• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.17-31
• /
• 2020

4차 산업혁명 시대의 시작과 함께 다양한 분야의 기술들이 서로 융합하며 새로운 형태의 기술과 제품들이 개발되고 있으며, 이와 더불어 그것들에 대한 시장 지배력을 갖기 위한 지식 재산권의 행사나 특허등록의 중요성이 높아지고 있어 국내는 물론 해외에서의 특허출원이 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라, 심사관 1인당 처리해야 할 특허 처리 건수가 해마다 많아지고 있어 선행기술조사에 소비되는 시간과 비용이 점점 증가하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구는 다수의 해외특허 우선권 주장 시 동일 우선권 주장 특허문서 간 유사도를 계산하여 심사관 및 특허 출원인이 유사문서를 우선 검토 할 수 있도록 함으로써 심사 시간과 비용을 줄이고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 본 연구에서는 비정형 특허 문서의 데이터를 전처리 후 LDA 토픽 모델링과 Word2vec을 활용하여 특허 문서 간 유사도를 구하고, 이 유사도 점수가 높은 순으로 검토 문서를 우선 추천하는 유사 특허 추천 모델을 제안하였다. 3단계의 모델 생성과정을 통해 만들어진 모델을 사용하여 재현율 95%로 높은 결과를 보였다. 본 연구에서 제안한 모델을 통해, 심사관은 효율적으로 선행기술에 대한 조사가 가능해지며, 심사 수행 중 유사하다고 판단된 특허문서에 대한 심사 이력을 신속하게 참고할 수 있어 업무 부담감을 줄이고 심사풀질을 향상시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권7호
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2022

This scientific article is devoted to the study of the legal significance of such a category of legal status of the purchaser of another's thing, as its good faith. The essence of this phenomenon has been studied, it has been established that the criterion of good faith attaches significant importance to the claims of the participants of these relations for the acquisition or preservation of private property rights. The paper emphasizes that, in addition to the importance of good conscience at the time of possession of another's thing, which gives legal certainty the possibility of registration of the title and is part of the actual composition for the acquisition of property or the right of ancient possession, bona fides also characterizes the behavior of the occupier. In this case, good conscience only has some legal consequences when it is opposed to subjective law. Under such conditions, it acquires direct legal significance, including as a condition for the acquisition and protection of rights. Good faith possession of another's property is an internal indicator of the subject's awareness of a certain property status. This sense, the article assesses this status from the standpoint of the scientific concept of the visibility of law. According to this theory, prescription is also considered as a consequence of the appearance of law, however, because it arises and lasts against the will of the parties and despite their awareness of this fact. Therefore, bona fide continuous and open possession of property as one's own, during the acquisition period, was most significantly associated with the appearance of property. Therefore, the concept of good faith, in the sense of personal perception of real values, is closely related to the principle of protection of the appearance of law, as it is aimed at understanding it by third parties. The paper notes certain differences in the application of the theory of the appearance of the right in the acquisition of property by a bona fide purchaser from an unauthorized alienator and the acquisitive prescription. It is emphasized that such a mechanism must be used in presuming the attitude to the thing as its own, by the holder of movable property. But there should be exceptions to the rule, in particular, if the owner has grounds for vindication of the thing.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.119-164
• /
• 2007

Improving the formal objection system regarding reviewing medical expenses requires authority and confidence in the aspect of well-functioning the health insurance review and assessment system, legally and appropriately. The purposes of improvement of the formal objection system should aim for protecting the people's right of health. On handling the formal objections, the disputes of the rights should be settled economically and promptly by fairness, specialty, and objectivity in the health insurance review and assessment administration. Therefore, in order to promote the administrative specialty of health insurance, the formal objection committee needs to be organized independently and guaranteed expertly. Under the current formal objection system, however, the organization of committee lacks right-relief function, recognition and public relation as a health insurance appeal system, and related professional man powers. It is also analyzed that there are several controversial points, such as mass deliberation to the formal objection committee and its conference procedure. As a measure of improvement, it is analyzed that the committee needs to be organized independently with a proper number of professional man powers. The strict deliberation procedures and the prohibition of the decision-making by non-conference are also required to be empowered. The formal objection procedure provides the beneficiaries and the claims legitimately, so that it secures the legal relations on the health insurance system. Therefore, on the conference process of formal objection, the expert and guaranteed protection should be provided promptly, and its procedures to the appellants should also be assisted kindly.

• The Korean Journal of Ecology
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.245-251
• /
• 2001

Dokdo is a volcanic island, and its formative geological age took place at the end of the Pliocene Epoch. Dokdo is located at 131。 52′33" East longitude, and 37$^{\circ}$ 14′18" North latitude, and is consituted of 87 islands. The total area of Dokdo is 0.186 $\textrm{km}^2$ and the length of its coastline is 4 km. Ookdo is a treasury of fish resources where many varieties of fish including squid and Alaska pollack live in abundance of greatest importance. Dokdo is a forward fishery base. Ullung island is located at 37$^{\circ}$ 27′~37$^{\circ}$ 33′North latitude and 130$^{\circ}$ 47′~130$^{\circ}$ 56′East longitude. The area of Ullung is 72.92 $\textrm{km}^2$ and the length of its seashore is 44.21 $\textrm{km}^2$. The total marine product of Ullungdo(1995) is 9,066 tons (M/T). The largest is squid, 8,900 tons. For the sea area of the depths near the Ullungdo, coast, that of 50m or less is 2,477 ha, and that of 50- 100m is 1,471ha. This fact tells us that there is no extensive area of a very shallow sea, and that it is directly connected to the deep sea. Ullungdo is a treasury of marine bioresources with rich and varied fishes including squid and Alaska Pollack and many others. Presently there is a sovereignty dispute over Dokdo between Korea and Japan. Since A.D.512, Dokdo has been a part of territory of Korea. Dokdo is a part of Kyungsang-Bukdo, Ullung-gun, Ullung-up, Do-dong in the Korean administrative district division system. Japan strenuously claims sovereignty for significant economic reasons, including fishery rights, and has adhered to a contradictory position that "Dokdo is Japanese land" since Japan incorporated Dokdo into Japanese territory in 1905.ritory in 1905.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.3-27
• /
• 2016

There is a need for disputes in sports to be settled by arbitration rather than a court ruling, taking the unique characteristics of sports into consideration. Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). A dispute resolution system is regarded as: an arbitrator is selected by the agreement between the parties, and a binding decision is made, which the parties obey, consequently resulting in a final resolution. To resolve a dispute upon arbitration, there must be an arbitration agreement upon the free will of the parties. In relation to the arbitration agreement, however, there are some cases in which sports organizations have an arbitration clause in the articles of association, regulations or player registration application that call for settling disputes by arbitration. In such cases, the validity of the arbitration agreement may create doubt whether or not this sort of arbitration has been made by mutual agreement. Consequently this is required to be legally examined. The activities of a sports organization are recognized as part of private autonomy, and they include even the rights that establish regulations or rules. Nonetheless, the powers that such sport organizations are able to establish are not allowed without limit. However, sports activities and autonomy shall be protected as themselves. Therefore, if we give priority to arbitration upon the independent arbitrator and fair process by establishing an independent arbitral organization in charge of sports disputes to handle the effective resolution of disputes and protect sports autonomy and ask for a court decision if one party disobeys the arbitration, or the sports arbitration prepositive principle, it seems helpful to resolve the unfairness of compulsory jurisdiction and the clause for sports arbitration and protect the player's right of choice and of claims for trial.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.215-223
• /
• 2020

패전 이후 1950년대를 전후하여 일본에서는 서클문학운동이 전국에서 일어났고, 재일조선인 민족운동의 주체도 자신들의 정치적 권리와 주장을 문학운동과 연동하여 서클과 기관지를 통하여 생산·확장시켜왔다. 그러나 지금까지 재일조선인 민족운동의 정치적 주체와 문학서클 운동과의 교류, 갈등을 구체적인 사례로 분석 연구한 사례는 아직 미미한 실정이다. 따라서 본고에서는 조련과 민전의 정치적 역학관계로 탄생한 '오사카 시인집단' 기관지『진달래』와 노선전환에 따른 조총련의 '재일조선 문학회' 기관지『조선 문예』의 성립과정과 두 잡지의 교류, 갈등, 해산 과정 등을 비교분석하여 그 실체를 규명했다. 즉, 해방 후 재일조선인 문학자들이 갖고 있었던 탈식민지화로의 끝없는 고민과 대립, 모순과 갈등의 실체를 '공화국공민과 재일', '주제와 창작언어'등으로 분석하여 '조총련과의 갈등'으로 결국 해산에 이르는 과정을 분석하였다. 본고에서 파악된 1950년대 재일조선인들의 시대정신은 향후 재일조선인문학의 출발점 연구에 새로운 방향을 제시해줄 수 있으리라 기대된다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.165-175
• /
• 2010

본고에서는 부르디외의 이론을 바탕으로 취향(또는 기호)이 개인에게 내재되어 있는 것의 발현이 아니라 살아온 환경 및 아비투스에 의해 결정지어지며, 이러한 취향(또는 기호)은 모방과 동조의 자연스러운 흐름으로 이어진다고 본다. 이 흐름이 바로 다수의 승인으로부터 정당성을 확보한 유행이라 할 수 있다. 그러나 유행의 본질은 헤게모니적 역학 관계 안에 존재하며, 서로의 (계급 문화적) 동질성과 차이점을 결정짓는 데에 있다. 이러한 점에서 유행이 유통되는 창구로서의 대중문화 역시 기득권에 정당성을 부여한다는 비판에서 자유로울 수 없다. 따라서 본고에서는 유행과 대중문화를 통한 지배 전략에 대한 경계를 늦추지 말아야 할 것과 이를 위한 인식의 전환을 요구한다. 이 과정에서 최근 디지털 첨단 기술의 발전에 따른 팬덤문화 및 대안문화는 대중의 상호간 소통을 통한 대중문화 형성의 주체성과 역동성을 기대하게 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.43-68
• /
• 2020

The "arbitration" system resolves disputes through judgments on rights relations or claims between disputed parties by judging by private trial, but it does not have organizational and material bases to execute the contents of these judgments. Therefore, unless the parties succeed in voluntarily surrendering to the results of the arbitration award, the implementation of the award will be accomplished by the enforcement of the assistance of the National Court. However, unlike the court's ruling, the arbitration tribunal does not generate enforcement power from the judgment itself, and it must be filed with the court for execution. In this regard, Germany provides for arbitration proceedings in the Civil Procedure Act Volume 10. In particular, Article 1060 governs the approval and enforcement of domestic arbitral awards. Accordingly, the procedure for declaring the feasibility of domestic arbitration proceedings and the execution of forced execution are commenced. Regarding the enforceable declaration of a domestic arbitral award, it differs from the simpler process requirements compared to the procedure in a foreign arbitral award, and usually has the same effect as a final judgment between the parties without a separate approval procedure. However, the arbitration award does not constitute an enforceable power that can be implemented, but is enforced through the national court's declaration procedure. However, if there is a ground for cancellation as provided for in Article 1059 (2) of the German Civil Procedure Act, the arbitral award is canceled and the application for enforcement is dismissed.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.91-122
• /
• 2014

For a variety of reasons, the number of medical disputes is continuously rising. Due to the intrinsic qualities of medical treatments, one would find it more apt to subject medical disputes to general conflict resolution procedures rather than to once-for-all decisions under legal suits. To address the increasing medical disputes with greater professionalism and efficiency, the Medical Disputes Mediation Act was enacted and a medical dispute mediation system put in place, while drawbacks have been blamed to both. The current mediation procedures require the respondent's agreement as a disclosure requirement. A reasonable improvement to this would be to amend the regulation of agreement supposition, or to enforce procedural participation only to public health facilities managed by the national or regional government. Furthermore, small claims cases of 20 million KRW or less in claim may be considered for conciliation-prepositive principle. The concentration on small claim medical disputes is a phenomenon that can be addressed by carrying out maximum authentication commissions or similar measures, one of the solutions by enhancing the public trust in the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. The proper management of medical authentication teams is one way to address the existing problems in the authentication system. For this, the number of team members shall be increased under more flexible authentication procedures. All indemnity resources for medical accidents of force majeure must be borne by the Government, for it is the body principally responsible for social compensation. Placing this cost on the establisher of the subject medical facility holds the possibility of violating fundamental rights. While the costs for subrogation payment system for damages may be borne by the healthcare facility establisher, a deposit-based system must be created for cases in which the facility shuts down, without holding the responsibility for accident cause. Such change to a deposit-based system will evade the controversies of unconstitutionality, etc.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.133-141
• /
• 2013

1952년1월 18일 이승만 대통령의 인접해양의 주권선언이후(평화선언) 일본은 독도에 관한 대한민국의 영유권을 인정하지 않고 이를 한 일간의 영유권에 관한 법적분쟁으로 보고 국제사법재판소에 부탁하여 해결하자고 1954년부터 틈틈이 주장하고 있다. 국제사법재판소는 한 일간의 독도의 영유권 귀속문제에 대해 당연한 관할권을 갖는 것이 아니며 또 대한민국정부는 독도문제해결을 위해 국제사법재판소에 제소하자고 하는 일본의 제의에 합의할 필요가 없다. 특히 대한민국정부는 독도영유권 문제에 대해 일본과의 사전 합의한바 없어 국제사법재판소의 관할권은 인정되지 않는다. 그러나 일본이 일방적으로 국제사법재판소에 제소할 경우 대한민국은 명시적 및 묵시적 동의 등의 국제사법재판소에 확대관할권을 부여하는 결과가 없도록 유념해야 할 것이다. 독도영유권 분쟁의 해결방법으로서 가장 훌륭한 방안은 대한 민국의 주권을 실력으로 행사하면서 독도에 대해 실효적 지배를 보다 강화해 나가는 것이다.