• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권10호
• /
• pp.137-145
• /
• 2022

This study aims to test the information content of sustainability reports issued by the most significant telecommunications companies operating in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Stc, Zain, and Mobily), and their compatibility with the national sustainability standards issued by the Ministry of Commerce in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in light of the Kingdom's vision 2030, and its impact on the stock exchange indices of these companies. The event study methodology was used to study the impact of publishing sustainability reports on stock prices and the trading volume of these companies' shares in the Saudi stock market during the period from (October 2020 to March 2021). The results indicate a significant impact of the information contained in the sustainability reports on stock prices and trading volume in the stock market, and the importance of directing the company's management towards more disclosure of information about sustainability in its environmental, social, and economic aspects instead of focusing only on information related to the financial performance and economic activity of the company. This encourages the listed companies to disclose the sustainability of the financial reports and standardize the form in which these disclosures are prepared.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.1121-1133
• /
• 2021

The paper examines the impacts of the various sustainability dimensions on the financial performance of commercial banks in three Arab countries. Three dimensions have been considered as constitutive of the term sustainable development (social, economic, and environmental). The relationship between the sustainability dimensions of companies and accounting indicators was analyzed. The main hypothesis posits that the dimensions of sustainability do not have a significant and positive effect on the financial performance of the commercial banks. The study population consisted of commercial banks operating in three Arab countries (Oman, United Arab Emirates, and Jordan); the period of the study is from 2007 to 2018. The data were collected from the financial reports and sustainability reports of each bank through the Internet. The overall results of the study showed a moderately positive relationship between all sustainability dimensions and the banks' financial performance. The main contribution of the research is to study the dimensions of sustainability reports as contained in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI-G4) and their impacts on the financial performance of commercial banks. Thus, this research will contribute to increasing the interest of the banks in sustainable development in a context where this research in Arab countries is scarce.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.153-171
• /
• 2022

세계적으로 ESG경영 열풍이 불면서 국내,외 기업들은 자발적으로 지속가능경영을 선언하고 전략을 수립하여 적극적으로 대응하고 있다. 금융위원회에서는 ESG경영을 나타내는 지속가능보고서 공시를 단계적으로 의무화하고 있으며, 앞으로 중소기업까지 확대될 것이다. 지속가능보고서의 정보공개는 주로 국제표준 GRI, SASB, TCFD로 활용되며, 국내 다수 기업이 GRI Standards 가이드라인을 사용하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 지속가능보고서의 구성체계를 살펴보고 GRI Standards를 기준으로 공기업과 사기업을 비교하여 유형별 지속가능경영을 분석하고자 한다. TF-IDF 모델링을 통해 분석 결과 공기업은 '사회', '노동' 분야에 초점을 두었으며, 사기업은 '경제', '환경' 분야에 집중하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 전자·정보통신 산업은 '제품책임'에 중점을 두는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 지속가능경영을 등급에 따라 수치화하여 분석한 기존 연구와는 달리 비정형데이터인 지속가능보고서를 분석함으로써 ESG경영에 관심을 갖는 연구자 및 관리자에게 유용한 이론적, 실무적 시사점을 제공할 것으로 기대된다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제48호
• /
• pp.45-92
• /
• 2016

기업은 자신들의 경제 환경 사회적 영향 및 성과에 대해 설명책임의 수단으로 '지속가능성보고서'를 발간하고 있다. 법적 규제인 재무 공시와는 달리 '지속가능성' 보고는 비재무적 요소에 대한 기업들의 성과를 보고하는 것이기에 이에 대한 신뢰성은 기업에 의존할 수밖에 없다. 그러나 현재 발간되는 지속가능성보고서는 지표 데이터에 대한 증거나 출처를 포함할 수 없는 유형으로, 기업의 홍보 수단으로 여겨지는 경향이 있으며 신뢰성에 대한 의혹이 여러 차례 제기되고 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 업무에 대한 내용과 맥락이 담긴 기록으로 기업의 설명책임을 입증할 수 있도록 증거기반 설명책임에 대한 개념을 적용해 보았다. 증거기반 설명책임이란 행위에 대한 증거 기록을 생산 및 축적하고 이용가능한 정보로 관리하여 설명책임으로 활용하는 것이다. 국내 기업에서 발간한 지속가능성보고서의 지표데이터 유형과 영국 보다폰의 웹 기반 보고서 사례를 살펴보고, 업무 기록을 지표 데이터의 증거로 연결할 방안에 대해 연구해보았다. 이를 위해 필요한 기록을 증거로 확보할 수 있도록 기록의 생산체계를 재설계하였다. 업무 중 생산된 기록을 SR(Social Responsibility)설명책임정보로 취합 및 관리하고 이해관계자에게 제공할 수 있는 SR시스템(Social Responsibility System)과 기록관리시스템(RMS)의 연계 구축을 제안하였다. 또한 조직체계 및 규정을 통해 기업의 전문적인 기록관리 체계를 단계적으로 구축하고 관련 업무 담당자와의 협업을 통해 기업의 신뢰성 있는 설명책임을 지원할 수 있는 인프라 구축을 이야기했다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권9호
• /
• pp.631-638
• /
• 2020

The intention of this research is to identify the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on firm value with profitability as a moderating variable. Data collection is carried out with data documentation that is based on financial reports and sustainability reports. All companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2013-2017 period are considered as the population of this study. Samples were selected using the purposive sampling method. The following are criteria that would be used in this study: 1) publish a sustainability report using the GRI G4 standard as a reference in preparing reports for 2013-2016, 2) publish a complete financial report for the 2014-2017 observation period, 3) not experience a loss during the 2014-2017 period. The total sample of the study was 109 companies. The study uses path analysis assisted with WarpPLS software version 6.0. The results show that the disclosure of corporate social responsibility has a positive and significant effect on firm value, and profitability moderates the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure on firm value. The implication of the research is that implementing corporate social responsibility is very important to increase firm's value and firm's sustainability in the future.

• 패션비즈니스
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.88-107
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to understand the current status of practice for sustainability in luxury fashion brands. A total of five luxury brands (Louis Vuitton, Hermès, Gucci, Burberry, and Prada) were selected. Each company's official website, sustainability reports, and articles on sustainability practices were compiled. In addition, analysis was performed based on criteria of sustainability such as environmental, social, economical, and cultural dimensions. As a result, the biggest commonality of the five brands was that they promoted the most active change in the environment. These brands tried to reduce energy consumption in materials and production processes. Among them, Burberry, Gucci, and Louis Vuitton had their own departments for sustainability. However, there were differences in strategies of activities between brands for social, economical, and cultural sustainability. Among the five companies, Burberry and Gucci pursued sustainability strategies the most aggressively. They separated their sustainability strategies in terms of environmental, social, economical, and cultural aspects and shared them with consumers. A set of outcomes for the plan were provided as objective data. The sustainable management strategy has become a key strategy for long-term growth of the luxury brand market. To survive in the market, luxury brands should elaborate sustainable management strategies and actively share them with consumers.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.315-326
• /
• 2020

This study aims to test empirically whether the ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard (ACGS) has a positive effect on Sustainability Reporting (SR) and whether the ACGS and Sustainability Reporting (SR) have a positive effect on Firm Value (FV). The study was conducted in five ASEAN countries - Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Thailand from 2014 - 2017. The research sample was collected from companies with the ACGS data and obtained with the help of 359 company observations. Hypothesis testing was performed using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS). The results of the study do not support all hypotheses. The ACGS has no effect on sustainability reporting. The ACGS has a significant negative effect on firm value, while sustainability reporting has a negative and insignificant effect on firm value. The ACGS and sustainability reporting are not good news for investors. This research's limitation is that companies rarely disclose the final value of the ACGS in their annual reports, so this research uses content analysis. The weakness of content analysis is the researchers' subjectivity so that the point of view between researchers is different. Besides, sustainability reporting for several ASEAN countries is voluntary, so not all companies can be sampled, which ultimately affects interpretation.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.351-363
• /
• 2020

The objective of this paper is to explore how board gender diversity affects corporate sustainability performance. Therefore, this paper examines the direct association between board gender diversity with corporate sustainability performance and the mediation effect of enterprise risk management (ERM) on this association. The study employed a cross-sectional survey method. Data were collected from annual reports, websites, and through the questionnaires that were distributed to Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of all the listed companies of Dhaka Stock Exchange, Bangladesh. The partial least square technique of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach was employed for data analysis. The result did not find support for the direct association between board gender diversity and sustainability performance in Bangladesh context. This implies that contextual factors, such as, male-dominant board, appointment of female directors based on family ties, lack of education and expertise etc. may discount gender diversity direct influence on sustainability performance. However, the study finds strong support for the mediating role of ERM use within the corporate structure. Further analysis of indirect effect suggests that ERM use mediates the relationship of board gender diversity and sustainability performance in full. This implies that in the Bangladesh context effective use of ERM is highly recommended.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.287-316
• /
• 2023

최근 전 세계적으로 기업의 환경(Environmental)·사회(Social)·지배구조(Governance)의 비재무적 요소를 고려한 지속가능경영이 필수적으로 요구되면서, 각 기업들은 이에 대응할 수 있는 전략적 방향 수립이 중요해지고 있다. 특히 기업이 속한 산업별로 상이한 ESG 이슈에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 산업과 개별 기업의 특성을 반영한 전략을 개발하고 추진할 수 있어야 할 것이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 금융, 제조, IT 분야별로 나누어 주요 국내 기업들의 ESG 보고서와 관련 뉴스 기사를 이용하여 산업별 ESG 동향과 활동을 비교 분석하였다. 키워드 빈도분석과 토픽 모델링을 활용한 분석 결과, 국내 ESG 선도 기업들의 지속가능경영 활동에서의 산업별 차이를 도출 할 수 있다. 금융 분야에서는 '고객 중심 경영'과 '기후 변화 대응', 제조 분야에서는 '지속가능한 공급망 관리'와 '탄소중립', IT 분야에서는 '기술혁신'과 '디지털 책임'이 강조되었다. ESG 요소별 우선 순위가 높은 활동의 예를 들면, 환경 측면에서는 '에너지 절감과 친환경 활동', 사회 측면에서는 '사회공헌과 상생', 지배구조 측면에서는 '이사회 독립성 강화와 리스크 관리' 등으로 나타났다. 더 나아가 산업별 각 ESG 요소의 핵심 이슈 뿐 아니라 ESG 보고서와 뉴스 기사의 내용 유사성 및 차별점도 확인하였다. 연구의 결과는 산업별 동향을 고려한 ESG 경영 전략 및 정책의 방향성을 제시하고 있으며 이는 산업별 ESG 평가체계 수립에도 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.1097-1104
• /
• 2020

This research seeks to provide evidence about how political connections, proxied by government ownership and the existence of politically connected board members, affect the extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures in Indonesian listed companies. This research uses the legitimacy theory as a basis for explaining management's motivation for disclosing its CSR. The sample consists of 131 firm-year observations from 38 non-financial public companies that published sustainability reports from 2013 to 2017. We measured the CSR disclosures using a disclosure checklist on the sustainability reports. We subsequently processed the data using a random effect (RE) linear regression. The result shows that CSR disclosures were greater in government-owned companies but lower in companies that have politically connected board members. The results support the legitimacy theory that the government intends to demonstrate legitimate national economic and political conditions by showing that government-owned companies are sustainable. However, CSR disclosures seem to have a substitutive relationship with the existence of politically connected board members, since those political connections may protect the company from public pressure and/or the risk of litigation, reducing the need for CSR disclosures. This research provides evidence that different types of political connections may have different impacts on corporate disclosures.