• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.186-193
• /
• 2003

The object of this study is to ensure the stability of bulk cement cars conducting vibration performance test, dynamic characteristic analysis and static load test of bogie frame. In case of static load test, bogie static load test facility was used. In case of dynamic characteristic analysis, Vampire Software was used. In case of vibration performance test, real bulk cement cars were used in kyeung-bu line. In the results of static load test of bogie frame for bulk cement car, all structures satisfied allowable stress criteria of materials. The vibration performance test and dynamic characteristic analysis results satisfied allowable standards.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.53-60
• /
• 2019

이 연구에서는 정적 변위를 사용하는 유전자 알고리즘을 이용한 교량의 유한요소해석모델 개선 기법을 제안하며, PSC 거더교를 대상으로 한 실증시험 데이터를 이용하여 제안된 방법을 검증하였다. 실증 재하시험으로 정적재하시험과 의사정적재하시험을 수행하였으며, 각 재하시험의 계측 데이터를 이용하여 대상교량의 유한요소해석모델 개선을 진행하였다. 최종적으로 의사정적재하시험의 계측 데이터를 통해 개선된 모델을 이용하여 공용 내하력평가를 수행하였다. 내하력평가에는 현 도로교설계기준과 구 도로교설계기준, AASHTO LRFD의 설계 활하중을 이용하였으며, 각 설계기준 별 내하력평가 결과를 비교하였다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 1999년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.249-258
• /
• 1999

Dynamic load and static load tests are performed on steel pipe piles and concrete piles at five construction sites in highway to compare the difference of load bearing mechanisms. At each site, one steel pile is instrumented with electric strain gages and dynamic tests are performed on the pile during installation. Damages of strain gages due to the installation are checked and static test is performed upon the same pile after two or seven days as well. It shows that load transfer from side friction to base resistance behaves somewhat differently according to the results of load-settlement analysis obtained from PDA and static load test. Initial elastic stage of load settlement curves of two load tests is almost similar. But after the yielding point, dynamic resistance of pile behaves more stiffer than static resistance, thus, dynamic load test result might overestimate the real pile capacity compared with static result. Analysis of gage readings shows that unit skin friction increases exponentially with depth. The skin friction is mobilized at the 1∼2m above the pile tip and contributes to the considerable side resistance. Comparison of side and base resistances between the measured value and the calculated value by Meyerhof's bearing capacity equation using SPT N value shows that the calculated base resistance is higher than the measured. Therefore, contribution of side resistance to total capacity shouldn't be ignored or underestimated. Finally, based upon the overall test results, a construction control procedure is suggested.

• 한국공간구조학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국공간구조학회 2008년도 춘계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.19-24
• /
• 2008

본 논문은 풍동실험과 정적하중 실험을 실시하여 강풍 설계시 대공간 구조물의 막구조 동적응답을 확인하여 거스트 계수(gust factor)를 산출해 보고자한다. 이를 위해 섬유재료의 변형률에 따라 하중을 구할 수 있는 막재료 성능실험과 4가지(saddle형, wave형, arch형, point형) 막구조 모형에 따른 횡방향 동적하중과 동적변형응답을 측정할 수 있는 풍동실험, 동적변형응답에 따라 정적하중을 구할 수 있는 정적하중실험을 실시함으로써 거스트 계수(gust factor)를 산출하였다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2000년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.277-284
• /
• 2000

Using the large diameter (D ＝ 2,500mm, L ＝ 40m) batter steel pipe piles, designed as compression piles but used as reaction piles during the static compression load test of socketed test piles (D ＝ 1,000mm, L ＝ 40m), static pile load tests for large diameter instrumented rock-socketed piles were performed. The reaction steel pipe piles were driven 20m into the marine deposit and weathered rock layer and then l0m socketed with reinforced concrete through the weathered rock layer and into hard rock layer. Steel pipe and concrete in the steel pile part, and concrete and rebars in the socketed parts were instrumented to measure strains in each part. The pullout amounts of reaction pile heads were also measured with LVDT. During the static pile load test, total compressional load of about 20MN was loaded on the head of test piles, but load above 20MN was not loaded due to lack of loading capacity of loading system. Over the course of the study, maximum pullout amount up to 7mm was measured in the heads of reaction piles when loaded op to 10MN and 1mm of pullout amount was measured. More than 85% of pullout load was transfered in the residual weathered rock layer and about 10% in the soft rock layer, which was somewhat different transfer mechanism in the static compressional load tests.

• 한국지반환경공학회 논문집
• /
• 제18권9호
• /
• pp.19-31
• /
• 2017

미국 사례의 경우 항타말뚝과 현장타설말뚝은 동재하시험과 정재하시험 지지력 상관관계 분석에서 좋은 상관관계를 나타내었다. 하지만, 국내에서는 해외에서 많이 사용하지 않는 매입말뚝으로 주로 시공을 하고 있으며, 매입말뚝의 동재하시험 신뢰성에 대해 의문이 많아 동재하시험의 신뢰도를 확인하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 LH 현장(천안, 인천, 의정부)에서 PHC 매입말뚝에 대하여 재하시험을 실시하였으며, 동재하시험(EOID 7회, Restrike 7회)과 정재하시험(7회) 지지력을 비교 분석하였다. 그 결과 재항타동재하지지력 및 정재하지지력 평균 값 비교 시 정재하지지력 평균 값이 약 27% 높게 나타났다(신뢰도 : 0.73, 변동계수 : 0.3). 재항타지지력(Davisson 판정 값) 및 정재하지지력(Davisson 판정 값) 평균 값 비교 시 정재하지지력(Davisson 판정 값) 평균 값이 약 27% 높게 나타났다(신뢰도 : 0.73, 변동계수 : 0.2). 동재하시험과 정재하시험의 차이를 줄이고자 본 연구에서는 수정동재하지지력(EOID의 극한선단지지력+Restrike의 극한주면마찰력)을 제시하였으며, 수정동재하지지력과 정재하지지력을 비교했을 때는 그 차이가 9%로 줄어들었다(신뢰도 : 0.91, 변동계수 : 0.2). 또한 변동계수가 0.2로 줄어들어 일관성이 증가한 것으로 나타났다.

• 항공우주시스템공학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.28-34
• /
• 2015

Armed aircraft of a basic trainer class installs external stores under wing box by using pylon and performs an operation such as weapon delivery and jettison, and should be designed to withstand all kinds of loads applied to external stores. The static strength test of pylons and wing box was performed to assess the static strength of pylon and their support structures for substantiation. Based on the test, the structures were verified to fully satisfy a given design requirement. In this paper, methods of test load generation of wing box and pylon, evaluation of test result data and design result of test set-up were presented. Comparing the FEM analysis with the same test data can lead to good match and reasonable deviation between both. Finally, based on the test and the analysis, the static strength of test article was substantiated and the reliability and effectiveness of analysis math model were obtained.

• 항공우주시스템공학회지
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.98-105
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 우주발사체용 복합재 산화제탱크의 구조 강건성을 검증하기 위해 수행된 정하중시험 결과를 제시하였다. 먼저, 복합재 산화제탱크 정하중시험에 사용된 시험장비를 소개하고, 복합재 산화제탱크가 만족해야 하는 시험 요구도를 설명하였다. 그리고, 정하중 시험치구, 유압, 제어장비, 데이터획득장비로 구성되는 시험셋업 구성도를 제시하였고, 전단, 등가압축, 굽힘, 조합시험으로 구성된 복합재 산화제탱크 정하중 시험의 하중 프로파일을 제시하였다. 하중 제어의 결과로 시험하중 증가에 따른 각 하중부과기에서 입력하중과 출력하중 사이의 오차와 각 로드셀 A와 b 채널사이의 오차를 제시하여 본 시험의 신뢰성을 확인하였다. 정하중 시험 결과로, 각 시험에서 하중부과기의 하중은 허용 오차 범위 내에서 적절히 잘 제어되었으며, 시험시편도 요구 하중 내에서 파손이나 심각한 구조적 결함을 유발하는 좌굴은 발생하지 않는 것으로 확인되었다.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.124-133
• /
• 1997

Pile load test is good for estimating pile bearing capacity, but using this method is limited by time and cost required. Dynamic and static method is more convenient and economical, but confidence of estimated value by dynamic and static method are lower than that of pile load test. After being compared pile bearing capacity data obtained from pile load test with those of other two methods, the results from this study were summarised as follows. For allowable bearing capacity values greater than 175t per pile, bearing capacity acquired from static method was higher than that acquired from pile load test, whereas bearing capacity acquired from pile load test was higher than that acquired from static method for values under 175 per pile. It was that variance of bearing capacity was large when bearing capacity obtained by dynamic method was higher than 250t. Also bearing capacity based on dynamic method was higher than that based on pile load test. Allowable bearing capacity get from dynamic method suggested that carefull precautions are necessary in application for allowable bearing capacity values higher than 2S0ton per pile.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.32-36
• /
• 2004

Aluminum carbody for rolling stocks is light and perfectly recycled, but includes severe defects which are very dangerous to fatigue strength. Static load test has been performed up to date to assess structural safety of the carbody. However, static load test is not sufficient to evaluate fatigue strength of the carbody, because fatigue failure is caused by dynamic load. In this study, the established load test methods for carbody are described and the characteristics of the methods are discussed. Also, a testing method to simulate dynamic loading condition is proposed for evaluation of fatigue strength of the carbody. The results by the proposed testing method are compared with the results by the static load test and new findings are discussed.