• 농촌계획
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.25-36
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to construct a quantitative evaluation method that can analyze the policy effectiveness with the construction of a implicit composite index incorporating spatial econometrics models. In order to propose a methodological framework for the program evaluation, this study conducts an empirical analysis with the application of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project (CRVDP) which explicitly claims to achieve comprehensive goal of community development. The present study pays particular attention to quantifying the composite evaluation index and drawing net effect through the application of a series of spatial econometrics models. The spatial unit of the analysis is drawn at Eup-Myeon level in rural areas in Korea, and the time horizon is in between 2005 and 2010. We utilize the Korean Agricultural Census data in 2005 and 2010. Three steps of methodological processes are needed to satisfy the objective of the present study. First, we apply factor analysis to construct the composite index that represents comprehensive settlement environment in rural area. The index should be matched with the main objective of the CRVDP. Second, we apply the derived index to a series of spatial econometrics model as dependent variable. Lastly, utilizing the estimated coefficients of the econometrics models, we apply decomposition technique to estimate CRVDP's net effect from both cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. We find that the results of the decomposition analysis by the execution of the CRVDP are positively associated with the explicit object of the project.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2015

Recent construction site large disaster occurs in, even normal disaster not be reduced, the efforts of pre-disaster prevention for this is also a need to study the evaluation index. By comprehensive examination zero reform the current lowest bid system has included the social responsibility index is scheduled, objective and quantitative evaluation indicators making construction safety areas that are included in the item of social responsibility is required ing. In this study, the construction, in order to prevent disasters, efforts pre disaster prevention be presented metrics in the construction safety in the field of comprehensive examination system and the evaluation index, it is intended to examine the evaluation items for the evaluation indices.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2007

This paper presents a consolidated patent index to measure national technology innovation and science technology activation, as well as index for the main constituent such as corporation, research organization by comprehensive analysis of existing patent index. It is classified by macroscopic index and analytical index in the consolidated patent index, in which macroscopic index is to present a degree of innovation in national scientific innovation and is divided into the Consolidated Patent Index and Index for comparison between countries. The analytical index basically designed to measure R&D activity by the main constituent is divided to present by quantitative index utilizing bibliographical data in patent and other technical publication related therein, and qualitative index for analysis of bibliographical data. In this paper, the Consolidated Patent Index is presented by adding Creation Index representing for patent by developing excellent technology, Evaluation Index representing valuable technology thereof, and Utility Index representing applicability diffused.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.185-202
• /
• 2023

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.129-144
• /
• 2013

Recognizing a limits on quantitative evaluation of cultural contents' and for its betterment, study aims developing a qualitative evaluation model. For this study, Reception Theory, Semiotics and Psychology were derived for epistemological dimension to contemplate culture contents' essential attribute. To be concrete, cultural contents was examined as experiential products, emotional products, rememberable products and texts. Also, codes of fun, emotion and culture were discussed as intrinsic attributes for cultural contents and how those attributes were expressed or composed in cultural contents was discussed as well. Evaluation items were extracted based on final discussion at the epistemic level, set up the final evaluation model by taking experts' advices on each items. With all those outcomes, qualitative evaluation model for cultural contents was developed. For the importance of each index in the model, priority was granted by weighting on each index. Lastly, evaluation scale was developed for each index. The culture contents' evaluation model developed in study is meaningful not only in drawing qualitative evaluation items of video(image) contents and developing the index and model for the first time, but also its possibility of wide use for other genres.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제50권2호
• /
• pp.183-197
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative evaluation model for the defense quality management system and suggest institutionalization plans. To this end, another existing evaluation model was reviewed and analyzed to develop a quantitative evaluation model applicable to military institutions. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a DQMS quantitative evaluation model, a military product quality level survey model and a defense quality model operated in the defense field were analyzed. In addition, evaluation models and indicators were analyzed by investigating evaluation models operated by other institutions and private sectors. Results: As a result of the study, the total score of the DQMS model was 1,000 points, 600 points for maturity level indicators and 400 points for operation performance indicators, and the evaluation items consisted of 7 major categories and 25 middle categories. The maturity level index 600 points are 70 points for organizational situation, 60 points for leadership, 40 points for planning, 100 points for support, 180 points for operation, 90 points for performance evaluation, and 60 points for improvement. Conclusion: It will be easy to quantify and evaluate the operating level of DQMS certified companies through the application of the DQMS quantitative evaluation model and evaluation criteria presented in this study. As a result, it will be possible to grasp the level of quality management system and the areas of improvement, and the overall level of improvement can be expected by inducing voluntary improvement activities through sharing of best practices and identifying improvement cases.

• 한국정보전자통신기술학회논문지
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.292-300
• /
• 2023

본 논문에서는 생성형 인공지능 관련 특허에서, 기술의 핵심 구성 요소에 기반하여 수립된 정성적 평가 지표를 활용해 특허 발굴 방법과 전략을 제시한다. 현재 특허 품질에 대한 평가는 정량적 지표에 의존하고 있으나, 기존의 정량적 지표는 생성형 인공지능 기술의 특성을 대표할 수 없어 정확한 평가가 어렵다. 이에 실제 특허의 강약을 알 수 있는 특허 청구범위를 기준으로 하여, 기술적 특성을 고려한 정성적 지표가 추가로 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 생성형 인공지능의 기술적 특성을 고려하여 새로운 평가 지표를 제안한다. 제안한 평가 지표를 활용하여 핵심 특허를 선정하였으며, 선정된 핵심 특허에 대하여 기존의 정량적 평가 방법을 통해 제안한 지표가 적합한지 확인하였다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권7호
• /
• pp.3528-3537
• /
• 2013

비정형 건축곡면의 패널분할 최적화 정도를 평가하기 위한 여러 가지 최적화 평가기법들이 개발되어 적용되고 있으나 이러한 평가기법과 평가지표들은 독립성, 보편성을 확보하고 있지 못하다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 비정형곡면 패널분할 최적화 평가기법 및 평가지표에 관한 사례 및 선행연구 고찰을 통한 독립성 및 보편성이 확보되는 비정형 곡면 패널분할 최적화의 정량적 평가를 위한 평가항목 추출과 평가지표의 제안이 이루어진다. 제안된 세 가지 패널분할 최적화 평가항목은 원형 충실도, 생산 용이성, 연속성이며, 원형 충실도를 위한 평가지표로는 곡면 일치, 생산 용이성을 위한 평가지표로는 평면성, 평면 패널 비율, 연속성을 위한 평가지표로는 접선 연속성, 사이 간격이 제안되었으며 그 산출방법이 함께 제안되었다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.33-50
• /
• 2004

본 논문에서는 정보화 투자에 대한 성과평가를 통해 공공부문의 정보화 예산투자에 대한 타당성과 효과성 측정 방안, 그리고 투자대비 효과의 적합성을 제고 할 수 있는 계량적 평가모델을 제시하였다. 즉, 전자정부 과제로 추진된 정부전자문서유통센터 구축사업을 대상으로 정보화 투자에 대한 명확한 성과목표를 설정하고 사전평가 및 사후평가를 객관적으로 측정할 수 있는 핵심성과지표(KPI)를 개발하여 계량적 평가모델을 이용한 현장검증 연구방식으로 성과평가 결과를 도출하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.62-70
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to derive implications for improving related policies and evaluation criteria in the future by analyzing trends of evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation in Korea. For this purpose, five surveys on industry-university cooperation by government departments, major general university evaluations, and evaluation indicators of specialized industry-university evaluations by the Ministry of Education were analyzed. As a result, most of the evaluation criteria for domestic industry-university cooperation have been composed of quantitative indicators and have a limited character as quantitative performance management for government projects. Although the Ministry of Education's evaluation criteria for industry-university cooperation projects has gradually changed to a segmented index considering universities, industries, and regions, it needs to be supplemented for sustainability of industry-university cooperation. In order to promote sustainable industry-university cooperation in the future, it was suggested that first, it is necessary to supplementation of qualitative Indicators considering each university's characteristics, second, the composition of indicators related to reflect on demand in the process of the cooperation, and third, to build a virtuous cycle system for future operation of evaluation criteria.