• Title/Summary/Keyword: Static pile load tests

Search Result 111, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Bearing capacity of large diameter PHC pile and large diameter composite pile (대구경 PHC말뚝 및 대구경 복합말뚝($\phi$1,000mm) 지지력 산정에 관한 연구)

  • Shin, Yun-Sup;Park, Jae-Hyun;Hwang, Ui-Seong;Cho, Sung-Han;Chung, Moon-Kyung;Lee, Jin-Young
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2010.03a
    • /
    • pp.351-359
    • /
    • 2010
  • Large PHC piles with a diameter of 1,000mm or larger were recently introduced for the first time in Korea. This paper presents full-scale static and dynamic pile load tests performed on two 1,000mm PHC piles and two composite piles with steel pipe piles of the same diameter in the upper portion, installed by driving and pre-boring. The objectives of the tests include evaluating pile drivability, load-settlement relation, allowable bearing capacity, and the stability of mechanical splicing element for the composite pile(a.k.a. non-welding joint). The performance of the large diameter PHC piles were thought to be satisfactory compared to that of middle sized PHC piles with a long history of successful applications in the domestic and foreign markets.

  • PDF

A Case Study on the Measurement and Estimation of Bearing Capacity of Large Diameter Bored Pile (대구경 현장타설말뚝의 지지력 측정 사례연구)

  • 이원제;정훈준;이우진;장기수
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2000.11a
    • /
    • pp.285-292
    • /
    • 2000
  • Though there has been increasing use of large diameter drilled shaft as a foundation structure of bridges, current practice for quality control is to confirm the minimum required load carrying capacity during construction stage. For economic and appropriate design of drilled shaft, it is necessary to evaluate the load transfer mechanism by pile load tests during initial stage of construction and to use the test results as a feedback to a revision of initial design. In this paper, results of load tests peformed at several domestic sites are presented to investigate the load transfer characteristics of large diameter drilled shaft. It was found that most of the load on piles is sustained by shaft friction and that only small portion of the load reaches the bottom of the drilled shaft. Some test results of drilled shaft by Pile Driving Analyzer performed at same sites are also presented to compare the load transfer characteristics interpreted from static pile load tests.

  • PDF

Reliability Updates of Driven Piles Using Proof Pile Load Test Results (검증용 정재하시험 자료를 이용한 항타강관말뚝의 신뢰성 평가)

  • Park, Jae-Hyun;Kim, Dong-Wook;Kwak, Ki-Seok;Chung, Moon-Kyung;Kim, Jun-Young;Chung, Choong-Ki
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2010.03a
    • /
    • pp.324-337
    • /
    • 2010
  • For the development of load and resistance factor design, reliability analysis is required to calibrate resistance factors in the framework of reliability theory. The distribution of measured-to-predicted pile resistance ratio was constructed based on only the results of load tests conducted to failure for the assessment of uncertainty regarding pile resistance and used in the conventional reliability analysis. In other words, successful pile load test (piles resisted twice their design loads without failure) results were discarded, and therefore, were not reflected in the reliability analysis. In this paper, a new systematic method based on Bayesian theory is used to update reliability index of driven steel pile piles by adding more pile load test results, even not conducted to failure, into the prior distribution of pile resistance ratio. Fifty seven static pile load tests performed to failure in Korea were compiled for the construction of prior distribution of pile resistance ratio. Reliability analyses were performed using the updated distribution of pile resistance ratio and the total load distribution using First-order Reliability Method (FORM). The challenge of this study is that the distribution updates of pile resistance ratio are possible using the load test results even not conducted to failure, and that Bayesian update are most effective when limited data are available for reliability analysis or resistance factors calibration.

  • PDF

A Study on Friction Capacity Behavior for Driven Steel Pipe Pile and Drilled Shaft Pile with Field Test (항타강관말뚝과 현장타설말뚝의 주면마찰력 거동에 관한 현장실험 연구)

  • Jung, Sung-Min;Lee, Min-Hee;Song, Byeong-Deok;Choi, Yong-Kyu
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2005.03a
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2005
  • In this study, static pile load tests for instrumented drilled shaft pile and instrumented driven steel pipe pile were performed. Based on the results of pile load test, skin friction of each stratum was compared. Skin friction of drilled shaft were more than those of driven pile at the same settlement. This was based on the difference of surface roughness of piles and pile construction methods.

  • PDF

Evaluation of Point Bearing Capacity using Field Model Pile Test (현장 축소모형 말뚝 시험을 이용한 선단지지력 예측)

  • Lee, Chang-Ho;Lee, Woo-Jin;Jeong, Hun-Jun;Han, Shin-In
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.6 no.3
    • /
    • pp.47-54
    • /
    • 2005
  • In many practical cases, design methods of pile have been used mainly semi empirical bearing capacity equations. It can be done that confirmation of pile bearing capacities through using of dynamic and static tests during constructing or after constructions. If a prediction of layered point pile bearing capacity could be done through simple tests during field investigation, it could be done that more reliable design of pile than a prediction of using semi empirical equations or static formulations. This paper suggests a method to estimated point bearing capacity during in-situ investigation by using the dynamic rod model pile and verifies the point bearing capacity compare with results of static pile load tests. From test results, the unit ultimate point bearing capacities are relatively similar through a dynamic rod model pile tests and static pile load tests. The unit ultimate point bearing capacity by using N value is shown about 50 % value of measured unit ultimate point bearing capacity from field test result and the prediction of the unit ultimate point bearing capacity by using N value is shown very conservative, illogical and uneconomical pile designs.

  • PDF

A Study on the Engineering Behaviour of Prebored and Precast Steel Pipe Piles from Full-Scale Field Tests and Finite Element Analysis (실규모 현장시험 및 유한요소해석을 통한 강관매입말뚝의 공학적 거동에 대한 연구)

  • Kim, Jeong-Sub;Jung, Gyoung-Ja;Jeong, Sang-Seom;Jeon, Young-Jin;Lee, Cheol-Ju
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.19 no.4
    • /
    • pp.5-16
    • /
    • 2018
  • In the current study, the engineering behaviour of prebored and precast steel pipe piles was examined from a series of full-scale field measurements by conducting static pile load tests, dynamic pile load tests (EOID and restrike tests) and Class-A and Class-C1 type numerical analysis. The study includes the pile load - settlement relations, allowable pile capacity and shear stress transfer mechanism. Compared to the allowable pile capacity obtained from the static pile load tests, the dynamic pile load tests and the numerical simulation showed surprisingly large variations. Overall among these the restrike tests displayed the best results, however the reliability of the predictions from the numerical analysis was lower than those estimated from the dynamic pile load tests. The allowable pile capacity obtained from the EOID tests and the restrike tests indicated 20.0%-181.0% (avg: 69.3%) and 48.2%-181.1% (avg: 92.1%) of the corresponding measured values from the static pile loading tests, respectively. Furthermore, the computed results from the Class-A type analysis showed the largest scatters (37.1%-210.5%, avg: 121.2%). In the EOID tests, a majority of the external load were carried by the end bearing pile capacity, however, similar skin friction and end bearing capacity in magnitude were mobilised in the restrike tests. The measured end bearing pile capacity from the restrike tests were smaller than was measured from the EOID tests. The present study has revealed that if the impact energy is not sufficient in a restrike test, the end bearing pile capacity most likely will be underestimated. The shear stresses computed from the numerical analysis deviated substantially from the measured pile force distributions. It can be concluded that the engineering behaviour of the pile is heavily affected if a slime layer exists near the pile tip, and that the smaller the stiffness of the slime and the thicker the slime, the greater the settlement of the pile.

Determination of True Resistance from Load Transfer Test Performed on a PHC Pile (PHC 말뚝의 하중전이실험을 통한 참 지지력의 산정)

  • Kim, Sung-Ryul;Chung, Sung-Gyo;Dzung, N.T.
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.22 no.11
    • /
    • pp.113-122
    • /
    • 2006
  • Although a number of static pile load tests have been performed in this country, re-consideration on the interpretation and loading method is needed, because of their less usefulness in practice. For this study, a static loading testing was performed for a long instrumented PHC pile, which was installed in sand layer overlying thick soft clay. The shaft resistance of the pile had been monitored for a long time after installation, and then the static load testing was performed by the quick load test, unlike the recent Korean practice. Using the measured data, the elastic modulus of pile, residual stress and true resistance on the pile were determined. In the event, it was found that the residual stress on the pile, which remained prior to the static loading, significantly affects the shaft and toe resistances. Also, it was realized that the setup effect for the long pile is significant.

Study on the Vertical Pile Capacity of Base-grouted Pile (선단 하부지반 그라우팅된 개단강관말뚝의 연직 지지력에 관한 연구)

  • 정두환;최용규;정성교
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.165-180
    • /
    • 1999
  • Static load tests were performed for open-ended piles, closed-ended piles, piles with grouted toe, and base-grouted piles by using calibration chamber. Then vertical bearing capacities determined from load tests were compared with each other. The stability of base-grouted pile during a simulated seaquake was investigated by changing the penetration depth. Also, static load tests and seaquake tests for 2-piles and 4-piles group were performed. The bearing capacity of the pile grouted inside the toe was 11.2~30.8% less than that of open-ended pile because of reduction of base resistance due to disturbance of base soil under pile toe. The bearing capacity of a base-grouted pile was 23.8~33.9% more than that of an open-ended pile and was similar to that of a closed-ended pile. The bearing capacity of base-grouted group pile was increased ; the bearing capacity of base-grouted 2-piles group increased 14.6~31.8% compared to that of open-ended 2-piles group, and that of base-grouted 4-piles group increased 15.3~22.4% compared to that of open-ended 4-piles group. During the simulated seaquake in deep sea, stability of base-grouted pile was found to be dependent on the pile penetration depth. During seaquake motion, single long base-grouted pile longer than 20m was stable and short base-grouted pile shorter than 12m failed. But relatively long base-grouted pile longer than 12m kept mobility state. Bearing capacity of base-grouted group pile with penetration depth less than 7m was degraded a little bit ; so, base-grouted group pile could maintain mobility condition.

  • PDF

Reliability analysis of piles based on proof vertical static load test

  • Dong, Xiaole;Tan, Xiaohui;Lin, Xin;Zhang, Xuejuan;Hou, Xiaoliang;Wu, Daoxiang
    • Geomechanics and Engineering
    • /
    • v.29 no.5
    • /
    • pp.487-496
    • /
    • 2022
  • Most of the pile's vertical static load tests in construction sites are the proof load tests, which is difficult to accurately estimate the ultimate bearing capacity and analyze the reliability of piles. Therefore, a reliability analysis method based on the proof load-settlement (Q-s) data is proposed in this study. In this proposed method, a simple ultimate limit state function based on the hyperbolic model is established, where the random variables of reliability analysis include the model factor of the ultimate bearing capacity and the fitting parameters of the hyperbolic model. The model factor M = RuR / RuP is calculated based on the available destructive Q-s data, where the real value of the ultimate bearing capacity (RuR) is obtained by the complete destructive Q-s data; the predicted value of the ultimate bearing capacity (RuP) is obtained by the proof Q-s data, a part of the available destructive Q-s data, that before the predetermined load determined by the pile test report. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can easy and effectively perform the reliability analysis based on the proof Q-s data.

Axial Bearing Characteristics of Tip-transformed PHC Piles through Field Tests (현장검증시험에 의한 선단변형 PHC말뚝들의 연직하중 지지특성에 관한 연구)

  • Choi, Yongkyu;Kim, Myunghak
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.34 no.11
    • /
    • pp.107-119
    • /
    • 2018
  • PHC piles, extension-plate attached PHC piles, and steel pipe attached PHC piles were installed in field test site. Axial compressive static load tests including load distribution test and Pile Driving Analyzer (after driving) were done on the tip-transformed PHC piles and the grouted tip-transformed PHC piles. Load-displacement curves of three different type of PHC piles, which are PHC pile (TP-1), extension plate attached PHC pile (TP-2) and steel pipe attached PHC pile (TP-3), showed almost the same behavior. Thus bearing capacity increase effect of the tip-transformed PHC piles was negligible. Share ratio of side resistance and end bearing resistance for PHC pile, extension plate attached PHC pile, and steel pipe attached PHC pile were 95.8% vs. 4.2%, 95.6% vs. 4.4%, and 97.8% vs. 2.2% respectively.