• 제목/요약/키워드: Student Assessment

검색결과 686건 처리시간 0.021초

서술형 평가를 통한 학생들의 도형에 대한 이해 고찰 (A Study on Students' Understanding of Figures through Descriptive Assessments)

  • 최수임;김성준
    • East Asian mathematical journal
    • /
    • 제29권2호
    • /
    • pp.207-239
    • /
    • 2013
  • This research is a study on student's understanding fundamental concepts of mathematical curriculum, especially in geometry domain. The goal of researching is to analyze student's concepts about that domain and get the mathematical teaching methods. We developed various questions of descriptive assessment. Then we set up the term, procedure of research for the understanding student's knowledge of geometric figures. And we analyze the student's understanding extent through investigating questions of descriptive assessment. In this research, we concluded that most of students are having difficulty with defining the fundamental concepts of mathematics, especially in geometry. Almost all the students defined the fundamental conceptions of mathematics obscurely and sometimes even missed indispensable properties. And they can't distinguish between concept definition and concept image. Prior to this study, we couldn't identify this problem. Here are some suggestions. First, take time to reflect on your previous mathematics method. And then compile some well-selected questions of descriptive assessment that tell us more about student's understanding in geometric concepts.

초등 과학 지도교사의 학생 평가 전문성 인식과 실제에 대한 사례 연구 (A Case Study on the Perception and Practice of Elementary Science Teachers' Student Assessment Competency)

  • 윤미영;주은정;홍영식
    • 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
    • /
    • 제41권1호
    • /
    • pp.134-149
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구의 목적은 초등 과학 지도교사 3인의 학생 평가 전문성을 파악하고, 이를 신장시키기 위한 전략적인 방안을 탐색하는데 있다. 연구는 질적 사례 연구 방법으로 진행되었으며, 자료수집을 위해 자기 인식 체크리스트, 심층 면담을 실시하였다. 자료 분석은 연구자를 포함한 과정 중심 평가 선도 교원 2인과 초등 과학 교육 전문가 2인의 검토와 합의를 거쳤다. 그 결과, 연구 참여자 3인의 학생 평가 전문성 자기 인식 수준은 비교적 높았지만, 공통적으로 결과 환류 영역의 척도 평균이 가장 낮았다. 또한 연구 참여자들의 학생 평가 전문성은 서로 다른 수준과 특징을 보였으며, 학생 평가 전문성에 대한 인식과 실제의 불일치도 일부 발견되었다. 교사의 학생 평가 전문성 신장을 위해서는 전략적인 지원과 교육이 필요하며, 초등 과학 학생 평가 전문성 자기 진단 도구개발이 선행되어야 할 것이다.

수학교사의 학생 평가 전문성 범주 및 기준 개발 (Development of the Categories and Standards for Mathematics Teachers' Student Evaluation Competence)

  • 고상숙;이강섭;김인수;신인선;신현용;이병수;이중권;최영기;한인기
    • 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
    • /
    • 제44권2호
    • /
    • pp.281-295
    • /
    • 2005
  • To evaluate students properly in mathematics, it is essential to clarify and specify the object of study. Proper assessment tools are also needed coupled with an effective assessment method. The assessment tools have to be reasonable and trustworthy. Conducting the assessment should always produce fair and positive results and effectiveness. Establishing standards for the student evaluation competence of mathematics teachers should satisfy such objectives. Referring to the previous study suggested by Korea Institute' of Curriculum & Evaluation(KICE), this study classified the elements of capacity for evaluation competence into the general assessment, the assessment content understanding, and the assessment conduct & application areas. The specific elements of each area are established as standards. At last, 13 standards were suggested and summarized. to describe the math teachers' student evaluation competence.

  • PDF

Student Perceptions of Peer Assessment in an Action Research Context

  • Shin, Myeong-Kyeong;Yager, Robert-E.;Oh, Phil-Seok
    • 한국지구과학회지
    • /
    • 제25권3호
    • /
    • pp.129-141
    • /
    • 2004
  • A peer assessment method was implemented as part of an action research project where the primary goal was to create constructivist science classrooms. Student reflective writings, which had been created in the process of action research, were analyzed to examine the perceptions of the students concerning the peer assessment method employed in their earth science classrooms. Five perception categories and thirteen statements were developed from the student writings. These indicated that the students appreciated the positive nature of peer assessment and the effects of it as an alternative method for promoting learning. It was also revealed, however, that some students displayed inappropriate behaviors toward peer assessment which led to negative perceptions of the new assessment method. Implications for future use of peer assessment in science classrooms are discussed. Limitations founded in the present study as well as possible solutions are provided.

Exploration of High School Science Teachers' Perceptions on Instruction and Assessment of Science II Elective Courses in the 2015 Revised Curriculum

  • Kwak, Youngsun
    • 한국지구과학회지
    • /
    • 제43권4호
    • /
    • pp.557-566
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study was to examine the status of the field application of the Science II career electives with the application of the 2015 revised curriculum up to the 3rd year of high school. This study focused on examining high school science teachers' perceptions of the student-participatory class and process-centered assessment in Science II subjects, which are career-intensive high school science electives. A total of 192 science teachers responded to the survey questionnaire, and 12 teachers participated in interviews. In the in-depth interviews conducted to supplement the survey results, questions were asked about changes in the overall class, the status of student-participatory classes, and changes in the assessment of Science II subjects due to the emphasis on process-centered assessment. The main research results included teachers' perceptions of changes in teaching and assessment methods with the application of the revised curriculum, the degree to which the eight skills used in Science II classes develop the key competencies of science, and the teaching and assessment methods commonly used in Science II classes. Science teachers generally agreed with the purpose and necessity of introducing student-participatory classes and process-centered assessment, which are the core purpose of the 2015 revised curriculum. However, they had difficulties in practice due to the excessive content of Science II subjects. Problems were also encountered with securing objectivity and fairness during assessments and the operation of online science classes due to COVID-19.

과학 교과의 학생 평가에서 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성 및 교사 인식 탐색 (Exploration on the Feasibility of Utilization and Teacher Perceptions of Using ChatGPT for Student Assessment in Science )

  • 이동원;심현표;백종호
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제44권1호
    • /
    • pp.119-130
    • /
    • 2024
  • 본 연구는 과학 교과의 학생 평가에서 생성형 인공지능인 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성을 탐색하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 평가 문항을 개발하여 학생들로부터 문항에 대한 응답 자료를 수집하였고, 응답 결과를 ChatGPT에 입력하여 평가의 과정을 수행하도록 하였다. 또한 교사들에게 ChatGPT로부터 얻은 평가 결과를 공유하고, 교사들의 평가 과정과 비교하여 학생 평가에서의 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성을 탐색해 보았다. 연구 결과, 채점 기준의 설정 측면에서 ChatGPT가 생성해 내는 채점 기준이 전반적으로 타당성을 갖추고 있는 것으로 볼 수 있었다. 그러나 ChatGPT가 수행한 채점 결과는 교사들 채점한 결과와 비교하였을 때 일관성이 다소 낮았고, 특히 문항에 포함된 평가 요소가 많고, 평가 요소별 배점 기준이 복잡할수록 채점 결과의 일치도가 더 낮게 나타났다. 학생 응답에 대한 피드백 측면에서는 학생 응답의 과학적 타당성을 평가하는 과정에서 일부 잘못된 내용을 제공하거나 교육과정을 넘어서는 수준의 피드백이 생성되는 경우도 있었으나, 문항에 대한 올바른 답안을 알려주고, 추가적인 사례들을 제공하는 등의 긍정적인 부분도 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과들을 바탕으로 교사들로부터 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성에 대한 인식을 살펴 보았을 때, 학생 평가에서 중요하게 인식되는 '신뢰성' 측면에서 부족한 면이 있기는 하지만, 교사들의 평가를 지원하는 측면에서 활용 가능성을 발견할 수도 있었다. 마지막으로, 이러한 연구 결과를 종합하여 학생 평가에서의 ChatGPT의 활용에 대한 시사점을 제언하였다.

Applying Machine Learning approaches to predict High-school Student Assessment scores based on high school transcript records

  • Nguyen Ba Tien;Hoai-Nam Nguyen;Hoang-Ha Le;Tran Thu Trang;Chau Van Dinh;Ha-Nam Nguyen;Gyoo Seok Choi
    • International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.261-267
    • /
    • 2023
  • A common approach to the problem of predicting student test scores is based on the student's previous educational history. In this study, high school transcripts of about two thousand candidates, who took the High-school Student Assessment (HSA) were collected. The data were estimated through building a regression model - Random Forest and optimizing the model's parameters based on Genetic Algorithm (GA) to predict the HSA scores. The RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) measure of the predictive models was used to evaluate the model's performance.

초등학교 수학과 학생평가 실태 분석 (A Study on the Student Assessment of Elementary School Mathematics)

  • 이종욱
    • 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
    • /
    • 제48권1호
    • /
    • pp.21-32
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purpose of this study is to diagnose the current states and the problems of student assessment of Elementary School Mathematics. For that purpose, this study conducted a survey and had the individual interviews. The surrey items consisted of the six main parts: questions about the development of assessment tools, the method to assess, the grading, the special supplementary courses, the opening of learning effect, and the follow-up guidances. The results of this study are as the follow First, elementary teachers depended heavily on internet sites for developing assessment problems. Second, elementary teachers made use of a performance assessment, a unit assessment, and a term examination at ordinary times. Third, unit assessment was largely referred for grading by elementary teachers. Fourth, in selecting the students for the special supplementary courses, both criterion-referenced assessment and norm-referenced assessment were considered. After finishing the special supplementary courses, additional tests were usually taken. Fifth, elementary teachers took a negative attitude in opening of learning effect. specialty opening of test paper to parents of students was done under 30%. Sixth, fellow-up guidances were the most through the classroom guidances. but consulting with parents of students was not frequently conducted by teachers.

  • PDF

변증(辨證) 기반 진료수행시험(CPX) 시나리오를 이용한 역할극에 대한 학생 자가 평가의 일치도와 개선 방안 (Consistency of Student Self-Assessment of Role Play Using the Syndrome Differentiation-Based Clinical Performance Examination Scenario and Improvement Measures)

  • 조학준;조나영;박정수
    • 대한예방한의학회지
    • /
    • 제26권2호
    • /
    • pp.37-53
    • /
    • 2022
  • Objectives : This study analyzed the concordance between student self-assessment and peer-evaluation in a role play using the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) scenario developed based on Korean medical syndrome differentiation. Methods : The subjects of this study are first-year-students majoring in Korean Medicine. The role play based on clinical case was performed in the class of Korean Medicine Classics. Feedback on clinical skill competency got through student self-assessment and peer-evaluation, and this study was compared and analyzed of result. Results : A simple comparison of the results of self-assessment and peer-evaluation in the evaluation results of clinical skill competency may appear to be consistent. However, it was not statistically significant. It is necessary to enhance the discriminative ability in the evaluation of clinical skill competency. It will be possible to improve a bit by relatively increasing the weight of the scores on the items that students expect to respond differently among the evaluation items. In addition, in order to dramatically improve the systemicity and reliability of the evaluation of clinical skill competency itself, it is necessary to introduce the Introduction to Clinical Traditional Korean Medicine (ICTKM) course. Conclusions : Student's self-assessment and peer-evaluation as feedback on clinical skill competency are suitable for the purpose of education and training. However, the reliability of the evaluation was not statistically significant.

수행평가를 활용한 영재 판별 (An Applicaton of Performance Assessment for the Identification of Gifted and Talented Students)

  • 오영주
    • 영재교육연구
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.77-116
    • /
    • 1997
  • The paper-and-pencil multiplce choise test has been widely used to identify gifted and talented student in Korea. Such test have several drawbacks; such~a s not being able to assess creative problem solving abilities and high level thinking abilities which are important characteristics of gifted students. The Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI) developed a performance assessment which challenged traditional methods of identification. The 5-day summer camp was held to select gifted students for the Korean Minjok Leadership Academy. 211 students were evaluated in the aspects of creative problem solving abilities, high level thinking abilities, task commitments, and cooperativeness with various performance tasks, such as essay tests, conversations, oral examinations, computer simulations, puzzles, experiments, group discussions, debates, research reports, and games. As a result, it was found that there were several limitations of the performance assessment in terms of low reliability, requiring high costs and many professionals, and taking long times and large spaces. Expanding and continuing research should follow in order for a performance assessment to use widely as an identification methods because it assesses 'true' abilities of each individual student. follow in order for a performance assessment to use widely as an identification methods because it assesses 'true' abilities of each individual student.

  • PDF