• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.367-374
• /
• 2018

4차 산업혁명시대에 필요한 인재를 양성하기 위해서는 영재를 선발하여 체계적으로 교육하는 것이 필요하다. 특정 분야에 뛰어난 영재도 중요하지만 이보다는 수학, 과학, 정보 분야의 융합 인재가 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 대학영재교육원의 영재 교육 대상자들을 선발할 때에 정보영재의 특성이 반영된 평가 요소가 과학영재 선발에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 대해 알아본다. 정보영재의 특성에서 인지적인 요소들인 규칙화 능력, 추론화 능력, 효율화 능력, 일반화 능력, 구조화 능력, 추상화 능력이 과학영재를 선발하는데 있어 상관 관계가 매우 높게 나타났다. 과학영재교육원 지원자들 그룹에서의 상관 관계가 1차 합격자 그룹보다 더 높고, 최종 합격자들 그룹보다 더욱 높다. 이것은 정보영재의 특성을 나타나는 문항들이 과학영재 선발에 많은 영향을 미친다는 것을 의미한다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.63-84
• /
• 1999

This study is to examine the current problems of teaching gifted children and suggest elements(or factors) to be considered in setting up goals thereof by analyzing incumbent teachers awareness. 121 teachers were arbitrarily selected from 30 different kindergartens located in Seoul and Anyang, and they were interviewed with two parts questionnaires(or opinions) of improving current practice. The first part of the questionnaire is composed of the questions about teachers awareness of gifted children, actual state of teaching gifted children, effects of teaching in kindergarten for gifted children, and desired direction for teaching improvement. The second part of the questionnaire provided interpretation of precociousness by study habit, creativity and definitive properties and asked the number of children qualified in their classes. Since the results of the first interview as to awareness of gifted children were dismal, 40 teachers were thereafter randomly selected again, and the second interview was warranted. The results alarmingly revealed that program of teaching gifted children were barely existing even though the teachers awareness for the needs of special education for the precocious as well of study materials and programs thereof was high. In addition, the teachers familiarity of gifted children was surprisingly low. At the second interview whereby gifted children was explained, the teachers awareness of gifted children was dramatically improved to 40% in comparing with 7.4% at the first interview without explanation of gifted children. Teachers awareness of gifted children was low because of lacking direct or indirect experience of having gifted children and special programs therof in their classes as well as teachers nonchalance. Therefore not only adequate training and education of teachers, but also cultivation of qualified teachers for special programs for the precocious are obligatory. Training of incumbent teachers and determination of gifted children are prerequisite for timely discovery of gifted children and adequate education for them. Development of special education programs and diffusion are also crucial.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.635-641
• /
• 2005

This paper suggests a research & education (R&E) model for the gifted in science education. The model has been developed under three assumptions. The first is that using the sequences of a gifted educational program designed to facilitate the process will assist in gifted students' construction of scientific knowledge and comprehension of laboratory practice through concrete experimental experience. The second is that gifted students will be able to apply this learning to further study using and extending scientific knowledge and experience. The third is that challenging tasks and feedback at the requisite stage of development will improve instructional effectiveness. The R&E Model has five phases: engaging, exploring, planning, performing and elaborating; furthermore, it suggests roles for the mentee and mentor. The R&E model has two functions for gifted education. The first is providing guidance for gifted curriculum developers as they design a mentor program, and the second is helping a mentor improve instructional effectiveness through use of strategies. This model has potentials to educate the gifted students in the Science Education Institute for the Gifted.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.597-612
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 국내 영재교육의 새로운 분야로 확대되고 있는 '발명교육'이 영재교육의 독립적 영역으로서 정체성을 가질 수 있는지를 현장 교사들의 인식분석을 통하여 판단해 보고자 수행되었다. 연구의 대상은 총 576명의 현직 교사들로서 직무연수 등의 기회를 통해 배포된 인쇄된 설문지나 이메일을 통해 안내된 온라인 설문지를 통해 응답하도록 하였다. 본 조사연구를 통해 확인할 수 있었던 가장 중요한 정보는 교사들 대부분(93.9%)이 발명영재교육이 별도의 영재교육 분야로서 필요하다는 의견을 보였다는 것이다. 또한 발명영재의 특성, 교육프로그램, 담당교사에게 요구되는 자질, 진도지도 및 상담, 선발방식, 필요한 교육시설 등 다양한 측면에서 수학이나 과학 분야의 영재교육과 뚜렷한 차별성을 갖는 것으로 인식하고 있었다. 기존 국내연구에서 밝히고 있는 발명영재 특성의 차별성에 대한 인식을 살펴본 결과로는 지식기술역량에 해당하는 3가지 특성 중 3가지 모두, 통합창의역량에 해당하는 3가지 특성 중 2가지, 인성역량에 해당하는 4가지 특성 중 1가지가 발명영재에게 특별히 요구되는 고유한 특성으로 인식하고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해, 발명영재교육은 선진 외국의 영재교육에서 충분한 이론적 근거를 얻거나 관련 프로그램의 선례를 찾아볼 수는 없더라도 국내 영재교육에서 이미 독립적인 한 분야로서 인식되고 있으며, 어떤 면에서는 우리나라 영재교육이 해외의 영재교육 발전에도 크게 기여할 수 있는 선구자적 역할을 수행할 수 있는 좋은 기회가 될 수 있음을 알 수 있다.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.278-289
• /
• 2015

연구의 목적은 영재교육대상자의 선발 방법이다. 즉, 시험 선발과 자동 진급에 따라 선발된 영재학생간의 학업정서, 메타인지, 자기효능감을 차이를 비교, 분석함으로써 선발 방법에 따른 영재 학생의 특성을 이해하고 효과적인 영재교육을 위한 영재교육대상자 판별 및 선발에 있어서의 타당한 근거를 마련해 보고자 한다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영재선발방법에 따라 선발된 영재 학생간의 학업정서, 메타인지능력 및 자기효능감의 연구에서는 시험 선발 영재학생과 자동 진급 영재 학생 간에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 영재라는 동질 집단 조건에서는 선발방법의 차이에 따른 영향은 없는 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, 동일한 선발된 방법에 따른 비교에서, 영재학생의 학업정서를 살펴보면, 시험선발의 경우 초등과 중등 모두에서 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 자동진급에서는 중등의 영재교육기관별 분석에서 영재교육원 학생이 영재학급 학생보다 높았음을 알 수 있었다(p<.05). 메타인지능력에서 있어서는 초등에서는 차이가 없었으나, 중등의 경우 시험선발에서 남학생이, 영재교육원 학생이 높았고(p<.05), 자동진급에서는 영재교육원 학생이 높았음을 알았다(p<.05). 또한 자기효능감에서는 선발 방식에 따라 차이가 없었고 단지 자동진급에서 영재교육원 학생이 영재학급학생보다 높았음을 알았다(p<.05).

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.437-445
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to examine about science gifted class student's effect of education for the science gifted class. For this, 21 item-questionnaires were given to 292 students at the 4th, 5th and 6th graders in 3 elementary gifted schools located in Incheon. The results of this study were as follows: First, science gifted students were positive in effect of gifted class. This was more positive as class is low. Second, gifted students are thinking that it is helped to own learning that study at gifted class in cognitive side but appeared relatively low regarding school record or utterance, study method, thinking faculty, creativity. Third, they did not think that is exerting a lot of effects about own habit that study, interest, pride in emotional side. Fourth, they thought that is effective in relation with new friends more than teachers and parents in sociocultural side. Fifth, in private tutoring side they thought that is not influencing to solve academy taking a course of decrease.

• 동아시아식생활학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.46-54
• /
• 1999

The present study was done to investigate the eating behavior of gifted and non-gifted children. Of the students who responded, 77.5% replied that they eat three meals a day and 22.5% replied otherwise. More of the gifted students(85%) had three meals a day than the non-gifted students (70%). The percentage of students who have breakfast is 79.4%, and the majority of them (72.2%) apparently have rice and soup as their menu. Most of the children took approximately 20 minuets to have a meal. The gifted students tended to have a better appetite and less dislike for a particular food. They also tended to have snacks out of hunger compared to the non-gifted children, who had snacks out of habit. The gifted group tended to have more snacks prepared at home compared to the non-gifted group who had more snacks bought at the store. The gifted group drank more milk and exercised more regularly than the non-gifted ones. Both groups slept around 8 hours a day. Even though 7.4% of the children are actually overweight, it is interesting to note that 27.2% thought they are overweight.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.316-329
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to examine how middle school students perceived the operation of on-line and off-line math-gifted education. The research questions were as follows: 1. How do students recognize the current situation concerning the operation of on-line and off-line gifted education? 2. How do students recognize the effect and satisfaction level of on-line and off-line gifted education? 3. How do students recognize the improvement of on-line and off-line gifted education? The subjects in this study were 591 students who included 208 in on-line classes and 383 in off-line classes. The results were as follows: First, the students who were enrolled in the on-line and off-line classes regarded gifted people as ones who had a superb ability in a particular field and as ones who think creatively. Second, all the students in on-line and off-line classes found gifted education to be of use to developing their potentials, and they had the biggest preference for experiential field study as the most effective teaching method. Third, concerning their needs for the management of gifted classes, they asked for immediate Q&A services over the Internet.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.307-337
• /
• 2007

이 연구의 목적은 초등학교와 중학교의 영재학생들을 대상으로 TTCT(Torrance Test of Creative Thinking)를 실시하여 창의성 영재를 선발하고, 선발된 창의성 영재들의 창의적 특성들이 초등학생과 중학생 간, 수학영재와 과학영재 간 어떤 차이가 있는가를 밝힘으로써 창의성 영재들의 창의적 특성을 규명해 보려는 것이다. 이를 위해 전라북도교육청 산하 17개 영재교육원 학생 중 수퍼영재교육을 희망한 594명을 대상으로 창의성 영재를 선발, 초등학생과 중학생의 창의성 요인의 차이 검증(t-test), 수학영재와 과학영재의 창의성 요인의 차이검증(t-test), 창의성 영재선발에 영향을 미치는 창의성 요인들의 초 중학생 간 및 수학영재 과학영재 간 차이검증(중다회귀분석)을 하였다. 연구결과, TTCT는 창의성 영재 선발과 탈락을 변별하는 역량이 있으나, 창의성 요인 중 '유창성'과 '독창성', '유창성'과 '정교성' 간에는 각각 .78, .50의 상관계수를 보여 창의성 요인의 고유성이 낮을 가능성이 발견되었다. 또 중학생은 초등학생에 비해 유창성(원 그림)과 정교성 요인(그림구성, 그림완성, 원 그림), 제목의 추상성(그림구성)이 유의하게 낮으며, 과학 영재는 수학영재에 비해 독창성(그림구성)과 정교성(그림구성, 그림완성, 원 그림) 요인에서 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 따라서 창의성 영재 선발을 위한 검사의 타당도를 높이기 위한 방법이 계속 연구되어야 하며, 학년이 높아지면서 창의성이 낮아지는 문제의 해결방법과 교과별 영재의 창의성을 기르기 위한 방안이 모색될 필요가 있다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.748-757
• /
• 2004

When teachers for the gifted express metaphors about their teaching, they may develop better understanding and conceptualizing of teaching and enable to choose appropriate teaching strategies for optimizing individualized learning of the gifted. Therefore, the purpose of this study includes to explore metaphors about science teachers' teaching for the gifted in middle schools and classify into types of metaphors. The survey was administered and completed survey instruments by 66 science teachers for the gifted at gifted educational institutions affiliated with local offices of education and 18 science teachers at middle schools were analyzed. It was revealed that science teachers for the gifted described seven types of metaphors about their teaching with characteristics of student-centered (counsel, helper, etc.), teacher-centered (judge, captain, etc.), or student-teacher-interacted (painter, nurse, etc.) types. More than 60% of teachers described their teaching as either student-centered or student-teacher-interacted types. However, percentage of teachers for the teacher-centered and power-oriented type was higher for science teachers for the gifted (33%) than science teachers for regular students (22%). It was also found that female science teachers for the gifted showed higher percentage for teacher-centered and power-oriented (35%) than male teachers (28%) and teachers with BS degree showed higher percentage for student-centered and service-oriented type (33%) than teachers with MS degree (27%). In addition biology teachers for the gifted also were appeared to be more teacher-centered and power-oriented type (60%) than physics (21%), chemistry (6%), and earth science (33%).