• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.293-302
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 2년차 신임 교사의 사례 연구를 통해 수학수업에 대한 신임교사의 발문 유형의 특성을 분석하고 그에 따른 대안을 탐색하기 위한 것이다. 연구 결과, 확인을 위한 발문이 가장 많았으며(69%), 이해를 위한 발문(25%), 성찰을 위한 발문(6%) 순이었고, 창의성 신장을 위한 발문은 하지 않는 것을 알 수 있었다. 더불어 기존 연구를 바탕으로 신임교사의 발문과 관련된 대안적인 창의성 신장을 위한 발문을 제안해 보았다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.276-285
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to investigate the pattern and characteristics of elementary school teaching and learning processes in science based classes. The study participants' class was recorded in video and instructional conversation transcription. The pattern of the observed class was analyzed using the classification frame suggested by Mogan &Saxton(2006). In result, the questioning for elicit information was most frequent and questioning for shape understanding and the questioning for press for reflection in its priority. In result, the presence of elicited questioning for the attainment of knowledge and understanding is more prominent in science-based classrooms. It was revealed that the participating teachers used the questioning sentence pattern more frequently and the self-sustained inquiry that accelerates creative thinking of the student was lacking. It was discovered that teaching elicited questioning, which accelerates creative thinking, as well as fact confirmation pattern is a necessary element of training for teachers.

• 말소리와 음성과학
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 2015

Previous research on syntactic processing shows that the interpretation of a syntactically ambiguous sentence is frequently strongly biased towards one meaning over another. The current study investigated the effect of bias strength on the production of disambiguating prosody for English ambiguous sentences. In Experiment 1, 40 speakers gave default readings of 18 syntactically ambiguous sentences. Questioning was used to prove intended meanings behind default readings. Intended meanings were treated as interpretation biases when a majority of speakers read a sentence with the same intended meaning. The size of the majority was used to establish bias strength. In Experiment 2, 10 speakers were instructed to use prosody to disambiguate given alternate meanings of the sentences from Experiment 1. The results indicated an effect of bias strength on disambiguating prosody: speakers used temporal juncture cues to reliably disambiguate alternate meanings for sentences with a weak interpretation bias, but not for those with a strong bias. Overall, the results indicated that interpretation biases strongly affect the production of prosody.

• 음성과학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.37-50
• /
• 2000

This paper describes a test of everyday speech understanding ability, in which a listener's utilization of the context-situational information of speech is assessed, and is compared with the utilization of acoustic-phonetic information. The test items are sentences which are presented in a babble type of noise, and the listener response is the key word in the sentence. The key words are always two-syllabic nouns and the questioning sentences are added to obtain the responding key words. Two types of sentences are used. One is the high-predictable sentences for which the key word is somewhat predictable from the context. The other is the low-predictable sentences for which the key-word cannot be predicted from the context. Both types are included in six 40-item forms of the test, which are balanced for intelligibility, key-word familiarity and predictability, phonetic content, and length. Performance of normally hearing listeners shows significantly different functions for various signal-to-noise ratios. The potential applications of this test, particularly in the assessment of speech understanding ability in the hearing impaired, are discussed.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.721-741
• /
• 2010

이 연구는 중학교 일반학급과 영재학급의 과학수업을 관찰하여 교사의 발문과 피드백, 학생의 응답에 대한 유형과 빈도 분석을 통해 교사와 학생사이의 언어적 상호작용을 비교 분석한 것이다. 연구 결과, 일반학급의 과학수업에서 교사들은 교과서의 내용을 정리해서 묻거나 그대로 안내하는 발문을 많이 사용하였고, 재진술 형태의 즉각 피드백을 주로 사용하였다. 학생들은 네, 아니오, 와 같은 단순 확인 단답형 응답을 많이 사용하였으며, 언어적 상호작용 모형은 인지 기억적 사고 발문-단답형 응답-즉각 피드백 순서가 가장 많았다. 영재학급의 과학수업에서 교사들은 이유가 뭐에요? 왜 그런 거예요? 와 같은 개방적 발문의 확산적 사고 발문과 평가적 사고 발문을 사용하였고, 설명형 형태의 즉각 피드백을 주로 사용하였다. 일반학급과 비교하여 지연 피드백은 높게 나타났으나 즉각 피드백은 낮게 나타났다. 학생들은 짧은 단어나 간단한 문장 형태의 단답형으로 응답하였으며, 수업참여가 보다 적극적이었다. 언어적 상호작용 모형은 인지 기억적 사고 발문-문장 형태 단답형 응답-지연 피드백 순서가 많았다.