Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society (한국안광학회지)

The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society (한국안광학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparisons of Phoria Test Among Prism Settings of Von Graefe Technique

Von Graefe법의 프리즘 세팅에 따른 사위검사의 비교

  • Yu, Dong-Sik (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Kyungwoon University) ;
  • Ha, Eun-Mi (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Kyungwoon University)
  • Received : 2015.04.27
  • Accepted : 2015.05.18
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the differences among prism settings of the von Graefe technique for phoria measurement. Methods: Thirty eight healthy subjects (mean age $22.35{\pm}2.72years$) were tested with eye examination by interview, cover test, and refraction. Phorias were measured in a random order using four prism settings for the von Graefe method: base-in (BI) and base-up (BU), BI and base-down (BD), BU and BI, and BD and BI over the right and left eye, respectively. Results: Among the four prism settings in measurements of lateral and vertical phoria, there were not significant differences at distance, whereas there were significant at near. The reliability of near lateral phoria (ICC: 0.95) was good, but that of near vertical phoria was less reliable (ICC: 0.83). In comparisons of the paired t-test, the 95% limits of agreement, and mean difference between prism settings, BU had more useful than other prism settings at near phoria. Conclusions: Results from this study suggest that the von Graefe test with BU or BU including other setting prisms have useful methods, especially for near phoria measurements.

목적: 사위 측정에서 von Graefe법의 프리즘 세팅에 따른 차이를 비교하고자 하였다. 방법: 건강한 38명(평균 $22.35{\pm}2.72$세)을 대상으로 문진, 가림검사 및 굴절검사를 실시하였다. Von Graefe법의 4가지 프리즘 세팅 즉, 우안과 좌안에 각각 base-in(BI)과 base-up(BU), BI과 base-down(BD), BU과 BI, BD과 BI으로 하여 무작위 순서로 사위를 측정하였다. 결과: 수평과 수직사위 측정에서 4가지 프리즘 세팅별 차이는 근거리에서 유의한 차이를 보였으나 원거리에서 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 근거리 수평사위의 신뢰도는 좋았으나(ICC: 0.95) 근거리 수직사위의 신뢰도는 낮았다(ICC: 0.83). 각 프리즘 세팅 간의 대응비교, 95% 일치도 범위와 평균차이의 비교에서 근거리 사위검사의 경우 BU이 다른 프리즘 세팅보다 더 유용하였다. 결론: 이러한 결과들은 von Graefe에 의한 사위검사는 특히 근거리 사위검사에서 BU 또는 BU을 포함하는 다른 세팅 방법을 병행하는 것이 유용한 방법임을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee KB, Jeon SW, Lee HJ, Lee SH, Park WB, Mah KC et al. The comparative analysis of various distance phoria tests. Korean J Vis Sci. 2007;9(1):115-125.
  2. Lee KS, Jung MB, Kim TH, Sung AY. A study on the measurement and tendency of horizontal heterophoria using von Graefe method. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2006;11(2):151-157.
  3. Kim HD, Kim DN, Park EK. Comparison of three different methods of measuring horizontal phoria and vertical phoria. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2003;8(2):13-18.
  4. Wong EP, Fricke TR, Dinardo C. Interexaminer repeatability of a new, modified prentice card compared with established phoria tests. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(6):370-375. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200206000-00010
  5. Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Interexaminer repeatability of heterophoria tests. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(10):719-726. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199810000-00016
  6. Casillas Casillas E, Rosenfield M. Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(4):237-241. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000214316.50270.24
  7. Goss DA, Moyer BJ, Teske MC. A comparison of dissociated phoria test findings with von Graefe phorometry and modified Thorington testing. J Behav Optom. 2008;19(6):145-149.
  8. Kang SH, Hong HK. A comparative study on quantity of phoria between new phoria measurement with 3D display and existing methods. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2013;18(3):313-320. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.3.313
  9. Lee SH, Park SY, Kim SY, Lee DY, Kim KK, Son JS et al. Repeatability of new phoria test using color chart and color filter. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2010;15(3):269-274.
  10. Elliott DW. Clinical procedures in primary eye care, 3rd Ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007;176-178.
  11. Goss DA, Reynolds JL, Todd RE. Comparison of four disociated phoria tests: reliability and correlation with symptom survey scores. J Behav Optom. 2010;21(4):99-104.
  12. Maples WC, Savoy RS, Harville J, Golden LR, Hoenes R. Comparison of distance and near heterophoria by two clinical methods. Optom Vis Dev. 2009;40(2):100-106.
  13. Griffin JR, Grisham JD. Binocular anomalies: diagnosis and vision therapy, 4th Ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002;8-10.
  14. Enright JT. Slow-velocity asymmetrical convergence: a decisive failure of "Hering's law". Vision Res. 1996;36(22):3677-3684.
  15. Nan Li, Seger K, Crandall M, Jiang BC. Effect of customized near addition lenses on transient myopia induced by near-work. Clinical Optometry. 2010;2:43-49.
  16. Escalante JB, Rosenfield M. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio. Optometry. 2006;77(5):229-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2006.02.006
  17. Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical management of binocular vision, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002;36-37.
  18. Morgan MW. Analysis of clinical data. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1944;21:477-491. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-194412000-00001
  19. Daum KM. Characteristics of exodeviations: II. Changes with treatment with orthoptics. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63(4):244-251. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198604000-00002
  20. Raineya BB, Schroedera TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Reliability of and comparisons among three variations of the alternating cover test. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18(5):430-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0275-5408(98)00002-7
  21. Rouse MW, Borsting E, Deland PN, CIRS Group. Reliability of binocular vision measurements used in the classification of convergence insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci. 2002 ;79(4):254-264. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200204000-00012
  22. van Rijn LJ, ten Tusscher MPM, de Jong I, Hendrikse F. Asymmetrical vertical phorias indicating dissociated vertical deviation in subjects with normal binocular vision. Vision Res. 1998;38(19):2973-2978. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00079-0
  23. Schroeder TL, Rainey BB, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Reliability of and comparisons among methods of measuring dissociated phoria. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73(6):389-397. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199606000-00006
  24. Lyon DW, Goss DA, Horner D, Downey JP, Rainey B. Normative data for modified Thorington phorias and prism bar vergences from the Benton-IU study. Optometry. 2005;76(10):593-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2005.08.014
  25. Benjamin W. Borish's clinical refraction, 2nd Ed. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006;903.

Cited by

  1. Influence of Dissociating Prism on Lateral Phoria in Von Graefe Test vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.2.167
  2. Comparison of Amount of at Distance and Near Phoria in Dominant Eye and Non-dominant Eye by Von Graefe Method vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.2.111
  3. The Effect of Dissociating Prism on Lateral Phoria in Von Graefe and Howell Phoria Card Test vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.2.143