• 제목/요약/키워드: Report Quality

검색결과 1,688건 처리시간 0.026초

CARE 지침에 따른 대한한의학회지의 증례보고에 대한 질 평가 (Evaluation of the Quality of Case Reports from the Journal of Korean Medicine Based on the CARE Guidelines)

  • 최성열
    • 대한한의학회지
    • /
    • 제41권2호
    • /
    • pp.122-136
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objectives: A case report is a detailed report of the symptoms, signs, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of an individual patient. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of case reports from the Journal of Korean Medicine by the CARE (CAse REport) Guideline. Methods: Case reports published in the Journal of Korean Medicine from January 2016 to March 2020 were searched from Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS). We assessed the quality of reporting based on CARE (CAse REport) guideline as 'Sufficient', 'Not-Sufficient' and 'Not-Report'. Results: A total of 22 case reports were finally included for the assessment. The reporting items were reported as of reporting quality. After checking the result, there was a deviation in the sub-item reporting rate by a maximum 89.29%, a minimum 66.67% and a median 82.14% in case reports. Also after checking the quality in case reports by 28 detailed items in CARE guidelines, there were not reported 77% or more in the 5 sub-items 'Intervention adherence and tolerability', 'Informed consent', 'Adverse and unanticipated events', 'Diagnostic challenges', 'Patient perspective'. Conclusion: There is a need to improve the quality of case reports in the journal of Korean Medicine based on various studies using CARE guideline.

The Influence of Depression and School Life on the Quality of Life of Korean Child and Adolescent Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Comparison of the Perspectives of the Patients and Their Caregivers

  • Park, Byeong-Eon;Lee, Jeong-Seop;Kim, Hee-Yun;Bae, Jae-Nam;Kim, Won-Hyoung;Kim, Hye-Young;Rim, Mi-Roo;Kang, Sang-Gu;Choi, Seo-Hyun
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • /
    • 제30권1호
    • /
    • pp.2-8
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objectives: This study aimed to compare the quality of life reported by patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to the patients' quality of life as reported by their caregivers. In addition, it aimed to examine how emotional problems, including depression and anxiety, and the severity of the symptoms affect the quality of life reported by the patients and their caregivers. Methods: The patients' quality of life and their degree of depression and anxiety were measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Child Self-Report, the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), and the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale, respectively. The caregivers' perception of the patients' quality of life and severity of the ADHD symptoms were measured using the PedsQL 4.0 Parent Proxy Report and the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS), respectively. A total of 66 participants completed the survey. The independent-samples t-test, Pearson's correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were conducted. Results: The mean score of the PedsQL 4.0 Child Self-Report was significantly higher than the mean score of the PedsQL 4.0 Parent Proxy Report. However, for school function, the PedsQL 4.0 Child Self-Report score was significantly lower than that of Parent Proxy Report. The correlation between the PedsQL 4.0 Child Self-Report and PedsQL 4.0 Parent Proxy Report scores was significant only for emotional function and social function. The multiple regression analysis showed that the PedsQL 4.0 Child Self-Report and PedsQL 4.0 Parent Proxy Report scores were significantly predicted by the CDI and CPRS scores, respectively. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that there are clear differences between the quality of life reported by the patient themselves and that reported by their caregivers. In addition, the findings suggest that it is critical to treat the patients' accompanying depressive symptoms.

사용자 측면에서의 아리랑위성 3호 영상자료의 품질 정의 및 관리 (Definition and Monitoring of Image data Quality for KOMPSAT-3 from users)

  • 이동한;김민아;서두천;정재헌;전경미
    • 항공우주기술
    • /
    • 제13권2호
    • /
    • pp.87-98
    • /
    • 2014
  • 일반적으로 위성 영상자료 품질에 대한 요구조건 값과 사용자 측면에서의 품질사이에는 바라보는 시각에 따른 기술적인 차이가 존재한다. 실제로 아리랑위성 3호도 2012년 12월31일에 검보정 작업이 완료되어 영상자료 품질 요구조건 값들을 모두 만족하여 정상운영을 시작하였지만, 아리랑위성 3호를 위한 사용자 측면의 영상자료 품질을 별도로 정의하여 관리하고, 필요에 따라 추가 검보정 작업을 수행하고 있다. 검보정팀과 자료처리팀에서는 아리랑위성 3호 영상자료 품질보고서를 작성하여, 처리시스템에서 생성되는 영상자료의 품질을 판단하여 관리하고 있으며, 그 중에서 영상자료 품질을 저하시키는 5개의 추가 검보정 항목을 선정하였고, 현재 추가 검보정 작업을 완료하여 처리시스템에 추가하는 작업을 진행 중이다.

2015년부터 2018년까지 사상체질의학회지에 보고된 증례에 대한 보고의 질 평가 : CARE지침을 바탕으로 (Assesment of The Quality of Reporting in Case Reports in Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine from Year 2015 to 2018 : Using CARE Guidelines)

  • 김지환;이혜림;이주아;이명수
    • 사상체질의학회지
    • /
    • 제30권2호
    • /
    • pp.28-41
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objectives The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of case reports about Sasang Constitutional Medicine(SCM). Methods Case reports published from March, 2015 to March, 2018 in Journal of SCM were identified by searching from Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System(OASIS). We assessed the quality of reporting of them based on CAse REport (CARE) guideline. Results A total of 39 case reports were finally included for the assessment. Overall quality of reporting was acceptable because case report even less reporting items mentioned 70.4% of them. However, the quality level was uneven because the maximum report rate was 77.8 %, the minimum 44.4 %, and the median 66.7 % when rigorously assessed. More than 50% of 39 case reports did not report 6 items about intervention adherence and tolerability, Diagnostic challenges, patient's perspective on interventions, informed consent, timeline, and adverse events, and did not sufficiently report 4 items about inclusion of terms such as case reports or SCM in keyword, symptoms of patient in abstract, information such as occupation relevant with psychosocial history, and the rationale for conclusions. Conclusions Efforts to improve the quality of reporting in SCM, and to develop case reporting guidelines appropriate for SCM are required.

프로젝트 상급자 특성이 프로젝트관리자의 보고 성향과 시스템 개발성과에 미치는 영향 (Effect of Senior Managers' Characteristics on Project Manager's Reporting Tendencies and Information Systems Development Performance)

  • 장시영;오만석
    • Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.149-179
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study explores the reporting tendencies of project managers when sending a status reports to their respective senior managers in information systems development project. It also examines the effect of selective reporting on report quality and systems development performance. The research model is proposed based on literature survey as well as key points from Iacovou et al. [2009] which is an extension of selective reporting in information systems project. Analysis of responses from 257 project managers in information systems industry indicates that pessimistic reporting by project managers has negative effect on both report quality (mediator variable) and systems development performance, while optimistic reporting has no significant effect on systems development performance. The CEO interest has an impact on the senior manager's power, which in turn leads to optimistic reporting by project managers. The senior manager's character has an impact on the senior manager's leadership, which in turn leads to pessimistic reporting. No direct relationship exists either between CEO interest and optimistic reporting or between senior manager's character and pessimistic reporting. In addition, trust toward the senior managers is significantly related to pessimistic reporting. Finally, report tendencies are also found to be affected by the active/passive characteristics of project managers.

경추성 현훈 환자의 복합 한의진료 경과 및 삶의 질 변화 : CARE 가이드라인에 따른 증례보고 (Herbal Medicine and Local Acupuncture Point Stimulation Administration and Their Clinical Effect on Quality of Life for Cervicogenic Dizziness (CGD) Patient: A CARE Guideline Compliant Case Report)

  • 김은미;조희근
    • 대한한방내과학회지
    • /
    • 제41권3호
    • /
    • pp.414-423
    • /
    • 2020
  • Background: This study examines the clinical effect on quality of life of herbal medicine and local acupuncture point stimulation administration for a cervicogenic dizziness (CGD) patient. This case report was described in accordance with CARE guidelines. Case Report: A 25 year-old female patient suspected to be suffering from CGD was examined. The patient was treated with herbal medicine and local acupuncture point stimulation. We used the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), and verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) to assess the patient's symptoms. As new herbal medicine and local acupuncture point stimulation were applied, dizziness, headache, and neck pain symptoms improved. Quality of life affected by the symptoms significantly improved. Adverse effects were not observed. Conclusions: This study may suggest that herbal medicine and local acupuncture point stimulation may be effective therapy for the treatment of typical symptoms in patients with CGD.

정보검색기반 결함위치식별 기술의 성능 향상을 위한 버그리포트 품질 예측 (Bug Report Quality Prediction for Enhancing Performance of Information Retrieval-based Bug Localization)

  • 김미수;안준;이은석
    • 정보과학회 논문지
    • /
    • 제44권8호
    • /
    • pp.832-841
    • /
    • 2017
  • 버그리포트는 소프트웨어의 유지보수 단계에서 발생한 결함 정보를 담고 있는 문서로서 개발자가 해당 결함을 수정하기 위해 필수적인 정보이다. 이 때 개발자가 버그리포트를 해결하기 위해 결함을 추적하는 시간을 단축시키기 위한 정보검색기반 결함위치식별 기술들이 제안되었다. 그러나 정보검색에 유용하지 못한 내용들로 작성된 낮은 품질의 버그리포트가 등록 될 경우 결함위치식별 성능이 크게 저하된다. 본 논문에서는 낮은 품질의 버그리포트를 선별하기 위한 품질 예측 방법을 제안한다. 이 과정에서 버그리포트의 쿼리로써의 품질 요소를 정의하고, 기계학습을 사용하여 품질을 예측한다. 제안 방법을 오픈 소스 프로젝트에 적용하여 기존 품질 예측 기술 대비 평균 6.62% 더 정확하게 예측하였다. 또한 기존 결함위치식별 기술에 제안 예측 기술과 자동 쿼리 재구성 기술을 함께 적용한 경우 결함위치식별 정확도를 1.3% 향상시켜, 제안 품질 예측 기술이 정보검색기반 결함위치식별 기술의 성능 향상을 도울 수 있음을 확인하였다.

CARE (CAse REport) 지침에 의한 한방비만학회지 증례 논문에 대한 보고의 질 평가: 2013년~2018년 증례보고를 중심으로 (Evaluation of the Quality of Case Reports of the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research from 2013 to 2018 According to the CARE (CAse REport) Guidelines)

  • 박경무;최성열;이주아;송윤경
    • 한방비만학회지
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.144-151
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of case reports of the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research by the Case Report (CARE) guidelines. Methods: Case reports published in the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research from January 2013 to July 2018 were searched from Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS). We assessed the quality of reporting based on CARE guidelines. Results: A total of 8 case reports were finally included for the assessment. There was a deviation in the sub-item reporting rate by a maximum 75% and a minimum 57.14% in case reports. The 10 sub-items mentioned below, such as 'Timeline', 'Diagnostic challenges', 'Diagnostic reasoning including other diagnoses considered', 'Prognostic characteristics', 'Changes in intervention', 'Important follow-up diagnostic evaluations and other test results', 'Intervention adherence and tolerability', 'Adverse and unanticipated events', 'Patient perspective' and 'Informed consent' were reported below 30%. Conclusions: Efforts to diversify the subject of the case study and to apply appropriate reporting guidelines are needed to improve the quality of the case report contributed to the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research.

국방품질경영시스템 인증 심사결과 분석을 통한 인증제도 개선 방안 (Improving Certification System by Analyzing Audit Result of the Defense Quality Management System)

  • 김영현;이종찬;최재호;변재현
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제46권3호
    • /
    • pp.465-482
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: This article aims 1) to propose improvement directions of the certification by recognizing the quality management practices based on the analysis of the audit results of the military contractors and 2) to suggest some ideas on quality audit planning preparation to help the government quality assurance representatives. Methods: Based on the nonconformity report of the defense quality management system (DQMS) requirements, frequently occurring requirement components are found and summarized. Three hypothesis testings are executed to check whether the maturity levels of the quality management systems are influenced by the company size, weapon tye, and company type, regarding the nonconformity frequency as dependent variable. Results: Nonconformity occurs most frequently in the order of product realization, measurement analysis and improvement, management responsibility, resource management, and quality management system. Nonconformity reduces when the company size increases, for the guided weapons, and in the defense companies. Conclusion: Since small-sized companies are inferior to larger companies with respect to the DQMS maturity level, more support should be provided to these small-sized companies which produce military supplies.

소아암 생존자 집단과 건강통제 집단의 삶의 질과 문제행동 비교 및 부모보고와 자기보고의 차이 연구 (Discrepancy between Parent and Child Report on Quality of Life and Behavioral Problems in Child and Adolescent cancer survivors and Healthy Control Group)

  • 김민희;정경미;이명아;유철주;원성철;신윤정
    • 한국심리학회지ㆍ건강
    • /
    • 제16권3호
    • /
    • pp.483-500
    • /
    • 2011
  • 의학 발전과 함께 소아암이 치료 가능한 질병이 되면서, 소아암 생존자 아동, 청소년의 장기적인 심리사회적인 적응과 관련된 문제가 주목을 받고 있다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 소아암 생존자 아동, 청소년의 삶의 질과 문제 행동 수준을 건강 통제 집단과 비교하고, 자녀의 심리적 적응 상태를 평가하는데 나타나는 부모와 자녀의 보고 불일치 양상이 소아암 경험 여부에 따라 차이가 나타나는가를 알아보았다. 소아암 생존자 집단과 건강 통제 집단의 아동, 청소년과 그들의 어머니가 연구에 참여하였다. PedQL의 아동 버전과 부모 버전을 이용하여 삶의 질을 측정하였고, K-CBCL과 K-YSR을 이용하여 문제행동 수준을 측정하였다. 분석 결과, 소아암 생존자 집단은 건강 통제 집단과 비교하여 전반적으로 신체적, 사회적 기능에서 낮은 삶의 질을 경험하고 있었고, 높은 수준의 내재화된 문제 행동을 보이고 있었다. 이 때의 결과는 어떤 정보원을 사용하였느냐에 따라 다소 차이를 보였다. 정보원간의 보고 불일치 양상을 살펴보았을 때, 두 집단 모두에서 부모는 자기 보고에서보다 문제 행동은 더 낮게, 삶의 질은 더 높게 보고하는 경향을 보였다. 소아암 생존자 집단과 건강 통제 집단에서 나타난 부모와 자기 보고의 불일치 정도를 비교해보았을 때, 삶의 질의 대부분의 영역에서는 유의미한 차이가 없었으나 내재화된 문제행동 영역에서 소아암 생존자 집단이 건강 통제 집단보다 부모와 자녀의 보고 차이가 유의미하게 더 큰 것으로 나타났다. 본 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구의 의의와 한계점에 대해 논의하였다.