• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.655-679
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 수학영재교육 담당교사의 교수학습 전문성 향상을 위해 수학영재 수업 사례를 주로 Flanders 언어 상호작용 분석법과 TIMSS 비디오 분석법을 이용하여 분석하고 이를 통해 수학영재 수업을 어떻게 해야 하는 것인가에 대한 시사점을 주고자 시작되었다. 본 연구를 통하여 수학영재교육 담당교사의 영재수업 질적 제고 방안에 대한 심층적인 이해와 반성적 성찰의 계기가 되어 더 나은 교사로서의 삶을 계획하고 영재수업 전문가로서 발돋움하는 기회가 되었으면 한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.203-231
• /
• 2005

Students in East Asia have consistently out-performed their counterparts in the West in recent international studies of mathematics achievement. But some studies also show that East Asian students are more rigid in thought, and lack originality and creativity. While different theories have been proposed to account for these student performances, relatively few research studies have been done on classroom practices, potentially a major variable for explaining student performances. This paper will report on the results of two classroom studies: the TIMSS 1999 Video Study and the Learners' Perspective Study (LPS). Results the quantitative analysis of the TlMSS 1999 Video Study data show that the East Asian classrooms were dominated by teacher talk, and the mathematics content learned was abstract and unrelated to the real life. On the other hand, the characteristics of the instructional practices in Hong Kong as judged by an expert panel are that student learned relatively advanced mathematics content; the components of the lessons were more coherent, and the presentation of the lessons was more fully developed. Hong Kong students seemed to be more engaged in the mathematics lessons, and the. overall quality of the lessons was judged to be high. Results of the analysis of the LPS data also show that the classrooms in the East Asian city of Seoul were in general teacher dominated, but students were usually actively engaged in the mathematics learning. Emphasis on exploration of mathematics and practicing exercises with variation was common. It is argued that the quality teaching in the East Asian classrooms laid a firm foundation in mathematics for students, and that constitutes a necessary condition for the development of students' creativity. In order to fully develop the creativity of East Asian students, they need to be given the right environment and encouragement.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.127-145
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 13개국이 참여하고 있는 수학 수업 국제 비교 연구인 LPS(Learner's perspective Study)의 한국 수업 자료를 수업 조직과 교수 활동의 측면에서 분석하였다. 한국 교사 두 명으로부터 각각 10차시씩, 총 20차시의 수업 자료를 분석한 결과 차시의 흐름에 따라 동일 교사 내에서 수업 조직과 교수 활동이 차이를 보였지만, 두 교사의 수업에 대한 전체적인 평균을 구한 결과 수업 조직과 교수 활동의 세부 항목 비중이 상당히 근접하는 것으로 드러났다. 한편 수업 조직과 교수활동 측면에서 분석한 한국의 결과를 중국(상하이, 홍콩)의 결과와 비교함으로써 우리나라 수업의 특징을 추출하고 수업 개선을 위한 제언을 제시하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.597-625
• /
• 2013

This study explored how teachers and students in different countries discursively interact to build 'Classroom Science Knowledge' (CSK) - the knowledge generated situatedly in the context of the science classroom. Data came from publicly released $8^{th}$ grade science classroom videos of five nations who participated in the Third TIMSS (Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study) video study. A total of ten video-recorded science lessons and their verbatim transcripts were selected and analyzed using a framework developed by the researchers of the study. It was revealed that a range of discourse modes were utilized and these modes were often sequentially connected to build CSK in the science classrooms. Although dominant discourse modes and their sequences varied among different lessons or different countries, the study identified three salient patterns of science classroom discourse: teacher-guided negotiation and the sequences of exploring - building on the shared and retrieving - elaborating. These patterns were found to be different from the discursive features commonly witnessed in the community of professional scientists and interpreted as implying the existence of unique epistemic cultures shared in science classrooms of different countries. Further studies are suggested to reveal detailed characteristics of these epistemic cultures of science classrooms, as well as to confirm whether any cultural traits inherently shape the differences in science classroom discourse among different nations.