• 원자력산업
• /
• 제5권5호통권27호
• /
• pp.6-11
• /
• 1985

• 에너지협의회보
• /
• 통권12호
• /
• pp.24-36
• /
• 1989

• 한국식생활문화학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국식생활문화학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.79-82
• /
• 2007

• 대한간호
• /
• 제23권3호통권126호
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 1984

• 건설관리
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.11-15
• /
• 2023

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.55-87
• /
• 2011

This paper is to illustrate a variety of court-annexed ADR programs and vindicate its implications of court-annexed ADR in United States. It has been almost three decades since Frank Sender articulated his vision of the multi-door courthouse. The court-annexed ADR originated from the concept of multi-door court house. Professor Sander argued that the court must transform from the court that provides litigation, only one type of dispute resolution, to the multi-door courthouse which provides a variety of dispute resolution methods including a number of ADR programs. The types of court-annexed ADR on which this paper focus are court-annexed mediation, court-annexed arbitration, mini trial, early neutral evaluation(ENE), summary jury trial, rent-a-judge, and med-arb in United States. The findings of this paper is as follows. First, the ADR movement is the irreversible and dominant phenomenon in the US court. The motivation of incorporating ADR into court is to reduce the cost of court to handle the civil disputes and to eliminate the delay of litigation process in the court. At the same time, a couple of studies of ADR revealed that the ADR program satisfied users of ADR. Second, the landscape of ADR has not been fixed. In 1970's, the court-annexed arbitration has been popular. In 1980's, the diverse kinds of ADR programs were introduced into the federal court as well as state courts, such as mini trial, early neutral evaluation(ENE), summary jury trial, and court-annexed mediation. But in 2000s, the court-annexed mediation has been the dominant type of ADR in United States. Third, the each type of ADR program has its own place for the dispute resolution. Since Korean society enters into the stage in which diverse kind of disputes occur in the areas of environment, construction, medicare, etc, it is desirable to take into consideration of the introduction of ADR to dispute resolution in Korea.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.504-512
• /
• 2017

Forest roads are essential for forest resource management. This study investigated and compared forest road and road policy data in Korea and the United States to improve future forest road policies in Korea. As compared to the United States (9.5 m/ha), Korea has much lower forest road density (3.19 m/ha) and has been actively constructing new forest roads. The Korea Forest Service leads forest road policy in Korea by providing subsidies for new road construction in non-national forests. The budget for forest roads accounted for 9.1% of the total Korea Forest Service budget in 2010 - 2015 and 73.5% of it was used for new road construction. Korean forest road policies have been distinctively changed over the past decades; e.g., an increase in forest road mileage in the 1990s, an increase in forest road standards in the 2000s, and an increase in the mileage of higher standard roads in the 2010s. In comparison to Korea, the United States has focused on road maintenance and road decommissioning since 2001. The budget for forest roads accounted for 2.9% of the total USDA Forest Service budget in 2011 - 2016 and 82.2% of it was used for operations and maintenance. Our study results suggest that forest road policies in Korea should start focusing on road maintenance and decommissioning, if needed.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.99-110
• /
• 2014

Flounder was selected as one of the 10 strategic export aquaculture products for seafood export expansion in 2013. The flounder aquaculture industry has promoted export market diversification and product diversification from live to processed goods as a it's main strategy. The purpose of this study is to find an improvement plan for export expansion to the United States, as it emerged as a new target export market for the flounder. A summary of the key findings is as follows. First, the western region of the United States prefers to consume live and fresh flounder, whereas the eastern region prefers to consume fresh flounder. Second, because of it's high quality, Korean flounder is favored in the western region of the United States despite it's high price, whereas in the eastern region of the United States, where production volume is high, Korean flounder has to compete with US flounders because of it's high price. Third, according to the survey results, US consumers tend to enjoy seafood, as well as flounder cuisines. Fourth, the main consumption place of flounders by US consumers are restaurants, and they prefer to consume them in the form of sashimi and sushi. Fifth, 70% of US consumers expressed willingness to consume flounder when eating out. which shows great market potential. However, the high price of Korean flounder and limited size of the live fish market act as major obstacles to expanding export volume. To expand exporting Korean flounder, continuos efforts such as price reduction, exporting highly fresh fish, the co-development of processed food with the US are needed.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.43-56
• /
• 2002

While there is universal agreement that the ecosystems approach to family resource management is the must influential currently, questions have arisen about the broad applicability of the Deacon & Firebaugh (1988) ecosystems framework. Engberg (1996) has characterized the dominant approach in family resource management as technical and argued that a technical approach substantially restricts feasible actions in much of the world and should not be used in ethical practice. The purpose of the present paper is to compare the family resource management patterns by dual role manager of business owning families in Korea and The United States. Such a comparison is an essential step in the assessment of the usefulness of the Deacon & Firebaugh framework, in particular, and the ecosystems framework, more generally. Korean respondents are 105 family and business managers interviewed in 2000 as part of a survey of owners of small to medium size family business enterprises in Seoul. U.S. respondents are 259 dual role managers in the National Family Business Survey (NFBS 1997). Chi squared statistics indicated country differences on each of the ten(goal setting, standard setting, demand clarification, resource assessment, action sequencing, actuating, checking, adjusting, demand responses, resource change)management practices. Mean responses on eight of the practices(goal setting, standard setting, action sequencing, actuating, checking, adjusting, demand responses, resource changes) were significantly different between two countries. U.S. total score means of family resource management were higher than Korea. Factor analysis of the management scale items yielded different patterns for Korea, and the United States. Korean dual role manager of family business were categorized into three different patterns as classic oriented manager, goal oriented manager, action oriented manager and U.S. were categorized into Process oriented manager and Production oriented manager. Both the number of managerial strategies and the types of strategies used varied in the two countries.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2005년도 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.492-496
• /
• 2005

하천은 정치적, 행정적, 사회적 구분을 자유자재로 넘나들고 물과 토지는 강한 연관성을 가지고 있다. 물과 하천의 이러한 특성들은 수자원을 효율적으로 관리하는데 큰 제약요소로 간주되어 왔다. 따라서 수자원을 유역이라는 한정된 범위 내에서 모든 인간활동과 자연현상을 통합적으로 고려한다는 개념은 바람직한 관리방안으로 알려지고 있다. 유역관리는 이러한 관점에서 물을 경제적이고 공평하게 관리하고 분배하여 수자원에 대한 장기적이고 지속가능한 해결방안을 마련하는 것이다. 본 연구는 유역관리에 대한 한국과 미국의 차이점을 파악하기 위하여 크게 세 가지 부분으로 이루어져 있다. 첫 번째 부분은 한국에서 1960년대 이후 시작된 유역관리가 1990년대에 수질관리 차원의 대유역관리로 진행되는 과정을 고찰하였다. 두 번째에는 미국에서 대유역관리가 실종되고 소유역관리가 확산되는 과정을 밝혔다. 마지막으로 유역관리에 대한 한국과 미국의 전개과정을 비교검토하고 그 차이점을 평가하였다. 미국에서는 대유역관리에 대한 관심이 쇠퇴한 반면에 수문학적 지역으로서의 소유역이 주요 관심대상으로 떠오르고 있다. 이에 반하여 우리나라에서는 현재 정치적 차원의 물관리체제개편과 사회적 차원의 강살리기운동이 동시에 전개되고 있다. 따라서 우리나라가 당면한 유역관리의 과제는 미국보다도 더욱 복합적이다.