• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.138-147
• /
• 2020

Purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric variations in patients of head and neck cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy using optimized non-coplanar (ncVMAT) beams with coplanar (cVMAT) beams using volumetric arc therapy. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients of head and neck cancer that had received radiotherapy using VMAT in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Each of the patients was planned using coplanar and non-coplanar orientations using an optimized couch angle and fluences. We analyzed the Conformity Index (C_IRTOG), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Heterogeneity Index (HI_RTOG), low dose volume, target and organs-at-risk coverage in both the plans without changing planning optimization parameters. Results: The prescription dose ranged from 60 Gy to 70 Gy. Using ncVMAT, C_IRTOG, DHI and HI_RTOG, and tumor coverage (ID_95%) had improved, low dose spillage volume in the body V_5Gy was increased and V_10Gy was reduced. Integral dose and intensity-modulated radiation therapy factor had increased in ncVMAT. In the case of non-coplanar beam arrangements, maximum dose (D_max) of right and left humeral head were reduced significantly whereas apex of the right and left lung mean dose were increased. Conclusion: The use of ncVMAT produced better target coverage and sparing of the shoulder and soft tissue of the neck as well as the critical organ compared with the cVMAT in patients of head and neck malignancy.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.1633-1636
• /
• 2015

Background: The advantages of Rapid Arc plans versus Intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for Carcinoma left breast were analyzed. Materials and Methods: In this study 20 Post mastectomy carcinoma left breast patients were analyzed. Both Intensity modulated Radiotherapy and Rapid Arc plans were generated for these patients. IMRT plans with 7 beams in an arc fashion and VMAT plans with two semi arcs were made to achieve 95% dose coverage to 100% volume. The plans were evaluated using Dose volume Histograms. Results: The mean Conformity and Homogeneity index in VMAT is found to be 1.05 and 0.065 respectively whereas in IMRT it was 1.07 and 0.069. The 20% volume of Heart received a mean dose of 960cGy in VMAT and 1300cGy in IMRT. The mean dose was 1236cGy in VMAT and 1870cGy in IMRT. The ipsilateral Lung received 3395cGy to 5% volume and 1840cGy to 20% volume on an average and the mean dose was 1205cGy in VMAT, while the same were found to be 3525cGy, 2012cGy and 1435cGy respectively in IMRT. The Contralateral Lung received a mean dose of 505cGy in VMAT and 553cGy in IMRT. The mean Monitor units in VMAT were 512MU and 1170MU in IMRT. The NTID in VMAT is $108.8{\times}10^5Gycm^3$ and $110.1{\times}10^5Gycm^3$ in IMRT. Conclusions: The target coverage, homogeneity and Conformity index were better in VMAT plans. The Ipsilateral Lung and heart dose were very less in VMAT plans. The Contralateral Lung dose and the Normal Tissue Integral Dose were also lesser in VMAT plans however the difference is not very appreciable. The MU in VMAT plans is almost 50% that of the IMRT plans which results in the reduction of treatment time. On the whole VMAT proves to be a better modality for treating Ca. Left Breast Patients.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권20호
• /
• pp.9033-9038
• /
• 2014

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for locally advanced left sided breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy. DIBH immobilizes the tumor bed providing dosimetric benefits over free breathing (FB). Materials and Methods: Ten left sided post mastectomy patients were immobilized in a supine position with both the arms lifted above the head on a hemi-body vaclock. Two thermoplastic masks were prepared for each patient, one for normal free breathing and a second made with breath-hold to maintain reproducibility. DIBH CT scans were performed in the prospective mode of the Varian real time position management (RPM) system. The planning target volume (PTV) included the left chest wall and supraclavicular nodes and PTV prescription dose was 5000cGy in 25 fractions. DIBH-3DCRT planning was performed with the single iso-centre technique using a 6MV photon beam and the field-in-field technique. VMAT plans for FB and DIBH contained two partial arcs ($179^{\circ}-300^{\circ}CCW/CW$). Dose volume histograms of PTV and OAR's were analyzed for DIBH-VMAT, FB-VMAT and DIBH-3DCRT. In DIBH mode daily orthogonal ($0^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$) KV images were taken to determine the setup variability and weekly twice CBCT to verify gating threshold level reproducibility. Results: DIBH-VMAT reduced the lung and heart dose compared to FB-VMAT, while maintaining similar PTV coverage. The mean heart $V_{30Gy}$ was $2.3%{\pm}2.7$, $5.1%{\pm}3.2$ and $3.3%{\pm}7.2$ and for left lung $V_{20Gy}$ was $18.57%{\pm}2.9$, $21.7%{\pm}3.9$ and $23.5%{\pm}5.1$ for DIBH-VMAT, FB-VMAT and DIBH-3DCRT respectively. Conclusions: DIBH-VMAT significantly reduced the heart and lung dose for left side chest wall patients compared to FB-VMAT. PTV conformity index, homogeneity index, ipsilateral lung dose and heart dose were better for DIBH-VMAT compared to DIBH-3DCRT. However, contralateral lung and breast volumes exposed to low doses were increased with DIBH-VMAT.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권8호
• /
• pp.225-232
• /
• 2014

전유방절제술을 시행하고 방사선치료시 조사야에 흉벽과 IMNs이 포함되어 심장과 동측 폐에 고선량의 방사선이 흡수되어 만성이환율에 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 전유방절제술을 시행한 유방암 환자의 방사선 치료시 IMRT와 VMAT 기법을 이용하여 선량분포양상을 비교하고자 한다. 유방암 진단을 받고 전유방절제술과 방사선 치료를 시행 받은 환자 중 PTV내에 IMNs가 포함되는 10명의 환자를 선택하여 환자의 흉벽조직, SCL, IMNs을 포함하여 각각 IMRT와 VMAT를 이용하여 치료계획을 실시한 후 PTV의 일치성과 심장 및 폐에 입사되는 선량을 서로 비교하고자 하였다. 그 결과 IMRT와 VMAT에서 모두 PTV의 일치성은 동일 양상(p<0.05)을 보였으며, 좌측유방암 환자인 경우 심장의 고선량 영역은 VMAT이 더 적은 체적으로 관찰(p<0.05)되었다. 폐선량의 경우 IMRT 보다 VMAT시 선량이 더 적게 관찰(p<0.05)되었다. IMNs을 포함하여 치료하는 경우 VMAT가 IMRT보다 방사선 치료 효율이 높을 것으로 사료된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.90-100
• /
• 2017

Purpose: To Study the dosimetric advantage of the Jaw tracking technique in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for Head and Neck Cancers. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected 10 previously treated head and neck cancer patients stage (T1/T2, N1, M0) in this study. All the patients were planned for IMRT and VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost technique. IMRT and VMAT plans were performed with jaw tracking (JT) and with static jaw (SJ) technique by keeping the same constraints and priorities for a particular patient. Target conformity, dose to the critical structures and low dose volumes were recorded and analyzed for IMRT and VMAT plans with and without JT for all the patients. Results: The conformity index average of all patients followed by standard deviation (${\bar{x}}{\pm}{\sigma}_{\bar{x}}$) of the JT-IMRT, SJ-IMRT, JT-VMAT, and SJ-VMAT were $1.72{\pm}0.56$, $1.67{\pm}0.57$, $1.83{\pm}0.65$, and $1.85{\pm}0.64$, and homogeneity index were $0.059{\pm}0.05$, $0.064{\pm}0.05$, $0.064{\pm}0.04$, and $0.064{\pm}0.05$. JT-IMRT shows significant mean reduction in right parotid and left parotid shows of 7.64% (p < 0.001) and 7.45% (p < 0.001) compare to SJ-IMRT. JT-IMRT plans also shows considerable dose reduction to thyroid, inferior constrictors, spinal cord and brainstem compared to the SJ-IMRT plans. Conclusion: Significant dose reductions were observed for critical structure in the JT-IMRT compared to SJ-IMRT technique. In JT-VMAT plans dose reduction to the critical structure were not significant compared to the SJ-IMRT due to relatively lesser monitor units.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.284-289
• /
• 2013

양측성 유방암 환자를 대상으로 부피적 조절회전방사선치료와 세기조절방사선치료의 선량학적 결과를 비교하여 효율적인 치료방법을 제시함을 목적으로 한다. 5명의 환자를 대상으로 8개 빔의 세기조절방사선치료와 12개 빔의 세기조절방사선치료, 1회전 부피적 조절회전방사선치료 계획을 수립하였다. 그 결과를 DVH 분석을 통해 선량학적으로 비교분석하였다. PTV의 평균선량과 $D_{98}$을 보면 12-IMRT가 $51.04{\pm}0.57$ Gy (오른쪽), $50.80{\pm}1.07$ Gy (왼쪽), $42.94{\pm}16.16$ Gy (오른쪽), $42.56{\pm}2.09$ Gy (왼쪽)로 우수한 경향을 보인다. HI와 $CI_{90,95}$에서도 12-IMRT가 우수한 결과를 보였다. 중요장기에서는 세치료계획 모두 우수한 결과를 보였지만 12-IMRT에서 가장 낮은 선량을 보였다. 12-IMRT가 PTV와 OAR의 선량학적측면에서 우수한 결과를 보여주었다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.32-42
• /
• 2019

Background: There have been much efforts to develop the proper and realistic machine Quality Assurance (QA) reflecting on real Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan. In this work we propose and test a special VMAT plan of plan-class specific (pcsr) QA, as a machine QA so that it might be a good solution to supplement weak point of present machine QA to make it more realistic for VMAT treatment. Materials and Methods: We divided human body into 5 treatment sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. One plan for each treatment site was selected from real VMAT cases and contours were mapped into the computational human phantom where the same plan as real VMAT plan was created and called plan-class specific reference (pcsr) QA plan. We delivered this pcsr QA plan on a daily basis over the full research period and tracked how much MLC movement and dosimetric error occurred in regular delivery. Several real patients under treatments were also tracked to test the usefulness of pcsr QA through comparisons between them. We used dynalog file viewer (DFV) and Dynalog file to analyze position and speed of individual MLC leaf. The gamma pass rate from portal dosimetry for different gamma criteria was analyzed to evaluate analyze dosimetric accuracy. Results and Discussion: The maxRMS of MLC position error for all plans were all within the tolerance limit of < 0.35 cm and the positional variation of maxPEs for both pcsr and real plans were observed very stable over the research session. Daily variations of maxRMS of MLC speed error and gamma pass rate for real VMAT plans were observed very comparable to those in their pcsr plans in good acceptable fluctuation. Conclusion: We believe that the newly proposed pcsr QA would be useful and helpful to predict the mid-term quality of real VMAT treatment delivery.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제54권10호
• /
• pp.3816-3823
• /
• 2022

This work analyzed the dosimetric difference between the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), partial/single/double-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (PA/SA/DA-VMAT) techniques in treatment planning for treating more than one target of lung cancer at different isocenters. IMRT and VMAT plans at different isocenters were created systematically using a Harold heterogeneous lung phantom. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), dose-volume histogram and mean and maximum dose of the PTV were calculated and analyzed. Furthermore, the dose-volume histogram and mean and maximum doses of the OARs such as right lung, contralateral lung and non GTV were determined from the plans. The IMRT plans showed the superior target dose coverage, higher mean and maximum values than other VMAT techniques. PA-VMAT technique shows more lung sparing and DA-VMAT increases the V_5/10/20 values of contralateral lung than other VMAT and IMRT techniques. The IMRT technique achieves highly conformal dose distribution to the target than other VMAT techniques. Comparing to the IMRT plans, the higher V_5/10/20 and mean lung dose were observed in the contralateral lung in the DA-VMAT.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2014

목 적 : 비소세포 폐암의 치료용적의 크기가 크거나 폐 용적이 작고, 몸의 정중선(Mid line)에 위치한 경우 척수의 허용선량을 고려한 방사선치료계획에서 폐 선량이 많아지게 되는데, 본 연구는 비소세포 폐암 환자의 3차원입체조형치료(Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy, 3D CRT), 제한된 각도를 이용한 세기변조방사선치료(Intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT)와 용적변조회전치료(Volumetric Modulated Arc therapy, VMAT) 치료계획을 각각 적용하여 전체 폐 선량을 비교 및 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : TrueBeam STx($Varian^{TM}$, USA) 10 MV 에너지를 이용하여 4명의 환자에 대하여 3D CRT, 제한된 각도를 이용한 IMRT와 VMAT 치료계획을 세우고, 총 선량 66 Gy/30 Fx 처방하였을 때, 선량용적히스토그램(Dose Volume Histogram, DVH)을 이용하여 치료계획용적(Planning Target Volume, PTV), 전체 폐 그리고 척수에 들어가는 선량을 평가하였다. PTV에 대한 처방선량지수(Conformity Index, CI), 선량균질지수(Homogeneity index, HI), 처방선량포함지수(Paddick's Conformity Index, PCI)를 구하고, 폐의 30 Gy 용적($V_{30}$), $V_{20}$, $V_{10}$, $V_5$, 평균선량(Mean dose)을 평가하고, 척수의 최대선량 값을 평가하였다. 결 과 : PTV에 대한 CI, HI, PCI의 평균값은 각각 $0.944{\pm}0.009$, $1.106{\pm}0.027$, $1.084{\pm}0.016$으로 평가되었다. 전체 폐에 대한 첫 번째 환자의 $V_{20}$은 3D CRT, IMRT, VMAT 각각 30.7%, 20.2%. 21.2%, 두 번째 환자의 $V_{20}$은 33.0%, 29.2%. 31.5%, 세 번째 환자의 $V_{20}$은 51.3%, 34.3%. 36.9%, 네 번째 환자의 $V_{20}$은 56.9%, 33.7%. 40%로 제한된 각도를 이용한 IMRT 치료계획에서 가장 낮게 평가되었다. 척수에 대한 최대선량 값은 모두 허용선량 미만으로 평가되었다. 결 론 : 비소세포 폐암의 방사선치료계획에서 3D CRT와 비교했을 때, 제한된 각도를 이용한 IMRT나 VAMT을 이용하면 척수의 허용선량을 넘지 않으면서 폐 선량을 줄여줄 수 있는 치료계획을 세울 수 있었다. IMRT와 VAMT을 비교해보면 PTV의 선량포함과 척수선량을 고려했을 때 IMRT 치료계획에서 보다 좁은 각도를 이용한 치료계획이 가능하였고, 이는 폐 선량을 좀 더 줄여줄 수 있는 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.110-115
• /
• 2014

원발성 폐암의 정위적 체부 방사선치료(Stereotatic Body Radiation Therapy; SBRT)시에, 종양주위의 빔 배열을 균등하게 한 $360^{\circ}$회전각도(Equally angles; EA)와 종양주위의 빔 배열을 부분각도(Partially angles; PA)로 배열한 치료계획의 선량차이를 확인하기 위하여, 세기조절방사선치료(Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, IMRT)와 체적변조회전치료(Volumetric-modulated arc therapy, VMAT)의 종양의 선량, 동측 폐의 선량, 반대측 폐의 선량, 손상위험장기(Organ at risk, OAR)의 선량, 치료효율 등을 비교분석 하였다. 12명의 환자에서 각각 4종류($IMRT_{EA}$, $IMRT_{PA}$, $VMAT_{EA}$, $VMAT_{PA}$)의 치료계획을 생성하였으며, 처방선량은 총 선량 60 Gy, 4회 분할치료로 표적체적 95%에 대해 100% 선량이 포함되게 하였다. IMRT와 VMAT의 치료계획 평가에서 $360^{\circ}$회전각도의 빔 균등배열과 부분각도 빔 배열에서 변수중 선량일치지수, 균질성지수, 고선량 유출, $D_{2cm}$, $R_{50}$은 빔 배열에 따라 크게 차이가 나지 않았다. 또한 손상위험장기인 척수, 기관지, 식도의 최고선량은 각각의 방법에 따라 차이를 나타내었다. 특히 $HDS_{location}$에서 21.63%와 26.46%의 큰 차이를 나타내었다.