• Title/Summary/Keyword: Scientific Knowledge

Search Result 1,742, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Investigating the Relationships among Substantive Understanding, Scientific Literacy and Learning Intention in CSILE-based Inquiry Learning and Inquiry Ability (CSILE 기반의 탐구학습에서 지식의 이해, 과학적 소양, 학습 의도 및 탐구력의 관련성 규명)

  • Kim, Jee-Il
    • The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
    • /
    • v.7 no.5
    • /
    • pp.57-70
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study is the subsequent study that has the objectives examining the relationships among 'substantive understanding', 'scientific literacy' and 'learning intention' in computer supported intentional learning environments and inquiry ability, variables for affecting knowledge construction derived from the finding out of the former study. As a result, the current study confirmed in CSILE the close correlation between 'the learning intention for scientific inquiry' and 'substantive understanding', between 'the learning intention for scientific inquiry' and 'scientific literacy'. Another result showed that 'scientific literacy' was the most significant predictor on inquiry ability. Base on the result of this study, the present researcher is about to make suggestions to stimulate learners' scientific literacy in CSILE-based inquiry learning.

  • PDF

Analysis of Elementary Students' Scientific Justification Activities based on Evidence (초등학생의 '증거' 사용에 따른 '과학적 정당화' 활동의 분석)

  • Jang, Shin-Ho;Jeong, Su-Jin
    • Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education
    • /
    • v.29 no.4
    • /
    • pp.414-426
    • /
    • 2010
  • For this study, inquiry-based learning program was developed for promoting elementary students' scientific justification activities based on their uses of scientific evidences. The program was applied to the 5th grade science class to examine the types of evidences and major features of scientific justification activities. Analysis of the data showed that the evidences used by students were classified into knowledge-based evidence, experience-based evidence and authority-based evidence. As for students' justification features, this study reports three major cases: a case evolving evidence and justification to become more valid and logical, as inquiry activities progressed, other case maintaining less valid and illogical evidence and justification, and final case revealing passive and reluctant participation in the inquiry activities. Overall, students' participation in scientific justification process became more valid and relevant, while there were some students who were unable to make the relevant relations between evidences and claims they made. The educational implications were discussed to consider more effective ways to improve the scientific classroom environment through social knowledge construction.

  • PDF

Factors of Korean Students' Achievement in Scientific Literacy

  • Shin, Dong-Hee;Ro, Koog-Hyang
    • Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
    • /
    • v.21 no.5
    • /
    • pp.893-905
    • /
    • 2001
  • Korean students ranked the 3rd out of 32 participating countries in the first cycle of PISA(Programme for International Student Assessment) science field, which assessed 15-years-old students' scientific literacy. PISA developed several variables such as parents' socio-economic status, parents' educational attainment, family wealth, and cultural possession, to investigate the effects of background variables on scientific literacy. On the other hand, motivation and engagement in science study were not given much attention, partly because science was the minor area in the first cycle of PISA. Therefore, PISA Korea developed a series of variables to collect data on students' learning motives and out-of-school activities in science as a national option. The results are as followings. First, Korea was found to be one of the PISA participating countries with the scientific literacy achievement least influenced by parents' socio-economic status, family wealth, and parents' cultural possession. Second, the degree of achievement in scientific literacy according to parents' educational attainment was in a positive correlation, similar to the overall tendency of PISA. Third, the most crucial learning motive for Korean students was their desire to develop scientific thinking abilities or obtain science knowledge. On the other hand, choosing jobs in the field of science or parental expectation was the least important learning motive. In particular, the motive for scientific learning was found to have a positive relationship with the degree of scientific literacy achievement. Therefore, the higher the students achievement, the stronger the motive for scientific learning in order to develop their ability to think scientifically or acquire science knowledge. Fourth, Korean students were shown to participate very little in out-of-school scientific activities other than watching TV programs related to science. Whatever the activities may be, the more actively involved students are in out-of-school scientific activities, the higher their scientific literacy achievement. Fifth, Korean girls were rather passive compared to boys in all areas, including science learning motive and out-of-school scientific activities. The gender difference was especially more pronounced in out-of-school scientific activities with wider gaps in such activities as reading scientific books or articles and visiting science-related web sites.

  • PDF

PRESENT STATUS AND SCIENTIFIC FACTOR ANALYSIS ON ITS PAST PROBLEMS OF THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIAD ON ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS (국제천문 및 천체물리 올림피아드 현황과 기출문항에 대한 과학탐구 유형 분석)

  • Yim, In-Sung;Sung, Hyun-Il;Han, In-Woo;Kim, Yoo-Jea;Choe, Seung-Urn
    • Publications of The Korean Astronomical Society
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.89-101
    • /
    • 2011
  • The International Olympiad on Astronomy and Astrophysics (IOAA) initiated by the Thailand Astronomical Society in 2007 is an annual competition for high school students. One of its aim is to enhance the development of international exchange in the field of school education in astronomy and astrophysics. This paper first provides the overview of the IOAA in terms of key regulations based on its statutes, history and current status. Secondly, the published syllabus of the IOAA is used for content analysis according to subject areas regarding the exam questions of the IOAA in theoretical, observational and data analysis parts from 2007 to 2010. Also, a scientific inquiry framework is applied to the same questions for assessment based on scientific inquiry in the cognitive aspect with two sub-classes of scientific knowledge and scientific reasoning. Among a dozen astronomy subject areas listed on the syllabus, the theoretical part of the IOAA makes more frequent use of the Sun, the solar system, properties of stars, and concept of time. In content knowledge, a factor of scientific knowledge, the IOAA questions, especially in the theoretical part have a lesser degree in difficulty than the IAO (International Astronomy Olympiad) exam questions for the same period whose degree in difficulty is comparable to college level. With regard to scientific reasoning, the IOAA questions tend to involve convergent rather than divergent thinking. Lastly, in light of these findings, discussions are given on the outcome of Korean participation in the previous IOAAs and ways to help better in preparing Korean students for future astronomy Olympiads.

A Suggestion of Cognitive Model of Scientific Creativity (CMSC) (과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 -인지적 측면을 중심으로-)

  • Park, Jong-Won
    • Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.375-386
    • /
    • 2004
  • Creative thinking alone can not lead to scientific creativity. Scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry skills are needed for scientific creativity. Focused only on cognitive aspect, I suggested a cognitive model of scientific creativity (CMSC) consisting of 3 components: thinking for scientific creativity, scientific knowledge contents, and scientific inquiry skills. Recently, many researchers have emphasized the various thinking for creativity as well as divergent thinking. Therefore, I suggested three types of creative thinking - divergent thinking, convergent thinking, and associational thinking - and discussed its rationale. Based on this model, an example of activity material for the scientific creativity was suggested. In the further research, based on CMSC, various activity types related to scientific creativity and concrete learning materials for scientific creativity will be developed.