• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2009

Korean e-Government web site has been evaluating as a distinguished government, ranked 5th of the 119 countries in the "Global e-government readiness index report 2005" by UN in 2006. However we have to focus poor rate of utilization in proportion to its high evaluation of e-Government ranking. These reason probably did not reflect the requirements of user to build and operate e-Government web site. In this paper we will provide the important factors to consider to build and operate e-Government web site. For this, we analyze the relative importance for evaluation factors of e-Government web site using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process).

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.73-81
• /
• 2003

최근 기업들은 글로벌 경쟁과 국내외 경영환경의 빠른 변화로 인해 과거와 같은 경영방식과 생산수단으로써는 경쟁에서 이겨나가기가 어려워지고 있다. 이와 함께 정보와 지식의 효과적인 활용을 통한 기업 경쟁력을 향상하려는 지식경영에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 지식경영의 성공요인들을 계층분석과정(AHP)을 통해서 찾아내고 성공요인들 간의 상대적인 중요도를 파악하여 지식경영을 도입하려는 기업들에게 성공적인 도입을 위한 시사점을 제공하고자 한다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.397-412
• /
• 2004

The importance of maritime sector in Korea has been increasingly recognized in recent days. As the country enters the $\ulcorner$new ocean era$\lrcorner$ the oceans are often regarded as holding the keys to solve the problems of modem industry associated with changing environment as well as changing societies and national politics. This paper attempts to address the national maritime R＆D policies and their relative importances. In the methodology, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process model is used to evaluate and rank the selected maritime R＆D projects which have a wide range of characteristics and policy implications. The criteria used for policy evaluation relates specifically to the Korea's evaluation needs and culture, and those criteria are weighted according to their relative importance as perceived by the maritime R＆D specialists.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.138-151
• /
• 2012

This study determines a consumer retail store choice by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for multi-criteria decision-making in the fashion retail industry. The study provides detailed and relevant information for management, marketers of fashion retail stores, and to improve competition between suppliers. Data was collected in February 2011 from questionnaires completed by 319 university students in Busan, South Korea. One of the major findings of this study was that consumer store preference was affected by the following factors in order of importance: product, image, service quality, and purchase facilitation. Brand image was assessed to be the most important of the evaluation elements, followed by individuality, style, and price. The results of rating the relative importance and priority of fashion retailers showed that department stores ranked most highly, followed by outlet malls, Internet shopping malls, brand malls, and discount stores.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.681-698
• /
• 2016

With increasing public concern for environmentally friendly agriculture, ecological aspect of landscape management is of growing importance. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) analysis were conducted based on the delphi survey of 31 experts to evaluate the relative importance and the preference of landscape elements. Landscape components of organic farmland were classified into 2 landscape fields, 5 landscape types, 14 landscape units, and 37 landscape elements. Overall relevance score for the proposed landscape components were about 5.5 on the seven point scale. While the relative importance weight of cropland landscape field was 0.71, the weight of intra-structure landscape field was 0.29. Among the cropland landscape, relatively higher weight was assigned to farming system (0.47) and margins (0.31), as compared with hydrological system (0.22). In the farming system, crop (0.40) and farm land (0.39) were the most important landscape units. In the margins, higher weight was given to Buffer zone (0.44) and Trees (0.42). Biological habitat (0.43) ranked the highest score in the hydrological system. Preferable landscape elements were glass house, companion plants, rice paddy field, diverse crop species, small pond, and small river, which are representing ecological advantage of organic farming systems. This result indicated that the landscape elements identified in the study would be suitable to evaluate ecological aspect of rural landscape in organic farmland.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.183-193
• /
• 2010

Well planned rehabilitation order of pipes is essential for efficient maintenance and management of Water Distribution Systems. In this study, not only deterioration rate of pipes but also structural and nonstructural failure which causes abnormal condition of WDS is considered to determine rehabilitation order. Probabilistic Neural Network is used for calculating deterioration rate at present and the importance of pipes is computed under structural and nonstructural failure by using Pipe by Pipe Failure Analysis and Effect Index. Utopian Approach, one of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods, is used for assessment of final rehabilitation order based on distance measure between utopian point and alternative one. Developed model in this study shows that it gives more reliable results than existing methods considering hydraulic relative importance does in application to real networks. In this point, the newly developed model, which gives advantages over existing models, can make a credible decision and simple application.

• 한국게임학회 논문지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.55-66
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 게임콘텐츠 관련 전문가들이 지능정보시대에 콘텐츠산업의 변화를 어떻게 인식하고 있고, 콘텐츠산업 정책 중에서 어떤 평가요인에 우선순위를 두고 있는가에 대해 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 계층분석과정을 이용하여 콘텐츠산업 정책 평가요인들의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위를 분석하였다. 분석결과, '콘텐츠 기술역량 강화', '콘텐츠 전문인력 양성', '콘텐츠관련 제도개선', '콘텐츠 이용 및 소비자 안전강화'의 순으로 평가되었으며, 하위항목 분석에서는 '콘텐츠 R&D 체계구축 강화'가 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 전문가집단별 분석에서는 산업계와 정책기관이 '콘텐츠기술역량 강화'를, 학계에서는 '콘텐츠 전문인력 양성'을 중요하게 평가하였다.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.257-265
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 자전거 이용에 필요한 이용환경과 관련된 지표를 도출하고, 자전거 이용환경을 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발 및 적용하였다. 분석결과 평가요소 간 상대적 중요도는 자전거 안전성이 가장 높았으며 전체적으로 자전거 주행에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 항목의 우선순위가 높고 간접적인 영향을 미치는 항목은 중요도가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 평가모형을 토지이용별로 자전거도로에 적용한 결과 비교적 현실적으로 묘사할 수 있는 것으로 확인되었고 향후 이를 활용하여 지자체의 자전거도로 이용환경 개선을 위한 개선방향 도출 등에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.97-125
• /
• 2015

In this study, we tried to evaluate the relative importance and find out the differences in consumer perceptions regarding service recovery strategies and the service provider in the distribution industry by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis method. Therefore in this study, we tried to systematize various recovery strategies which were considered very important during service failure process in the distribution industry and analyze the relative importance for each recovery strategy. We set hierarchy composed of four items of monetary, action-oriented, psychological, and assured level as primary selection criteria and a total of 16 items(indemnity, refund, gift, gift certificate, prompt resolution, exchange, manager support, explanation, apology, empathy, acknowledge, kindness, assortment, after service, manage subcontractor, manage employee) as secondary selection criteria. We tried to take one step further from the service sector and study service recovery strategies specialized in distributor services. This study suggests various implications about service recovery strategies of distributors. First, this study can provide practical implications - e.g. service recovery efforts should be applied differently depending on service channels. There is a perceptual difference with respect to the importance of the types of service recovery strategies between service provider and final customer. Second, we can find theoretical implications in terms of identifying the priorities through hierarchy design of new recovery strategies and comparison of each element from the classifications of the current fractional recovery strategies. We hope to help service providers to build more efficient recovery strategy system based on the results of this study.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.40-49
• /
• 2024

Background: This study aimed to prioritize policy measures to improve radiation safety management in medical institutions using the analytic hierarchy process. Materials and Methods: It adopted three policy options-engineering, education, and enforcement-to categorize safety management measures, the so-called Harvey's 3Es. Then, the radiation safety management measures obtained from the current system and other studies were organized into action plan categories. Using the derived model, this study surveyed 33 stakeholders of radiation safety management in medical institutions and analyzed the importance of each measure. Results and Discussion: As a result, these stakeholders generally identified enforcement as the most important factor for improving the safety management system. The study also found that radiation safety officers and medical physicists perceived different measures as important, indicating clear differences in opinions among stakeholders, especially in improving quality assurance in radiation therapy. Hence, the process of coordination and consensus is likely to be critical in improving the radiation safety management system. Conclusion: Stakeholders in the medical field consider enforcement as the most critical factor in improving their safety management systems. Specifically, the most crucial among the six specific action plans was the "reinforcement of the organization and workforce for safety management," with a relative importance of 25.7%.