• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.45-56
• /
• 2013

북한의 예측 불허의 공격에 대비하기 위하여 서북도서에 대한 전력증강은 위협기반에서 탈피하여 적 능력, 작전환경, 기술발전 등을 충분히 반영한 능력기반의 전력기획을 요구하고 있다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 서북도서에 대한 요구 능력 식별단계로부터 결정된 전력에 대한 투자단계까지의 능력기반 프로세스 중에서 식별된 능력들에 대한 획득 우선순위 결정단계에 대한 방법을 제안하였다. 식별된 능력들에 대하여 조직, 작전, 능력의 관계를 설정하고, 가중치를 부여함으로써 순위 결정의 모호성을 제거하고 세부적인 우선순위 결정이 가능하도록 하였다. 다른 우선순위 결정방법과 비교할 때, 서북도서에 대한 다양한 작전과 요구능력을 동시에 식별하고, 우선순위를 명확하게 구분하는 결과를 획득하였다. 능력기반 전력기획은 상대적으로 많은 전력들을 필요로 하고, 부족한 국방예산에 의하여 제한을 받기 때문에 세밀한 우선순위의 결정방법은 효율적인 전력증강에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.673-689
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 APT 공격을 탐지하고 대응하기 위한 과정의 하나로 APT 공격을 스코어링하는 방안을 제안한다. 먼저, 사이버 공격을 스코어링하는 과정에서 비일관적인 전문가의 주관적인 판단 요소를 고려한 기존의 연구와는 달리, MITRE ATT&CK^Ⓡ의 공격기술을 구성하는 여러 구성요소 중 정량화할 수 있는 요소들을 식별하고 이를 정량화하는 방안을 제시한다. 또한, 정량화된 요소들을 이용하여 단위 공격기술의 스코어를 도출하고, 나아가 여러 공격 기술로 구성된 전체 APT 공격의 스코어를 산출하는 방안을 제안한다. 제안한 스코어링 방법을 APT 공격 사례 보고서에 적용하여 APT 공격을 포함한 다양한 사이버 공격의 위협 수준 및 시급성을 판단하기 위한 정량화 가능성을 제시한다. 본 연구를 이용하여 APT 공격을 탐지하는 과정에서 실제 공격 여부를 판단하고, 공격의 우선순위를 산정함으로써 더욱 시급하고 중요한 사이버 공격에 대응할 수 있을 것이다.

• Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.605-614
• /
• 2007

Feeding pigs used to be a means of managing domestic resources that may otherwise have been wasted into valuable animal protein. Feeding pigs thus was a form of husbandry. Following recent rapid industrial development, pig rearing has changed from extensive to intensive, but this transformation has been associated with major concerns. The concentration of large amounts of pig manure in small arrears is environmentally hazardous. Moreover, high densities of animals in intensive production systems also impose a health threat for both animals and humans. Furthermore, the use of growth promoters and preventive medicines for higher production efficiencies, such as in-feed antibiotics, also induces microbial resistance thus affects human therapeutics. In addition, consumers are questioning the ethics of treating animals in intensive production systems. Animal welfare, environmental and bio-safe issues are re-shaping the nature of pig production systems. Feeding pigs thus involves not only the consideration of economic traits, but also welfare traits and environmental traits. Thus, a focus on technological feasibility, environmental sustainability and social desirability is essential for successful feeding operations. Feeding pigs now involves multiple projects with different sustainability goals, but goal conflicts exist since no pattern or scenario can fulfill all sustainability goals and the disagreements are complicated by reduced or even no use of in-feed antibiotics. Thus it is difficult to feed pigs in a manner that meets all goals of high quality, safe product, eco- and bio-sustainability, animal welfare and profit. A sustainable pig production system thus requires a prioritization of goals based on understanding among consumers, society and producers and needs to view from both a local and global perspective.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제18권7호
• /
• pp.1929-1952
• /
• 2024

The development of drones is transforming society as a whole and playing a game-changing role in warfare. However, numerous problems pose threats to the lives and safety of people, and the counter-drone system lags behind the rapid development of drones. Most countries, including South Korea, have not established a reliable counter-drone system in response to the threat posed by numerous drones. Due to budget constraints in each country, an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis was conducted among a group of experts who have been involved in policymaking and research and development related to counter-drone systems. This analysis aimed to determine the priority of building a counter-drone system. Based on various research data, the counter-drone system was analyzed in three stages: detection/identification, governance, and response. The hierarchical design mapped out the existing researched counter-drone technology into a hierarchical model consisting of 31 evaluation criteria. The conclusion provided a roadmap for establishing a counter-drone system based on the prioritization of each element and considering factors such as technological advancement, outlining directions for development in each field.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권32호
• /
• pp.123-159
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this research paper is to re-valuate the factors that affected the Royal Navy's rearmament and preparation for war by conducting analysis on the discussion held in the Britain on the strategic priorities and Navy's coping measures adopted during the interwar period. After the end of the WWI, each of the military arms of the Britain faced significant difficulty in securing budget and increasing their military power all throughout the interwar period, and the Navy was not an exception. The WWII that got started on September 1939 was the turning point in which this difficulty led to full-fledged crisis. Immensely many criticisms followed after the war and problems were identified when it comes to the Royal Navy's performance during the war. This type of effort to identify problem led to the attempt to analyze whether Royal Navy's preparation for war and rearmament policy during interwar period were adequate, and to identify the root causes of failure. Existing studies sought to find the root cause of failed rearmament from external factors such as the deterioration of the Britain itself or pressure from the Treasury Department to cut the budget for national defense, or sought to detect problems from the development of wrong strategies by the Navy. However, Royal Navy's failed preparation for the war during interwar period is not the result of one or two separate factors. Instead, it resulted due to the diverse factors and situations that the Britain was facing at the time, and due to intricate and complex interaction of these factors. Meanwhile, this research paper focused on the context characterized by 'strategic selection and setting up of priorities' among the various factors to conduct analysis on the Navy's rearmament by linking it with the discussion held at the time on setting up strategic priorities, and sought to demonstrate that the Navy Department's inadequate counter-measures developed during this process waned Royal Navy's position. After the end of WWI, each of the military arms continued to compete for the limited resources and budget all throughout the interwar period, and this type of competition amidst the situation in which the economic situation of Britain was still unstable, made prioritization when it comes to the allocation of resources and setting up of the priorities when it comes to the military power build-up, inevitable. Amidst this situation, the RAF was able to secure resources first and foremost, encouraged by the conviction of some politicians who were affected by the 'theory of aerial threat' and who believed that curtailing potential attack with the Air Force would be means to secure national security at comparatively lower cost. In response, Navy successfully defended the need for the existence of Navy despite the advancement of the aerial power, by emphasizing that the Britain's livelihood depends on trade and on the maintenance of maritime traffic. Despite this counter-measuring logic, however, Navy's role was still limited to the defense of overseas territory and to the fleet run-off instead of sea traffic route production when it comes to the specific power build-up plan, and did not understand the situation in which financial and economic factors gained greater importance when it comes to the setting up of strategic priorities. As a result, Navy's plan to build its powers was met with continual resistance of the Treasury Department, and lost the opportunity to re-gain the status of 'senior service' that it had enjoyed in the past during the competition for strategic prioritization. Given that the strategic and economic situation that Korea faces today is not very different from that of the Britain during the interwar period, our Navy too should leverage the lessons learned from the Royal Navy to make the effort to secure viable position when it comes to the setting of priorities in case of national defense strategy by presenting the basis on why maritime coping should be prioritized among the numerous other threats, and by developing the measures for securing the powers needed effectively amidst the limited resources.