• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-34
• /
• 1995

Since 1982, the government of Korea has actively promoted vertical cooperative R&D programs between government-sponsored research institutes (GRIs) and private firms. A number of firms participated in the programs because cooperative R&D could lower the risk and could contribute to rapid commercialization of many technologies. This paper examines the effectiveness of vertical cooperative R&D projects by the modes of cooperation between GRIs and industrial firms, and analyzes the performance of participating firms' technology sourcing strategies for commercial utilization of cooperative R&D results at the project performed from 1982 to 1989 under the Government-Industry Cooperative R&D Program sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST) in Korea. The cooperative R&D projects are classified into 4 groups by two criteria, i.e., the level of participation of firms, and the breadth of cooperation. The findings suggest that firms should actively participate in cooperative R&D projects. In addition, in order to enhance commercial success, cooperation between GRIs and industrial firms should not be limited to R&D stage only. The breadth of cooperation should be extended to commercialization stage. Small- and medium-sized firms participating in vertical cooperative R&D projects in Korea usually lack internal technological capabilities that are needed to commercialize the results of cooperative R&D. Three different technology sourcing strategies - exclusive cooperative R&D strategy, in-house development augmented cooperative R&D strategy, and licensing-in supplemented cooperative R&D strategy - are empirically derived through cluster analysis of the relative usage rates cooperative R&D and of other supplementary technology acquisition methods. The findings suggest that the firms participating in vertical cooperative R&D projects should try to utilize other supplementary technology acquisition methods in order to achieve commercial utilization of the vertical cooperative R&D results.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.373-390
• /
• 2006

지식 정보화 사회에서 연구개발 주체들 간 연구협력을 통한 지식의 확산 및 공유는 국가의 혁신 성과 제고를 위해 매우 중요한 요인으로 부각되고 있다. 우리나라는 1970 년대 이후 산학연 협력 활성화를 위한 지속적인 노력을 기울여 왔으며, 그 결과 최근에는 연구협력 건수 및 규모가 급속히 증가하였다. 반면, 기업들의 연구 협력 현황 및 수요를 분석한 결과는 공공 및 대학부문과의 연구협력이 기업의 혁신에 미친 기여도가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 기업 특성별로는 첨단기술 산업분야의 대기업이 계열사 등의 관련 기업과 연구협력을 수행한 경우에만 협력의 성과가 긍정적인 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 연구협력 활성화 정책은 기업의 연구협력 수요에 바탕을 두고 기업의 특성을 고려하여 수립되어야 할 것이다.

• 기술사
• /
• 제32권6호
• /
• pp.40-43
• /
• 1999

The R&D productivity has the same meaning as that of general meaning. Its input includes budget, facility, schedule, idea and target, and its output includes patent, paper, technological innovation and revenue increase and technology accumulation influenced by these factors. The choice of R&D item which will have the large effectiveness after customization, resource input of proper level, application of efficient development schema, effective usage of development output, objective appraisal for the R&D output and extension for the future project are the main factors for which is suggested to enhance the R&D productivity. The management's expectation for R&D can be represented as the innovativeness of output and potential influence to outsiders. The speedy output, even if incremental investment more than planning happens, will eventually result in the productivity enhancement of the enterprise, and managers must not encounter the opportunity loss in return for the excessive investment control.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.42-51
• /
• 2012

Korea has entered into the Post Catching-up era and the necessity of new innovation strategy in response is being raised. This study argues the necessity of new innovation strategy and discusses the issue of co-ordination between R&D and Human Resource for that as the key factor. From empirical analysis, there seems to be restricted inflow of outstanding human resources to manufacturing sectors and lowering effectiveness of major even with the improved compatibility between major and job. Especially, it is severe in the industries with high R&D investment. It can be interpreted as an incoordination of the technological innovation efforts from the aspect of R&D investment with human resource utilization from the aspect of new human resource. The analytical result and interpretation suggests that there should be more active improvement on the co-ordination between innovative manufacturers' efforts and human resource utilization, in order to keep sustainable development.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.601-608
• /
• 2009

Interoperability is the key issue in NCW. However, old-fashioned weapon systems have low level interoperability. The representative example is BTCS. Therefore, we apply KVMF R1 to BTCS in order to improve interoperability and testify the effectiveness of how to apply without any changes in existing software. In this paper, we have proposed a message and software architecture design method for applying KVMF to developed weapon system. Finally, it is confirmed that the proposed method is superior to apply KVMF to existing weapon system in a point of verifying how to highly efficiently apply KVMF on existing weapon system.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.425-438
• /
• 2015

This study proposes a three-stage model of R&BD performance which captures commercialization outcomes as well as conventional R&D performance. The model is composed of three factors : inputs (R&D budgets and researchers), outputs (patents and papers), and outcomes (technical fees, products sales, and cost savings). Three stages are defined for each transformation process between the three factors : efficiency stage from input to output (stage 1), effectiveness stage from output to outcome (stage 2), and productivity stage from input to outcome (stage 3). The performance of each stage is measured by data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA is a non-parametric efficiency measurement technique that has widely been used in R&D performance measurement. We measure the performance of 171 projects of 6 public R&BD programs managed by Seoul Business Agency using the proposed three-stage model. In order to provide a balanced and holistic view of R&BD performance, the R&BD performance map is also constructed based on performance of efficiency and productivity stages.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제17권11호
• /
• pp.331-341
• /
• 2017

최근 과학기술정보 콘텐츠 분석 기반의 R&D 전략 수립이 중요시됨에 따라 국내 외 과학기술 통계 정보를 수집, 범주화하여 DB를 구축하고 이를 증거 기반의 기초연구정책을 수립하는데 활용하고자 하였다. 국내 외 49종의 과학기술 관련 보고서 등 자료를 수집하여 6,446개 지표 추출, 877개 통계 정보로 범주화, 이중 208개를 집중 관리 통계로 도출하였다. 이렇게 구축된 DB의 활용성 제시를 위해 논문정보 관련 심층분석을 통해 제한적으로나마 우리나라 기초연구의 효과성을 보여주고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 고피인용 논문창출과 R&D 투자 간의 통계기반 분석과 고피인용 논문의 국내 외 지식맵 비교 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 기초연구비 증가가 우리나라의 보편적 연구활동도와 세계적 연구성과 창출에 긍정적 영향을 미친 것으로 나타났다. 또한 순수기초연구분야로 간주되어온 수학, 물리, 화학이 신성장동력이라 불리는 AI, 청정에너지 등 기술 발전의 기반이 되어왔음을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2016년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.627-629
• /
• 2016

공개소프트웨어(오픈소스 소프트웨어) 개발을 R&D로 추진하게 되면 많은 이점이 있고 여러 국가에서 공개소프트웨어 기반의 R&D 프로젝트가 지속적으로 만들어지고 있다. 하지만, 아직 공공분야의 오픈소스 R&D 프로젝트에 대한 적절한 관리 방안이 정립되지 않아 프로젝트 수행의 어려움은 물론 R&D 사업의 실효적인 성과를 창출하는 데 한계가 있다. 이에 여러 선행연구 및 사례를 조사하고 공공분야 오픈소스 소프트웨어 R&D 프로젝트에 대한 전주기적 관점에서 오픈소스 특성에 맞는 구체적인 추진 및 관리 방안을 제안하여 제도의 실효성을 제고하고자 한다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.191-204
• /
• 2023

Purpose - The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between R&D tax support policy and firm innovation activity using data on firms engaged in 12 national strategic technology sectors. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected survey data from 664 companies engaged in national strategic technologies. The data were then analysed using the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. Findings - First, corporate R&D tax support had a statistically significant positive (+) relationship with firm innovation performance. Second, there was a statistically significant positive (+) relationship with incremental innovation, but there was no statistical significance with radical innovation. Third, there was a statistically significant positive (+) relationship with the firm's first innovation, but there was no statistical significance with the world's first innovation. Fourth, there was a statistically significant positive (+) relationship with the number of R&D projects of a firm. Finally, there was a statistically significant positive (+) relationship with a firm's open innovation. Research implications or Originality - First, in terms of policy effectiveness, the government needs to consider promoting R&D tax support policies in areas where R&D competition is fierce. For private companies engaged in the 12 national strategic technology fields, the R&D tax support policy is working in the direction of promoting corporate innovation activities, and this positive policy effect is likely to be effective in areas where R&D competition is fierce. Second, if the government wants to improve the quality of corporate innovation activities through R&D tax support policies, it needs to provide incentives higher than the current level.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.145-168
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.