• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.26-33
• /
• 2004

Bonding Agent는 1세대에서 5세대에 거치기까지 많은 발전을 하였고, 최근에는 임상술식과정의 단축에 있어 비약적인 발전을 보였다. 최근에 개발되어 소개된 self-etching priming/bonding agent는 6세대 bonding agent로 분류되며, 이를 이용하여 법랑질 및 상아질에 대한복합 레진의 충전시 발생하는 미세누출을 methylene blue를 이용하여 관찰한 결과, 상아질에서는 기존의 4세대 5세대 접착제와 유의 한 차이가 없었으나, 법랑질에서는 6세대 bonding agent가 통계학적으로 높은 미세누출 양상을 보였다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.581-592
• /
• 2003

본연구는 유치와 영구치의 우식상아질을 제거하는 방법에 따른 상아질표면의 변화와 산부식양상, 혼성층의 양상, 그리고 이들이 상아질에 대한 복합레진의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가할 목적으로 시행되었다. 92개의 유구치와 92개의 영구 구치를 준비하여 상아질 표면을 노출시키고 인공우식을 유발시켰다. 이중 32개의 유구치와 32개의 영구구치는 $Carisolv^{TM}$과 bur로 삭제후 상아질표면을 SEM관찰하였으며 나머지 치아에서는 레진-상아질간 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 두가지 접착시스템(Single bond system, self-etching bonding system)과 한 종류의 레진(Z250, 3M)을 사용하였으며 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. $Carisolv^{TM}$의 우식치질 제거효과는 영구치보다 유치에서 더 우수하였으며, bur로 제거한 경우보다 더 거친 상아질 표면이 관찰되었다. 2. 산부식처리한 경우 유치와 영구치 모두 우식제거방법과 관계없이 도말층이 제거된 양상을 보였다. 3. Single bond system을 이용한 경우 두터운 $2-4{\mu}m$의 혼성층과 $10-15{\mu}m$의 adhesive layer가 관찰된 반면, self-etching bonding system에서는 비교적 얇은($1-2{\mu}m$) 혼성층만이 형성되었다. 4. 전단결합강도는 유치와 영구치 모두 우식제거방법에 관계없이 Single bonding agent를 적용한 경우에 self-etching bonding agent를 적용한 군보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 5. $Carisolv^{TM}$와 self-etching bonding agent 처리군에서 bur와 self-etching system 처리군보다 다소 높은 전단결합강도를 보였으나 유의성은 없었다(P>0.05).

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.289-299
• /
• 2002

The bond strength is one of the most important factor in establishing long-term success of esthetic restorative dentistry. So, various restorative materials have been introduced to improve the esthetic and physical properties. Ormocer (organically modified ceramic) was developed as a result of such efforts. This study was performed to compare the shear bond strength of ormocer based adhesive with that of existing dentin adhesive. In this study $Admira^{(R)}$ and $Admira^{(R)}$ bond of the ormocer system are grouped together for ADM, Single $Bond^{(R)}$ which is an one-bottle adhesive and Z-250TM which is hybrid composite resin of BIS-GMA system for SIN, and $Definite^{(R)}$ of ormocer and Etch & $Prime^{(R)}$ 3.0 which is a self etching priming/ bonding agent for ETC. The results of this study were as follows. : (1) In the comparison of shear bond strength according to different adhesive system, shear bond strength was increased in the order of ETC group, SIN group, ADM group. There was no significant difference between ADM group and SIN group. However, there was a significant level of difference between ADM and ETC groups as well as SIN and ETC groups( p<0.05). (2) Examination by a scanning electron microscope showed a well established hybrid layer and resin tag in both ADM group and SIN group, while ETC group showed a minimal formation of the hybrid layer when compared with ADM and SIN groups. From the above results, it may be reasonable to start the clinical application of ormocer system, and it is recommended that ormocer system should be used along with an ormocer based adhesive because ormocer system showed the lower shear bond strength when it used with other existing self etching priming/bonding agent. The self etching priming/bonding agent showed relatively low shear bond strength, and it is considered that the further study should be needed.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.310-321
• /
• 1999

In this in vitro study, confocal laser scanning microscopic morphology of dentin-resin interface and its relationship to shear bond strength were investigated after the exposed dentin surfaces were treated with 3 different kinds of dentin adhesive systems[three-step; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(SMPP), self-priming bonding resin; Single Bond(SB), self-etching primer; Clearfil Liner Bond 2(LB2)]. 52 extracted human molar teeth without caries and/or restorations. The experimental teeth were randomly divided into three groups of seventeen teeth each. In five teeth of each group, class V cavities(depth: 1.5mm) with 900 cavosurface angles were prepared at the cementoenamel junction on buccal and lingual surfaces. Bonding resins of each dentin adhesive system were mixed with rhodamine B. Primer of SMPP was mixed with fluorescein. In group 1. the exposed dentin was conditioned with etchant, applied with above primer and bonding resin of SMPP. In group 2, with etchant and self-priming bonding agent of SB. In group 3, with self-etching primer and bonding agent of LB2. After treatment with dentin adhesive systems, composite resin were applied and photocured. The experimental teeth were cut longitudinally through the center line of restoration and grounded so that about $90{\mu}m$-thick wafers of buccolingually orientated dentin were obtained. And, $70{\sim}80{\mu}m$-thick wafers sectioned horizontally, thus presenting a dentinal tubules at 900 to the cut surface of a remaining tooth, were obtained. Primer of SMPP mixed with rhodamine B was applied to these wafers. Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigations of these wafers were done within of 24 hours after treatment. To measure shear bond strength, the remaining twelve teeth of each group were grounded horizontally below the dentinoenamel junction, so that no enamel remained. After applying dentin adhesive systems on the dentin surface, composite was applied in the shape of cylinder. The cylinder was 5mm in diameter, and 2mm in thickness. Shear bond strength was measured using Instron with a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. It was concluded as follows ; 1. Hybrid layer of SMPP(mean: $4.56{\mu}m$) was thicker than that of any other groups. This value was not statistically significant thicker than that of SB(mean: $3.41{\mu}m$, p>0.05), and significant thicker than that of LB2(mean: $1.56{\mu}m$, p<0.05). There was a statistical difference between SB and LB2(p<0.05). 2. Although there were variations in the length of resin tag even in a sample, and in a group, most samples in SMPP and SB showed resin tags extending above $20{\mu}m$. But samples in LB2 showed resin tags of $10{\mu}m$ at best. 3. Besides primer's infiltration into demineralized peritubular dentin and dentinal tubules, fluorophore of primer was detected in the lateral branches of dentinal tubules. 4. All groups demonstrated statistically significant differences from one another(p<0.05), with shear bond strengths given in descending order as follows: SMPP(18.3MPa), SB(16.0MPa) and LB2(12.4MPa). 5. LB2 having thinnest hybrid layer($1.56{\mu}m$) showed the lowest shear bond strength(12.4MPa).