• Journal of the Korean Electrochemical Society
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.134-140
• /
• 2016

An aptamer-based biosensor using a new redox indicator has been examined for the electrochemical detection of thrombin. The aptamer modified primary aliphatic amine was covalently immobilized onto poly-(5,2':5',2"-terthiophene-3'-carboxylic acid) (polyTTCA) layer. Tetrabromophenolphthalein ethyl ester (KTBPE) was interacted to aptamer and used as an electrochemical indicator. Prior to the detection, the oxidation reaction of KTBPE onto aptamer modified layer was also investigated using differential pulse voltammetry. The characterization of the final sensor (KTBPE/aptamer -polyTTCA) was performed by voltammetry, QCM, and ESCA. After binding of thrombin onto KTBPE/aptamer based sensor, the peak signal of KTBPE was gradually decreased. The sensor exhibited a dynamic range between 10.0 and 100.0 nM with the detection limit of $1.0{\pm}0.2nM$.

• Archives of Pharmacal Research
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.227-230
• /
• 1993

A new device to detect methamphetamine (MA), amphetamine(A) and its metabolites in urine was developed using the paper strip method and the test tube method of dry chemical reagents. The reagent containing tetrabromophenolphthalein ethyl ester (TBPE) and borax. For the TBPE paper strip method, a device was prepared with a window at each end of the reagent paper strip ; one window is for the sample application, and the other window is for the methylene chloride. The diffused sample from one window reacts with reagent in the paper and produces color at the point where it meets with methylene chloride which has diffused form the other side. A positive smaple produces as red-purple color and the negative sample a greenish color, with a detection limit of 5-10 ppm. The result can be obtained within one minute. For the TBPE test tube method which contains dry reagents, the detection limit is 5 ppm and the result can be obtaineed within 30 seconds, however the carry-on is not as convenient as the paper strip method. The performance of both methods were evlauated by comparing with the results of gas chromatography (GC) and fluorescence polarizaiton immunoassay (FPIA). The results were proven that both methods were useful as primary screening reagents to detect MA in urine and in dry powder.