• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.463-480
• /
• 2012

This study is intended to investigate the frequency of scientific writing tasks in Korean and American science textbooks, to compare the differences in types of posing the writing tasks according to the level of the children's scientific cognition, and to analyze the differences in the organization and development of writing ones of each chapter and thus to propose an effective way of presenting scientific writing in science textbooks. Korean 'Science' and 'Experiment Observation Workbook'and Macmillan Mcgraw-Hill(MMH) Science for fourth graders were analyzed for the purpose. The results are as follows: First, Korean textbooks contain more science writing tasks per pages, and less per chapters than MMH one. Both text books provide balanced amount of science writing tasks, yet MMH especially does systematic exercises for each chapter. Second, the qualitative analysis of the textbooks' scientific writing shows that both textbooks contain a significant amount of "understanding" and "explanatory" writing, which reflects that the purpose of writing in science textbooks is leaning towards acquiring and verifying scientific concepts. In American textbooks, however, writings utilizing extensive cognition process and materials are also present. It is necessary for textbooks to present diverse and expressive writing assignments including personal opinions. Third, there are differences in organization and development of science writing tasks. Science writing tasks in Korean textbooks are present independently with lesson objectives of the chapters and practices, while those in MMH are systematically developed. Based on these results, it is necessary to systemize the textbooks' way of presenting writing tasks for effective teaching and learning. By organizing the writing materials and thus developing diverse materials, and by implementing extensive cognitive process in the writing activities, textbooks will be able to contribute in attracting the students' interests and in improving their scientific knowledge.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.175-199
• /
• 2021

The Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach is described as an immersive argument-based science inquiry focusing particularly on learning through epistemic practices. In the literature, several previous studies indicate how academic achievement is positively influenced by the SWH. In addition to these previous studies, several meta-syntheses of qualitative data have been conducted on this particular topic. With these literatures in mind, a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted with ten studies (N = 724) to examine the effectiveness of the SWH on student achievement in Turkey. To present a thoroughly detailed report, this study also examined the following moderators: grade level, subject area, school location, intervention length, and report source. Overall, this study found that in Turkey, the SWH classrooms performed better in academic achievement tests than traditional lecture-based classrooms. Additionally, the SWH is more likely to be effective regardless of grade levels, subject areas, and school locations.

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.169-179
• /
• 2016

이 연구는 특수교사를 대상으로 지적장애학생의 읽기 및 쓰기 지도 실태와 요구도를 알아보고자 하였다. 본 연구를 위해 광주, 대구, 부산 지역에 근무하고 있는 특수교사 71명에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과 특수교사들은 학생의 읽기 및 쓰기 수준을 파악하기 위해 표준화된 검사도구보다 직접 제작한 검사도구를 주로 사용하였다. 학생 지도 시 문제해결 방법과 신뢰하는 정보에 대해서는 자신의 지도 경험과 동료 및 선배의 조언을 이용하였고 학교에서 배운 지식의 활용의 사용빈도는 낮았다. 학생의 읽기 및 쓰기 지도 시 주로 통문자를 통한 지도가 이루어졌으나 교사의 지도경험과 교재의 다양성 또한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 학생지도를 위한 교육 참여의 요구도에서는 쓰기의 교수방법, 장애특성에 따른 교재 및 교구, 읽기 및 쓰기발달, 읽기 및 쓰기장애에 대한 관심과 요구가 높았다. 학생 지도 시 어려움과 요구도에서는 다양한 교재, 교구의 개발, 충분한 교재 및 검사도구 구비에 대한 요구가 높았다. 지도 시 어려움으로는 읽기, 쓰기에 대한 지식의 부족, 선별/평가도구 부족, 장애 특성에 따른 평가와 지도 등에서 어려움이 나타났다.

• The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.393-401
• /
• 2024

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming medical writing and publishing. This review article focuses on experimental evidence to provide a comprehensive overview of the current applications, challenges, and future implications of LLMs in various stages of academic research and publishing process. Global surveys reveal a high prevalence of LLM usage in scientific writing, with both potential benefits and challenges associated with its adoption. LLMs have been successfully applied in literature search, research design, writing assistance, quality assessment, citation generation, and data analysis. LLMs have also been used in peer review and publication processes, including manuscript screening, generating review comments, and identifying potential biases. To ensure the integrity and quality of scholarly work in the era of LLM-assisted research, responsible artificial intelligence (AI) use is crucial. Researchers should prioritize verifying the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content, maintain transparency in the use of LLMs, and develop collaborative human-AI workflows. Reviewers should focus on higher-order reviewing skills and be aware of the potential use of LLMs in manuscripts. Editorial offices should develop clear policies and guidelines on AI use and foster open dialogue within the academic community. Future directions include addressing the limitations and biases of current LLMs, exploring innovative applications, and continuously updating policies and practices in response to technological advancements. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are necessary to harness the transformative potential of LLMs while maintaining the integrity of medical writing and publishing.

• Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.35-38
• /
• 2013

No single project is identical to one another in the construction industry. Furthermore, many construction projects are suffering from tighter budget, shortened schedule and higher client satisfaction level. To overcome these, project managers and engineers are willing to apply various best management practices to their projects. However, it is non-trivial to select the most appropriate practices for their projects. In many cases, it is much more important to find the appropriateness of the management practices than just to use the practices. Although many researchers are focusing on the development of new management practices, there is little research on matching between the circumstances of projects and the developed management practices. The objective of this study is to provide a structured process to suggest the best management practices for individual construction projects by developing a computerized system where an individual project is matched with the most optimal management practices to increase the value of the project. At this stage of writing, the authors have developed a computerized system to effectively find out the best suitable management practices for individual projects. By maximizing the usages of this system, it would facilitate the application of the best management practices in the industry.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.624-627
• /
• 2013

No single project is identical to one another in the construction industry. Furthermore, many construction projects are suffering from tighter budget, shortened schedule and higher client satisfaction level. To overcome these, project managers and engineers are willing to apply various best management practices to their projects. However, it is non-trivial to select the most appropriate practices for their projects. In many cases, it is much more important to find the appropriateness of the management practices than just to use the practices. Although many researchers are focusing on the development of new management practices, there is little research on matching between the circumstances of projects and the developed management practices. The objective of this study is to provide a structured process to suggest the best management practices for individual construction projects by developing a computerized system where an individual project is matched with the most optimal management practices to increase the value of the project. At this stage of writing, the authors have developed a computerized system to effectively find out the best suitable management practices for individual projects. By maximizing the usages of this system, it would facilitate the application of the best management practices in the industry.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제10권7호
• /
• pp.71-76
• /
• 2019

본 연구의 목적은 교양영어 학습자들을 대상으로 실천학습(Action learning) 기법을 활용한 영어 수업 사례 연구를 통하여 그 효과를 알아보고자 했다. 본 연구는 학습자 중심 수업을 기본으로 하여 학습자 간의 상호수정 활동을 통해 영어 기술을 익힐 수 있다는 것에 연구의 가치를 두고 실천학습(Action learning)을 수업에 활용함으로써 그 효과를 알아보고자 했다. 2018년 3월 1일부터 2018년 6월15일까지 교양 영어 두개 반(실험반, 통제반) 학생을 대상으로 하였으며 실험 집단은 실천학습(Action learning) 협력기법을 활용한 협력쓰기 수업을 진행하고, 통제 반은 교수자가 기존에 하던 방식의 쓰기 수업을 진행하여 비교하였다. 본 연구의 연구문제는 실천학습(Action learning) 기법을 적용한 협력 쓰기 활동이 학생들의 쓰기 유창성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 알아보고자했다. 연구결과, 실험집단의 경우 단어의 수, 문장의 수와 문장 길이 등의 쓰기의 유창성 부분에서 통계적으로 유의미한 결과를 가져왔다. 학습자들은 학습 관계에서 더 깊이 있게 다른 사람들이 지닌 지식이나 생각을 공유하고 보다 규칙적인 근거를 가지고 근접발달영역 들어갈 수 있었다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제71호
• /
• pp.169-236
• /
• 2022

이 글은 기록학의 관점에서 쓰기를 다룬 연구이다. 이론적인 접근보다는 정책적인 접근을 시도했다. 그래서 기록학이 지난 20년 동안 구축했던 기록관리와 쓰기를 연결하는 데에 초점을 두었다. 그것은 기록관리가 필요한 곳에서 쓰기는 어떻게 가능하며 그 기록학적 의미는 무엇인가 하는가이다. 이런 문제의식을 기반으로 기록관리와 쓰기가 공생할 수 있는 상황에 대해, 이 둘의 상호작용과 효과에 대해 탐구했다. 논의의 구체성을 위해 사례를 분석하며 논의를 전개했다. 첫째, 대통령기록과 쓰기의 사례이다. 대통령의 말을 기록화 하는 과정에서 출현한 쓰기에 관한 것이다. 둘째, 시민기록과 쓰기의 사례이다. 시민사회 단체 활동가들이 아카이브 워크숍에 참여해 자기 단체의 기록물을 정리하는 과정에서 출현한 쓰기에 관한 것이다. 쓰기에 대한 사회적 관심이 크다. 그런 데에는 이유가 있을 것이다. 이 글에서는 관계적 가치에 주목했다. 쓰기는 하나의 기록실천인데, 그 요지는 관계적 가치를 추구한다는 점일 것이다. 사람이 사회적 관계를 맺고 살아가는 데에 요구되는 관계적 가치가 있을 것이다. 이 글에서는 '부탁, 안부, 관찰, 대화'에 주목했다. 기록관리와 쓰기의 공생적 상황에 대한 문제의식을 갖게 될 경우 관계적 가치에 대한 탐구가 필요해진다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.21-44
• /
• 2012

This paper aims to discuss the effects of learning how to write English interrogative sentences. 122 students who participated in the study learned basic structural components of English questions and practiced writing questions by inversing the subject and the verb in a given declarative sentence. The participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 which was given a brief explanation of interrogative structures and practices, and Group 2 which was given the same explanation and practices in addition to an assignment for which they had to make one or two comprehension questions based on reading a passage. For the pre-tests and the post-tests, they took a TOEIC reading test with 40 questions and a structure test with 25 questions. The results of the tests show that both groups improved significantly in the two post-tests, benefiting from this learning method. However, the additional treatment for Group 2 did not seem to be highly effective. In the questionnaire survey, the participants think that the method of learning English questions has helped them better understand English grammar as well as interrogative structures. The participants were also divided into three different levels: high, intermediate, and low. The intermediate level group students benefited most from learning writing questions as the results of the post-test of the 25-questions test and the final exam of the course show.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.141-171
• /
• 2017

This study investigates Korean language teachers' perception/beliefs and practices in written feedback. Two types of data were collected: (1) teachers' feedback on three compositions by elementary-level learners, and (2) a survey questionnaire. The result showed that teachers perceived written feedback to be important even though they had not enough opportunities to receive appropriate training. Lack of training brought about limited feedback in terms of both quantity and quality, and inconsistency between their beliefs and practice. This study closes with the needs for teacher training and further studies on teachers' feedback practices.