• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.103-107
• /
• 2008

본 연구에서는 기훼손(오염)지역에서 재개발사업을 시행할 때 고려해야할 토양환경관련 개선방안을 환경영향평가 사례에서 도출하였다. 환경영향평가 사례를 보면 소규모공장과 같은 잠재토양오염원이 다수 존재하였고 일부 사례에서는 오염토양도 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 몇몇의 사례지역에서는 군사시설로 인한 토양오염도 발견되었다. 따라서 재개발사업 진행시 기존 공장 및 군사시설로 인한 토양오염문제를 해결할 수 있는 정책적 방안을 제시하였다. 또한 재개발사업 계획 수립시 녹지공간(greenspace)의 환경적 편익을 최대화하기 위한 토지이용계획을 수립하는 것이 필요한 것으로 판단되었다.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지하수토양환경학회 2006년도 총회 및 춘계학술발표회
• /
• pp.11-15
• /
• 2006

Attempts were made to increase an efficiency of soil contamination investigation systems (SCISs) including Soil Network and Special Soil Contamination Management Facility Sites in Korea. In order to increase low efficiencies resulting from inappropriate SCISs, possible policy suggestions are driven based on the results from problem findings of Korean policy and comparisons of policies on industrialized countries including United States, United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Japan. First, functions of Soil Environment Conservation Act (SECA) on liability should be updated and reinforced to initiate a soil contamination investigation process for stakeholders including an owner(s) or a responsible party(ies) of the potentially soil contamination sites positively. Second, appropriate SCISs should be emerged for implementing the Soil Network and Special Soil Contamination Management Facility Sites properly. Stakeholders for the potentially contaminated sites should easily access and raise the soil contamination issues, and soil contamination investigation implemented by liable and profit environment (consulting) companies should be encouraged. Third, the soil contamination reporting system of SECA needs to change legally responsible. Further more, public announcement system showing soil quality of a site which exceeds a certain scale would be considerable. Fourth, liable environment (consulting) companies should legally execute Soil Environment Assessment of SECA.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.10-26
• /
• 2018

This paper reviews the soil conservation policies (SCP) in the global community and suggests the improved options in SCP in Korea. Soil Environment Conservation Act in Korea states soil is a valuable natural resource and it's value should be enhanced to provide the benefits that soil ecosystem can offer to people. However, SCP in Korea limits its application to not only the scope of soil environment but also the issues on soil pollution. The SCPs in the advanced countries have shifted their scopes from soil environment to soil ecosystem, put emphasis on the conservation of soil health rather than soil quality, and set the goals to optimize the soil ecosystem services to people while minimizing the soil threats. In this context, the soil security initiative was recently proposed to accomplish this goal while employing the nexus concept to bridge the soil ecosystem services with water, atmosphere, climate and biodiversity. Therefore, the key policies in soil conservation in Korea should expand the scope from soil environment to soil ecosystem, focus on soil health management, and develop the holistic governance among diverse stakeholder to maximize the soil ecosystem services. Soil ecosystem should be secured by national soil policies for human health.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.48-62
• /
• 2017

Korea and other countries have made various efforts to preserve soil. During the past several decades, Korea has implemented various policies on soil conservation practices; however, those policies have often lacked consideration of human and ecosystem risk management. while other countries have practiced various policies closely related to risk-based management for contaminated sites. Therefore, there is a great need for a paradigm shift of policy to better manage contaminated sites in risk-based strategies, while applying different management plans for soil and groundwater. In addition, the new policies should be administered with provision to improve soil health and related functions in ecosystem. This study has reviewed the trend in relevant policies in Korea and foreign countries to suggest the future policy directions for contaminated site management in Korea. For better management of contaminated sites, coherent policy that could complement the law, system, and relevant technology is required.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.20-29
• /
• 2016

Although a number of chemical accidents have been occurred in South Korea, the effective prevention act for soil contamination has not been established so far. To effectively protect soil contamination from chemical accidents, decision support laws and regulations are absolutely essential. Regarding this situation, this study was aimed at diagnosing problems in current chemical safety management and prevention and response system against chemical accidents through analyzing the domestic and foreign causes of chemical accidents and the accident response procedures and finally suggesting policy measures for solving those problems. In order to clarify management of soil contamination by chemical accident, this study suggests the establishment of chemical accident preparedness, response, and making of local chemical management law and policy. This law needs to be supported by a clear management framework to guide government officials and all other stakeholders in the management of soil contamination by chemical accident.

• 한국지하수토양환경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지하수토양환경학회 2005년도 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOIL & GROUNDWATER ENVIRONMENT
• /
• pp.171-171
• /
• 2005

• 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.156-168
• /
• 2016

The Korean government is planning to invest a lot of funds for conservation of the soil. Accordingly, it needs quantitative information on the soil. This paper attempts to analyze the total value of soil quantitatively: the total economic value of soil can be divided into use value and non-use value. To this end, we apply a replacement cost method (RCM) and contingent valuation method (CVM). Especially, CVM is most widely used to measure the non-use value such as environment goods. We employed the one-and-one-half-bounded dichotomous choice (OOHBDC) for willingness to pay (WTP) elicitation and a spike model. The monthly mean WTP was estimated to be KRW 3,949 per household for the next 10 years, which is statistically significant at the 1% level. Expanding the value to the relevant population gives us KRW 897.9 billion per year and as of the end of 2015, the non-use value of soil was assessed to be KRW 838.6 billion. Meanwhile, use value is subdivided into direct use value and indirect use value. This value was calculated KRW 3,277 trillion and KRW 51.8 trillion, respectively. As a result, total economic value of soil is estimated to be KRW 3,330 trillion in Korea.

• 한국지구물리탐사학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지구물리탐사학회 2001년도 정기총회 및 제3회 특별지포지움
• /
• pp.14-22
• /
• 2001

• 기술사
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.30-34
• /
• 2008

Recently problems of soil and groundwater contamination occur in major construction sites of highway, dam and railways. Contaminants of oil fuels are also detected in the former fuel storage facilities of railroad station and army troops of transportation, etc. These facilities are planned as the sites of commercial infrastructures after restoration from pollutants by the law of soil environment conservation of Korea. In this manuscript, the contents of soil environment conservation law including soil assessment and restoration technology are introduced. Recent changes of soil environment area are also analyzed.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.27-47
• /
• 2006

토양오염실태조사 및 특정토양오염관리대상시설 부지 등에서 토양오염조사의 효율을 획기적으로 높일 수 있는 정책제안의 마련을 시도하였다. 우리나라 정부기관에서 토양이 오염된 부지를 찾아 내는 조사효율이 2% 정도로 매우 낮은바, 이에 대한 근본적인 요인 분석과 더불어, 토양오염조사에 관한 미국, 영국, 독일, 네덜란드, 일본의 법 제도 비교 분석을 통해 다음의 네 가지 정책방향을 제안하였다. 첫째, 토양오염 의혹부지에 대한 이해당사자로 하여금 적극적으로 당해 부지의 토양오염 여부를 조사할 수 있도록 책임법규로서의 토양환경보전법의 기능을 보완하고 강화해야 한다. 둘째, 토양오염실태 조사 및 토양오염관리대상시설과 관련된 토양오염조사가 적극적으로 이루어질 수 있도록 토양오염조사체계를 획기적으로 개선해야 한다. 토양오염 의혹부지에 관련된 이해당사자가 민원을 제기하고, 토양오염조사 결과에 대해 인센티브를 얻고 책임을 질 수 있는 민간 환경전문업체가 토양오염조사를 수행할 수 있는 새로운 토양오염조사체계를 고려해야 한다. 셋째, 토양오염신고 제도의 강화이다. 현행 토양오염신고 제도의 의무화를 고려할 수 있다. 나아가서는 일정 규모의 토양오염 이상에 대해서는 이로부터 영향을 받을 수 있는 주민 등이 이를 인식할 수 있도록 공시하는 것도 고려해 볼 수 있다. 넷째, 토양이 오염된 부지를 찾음으로써 인센티브를 얻을 수 있는 민간 환경전문업체가 토양환경 평가의 수행기관으로 포함되는 것이다.