• Title/Summary/Keyword: R & D strategy

Search Result 942, Processing Time 0.032 seconds

An Explorative Study of R&D Priority based on Needs Attributes Model: Case of SMART TV (니즈속성의 중요성과 시급성에 의한 R&D 우선순위 결정에 관한 탐색 연구: SMART TV를 중심으로)

  • Han, Sung-Soo;Choi, Saesol
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.650-671
    • /
    • 2013
  • Products elicit the consumer's purchasing behavior by satisfying their needs and are cognized as the combination of various needs attributes. Also R&D is referred as a series of technical development activities to meet the consumer's needs attributes. In particular, in the market-oriented R&D era, it could obtain the legitimacy by developing the R&D based on the needs attributes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the priority setting in R&D field, considering consumer's needs attributes. To be concrete, we tried to present the evolutional direction of desirable phased R&D according to 'the importance degree for consumers on the attributes (functions) of the certain products' and 'the urgency degree of technical quality to fulfill its needs'. To achieve this, we targeted SMART TV, the convergence product, which contains the uncertainty in terms of marketability and technological aspect, and analyzed the priority of the R&D in SMART TV field. Based on the result of the analysis, 4-steps product concept (ultra high definition TV, interactive TV, 3D/immersive TV, personalized TV) is derived by analyzing the evolutional direction of R&D in SMART TV field. This finding implies that the success possibilities of product could be enhanced during the process of the evolution of products that have multiple needs attributes, by pursuing the R&D which fulfills the needs attribute first required in the market. In addition, it provides a useful framework to design the R&D roadmap in an aspect of R&D strategy.

  • PDF

Leverage Strategy to National R&D Investment in Korea: A System Dynamics Approach (국가 연구개발 투자시스템의 레버리지 전략: 시스템 다이내믹스 접근)

  • Park, Hun-Joon;Oh, Se-Hong;Kim, Sang-Jun
    • Korean System Dynamics Review
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.33-66
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study is an exploratory investigation on how national R&D investments decisions are made in Korea. For developing system dynamic model, we are interested in locating three structural dilemma, occurring with the Korean NIS. In so doing, we intend to devise the ways of ameliorating problems within the NIS investment decision-making process by providing policy implications. We identify delays and side effects during transition periods between different stages of technology innovation by perceiving the switching pattern dynamically, in which form of technologies shifts from one to another stage like paradigm shift, when the R&D investment reaches a certain stock. It is also suggested that the development of strategies is necessary in order to enhance efficiency of technological development process.

  • PDF

Formulating R&D strategy for core technologies in biotechnology using the Delphi and the AHP (Delphi와 AHP를 이용한 생명공학분야 미래유망기술의 R&D전략 수립)

  • Jo, Yong-Gon;Jo, Geun-Tae
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2004.05a
    • /
    • pp.185-188
    • /
    • 2004
  • 국가개발사업 연구개발관리차원에 대한 패러다임은 객관적 연구과제의 선정 ${\cdot}$ 진도관리 ${\cdot}$ 성과관리 중심에서 기술수요조사 및 예측, 자원배분 등 사전기획과 같은 R&D 전략수립 방향으로 변화하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 생명공학분야를 중심으로 미래 유망기술의 R&D 전략수립을 위한 절차를 제시한다. 먼저 전체과제의 중요도와 연구개발수준을 고려한 포트폴리오 구성을 위해서는 델파이방법을 사용하였다. 다음으로 앞으로 시급히 연구개발에 착수해야할 과제들의 우선순위를 설정하기 위해 AHP방법을 사용하였다.

  • PDF

A Study for Establishing Key Performance Indicators of R&D Departments (연구개발 부문의 핵심성과지표 개발 사례연구)

  • Cho, Nam Wook;Kim, Tae-Sung
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.35 no.4
    • /
    • pp.48-54
    • /
    • 2012
  • In this paper, quantitative and systematic procedures for establishing Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) of R&D departments are presented. The proposed methodology is composed of 4 steps : 1) identification of critical success factors, 2) identification of potential KPI's, 3) determination of KPI's and 4) monitoring and execution. A Strategy Map has been presented to better align KPI's with a company's competitive strategies. Also, Analytical Hierarchy Planning (AHP) is used to determine weights of KPI's and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to analyze the effectiveness of R&D departments. To demonstrate its validity of the proposed method, it has been applied to the R&D divisions of a semiconductor company.

Market, Firm, and Project-level Effects on the Innovation Impact of FP RTD Projects

  • Vonortas, Nicholas S.
    • STI Policy Review
    • /
    • v.1 no.2
    • /
    • pp.69-88
    • /
    • 2010
  • This paper explores the determinants of the innovation impact of publicly funded R&D projects along three broad dimensions, namely project, firm and market-related factors. In addition to these factors we examine the attributes of the research result per se and aspects of the commercialization process. The observations from empirical and qualitative analyses are based on R&D projects funded by the Fifth and Sixth Research Framework Programmes of the European Union. Firm size, prior experience, innovation culture, the nature of the project itself, explicit intension to commercialize, consortium management and strategy are the factors with the strongest effect on project success, defined in terms of product/process innovation and/or technical knowledge creation. The paper provides important implications for the organization, objectives, and management of public programmes that fund R&D and for project and participant selection.

연구개발 평가를 위한 ANP(Analytic Network Process) 모형

  • Lee Yeong Chan;Jeong Min Yong
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2002.05a
    • /
    • pp.492-499
    • /
    • 2002
  • Technology Management and R&D(Research and Development) have been one of the most difficult divisions for measurement and evaluation. In spite of these difficulties, the concern and importance of R&D has been dramatically increased. However, it is actually very difficult to manage more efficiently and effectively than any other departments of production, finance, marketing and so on. As criticizing the shortcomings of the traditional evaluation system in making decisions for corporate management which has only been focused on financial indices, so Kaplan & Norton has suggested the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) which can be managed Critical Success Factors(CSF) in accordance with corporate's strategy. The Analytic Network Process(ANP), though based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, allows the decision makers to leap beyond the traditional hierarchy to the interdependent environment of network modeling. Basing on BSC, this study has developed the evaluation system for R&D which has used ANP transforming quantitative and qualitative indices to the quantifying scales in evaluating R&D.

  • PDF

Optimization of Bobbin winding type Deflection Yoke Wire Distribution By Using Evolution Startegy (Evolution Startegy를 이용한 Bobbin형 편향코일의 권선분포 최적화)

  • Joe, M.C.;Kang, B.H.;Koh, C.S.;Joo, K.J.
    • Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
    • /
    • 1994.11a
    • /
    • pp.130-132
    • /
    • 1994
  • Recently, a Deflection Yoke(DY) is designed in the bobbin-seperator-coil-winding type for high-definite CRT and high-efficient DY of wide vision TV or High Definite TV. This paper presents an optimization or bobbin-seperator-coil-winding type yoke's coil distribution for minimizing gap between desired and practical deflections of electron beams using by Evolution Strategy.

  • PDF

A Study of Lean DFSS through the 4th Generation R&D Strategy - Creative Value Design - (4세대 R&D 전략을 통한 Lean DFSS 방법론에 관한 실증적 연구 - 창의적 가치설계를 중심으로 -)

  • Lee, Kang-Koon;Ree, Sang-Bok
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
    • /
    • 2006.04a
    • /
    • pp.431-436
    • /
    • 2006
  • 6 Sigma uses DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology as process of solving problem. Enterprise already propelling successfully 6 sigma such as Motorolla, GE and consulting companies leading 6 sigma also propose DMAIC methodology traditionally. But from making 6 sigma activated, enterprises and 6 sigma consulting companies propose 6 sigma methodology matching office indirection part and research and development part. As the forward example, DFSS(Design For Six Sigma) is R&D part application in GE. This study investigates 6 sigma methodology corresponding to Right Process of the kernel factor. Especially for optimum design of the R&D part, revise DFSS definition and general concept organization through Lean DFSS methodology research and analysis.

  • PDF

Strategies for Component reuse using Strategy Design Pattern (컴포넌트 재사용을 늘리기 위한 전략 패턴의 활용 방법)

  • Shim, Jun-Yong;Oh, Jung-in;Wi, Soung-Hyouk;Kim, Sae-Hwan
    • Annual Conference of KIPS
    • /
    • 2012.04a
    • /
    • pp.1194-1197
    • /
    • 2012
  • 디자인 패턴은 소프트웨어 설계 시 반복적으로 발생하는 문제를 해결하기 위한 방법을 기술한다. 특히, 객체지향 기술을 기반으로 하는 컴포넌트 설계 시 디자인 패턴을 활용함으로써 특정 설계 문제에 대한 해결책을 재사용할 수 있다. 좋은 객체 지향 설계는 재사용성, 확장성 및 유지보수성을 제공하는 것이며, 디자인 패턴은 좋은 설계에 필요한 구성 요소들의 관계 구조를 제시한다. 본 논문은 객체지향 기반의 컴포넌트 프레임워크 설계 시 프레임워크의 확장성과 구현 컴포넌트의 재사용성을 늘리기 위한 방안으로 디자인 패턴의 활용법을 제시한다. 특히, 알고리즘 재사용의 구조를 제시하는 전략 패턴과 처리 절차 재사용의 구조를 제시하는 템플릿 메서드 패턴의 구조를 비교하고, 분산 통신 컴포넌트 설계 시 전략 패턴의 적용 사례를 보여준다.

Government R&D Support for SMEs: Policy Effects and Improvement Measures

  • LEE, SUNGHO;JO, JINGYEONG
    • KDI Journal of Economic Policy
    • /
    • v.40 no.4
    • /
    • pp.47-63
    • /
    • 2018
  • Government R&D grants for SMEs have risen to three trillion Korean won a year, placing Korea second among OECD nations. Indeed, analysis results have revealed that government support has not only expanded corporate R&D investment and the registration of intellectual property rights but has also increased investment in tangible and human assets and marketing. However, value added, sales and operating profit have lacked improvement owing to an ineffective recipient selection system that relies solely on qualitative assessments by technology experts. Nevertheless, if a predictive model is properly applied to the system, the causal effect on value added could increase by more than two fold. Accordingly, it is important to focus on economic performance rather than technical achievements to develop such a model.