• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.211-218
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the differences among prism settings of the von Graefe technique for phoria measurement. Methods: Thirty eight healthy subjects (mean age $22.35{\pm}2.72years$) were tested with eye examination by interview, cover test, and refraction. Phorias were measured in a random order using four prism settings for the von Graefe method: base-in (BI) and base-up (BU), BI and base-down (BD), BU and BI, and BD and BI over the right and left eye, respectively. Results: Among the four prism settings in measurements of lateral and vertical phoria, there were not significant differences at distance, whereas there were significant at near. The reliability of near lateral phoria (ICC: 0.95) was good, but that of near vertical phoria was less reliable (ICC: 0.83). In comparisons of the paired t-test, the 95% limits of agreement, and mean difference between prism settings, BU had more useful than other prism settings at near phoria. Conclusions: Results from this study suggest that the von Graefe test with BU or BU including other setting prisms have useful methods, especially for near phoria measurements.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.11
• /
• pp.485-491
• /
• 2012

To investigate the difference in the value of horizontal heterophoria measured in phoria test of about normal 72 college students, using both Von Graefe test and Maddox rod test. We used two different methods which are Von Graefe test and Maddox rod test on full correction condition at the long distance. Using Von Graefe test of horizontal heterophoria Measurement, We measured 21 patients(29%) for orthophoria, 36 patients(50%) for exophoria and 15 patients(21%) for esophoria at distance. Using Maddox rod test of horizontal heterophoria Measurement, We measured 36 patients(50%) for orthophoria, 26 patients(36%) for exophoria and 10 patients(14%) for esophoria at distance. Each test average were $0.93{\Delta}$ BI for Von Graefe test, $0.96{\Delta}$ BI for Maddox rod test. We could not find the definite difference about the value of horizontal heterophoria aby testing method. Furthermore, heterphoria AC/A ratio was found to vary from 1.0 to 8.8 and its relationship to refractive error could not be determined.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.423-430
• /
• 2004

This Study on three different methods which are Von Graefe test, Maddox Rod test and Howell card test of measuring far and near lateral phoria investigated. It reviewed that 420 subjects aged from 15 to 35 years old. The result were as follows; 1. Using Von Graefe lateral phoria measurement, they were measured 6% for orthophoria, 62% for exophoria, 32% for esophoria at far distance. 2. Using Von Graefe lateral phoria measurement, they were measured 2% for orthophoria, 74% for exophoria, 24% for esophoria at near distance. 3. Using Maddox Rod lateral phoria measurement, they 59% for exophoria, 37% for esophoria at far distance. 4. Using Maddox Rod lateral phoria measurement, they 67% for exophoria, 30% for esophoria at near distance. 5. Using Howell card lateral phoria measurement, they 60% for exophoria, 32% for esophoria at far distance. 6. Using Howell card lateral phoria measurement, they 69% for exophoria, 27% for esophoria at near distance.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.155-160
• /
• 2001

To investigate the subjective refractive error with Von Graefe test. Maddox Rod test and polarizing lens test of Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement at distance on normal 109 subjects aged from 18 to 30 years old. The results were as follows: 1. Using Von Graefe Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement, they were measured 15% for orthophoria, 65% for exophoria and 20% for esophoria at distance. 2. Using Maddox Rod Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement, they were measured 14% for orthophoria, 57% for exophoria and 29% for esophoria at distance. 3. Using polarizing lens test of Horizontal Heterophoria Measurement, they were measured 15% for orthophoria, 72% for exophoria and 13% for esophoria at distance. 4. Each test average were $1.32{\Delta}BI$ for Von Graefe test, $0.88{\Delta}BI$ for Maddox Rod test and $1.76{\Delta}BI$ for polarizing lens test. 5. Patient's preference distribution were 44% for Von Graefe test, 28% for Maddox Rod test and 28% for polarizing lens test.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.151-157
• /
• 2006

We researched distant & near horizontal heterophoria of myope using von graefe method on full correction condition for young people 49 subjects(98eyes) with myopia after testing the objective refraction. Among the whole subjects, we got the results as Orthophoria 51.00%, Exophoria 38.75%, Esophoria 10.25% and Heterophoria 49.00% at a long distant. At a short distant, they showed Orthophoria 22.45%, Exophoria 67.35, Esophoria 10.20%, and Heterophoria 77.55%, Orthophoria 22.45. At a long distant they showed Orthophoria 4.08%, Exophoria 8.16%, Esophoria 0% on high myopia, Orthophoria 18.37%, Exophoria 12.25%, Esophoria 0% on middle myopia and Orthophoria 28.57%, Exophoria 18.37%, Esophoria 10.20% on low myopia.

• Journal of the Optical Society of Korea
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.418-424
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to assess repeatability and reliability of a new phoria test as compared to established phoria tests and to assess the possibility of mobile or online testing using the auto-flashed presentation. Near dissociated phoria was measured using the von Graefe method, the Howell card test, the modified Thorington test, and a new dichromatic card test (Red-Blue Phoria card test; RBP card test) on 109 subjects. The inter-examiner difference and test-retest difference were calculated. With the auto-flashed presentation of the RBP card test, near dissociated phoria was measured and the intraclass correlation coefficient and test-retest repeatability was assessed on 26 subjects. The variation in inter-examiner repeatability was the smallest for the modified Thorington test (+3.1/-2.6). The RBP card test was +3.0/-3.1, the Howell card test was +3.5/-2.7, and the von Graefe test was +6.2/-6.0. The variation in test-retest repeatability was the smallest for the RBP card test (+0.4/-1.4). The modified Thorington test was +1.3/-1.3, the Howell card test was +1.27/-1.45, and the von Graefe test was +1.59/-2.20. The ICC was 0.919 for the auto-flashed presentation of the RBP card test. The RBP card test is considered a highly repeatable method clinically and can be made a useful application for testing in mobile or online.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.53-61
• /
• 2005

In this study, we measured Near Point of Convergence(N.P.C) tests, Phoria tests using Von Grafe method and relative convergence tests on 138 men and 162 women, so a total of 300 subjects aged between 8~45 to examine the improvement of the fusion vergence through visual training and obtained as follows. 1. According to the results, the near point of convergence of 57 (19%) subjects were shorter than 7cm, and 243 (81%) were 7cm or longer, having a problem in convergence. After visual training, the number of subjects have the value shorter than 7 cm increased from 57 to 111 (37%), and the number of those have the value 7cm or longer decreased significantly form 243 to 189 (63%). 2. The results of the measure of lateral Phoria at far distance by Von Grafe method showed orthophoria 18 (6%), exophoria 198 (66%), esophoria 84 (28%). After phoria test, we examined the N.R.C and P.R.C test. The results showed that the hope finger was improved after V.T using B.l, B.O card. 3. The results of the measure of lateral Phoria at near distance by Von Grafe method showed orthophoria 6 (2%), exophoria 222 (74%), esophoria 72 (24%). After phoria test, we examine the N.R.C and P.R.C test. The results showed that the hope finger was improved after V.T using B.I, B.O card.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.251-255
• /
• 2004

Our research is about the measurement of the distance & near horizontal phoria by the Von Graefe test. The inspection was processed about normal 60 subjects(120eyes) aged from 20 to 30) years old by the subjective method of refraction. Among 120 eyes, the myopia is 64eyes(53%) and the emmetropia is 56eyes(47%). In the measurement of the distance horizontal phoria, we could know that the exophoria is 40%(24 subjects), the esophoria is 40%(24 subjects), and the orthophoria is 20%(12 subjects). In case of the near horizontal phoria, we could know that the exophoria is 65%(39 subjects), the esophoria is 23.3%(14 subjects), and the orthophoria is 11.7%(7 subjects).

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2003

We did the comparison research about three different methods of measuring horizontal phoria and vertical phoria which are Von Graefe test, Maddox Rod test and polarizing lens test. The inspection was don with the subjective method of refraction about normal 63 subjects aged from 20 to 28 years old. The analysis of date resulted in as follows : 1. Using Von Graefe Horizontal phoria Measurement, they were measured 5% for orthpharia, 51% for exophoria and 44% for esophoria. 2. Using Von Graefe vertical phoria Measurement, they were measured 68% for orthphoria, 20% for left hypophoria against the right and 12% for left hyperphoria against the right. 3. Using Maddox Rod Horizontal phoria Measurement, they were measured 7% for orthphoria, 49% for exophoria and 44% for esophoria. 4. Using Maddox Rod vertical phoria Measurement, they were measured 70% for orthphoria, 19% for left hypophoria against the right and 11% for left hyperphoria against the right. 5. Using Polarizing Horizontal phoria Measurement, they were measured 10% for orthphoria, 49% for exophoria and 41% for esophoria. 6. Using Polarizing vertical phoria Measurement, they were measured 92% for orthpharia, 5% for left hypophoria against the right and 3% for left hyperphoria against the right.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.117-123
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The aim of this study was to propose effective data for the clinical examinations of binocular vision by comparative analysis of measuring the near horizontal phoria according to accommodative stimulations. Methods: It carried out near horizontal phorias, targeting 104 college students (50 males and 54 females) aged between 19 and 24 ($20.27{\pm}1.31$). It made a comparative analysis of changes in near horizontal phoria according to accommodative stimulations by using the von Graefe, Maddox rod and the Howell phoria methods respectively. We have also investigated the AC/A ratio in all phoria groups. Results: As the additional lenses were changed to the negative (-) diopter, the near horizontal phoria changed to the esodeviation. At this time, the rate of change in the section signifies the AC/A ratio, and the values were not consistent based on the evaluating methods or on each section. The AC/A ratio of the esophoria group appeared the largest value in all groups. As a result of analyzing AC/A ratio at the exophoria group using the von Graefe method, the AC/A ratio was $1.568{\pm}1.937$ ${\Delta}/D$ on the additional lenses +2.00 D and $2.527{\pm}2.253$ ${\Delta}/D$ on the additional lenses -1.00 D and at the esophoria group using the Howell phoria method, the AC/A ratio was $5.521{\pm}1.337$ ${\Delta}/D$, $5.593{\pm}1.623$ ${\Delta}/D$ on the additional lenses +2.00 D, +1.00 D and $4.687{\pm}1.643$ ${\Delta}/D$ on the additional lenses -2.00 D. These were significant differences statistically. Conclusions: In the exophoria group, when the (-) lenses were added, the averages of the AC/A ratio were shown to be high but in the esophoria group, when the (+) lenses were added, the of AC/A ratio was high.