• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제44권5호
• /
• pp.526-536
• /
• 2006

Statement of problem : Use of fiber composite technology as well as development of nonmetal implant prosthesis solved many problems due to metal alloy substructure such as corrosion. toxicity, difficult casting, expensiveness and esthetic limit. After clinical and laboratory test, we could find out that fiber-reinforced composite prostheses have good mechanical properties and FRC can make metal-free implant prostheses successful. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to evaluate the flexural strength of implant fixed prosthesis using fiber reinforced composite. Material and methods : 2-implant fixture were placed in second premolar and second molar area in edentulous mandibular model, and their abutments were placed, and bridge prostheses using gold, PFG, Tescera, and Targis Vectris were fabricated. Tescera was made in 5 different designs with different supplements. Group I was composed by 3 bars with diameter 1.0mm and 5 meshes, 2 bars and 5 meshes for Group II, 1 bar and 5 meshes for Group III, and only 5 meshes were used for Group IV. And Group V is composed by only 3 bars. Resin (Tescera) facing was made to buccal part of pontic of gold bridge. All of gold and PFG bridges were made on one model, 5 Targis Vectris bridges were also made on one model, and 25 Tescera bridges were. made on 3 models. Each bridge was attached to the test model by temporary cement and shallow depression was formed near central fossa of the bridge pontic to let 5 mm metal ball not move. Flexual strength was marked in graph by INSTRON. Results : The results of the study are as follows. The initial crack strength was the highest on PFG. and in order of gold bridge Tescera I, Tescera II, Targis vectris, Tescera IV, Tescera III, and Tescera V. The maximum strength was the highest on gold bridge, and in order of PFG, Tescera I, Tescera IV Tescera II, Targis vectris, Tescera III, and Tescera V. Conculsions : The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this study. 1. Flextural strength of implant prosthesis using fiber reinforced composite was higher than average posterior occlusal force. 2. In initial crack strength, Tescera I was stronger than Tescera V, and weaker than PFG. 3. Kinds and number of auxillary components had an effect on maximum strength, and maximum strength was increased as number of auxillary components increased. 4 Maximum strength of Tescera I was higher than Targis vectris, and lower than PFG.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.438-452
• /
• 2005

Statement of problem: The use of Ceromer is increasing in dentistry. But, the research of Ceromer has not been conducted much. Purpose : This study was to evaluate the marginal fidelity and internal adaptation according to marginal position. Materials and Methods: In this study 60 resin crowns were fabricated. The measurements of the marginal fidelity were carried out using stereomicroscope $SZ-40^{(R)}$ (Olympus, Japan) and the measurements of fracture strength were done using Instron $8871^{(R)}$ (Instron Co., U.S.A.) at a cross head speed of 1mm/min. All of the measurements were statistically analyzed by ANOVA test, multiple range test and Weibull analysis. Statistical significance was set in advance at the probability level of less than 0.05. All of the measurements were analyzed with Window $SPSS^{(R)}$ Version 10.0 soft ware for the personal computer. Results : 1. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, but difference between these two and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 2. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each maerial and with/without fiber group in the marginal fidelity 3. There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Tescera^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ but no statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 4 There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each material and with/without fiber group in the fracture strength. 5. When comparing the fracture surface, no fiber group showed the resin which were fractured at the labial surface and separated from the adhesion surface. In fiber group, the fractures took a place in resin compartments. Conclusion. The marginal fidelity and the fracture strength were clinically acceptable. From these results, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$ were superior than $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ in the marginal fidelity But, when applying these resin crowns in clinic, more careful consideration is needed and further study is recommended.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.519-527
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study was to estimate shear bond strength according to difference in luting cements and Targis surface treatment. 70 non-carious extracted human molars and Targis shade D210(Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) were used in the present study and they were randomly assigned into 7 experimental groups ; Group 1 : specimens were bonded with using vitremer(3M, U.S.A). Group 2, 4, 6 : specimens were not-treated with silane and bonded with Panavia 21(Kuraray Japan), Choice(Bisco, U.S.A.) and Variolink II(Vivadent, Liechtenstein) respectively Group 3, 5, 7 : specimens were treated with silane and bonded with Panavia 21, Choice and Variolink II respectively. After the surface treatment, the luting cement was mixed by manufacturer's recommendation and then applied between dentin and Targis and excess cement was removed by brush. All specimens were stored for 24 hrs in distiled water at $37^{\circ}C$. Shear bond strength for each group was then measured. To examine the failure patterns of targis to dentin, specimens were fabricated and observed under the SEM. The results were as follows ; 1. The mean shear bond strength of the groups using resin cements was significantly higher than that using resin-modified GI cements (P<0.05). 2. There is no significant difference in shear bond strength between Panavia 21 and Choice whether silane was used or not(P>0.05). However, bond strength for the groups using Variolink II was higher in the specimens not-treated with silane than the treated specimens (P<0.05). 3. There is no significant difference in bond strength among the groups using silane surface treatment and resin cement (group 3, 5, 7) (P<0.05). 4. The proportions of the specimens showing the mixed fracture failure were 20% in groups using Panavia 21 and Variolink II and 15% in group using Choice.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제36권9호통권352호
• /
• pp.597-599
• /
• 1998

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 1998년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.38-38
• /
• 1998

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 1999년도 창립 40주년 기념 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.34-34
• /
• 1999

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.53-53
• /
• 2000

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.60-60
• /
• 2000

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.79-79
• /
• 2002

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2000년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.50-50
• /
• 2000