• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.233-240
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to 'evaluation' in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and 'literature analysis.' Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.649-662
• /
• 2017

1980년대 이후 우리나라 대학 수와 학생 수는 비약적으로 증가해 왔으나, 급격한 양적인 팽창에 비해 질적인 성장부진은 많은 비판을 받아왔다. 앞으로 2025년까지 학령인구는 급속하게 감소하여 2014년 현재 대입정원 대비 절반 수준이 될 것으로 예상되고 있다. 이로 인해 지방 소재 대학, 전문대학부터 타격을 입게 되면서 전반적인 고등교육 생태계의 황폐화를 초래할 우려가 제기된다. 이에 대해 선제적으로 대응하고자 대학 이해관계자들의 논란 속에서 정원감축을 포함하는 대학 구조개혁을 위해 1주기 대학 구조개혁평가가 실시되었다. 평가결과 하위 등급을 받은 대학들이 거세게 반발하는 등 평가결과를 두고 내홍을 겪고 있는데, 이는 대학 구조개혁평가 평가지표를 포함하는 평가 프로세스에 대한 신뢰도를 문제 삼는 경우로 평가시스템에 대한 불신을 기초로 하고 있다. 2주기, 3주기 대학 구조개혁평가를 앞두고 있는 상황에서 대학 구조개혁평가의 질을 제고하고, 문제점을 진단, 개선하기 위하여 메타평가가 요구된다. 대학 구조개혁평가의 메타평가를 위해서는 평가준거의 개발이 선결되어야 하는데, 기존 교육학적인 연구에 인적자원개발 접근을 더한 학제적 연구가 필요하게 되었다. 본 연구에서는 대학 사회에서 초미의 관심사가 되고 있는 대학 구조개혁평가를 종합적으로 진단, 평가할 수 있는 메타평가 준거를 개발하고, 인적자원개발 관점에서 학제적 접근을 시도하였다. 문헌연구, 전문가좌담회, 설문조사를 통해 대학 구조개혁평가 메타평가 준거로서 총 5개 평가영역, 21개 평가부문, 42개 평가준거로 구성된 ERPOU 모형이 개발되었다. 향후 대학 구조개혁평가를 비롯한 대학평가에 대한 메타평가 연구에 경영학을 비롯한 연구가 촉발되고, 활성화되기를 기대한다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.81-92
• /
• 2014

This study suggests 5 evaluation criteria (safety and technology, environmental impact, economic feasibility, social factors, and institutional factors) and 24 evaluation indicators for a NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) derived using factor analysis. To do so, a survey using 1 on 1 interview was given to nuclear energy experts and local residents who live near nuclear power plants. In addition, by conducting a factor analysis, homogeneous evaluation indicators were grouped with the same evaluation criteria, and unnecessary evaluation criteria and evaluation indicators were dropped out. As a result of analyzing the weight of evaluation criteria with the sample of nuclear power experts and the general public, both sides recognized safety as the most important evaluation criterion, and the social factors such as public acceptance appeared to be ranked as more important evaluation criteria by the nuclear energy experts than the general public.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권8호
• /
• pp.7-14
• /
• 2022

This study aimed to test the factor structure of the measure of student participation in distance education. The study population consisted of all teachers in public education and faculty members in higher education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia by applying it to a sample of bachelor's and graduate students at the college of Education at umm al-Qura University. The (ESE) was applied to a random sample representing the study population consisting of (216) respondents. The results of the study showed that the scale consists of three main factors, with showed a high degree of construct validity through fit indices of the confirmatory factor analysis. The results have shown a gradual consistency of the measure's invariance that reaches the high level of the Measurement Invariance across the gender and study groups variables.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.85-93
• /
• 1993

Aims of the EXCEPT project and tasks and characteristics of the EXCEPT system are presented based on an analysis of urban planning EIAs. The methodology of evaluation in EIAs, which had to be developed in order to program the system, is based on a model of evaluation processes. Evaluation principles, evaluation rates, an environmental model and a model of the projects being planned are presented. The evaluation concern re-unifies the different components of evaluation again.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.113-119
• /
• 2011

This paper is a part of the development on the safe navigation model of tugs and barges in Korea waters. desk-top tug-barge simulator is to train the crew of tugs and barges, especially tugs' crew. It is connected with steering and engine telegraph console and winch control console, and can describe three types of operation mode for a tug-barge working unit, towing mode, side by side and push mode. It can also record and assess each simulation run. The evaluation module can confirm the result of a finished simulation run and help trainees to find and correct their faults, and it is composed of result evaluation and process evaluation.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 2th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.407-416
• /
• 2007

The construction industry in South Korea is experiencing great changes: it is becoming developed on a larger scale, specialized to a high degree and rapidly incorporating with other industries. This development has resulted in higher demand of construction industry. Accordingly, the transparency and an objective method of evaluation in the process of projects in the construction industry are gaining more importance. Clients' and customers' needs also require more specific objective evaluation to find whether their projects are successfully performed or not. This study aims to discuss problems on the current post-evaluation items including the qualitative item analysis such as customer satisfaction. Moreover, this paper suggests the improved ways in which enable the application of the effective evaluation system to the construction industry.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.65-73
• /
• 2006

This study attempts to develop an interim evaluation system for the Integrated Rural Village Cluster Development Project(IRVCDP) which can secure its identity and sustainability, and induce its early settlement, and to derive plans for its steady progress. The evaluation system consists of three levels. The highest-order level is evaluation purposes, which describe IRVCDP's goals. They are expansion of income bases(EIB), improvement of living environments(ILE), strengthening of regional capabilities(SRC) and constructing effective project operation system(CEPOS). The second level is evaluation items, which each characterize the relevant evaluation purposes. The last level is evaluation indices, which observe achievement f3r evaluation purposes. 22 evaluation indices are selected to satisfy the purposes of this study through a brainstorming process and a survey on opinions of experts for those evaluation purposes and evaluation items which are derived from analyzing the IRVCDP's properties. The relative importance of the evaluation indices selected are determined through the AHP analysis. The most intriguing result from the AHP analysis is that strengthening of regional capabilities is found to be the most important one among evaluation purposes. It can be said that this result is parallel to a ultimate goal of the IRVCDP.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2000년도 NEW STRATEGY FOR DRUG DEVELOPMENT IN POST-GENOMIC ERA(대한약학회)
• /
• pp.265.2-265.2
• /
• 2000

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2021

The objective of this research is to devise a BARS evaluation system as a performance evaluation plan for non-face-to-face capstone design and to verify the validity through the expert FGI as the remote education is highlighted as a new normal standard in the post corona epoch. The conclusion of this research is as follows. First, the non-face-to-face capstone design is a competency centered subject that allows you to develop the engineering and majoring knowledge and its function and attitude, and the achievement of program outcome is the objective competency, and the researcher proposes the BARS method evaluation, one of competency evaluation method, as a new performance evaluation plan. Second, for the evaluation of PO achievement of non-face-to-face capstone design, the researcher deduced 20 behavior identification standard(anchor) of BARS evaluation system, and developed the achievement standard per 4 levels. Third, as the evaluation tool of non-face-to-face capstone design, the presentation data(PPT), presentation video, product such as trial product(model), non-face-to-face class participation video, discussion participating video, team activity report, and result report for the evidential data of BARS evaluation were appeared as proper. Finally, the BARS evaluation plan of non-face-to-face capstone design would be efficiently made through the establishment of evaluation plan, the establishment of grading standard of BARS evaluation scale, the determination of evaluation subject and online BARS evaluation site.