• 제목/요약/키워드: Xenograf

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.016초

Establishment of a [18F]-FDG-PET/MRI Imaging Protocol for Gastric Cancer PDX as a Preclinical Research Tool

  • Bae, Seong-Woo;Berlth, Felix;Jeong, Kyoung-Yun;Suh, Yun-Suhk;Kong, Seong-Ho;Lee, Hyuk-Joon;Kim, Woo Ho;Chung, June-Key;Yang, Han-Kwang
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • 제20권1호
    • /
    • pp.60-71
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: The utility of 18-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]-FDG-PET) combined with computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in gastric cancer remains controversial and a rationale for patient selection is desired. This study aims to establish a preclinical patient-derived xenograft (PDX) based [18F]-FDG-PET/MRI protocol for gastric cancer and compare different PDX models regarding tumor growth and FDG uptake. Materials and Methods: Female BALB/c nu/nu mice were implanted orthotopically and subcutaneously with gastric cancer PDX. [18F]-FDG-PET/MRI scanning protocol evaluation included different tumor sizes, FDG doses, scanning intervals, and organ-specific uptake. FDG avidity of similar PDX cases were compared between ortho- and heterotopic tumor implantation methods. Microscopic and immunohistochemical investigations were performed to confirm tumor growth and correlate the glycolysis markers glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and hexokinase 2 (HK2) with FDG uptake. Results: Organ-specific uptake analysis showed specific FDG avidity of the tumor tissue. Standard scanning protocol was determined to include 150 μCi FDG injection dose and scanning after one hour. Comparison of heterotopic and orthotopic implanted mice revealed a long growth interval for orthotopic models with a high uptake in similar PDX tissues. The H-score of GLUT1 and HK2 expression in tumor cells correlated with the measured maximal standardized uptake value values (GLUT1: Pearson r=0.743, P=0.009; HK2: Pearson r=0.605, P=0.049). Conclusions: This preclinical gastric cancer PDX based [18F]-FDG-PET/MRI protocol reveals tumor specific FDG uptake and shows correlation to glucose metabolic proteins. Our findings provide a PET/MRI PDX model that can be applicable for translational gastric cancer research.

동물 실험 모델에서 적용한 이종대동맥판막도관의 조직보존방법 비교; 신선 냉동보존과 무세포화 냉동보존 (Comparison of Different Methods of Aortic Valve Conduit Xenograft Preservation in an Animal Experiment Model; Fresh Cryopreservation versus Acellularized Cryopreservation)

  • 김창영;김경환;문경철;김웅한;성시찬;김용진
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.11-19
    • /
    • 2010
  • 배경: 현재 사용되는 다양한 이식편 중 상업적으로 이용 가능한 이종조직도관은 조직의 석회화, 섬유화, 염증 및 면역반응에 의한 조직 손상 등 조직변형이 발생하는 문제점을 가지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 높은 압력에 노출되는 대동맥부위의 이종판막도관을 조직보존방법에 따라 비교해 보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 돼지로부터 채취한 이종대동맥판막도관을 신선 냉동보존 및 무세포화 냉동보존으로 처리한 후 염소의 대동맥에 이식하였다. 생존기간에 따라 각각 2마리씩의 단기 생존(100일 미만) 및 장기 생존한 염소에서 이식했던 판막도관을 추출하여 조직학적 변화를 관찰하였다. 결과: 신선 냉동보존 군은 각각 31일, 40일, 107일, 411일 생존하였고, 무세포화 냉동보존 군은 각각 5일, 40일, 363일, 636일 생존하였다. 이중 단기 생존한 모든 염소는 문합 부위의 파열로 사망하였다. 신선 냉동보존 군에서는 침윤한 염증세포가 주로 호중구인 반면, 무세포화 냉동보존 군에서는 주로 림프구가 관찰되었다. 석회화, 섬유화, 혈전 형성 등의 빈도는 두 군간에 차이가 없었다. 결론: 두 가지 처리법으로 이종대동맥판막도관을 보존 후 장기 생존 유도가 일부에서 가능하였다. 두 군에서 모두 심각한 조직변성이 발생하여 이종도관을 적절히 보존 처리할 수 없었던 것으로 관찰되었다. 향후 개선된 보존법이나 변형된 판막도관 처리법의 개발 등의 실험연구에 기초자료로 가치가 있다고 판단된다.

상악 전치부 3D-티타늄 차폐막과 혈소판농축섬유소를 적용한 골유도재생술의 임상적 평가 (Clinical Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration Using 3D-titanium Membrane and Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin on the Maxillary Anterior Area)

  • 이나연;고미선;정양훈;이정진;서재민;윤정호
    • 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.242-254
    • /
    • 2018
  • The aim of the current study was to evaluate the results of horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) with xenograf t (deproteinized bovine bone mineral, DBBM), allograf t (irradiated allogenic cancellous bone and marrow), titanium membrane, resorbable collagen membrane, and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in the anterior maxilla. The titanium membrane was used in this study has a three-dimensional (3D) shape that can cover ridge defects. Case 1. A 32-year-old female patient presented with discomfort due to mobility and pus discharge on tooth #11. Three months after extracting tooth #11, diagnostic software (R2 GATE diagnostic software, Megagen, Daegu, Korea) was used to establish the treatment plan for implant placement. At the first stage of implant surgery, GBR for horizontal augmentation was performed with DBBM ($Bio-Oss^{(R)}$, Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland), irradiated allogenic cancellous bone and marrow (ICB $cancellous^{(R)}$, Rocky Mountain Tissue Bank, Denver, USA), 3D-titanium membrane ($i-Gen^{(R)}$, Megagen, Daegu, Korea), resorbable collagen membrane (Collagen $membrane^{(R)}$, Genoss, Suwon, Korea), and A-PRF because there was approximately 4 mm labial dehiscence after implant placement. Five months after placing the implant, the second stage of implant surgery was performed, and healing abutment was connected after removal of the 3D-titanium membrane. Five months after the second stage of implant surgery was done, the final prosthesis was then delivered. Case 2. A 35-year-old female patient presented with discomfort due to pain and mobility of implant #21. Removal of implant #21 fixture was planned simultaneously with placement of the new implant fixture. At the first stage of implant surgery, GBR for horizontal augmentation was performed with DBBM ($Bio-Oss^{(R)}$), irradiated allogenic cancellous bone and marrow (ICB $cancellous^{(R)}$), 3D-titanium membrane ($i-Gen^{(R)}$), resorbable collagen membrane (Ossix $plus^{(R)}$, Datum, Telrad, Israel), and A-PRF because there was approximately 7 mm labial dehiscence after implant placement. At the second stage of implant surgery six months after implant placement, healing abutment was connected after removing the 3D-titanium membrane. Nine months after the second stage of implant surgery was done, the final prosthesis was then delivered. In these two clinical cases, wound healing of the operation sites was uneventful. All implants were clinically stable without inflammation or additional bone loss, and there was no discomfort to the patient. With the non-resorbable titanium membrane, the ability of bone formation in the space was stably maintained in three dimensions, and A-PRF might influence soft tissue healing. This limited study suggests that aesthetic results can be achieved with GBR using 3D-titanium membrane and A-PRF in the anterior maxilla. However, long-term follow-up evaluation should be performed.