• 제목/요약/키워드: RespiTrainer

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.016초

RespiTrainer를 활용한 백-밸브마스크 환기에서 일회호흡량과 기도압 비교 연구 (Comparative Analysis of Tidal Volume and Airway Pressure with a Bag-valve Mask using RespiTrainer)

  • 신소연;이재국;노상균
    • 한국화재소방학회논문지
    • /
    • 제28권6호
    • /
    • pp.76-81
    • /
    • 2014
  • 이 연구는 RespiTrainer를 활용한 백밸브마스크 환기에서 1인 백밸브마스크, 2인 백밸브마스크, 전문기도삽관 별 호흡량과 기도압을 비교 분석하였다. 실험기간은 2014년 6월 2일부터 6월 10일까지이며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 18.0을 이용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과 기관내삽관을 통한 환기 $497{\pm}78mL$, 2인 BVM 환기 $479{\pm}91mL$를 보였고, 1인 BVM 환기와 킹후두관기도기, 후두마스크 환기에서 각각 $386{\pm}59mL$, $365{\pm}05mL$, $351{\pm}35mL$를 보였다. 기도압에서도 기관내삽관을 통한 BVM 환기에서 가장 높은 기도압(11.67 cm $H_2O$)을 보였다. 결과적으로 기관내삽관을 통한 BVM 환기와 2인 BVM 환기에서 1/3 백 압착법은 적절하였다.

옥시레이터 EM-100을 활용한 환기량과 기도내압 비교 (Comparison of Ventilatory Volume and Airway Pressures Using Oxylator EM-100)

  • 신소연;노상균
    • 한국화재소방학회논문지
    • /
    • 제29권5호
    • /
    • pp.104-109
    • /
    • 2015
  • 이 연구는 RespiTrainer를 활용한 옥시레이터 EM-100 환기에서 기관내삽관, 킹후두관기도기, 아이-겔, 마스크를 통한 호흡량과 기도압을 비교 분석하였다. 실험기간은 2015년 7월 20일부터 7월 21일까지이며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 18.0을 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과 기관내삽관이 537 ml (95% CI 530~545 ml), 킹후두관기도기 502 ml (95% CI 499~506 ml), 아이-겔 488 ml (95% CI 485~491 ml), 산소마스크 499 ml (95% CI 496~503 ml)의 환기량을 보였다. 기도압력은 기관내삽관이 $11.34cmH_2O$ (95% CI $11.21{\sim}11.41cmH_2O$), 킹후두관기도기 $10.67cmH_2O$ (95% CI $10.60{\sim}10.75cmH_2O$), 아이-겔 $10.42cmH_2O$ (95% CI $10.35{\sim}10.67cmH_2O$), 산소마스크 $10.61cmH_2O$ (95% CI $10.55{\sim}10.68cmH_2O$)로 측정되었다. 결과적으로 옥시레이터 EM-100을 이용한 인공호흡으로 적절한 호흡량이 전달되는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

Bag-Valve-Mask의 사용방법에 따른 일회호흡량과 평균기도압의 변화 연구 (Differentiation of tidal volume & mean airway pressure with different Bag-Valve-Mask compression depth and compression rate)

  • 조승묵;정형근
    • 한국응급구조학회지
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.67-74
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose : The purpose of this study is to get basal user guidelines of safer bag-valve-mask application on patient with normal pulmonary patho-physiologic condition. Methods : This study was accomplished by pre-qualified 25 EMS junior grade students. Participants were instructed randomly compress bag to one-third, half and total and also with differesnt compression speed. Resultant tidal volumes and mean airway pressures obtained in RespiTrainer were analysed in relation to the each compression depth and rate. Results : Demographic difference does not affect tidal volume with any compression depth and rate change. Increasing compression depth is correlated with tidal volume increasement at any compression rate and also with mean airway pressure. If the compression depth is same, compression rate change did not affect significantly the resultant tidal volume or mean airway pressure. Conclusion : Hand size, Experience, BMI dose not affect tidal volume. Compress the 1600 ml bag half to total amount is safe way to offer sufficient tidal volume without risky high airway pressure delivery to patient airway who with normal lung patho-physiologic condition.

백-밸브-마스크 환기 시 마스크 밀착방법에 따른 환기효과 비교 (Comparison of ventilation effects by mask-sealing methods during bag-valve-mask ventilation)

  • 이남종;백미례
    • 한국응급구조학회지
    • /
    • 제22권1호
    • /
    • pp.73-82
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the tidal volumes and airway pressures of 3 mask-sealing methods (one hand C-E, two hands C-E, and one hand O-E) for ventilation treatment. Methods: The study subjects were 45 paramedic students. Tidal volume was measured for the three sealing methods by setting a ventilator, connecting it to the masks for 2 minutes, and using Respi-trainer software. Results: Regarding general characteristics, the group of men, in upper grades, and with practical training experience and experience and experience in the implementation of bag-valve-mask ventilation provided higher tidal volumes. Regarding physical characteristics, larger hands and greater grip strength correlated with higher tidal volume. Two hands C-E generated the highest tidal volume of $483.78{\pm}34.14mL$, one hand O-E generated $449.59{\pm}51.09mL$ and one hand C-E generated $394.31{\pm}68.95mL$. Conclusion: Means of tidal volumes were statistically significantly different based on mask sealing methods (p<.001). Two hand C-E was performed by the two-persons task and was suggested as the most effective method. For the one-person task, one hand O-E was the more effective method compared to the previous one hand C-E.