifth, the provisions of GATT 1994 have been most frequently invoked by the members. GATS and TRIPS Agreement disputes are mainly involved in developed countries, in particular the U.S. and the EC. Sixth, very high winning ratio in the panel and Appellate Body process indicates that complaining parties review the possibility to get favorable rulings even before referring to the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) and prepare for the case very thoroughly. Seventh, roughly speaking, disputes were settled within two or three years. Therefore, seeking bilateral dispute settlement can be more advantageous to a complaining party than referring to a panel or an arbitrator because of low costs and short time period in dispute settlement. Finally, the DSB approved retaliatory actions for winning complaining parties against the defending parties who had rejected implementation of its rulings and recommendations. In conclusion, it can be said that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism has been operated very successfully for the first four and a half years. It is hoped that continued study on state-of-play of WTO dispute settlement mechanism will be contributory to improved national interest of Korea.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 2019

This study investigates the WTO dispute over Japanese fishery products originated from Fukushima and another seven prefectures. Being subject to an import ban and additional radioactive test requirements, Japan complained that the Korean government's trade measures are inconsistent with the principles of the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. This paper considered the contrasting judicial decisions made by the Panel and Appellate Body and analyzed the debates with respect to their trade-discriminatory effects (Article 2.4), the relevance of appropriate level of protection (Article 5.6) and the precautionary approaches (Article 5.7). Consistent with the final rulings, this paper identifies the need for a broaden understanding of regional conditions and qualitative aspects of protection in risk analysis. Findings also suggest that Korea has diverted its fishery imports from Japan to other countries, while Japan has created export diversion from Korea to other destinations.

• 한국심리학회지:법
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.211-239
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 지적장애인 성폭력 사건의 특성과 쟁점에 대한 법관의 판단을 확인하기 위하여 2015년부터 2018년 사이 선고된 하급심 판결문 분석을 실시하였다. 총 716건의 지적장애인 성폭력 사건에 대한 판결은 무죄 6.0%, 자유형 53.5%, 집행유예 36.7%로 나타났다. 절반 이상의 피해자는 반복적으로 피해를 경험했으며 특히 피고인이 친족이거나 아는 사람인 경우 피해가 반복되는 경향이 높았다. 전체 사건 중 절반은 피해 일시를 특정하지 못하였는데 피고인이 아는 사람이거나 피해가 반복된 경우 일시 특정에 더 어려움을 경험하였다. 지적장애인 사건의 쟁점사항은 진술의 신빙성, 사건당시 항거불능 여부 및 피고인이 피해자의 장애 인식 여부로 나타났다. 진술의 신빙성 판단 시 법관이 가장 빈번하게 사용하는 판단 기준은 진술의 일관성, 구체성, 허위 진술동기, 피해자 인지능력, 진술분석 결과 등의 순이었다. 항거불능 판단 기준으로는 피해자의 태도, 피고인의 태도, 성에 대한 지식 및 이해 순이었다. 장애인식 여부의 경우 피고인의 태도, 피해자의 언어 및 의사소통 능력, 관계지속기간, 일상생활능력 순이었다. 피해자의 장애등급과 성별에 따라 유무죄 판결 및 쟁점사항에 차이는 존재하지 않았다. 다만 피해자 연령이 13세 미만인 경우 13세 이상 피해자와 비교하여 진술의 신빙성 판단이 쟁점이 되는 빈도가 더 높은 반면 장애 인식 여부의 빈도는 유의미하게 더 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 결과에 대한 시사점 및 실무에서 활용방안에 대해 논의하였다.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.91-102
• /
• 2022

Purpose: This study systematically analyzed cases in South Korea wherein nurses were prosecuted for involuntary manslaughter or injury due to professional negligence in pediatric care. Methods: We analyzed the precedents using the methodology of Hall and Wright (2008) and Austin (2010). Of the 618 cases retrieved from the Supreme Court Decisions Retrieval System in South Korea, we selected the 12 cases in which children were the victims and nurses were the defendants, using a case screening methodology. Results: The most frequent penalty was a fine, and newborns were the most frequent victims. The distribution of cases according to Austin's violation categories was: improper administration of medications (n=5), failure to monitor for and report deterioration (n=4), ineffective communication (n=4), failure to delegate responsibly (n=4), failure to know and follow facility policies and procedures (n=1), and improper use of equipment (n=1). Conclusion: To ensure the safety of children, nurses are required to teach and practice a high standard of care. Nursing education programs must improve nurses' awareness of their legal obligations. Nursing organizations and leaders should also work towards enacting effective nursing laws and ensuring that nurses are aware of their legal rights and responsibilities.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.15-31
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of patient safety incidents (PSIs) related to nursing and to provide primary data for preventing the recurrence of similar incidents. Methods: This secondary analysis study included damage claims rulings filed for clinical negligence from 2014 to 2018 that contained the keyword 'nurse'. It excluded judgments irrelevant to nursing care and in which clinical negligence or causal damages were overruled. A total of 93 cases were analyzed. The characteristics of PSIs were derived through descriptive statistics, and two instances of nursing-related PSIs were examined by qualitative content analysis focusing on root causes. Results: The analysis of PSIs related to nursing suggested that the medical institutions where the PSIs occurred most frequently were hospitals, and the most common types of PSIs were medication, surgery, and treatment/procedure, in that order. In addition, it indicated that nursing-related PSIs occurred most frequently in general wards during the day shift, with the most common related nursing practice being managing potential risk factors. The qualitative analysis showed that careless monitoring and institutional inertia were causes of PSIs. Conclusion: To prevent nursing-related PSIs, nurses need to individually monitor and assess patient conditions. In addition, support should be accompanied by the improvement in the systems in place aimed at preventing the recurrence of nursing-related PSIs at the institutional and national level, such as securing appropriate nursing personnel and improving labor conditions.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.77-89
• /
• 2018

The chromosomes of all the world are the same in all 24 pairs, but the key, skin color and appearance are different. Also, it is the resistance of adult disease, diabetes, cancer. In 1953, Watson, Crick of Cambridge University experimentally discovered a DNA double helix structure, and in 1962, They laureates the Nobel Prize. In 1964, Temin, University of Wisconsin, USA, experimentally identified the ability to copy gene information from RNA to DNA and received the Nobel Prize in 1975. In this paper, we analyzed 24 pairs of DNA chromosomes using mathematical matrices based on the combination order sequence of four groups, and designed the Taegeuk pattern genetic code for the first time in the world. In the case of normal persons, the middle Yin-Yang taegeuk is designed as a block circulant Jacket matrix in DNA, and the left-right and upper-lower pairs of east-west and north-south rulings are designed as pair complementary matrices. If (C U: A G) chromosomes are unbalanced, that is, people with disease or inheritance become squashed squirming patterns. In 2017, Professor Michel Young was awarded a Nobel by presenting a biological clock and experimentally explained the bio-imbalance through a yellow fruit fly experiment.This study proved mathematical matrices for balanced and unbalanced RNA.

• 한국한의학연구원논문집
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 2009

Objectives : The lawsuits associated with medical practice in Korean medicine are increasing gradually. However, the clear definition for medical practice in Korean medicine has not been existed in Korean law. Only we may understand the concept regulated by judicial precedents of the court of justice or the authoritative interpretation by the government. Methods : For study, a database was established for medical lawsuits involving Korean medicine(1968~2009, n=130). Results : According to court rulings, the medical practice in Korean medicine is an act to diagnose a person's illness, prescribe and treat to cure based on traditional Korean medicine, to be understood as a medical care, to have some factor to create or increase danger for the preservation of health or hygiene, and to be practiced by medical specialists based on their professional knowledge. Conclusions : But, such definition is not proper and exceedingly vague. Besides medical circumstances Koreans Medicine are changing, and new precedent to the definition of the practice of medicine is establishing. Therefore the meaning and scope of the medical practice in Korean medicine should be modified and amended, reflecting these conditions.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제69권
• /
• pp.127-151
• /
• 2016

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts(PICC) was published in 1994. PICC has been functioned as a guideline of international commercial contracts, an applicable law to govern a contract by the agreement of the parties to a contract, general principles of law and lex mercatoria. In addition, PICC has a role of interpreting or supplementing international uniform law instruments as well as domestic laws, and also has served as a model for national and international legislations. PICC has been accepted as a authoritative source of knowledge of international trade usages of international commercial contracts to the arbitral tribunal rather than domestic court because it excluded the characteristics of hard law at the drafting stage. This article dealt with the rule on gross disparity of validity which fall outside the scope of UN Convention on Contract for the International Sale of Goods(CISG), which has obtained a leading legal position of uniform law in international sales of good. In other words, PICC suggests a series of meaningful solutions to the issue of gross disparity of contract which is the most complicated among legal disputes occurring during the process of conclusion of contact and also extremely different and diverse between legal systems. This article covered the issue of gross disparity of contract at the conclusion of contact and suggested the legal basis of several rules related to the gross disparity by analysing gross disparity rule of PICC. Furthermore, this article suggested legal check points or implication as well as interpretation and evaluation on doctrine of laesio enormis and undue influence or unconscionability. This article also dealt with a comparative analysis with Principles of European Contract Law(PECL) and Common European Sales Law(CESL) which have important legal positions in the area of international commercial contract as well as in terms of close relationship to PICC by linking with recent court or arbitral tribunal rulings.

• 한국심리학회지:법
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 지적장애인 대상 성폭력 사건 수사 및 재판과정에서 전문가 의견 활용 실태를 확인하였다. 총 670건의 지적장애 성폭력 사건 하급심 판결문을 분석한 결과, 전체 사건 중 97.5%는 1개 이상의 전문가 의견서가 재판 기록에 포함되어 있었다. 대부분 사건에서 진술분석 전문가 의견서(91%)가 존재하였으며, 이외 의사 소견서(41.1%), 진술조력인 의견서(36%), 전문심리위원 의견서(9.5%) 등이 포함된 것으로 확인되었다. 진술 신빙성 판단이 쟁점이 된 180건의 사건 중 80건(44.4%)에서 법관은 진술신빙성 판단의 근거로 진술분석 전문가가 작성한 의견서 내용을 판결문에 인용한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 피해자의 연령이 13세 미만이거나, 유죄 판결 시 진술분석 의견서를 인용하는 빈도가 더 높았다. 인용된 내용을 살펴보면 준거기반내용분석(CBCA)과 관련된 내용이 가장 많았으며, 피해자의 심리상태, 진술오염 가능성, 인지적 특성에 대한 의견서의 내용이 진술의 신빙성을 판단하는 근거로 판결문에 제시되었다. 진술신빙성에 대한 진술분석 전문가와 법관의 판단은 1건의 제외한 79건에서 일치하였다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 전문가 의견 활용 방안에 대해 논의하였다.