• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.243-259
• /
• 2011

The Yang-Hui arithmetic(楊輝算法) is a crucial textbook on mathematics for make out the Orient mathematics. In this thesis, compare the Yang-Hui arithmetic and the part of the equation and the function both in the middle school mathematics of the 7th Educational Curriculum Revision. As well, drawing a parallel between two things is the solution that had given in the Yang-Hui arithmetic and have given in the middle school textbook of the 7th Educational Curriculum Revision.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2012

본 논문에서는 최초로 한국의 전통 수학에 대하여 연구를 시작한 수학자 장기원(張起元, 1903-1966)의 학술적 배경과 그가 이룬 사료 발굴 및 연구 성과에 대하여 소개한다. 이어서 그가 저술한 논문들을 분석하고, 그 후에 소개된 국내외의 다른 수학사학자들의 논문과 비교 및 분석하여 의미있는 결론을 유도한다.

• Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
• /
• 제32권6호
• /
• pp.497-505
• /
• 2018

Purpose: To evaluate and compare published methods of calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power following myopic laser refractive surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 69 patients (69 eyes) who had undergone myopic laser refractive surgery previously and subsequently underwent cataract surgery at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea from January 2010 to June 2016. None of the patients had pre-refractive surgery biometric data available. The Haigis-L, Shammas, Barrett True-K (no history), Wang-Koch-Maloney, Scheimpflug total corneal refractive power (TCRP) 3 and 4 mm (SRK-T and Haigis), Scheimpflug true net power, and Scheimpflug true refractive power (TRP) 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm (SRK-T and Haigis) methods were employed. IOL power required for target refraction was back-calculated using stable post-cataract surgery manifest refraction, and implanted IOL power and formula accuracy were subsequently compared among calculation methods. Results: Haigis-L, Shammas, Barrett True-K (no history), Wang-Koch-Maloney, Scheimpflug TCRP 4 mm (Haigis), Scheimpflug true net power 4 mm (Haigis), and Scheimpflug TRP 4 mm (Haigis) formulae showed high predictability, with mean arithmetic prediction errors and standard deviations of $-0.25{\pm}0.59$, $-0.05{\pm}1.19$, $0.00{\pm}0.88$, $-0.26{\pm}1.17$, $0.00{\pm}1.09$, $-0.71{\pm}1.20$, and $0.03{\pm}1.25$ diopters, respectively. Conclusions: Visual outcomes within 1.0 diopter of target refraction were achieved in 85% of eyes using the calculation methods listed above. Haigis-L, Barrett True-K (no history), and Scheimpflug TCRP 4 mm (Haigis) and TRP 4 mm (Haigis) methods showed comparably low prediction errors, despite the absence of historical patient information.