• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.183-191
• /
• 2004

This paper shows that there are some extra-factors on the evaluation of lecture by students. The extra-factors are sex, day and nighttime, academic year, size of lecture, and grades. And this paper analysis the proportion of the student which put the same mark on all items(same marked proportion).

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.120-124
• /
• 2013

The clinical clerkship focuses students on developing their ability to perform comprehensive diagnosis and management of patients with common undifferentiated problems by the integration of knowledge and clinical reasoning. Therefore, the clerkship evaluation system should assess their actual problem solving and professional behavior. However, concern remains that clerkship evaluations are imprecise and highly variable. This review is designed to provide faculty members with concepts, options, and a methodology to actively teach and evaluate the clinical clerkship, as well as offer encouragement and inspiration to medical students. We reviewed past and current clinical clerkship evaluations and discuss several tips to improve clinical excellence such as continuity, transparency of the evaluation process, a faculty development program, practical examination of clinical skills, implementation of a checklist for recording exposure and skills, providing prompt and constructive feedback to students, self-evaluation of professional performance, varying multi-faceted assessment combinations, being outpatient clinic-centered, and having dedicated faculty members who give students one-on-one contact with a preceptor.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2006

교육에 있어 평가는 교육 주체뿐만 아니라 때로는 국민적인 관심사가 된다. 최근 교육인적자원부에서 제시하는 개혁안과 사회의 요구를 반영할 때, 숫자 하나로 학생의 모든 성취 정도를 나타내는 전통적인 검사 방법은 한계가 있다. 이에 따라 구성주의를 바탕으로 교육 평가 분야에 수행평가가 대두되었으며, 포트폴리오 (Portfolio)는 수행평가 철학을 구현하는 대표적이고 효율적인 한 방법이다. 포트폴리오 평가 기법의 많은 장점과 함께 단점 역시 지적되었는데, 물리적 공간과 비용의 문제 그리고 자료접근과 검색의 비효율성 등이 그것이다. 이런 포트폴리오의 단점을 극복하면서 학생들의 ICT (Information & Communication Technology) 활용능력 향상까지 도모할 수 있는 것이 전자 포트폴리오 (Electronic Portfolio) 평가 기법이다. 본 연구의 목적은 전자 포트폴리오 평가 절차 모형을 개발하고, 각 단계별로 지침이 될 수 있는 구체적인 활동을 제안하는 것이다. 개발된 포트폴리오 평가 절차 모형은 준비, 개발, 평가, 활용의 네 단계로 이루어져 있으며 각 단계별로 교사와 학생의 활동을 구분하여 제시하였다. 본 모형은 교사, 학생, 학부모에게 포트폴리오 평가에 대한 안내를 제공하고, 교사에게는 평가과정 전반에 걸친 지침을 제공할 것으로 기대한다.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.52-57
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this research is to evaluate teachers' perception of Korean's achievement standard-based testing system (ASTS) and its process of implementation, and to propose a method of evaluating students' academic aptitude based on university entrance examinations. The core of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum is asserted by changes in classroom instruction, specifically encouraging students' participation in class based on a new method to evaluate student achievement. A total of 124 teachers in charge of student career counseling in middle and high schools in the Jeonbuk province participated in the study. The schools implementing the new method of ASTS were using 61.6% for unit school cut-off point, as opposed to the existing fixed cut-off point of 38.4%. The teachers understanding of the achievement evaluation method was rated 3.54 on the 5-point Likert scale, implying that they had a relatively good understanding of the method. Some of the challenges associated with reflecting the scores from the new student ASTS include difficulty of comparing scores across schools; grade inflation; advantages and disadvantages associated with the type of high school; and the increased importance of university entrance examination. In the ASTS, the fairness during the evaluation of the high school grades and the consequently the reliability of the evaluation prove worrying. As an ultimate result, selecting students based on university admissions data became untrustworthy. There should be further discussions on how students' achievement obtained from the new ASTS should be applied during the university admission process and how students' academic aptitude can be assessed in order to set a direction for secondary school education.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.1077-1098
• /
• 2013

자기주도학습을 암묵적으로 다루는 과학내용수업과 명시적으로 다루는 자율학습자수업으로 구성되어 있는 과학영재 프로그램에 참여한 중학생들에게 매 수업마다 평가의 일부로 수업에서 만족스러운 점을 서술하도록 하였다. 본 연구에서는 이 두 가지 수업에 대한 학생들의 평가에서 언급되는 자기주도학습 관련 요소들을 비교하였다. 첫째, 자기주도 학습 관련 하위요소의 대부분이 학생들의 평가에 언급되어 있었다. 수업 평가에서 만족스러운 이유를 조금이라도 구체적으로 서술한 경우, 거의 언제나 자기주도학습 관련 요소들을 포함하고 있었으며 분류기준에 있는 대부분의 하위요소가 언급되었다. 그러므로 대부분의 학생들이 자기주도학습 관련 요소들을 인식했고, 그에 대해서 만족스러워했음을 알 수 있다. 둘째, 두 가지 수업에 대한 평가에서 자주 언급되는 자기주도학습 관련 요소와 빈도에 차이가 있었는데, 자율학습자수업에 대한 평가에서 더 많은 요소들이 더 높은 비율로 언급되었다. 예를 들어 탐구기반 차원의 하위요소인 조별활동은 두 수업에서 동일하게 수행되지만, 자율학습자수업에 대한 평가에서 더 자주 언급되었다. 자율학습자수업 평가에서 더 자주 언급된 하위요소들로 인지차원에서 조직화, 계획, 점검, 동기차원에서 자아효능감과 성취가치, 행동차원에서 행동 통제 등이 있다. 한편 일반인지 차원의 하위요소인 지식의 정교화는 주로 과학내용수업 평가에서 언급되었으며, 동기차원의 하위요소인 목적지향은 두 수업에서 모두 많은 학생들이 언급하였으나 과학내용수업 평가에서 더 많은 학생들이 언급하였다. 따라서 두 가지 수업에서 학생들이 인식하는 자기주도학습 관련 요소들에 차이가 있으며 두 수업이 서로 보완적이며 두 가지 수업이 모두 필요한 것으로 보인다.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2005

One of the main factors that determine the quality of instruction is the teaching ability of the instructor administering the class. To evaluate teaching ability, methods such as peer review, student feedback, and teaching portfolio can be used. Among these, because feedback from the students is directly associated with how well the students feel they have learned, it is essential to improving instruction and teaching ability. The principal aim of instruction evaluation lies in the evaluation of instructor's qualification and the improvement of instruction quality by enhancing professionalism. However, the mandatory instruction evaluations currently being carried out at the term's end in universities today have limitations in improving instruction in terms of its evaluation items and times. To improve the quality of instruction and raise teaching abilities, instruction evaluations should not stop at simply being carried out but also be utilized as useful data for students and teachers. In other words, they need to be used to develop teaching and improve instruction for teachers, and consequently, should also exert a positive influence on students' scholastic achievements and learning ability. The most important thing in evaluation is the acquisition of accurate information and how to utilize it to improve instruction. The online instruction diagnosis item pool is a more realistic feedback device developed to improve instruction quality. The instruction diagnosis item pool is a cafeteria-like collection of hundreds of feedback questions provided to enable instructors to diagnose their instruction through self-diagnosis or students' feedback, and the instructors can directly select the questions that are appropriate to the special characteristics of their instruction voluntarily make use of them whenever they are needed. The current study, in order to find out if the online instruction diagnosis item pool is truly useful in reforming and improving instruction, conducted pre and post tests using 256 undergraduate students from Y university as subjects, and studied the effects of student feedback on instructions. Results showed that the implementation of instruction diagnosis improved students' responsibility regarding their classes, and students had positive opinions regarding the usefulness of online instruction diagnosis item pool in instruction evaluation. Also, after instruction diagnosis, analyzing the results through consultations with education development specialists, and then establishing and carrying out instruction reforms were shown to be more effective. In order to utilize the instruction diagnostic system more effectively, from planning the execution of instruction diagnosis to analyzing the results, consulting, and deciding how those results could be utilized to instruction, a systematic strategy is needed. In addition, professors and students need to develop a more active sense of ownership in order to elevate the level of their instruction.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study came to start to be helpful in that the teachers in field produced evaluation subject about the mathematics and applied by analyzing the performance capacity for the students about the subject developed through the application of subject about the teaching-learning model that can utilize the learners' learning experience and the development of items that can evaluate it by utilizing various and concrete operational materials as an object of the first year at the middle schools. The concrete purpose of realizing it is as follows. 1. This study is to develop the teaching-learning model centered on activities adequate to utilize various and concrete operational materials. 2. This study is to develop evaluation data for utilizing the concrete operational materials by making construction through the application of developed teaching-learning model as possible. 3. This study is to present standards initiative for reliable and fair marking about the evaluation data and to analyze the students' practice capacity by using it effectively. For accomplishing the purpose of this research, this study is the work-oriented teaching and learning model using learning data that can be easily found around the surroundings and 8 evaluation programs in order that the experience-oriented learning based on circumstances learning among the learning models of constructivism. Also, it is to examine the result after applying that on a basis of 25 students, consisted of only on class in a year, in the first year at the small size of agricultural middle schools. The result of this study from this research is as follows. First, as a result of frequency survey, of response about the developed evaluation data it showed positive response more than 80% of all the items. The atmosphere of self-directed learning was produced because the developed evaluation data could induce activity-based learning naturally by stimulating the students' curiosity and promoting interest. Second, this study executed t-test for the result of questionnaire about the mathematics propensity, and there were significant differences in 19 items among 25 items. It presented that the application of data about the teaching-learning and evaluation directly using concrete operational materials to the constructional learning by level might have desirable affect on the students' mathematical propensity. It came to be a motive that could increase value recognition and interest on the subject of mathematics by investigating a mathematical principle rule and confirming it through activity learning using the concrete operational materials.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제27권10호
• /
• pp.255-265
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 H대학 전교생 필수인 IT 교과목 강의평가에 영향을 주는 요인에 대해 비교 분석하였다. 본 연구의 목적은 강의만족도가 학업성취도, 출석율, 수강과목군과 유의미한 상관관계를 가지는지 파악하는 것이다. 특별히 컴퓨터를 활용하는 실습이 많이 요구되는 IT 교양과목들의 강의 만족도가 일반 교양과목의 강의만족도 경향과 어떤 차이가 있는가를 확인하고자 하였다. 본 연구를 위해서 H 대학교에서 2019년도 1, 2학기에 진행한 교양 IT 교과교육과정의 12개 교과목에서 2,322명 수강생들이 제출한 2,149건 강의평가 결과를 자료로 사용하였다. 강의평가 결과는 객관식 선택형 문항의 평가점수 외에도 주관식 서술형 문항도 학생들이 제출한 서술문을 긍정형과 부정형으로 분류하여 계량화를 하여 강의평가 결과를 객관화하였다. 연구 결과, 출석률과 학업성취도가 높을수록 강의만족도가 높았으며, 주관식 문항에서는 부정 단어보다는 긍정 단어를 더 많이 사용하였고, 학점이 낮을수록 부정 단어를 더 많이 사용하였다. 초급프로그래밍이나 소프트웨어활용군 과목군에서는 출석률이 높을수록 강의만족도가 높았지만, 중급프로그래밍에서는 출석률과 선택형 평가점수는 상관관계가 없었으며 주관식 문항에서도 타 과목군보다 부정 단어를 많이 사용하였다. IT 교과목에 대한 강의평가 경향은 일반 교과목의 강의평가 경향과 유사한 면도 있지만 중급프로그래밍 교과목에서는 대체로 부정적인 평가를 하는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국학교보건학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.53-61
• /
• 2007

Purpose: The purpose of this study on education and skill of Basic life Support Training in Middle and High School Students. Methods: The Basic life support training courses are taught mostly by Emergency Medical Technician and Paramedic. Sixty five middle school students, Seventy eight High school students and forty six adult received tuition in Basic life support training and subsequently completed questionnaires, test and interviews to assess their theoretical knowledge regarding their likelihood of performing Basic life support training. Under the supervisor, The subjects were evaluated by comparing basic life support education and skill data collected and the education sessions consisted of a 30min video tape. The Basic life support skill sessions used Laerdal manikin, and the data stored from the HeartSim were collected for further analysis. The students were asked to practice what they had been. A statistical analysis was done using the SPSS version 13. Results: Their average age of middle school students were 15.3±1.2 years, high school students (17.3±1.8), and adults(38.3±2.3). The total of 189 subjects were evaluated. The criteria used in the study had the following results First, We found that middle and high school students scored higher than adult. The scores were statistically significant to teach and evaluate the education evaluation showed that the adults scored lower than the middle and high school students. Second, We found that high school students and adult scored higher than middle school students. The scores were statistically significant to teach and evaluate the skills evaluation showed that the middle school students scored lower than the high school students and adult. Conclusion: We found that middle and high school students were superior to adult counterparts in understanding the basic life support education. We found that high school students and adult scored higher than middle school students in the BLS skill training. An expansion of basic life support training to middle and high school students is demanded. The Basic life support skills training seems to be retained between 6 and 12 months. The basic life support training should included in the school education curriculum in school.

• The International Journal of Costume Culture
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.104-112
• /
• 2006

The studies on impression formation usually have focused on the effect of certain appearance features which elevates perceptual evaluation. This study tried to find out whether there is a consensus on impression formation between the perceived person and the perceiver and if the gender is any significant variable to cast any difference on the impression evaluation. Seven photos of voluntary students in ppt file were projected to 143 students attending a university psychology class and were subjected to a impression evaluation questionnaire consisting of 28 adjective scales. The analysis of result revealed: 1) There was a significant difference between the impression evaluation scores of the perceivers and the perceived; the self evaluation of the perceived person was higher than the perceivers' evaluation. 2) There was also a significant evaluation score difference between the genders of the perceivers; the female perceivers rated the stimuli higher than the male perceivers. There was no interaction effect between the genders of the perceivers and the perceived.