• 만화애니메이션 연구
• /
• 통권41호
• /
• pp.455-486
• /
• 2015

1986년 특허등록으로 시작된 3D프린팅 기술은 당시에는 인식 부족으로 일부 기업 외에는 주목받지 못하는 기술이었다. 그러나 20년이 지나 만료되는 특허들이 나오는 오늘날에는 가격도 개인이 구매가능한 선까지 낮아졌고 컴퓨터 성능향상 및 인터넷 정보교류의 보편화로 3D 콘텐츠에 대한 인식이 보편화 되어 산업계는 물론 일반인들에게도 주목 받고 있다. 수정 및 유통이 편리한 디지털 데이터를 기반으로 하면서 금형제작이 필요없는 3D프린터는 제작 공정에서 획기적인 변화를 가져 올 수 있으며 캐릭터 콘텐츠상품 분야에서도 동일한 효과를 얻을 수 있다. 최근 들어 관심을 받고 있는 키덜트 문화의 가장 선두에 있는 다양한 캐릭터 상품 제작에는 3D프린터를 사용하는 것이 필수적인 공정이 되고 있으며 이 같은 캐릭터 콘텐츠 관련 산업현장 수요를 예측해 볼 때, 그리고 특허 만료 및 기술의 공유로 저렴해진 가격 등을 고려해 볼 때, 앞으로 교육현장에서 3D프린터를 활용할 수 있는 인재를 양성하는 교육과정을 도입하여 보다 창의적인 작업을 할 수 있는 인재를 양성하고 취업의 영역과 기회를 확대하는 것은 꼭 진행되어야 할 것이다. 그러나 학교 교육에서 3D프린터를 도입하고자 할 때 얻을 수 있는 정보는 한계가 있다. 언론이나 정보매체에서는 3D 프린터에 대한 장밋빛 미래가치나 산업규모 성장과 같은 일반적인 정보만을 거론하고 있으며 학계에서도 연구의 수준의 프린팅 기술 소개나 산업에서의 적용, 산업 규모 데이터 분석 등 개론수준의 내용 정리에 머무르고 있다. 이러한 정보의 부족은 교육현장에서 문제를 발생시킨다. 장점과 단점 비교와 같은 실질적인 정보 비교 없이 일단 도입 하여 시행착오의 과정 이후에서야 사용을 할 수 있게 됨으로서 시간적, 기회비용이 발생할 수밖에 없는 상황이다. 특히 많은 비용을 들여 도입한 장비가 학교 교육의 특성에 맞지 않는다면 그로 인한 비용손실은 클 것이다. 본 연구의 목적은 관련 전문가들이 아닌 기술관련 기반이 없는 일반 사용자들을 대상으로 하였다. 기존의 의 3D프린터 기술소개의 정도가 아닌 대표적 기술에 따른 사용상의 주의 점과 문제점을 분석하고 장단점을 비교하여 학교 교육, 특히 애니메이션 관련 학과에서 캐릭터 상품 개발과 관련한 교육에서 필요한 3D 프린터는 어떤 특성을 가져야 하는지를 설명하고 앞으로 3D프린터 이용한 교육을 시행하고자 할 때 실질적인 도움이 될 수 있는 정보를 제공하고자 하였다. 본론에서는 지지대 방식, 재료의 종류, 이차원 프린팅 방법, 삼차원 프린팅 방법과 같이 새로운 관점으로 기술을 구분하여 설명하였다. 이렇게 다른 구분 방식을 선택 하게 된 이유는 사용상의 실질적인 문제들을 상호 비교하기 용이하도록 하기 위함이다. 결론적으로 가장 적합한 3D프리터는 출력물의 품질은 다소 부족하지만 비교적 가격대가 저렴하고 재료 및 유지보수비용이 적게 드는 FDM방식의 프린터로 선정하였으며 부가적으로 기술지원이 잘되는 업체를 선정하기를 추천한다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.83-101
• /
• 1981

Under the full consideration of the growing need and importance of population education in the field of home economics in Korea, the study was carried out to verify and assess the following facts on the current issues of population education of home economists who are presently engaging in teaching professions as the teachers of middle and high school and professors of college and universities by setting its primary objectives of the study as followings; 1) to assess the degree of general knowledge and attitudes of home economists toward population education in the field of home economics, 2) to verify the problems encountered in implementing population education by home economists in its field, 3) to find an existing status of previous trainings received and other activities of population education of home economists aimed at utilizing these findings as a part of reference materials when the population education is conducted in the field of home economics. In order to attain these objectives described above, the questionnaire was carefully designed to house a total of 40 questions with good combination of multiple-choice and the simple answer questions. The mail questionnaire survey was conducted by establishing teachers of home economics at middle/high schools and college/universities as Senior Home Economists(SHE) who are from public, private liberal arts and vocational schools. The rate of response observed during the survey was 45.6 percent and the findings of the survey research are as follows: 1) Examining the status of the respondents by residence and religion, it was found that 45 percent of middle & high school teachers ar.d 59. 1 percent of college professors are residing in Seoul city area and that the largest percent of them are christian in their religion. Analyzing respondents by their ages, 56 percent of middle/high school teachers are in their 30s, 45 percent of college professors are in their 40s, and 37 percent of college teachers are in their 30s. In addition, 13 percent of the total respondents are found to be unmarried. The study also revealed that 71 percent of the college professors finished Master Degree course and 82 percent of middle/high school teachers are graduated from college level lasting 4 years. Looking over the status cf major fields of respondents, 68.4 percent of middle/high school teachers are specialized in home economic education and the college professors, on the other hand, show relatively even prortion by specializing in the order of food & nutrition science, clothes & textile science and home managerial science. As far as the length of teaching experience is concerned, a relatively longer period of teaching experience is observed in the college professors in comparison with that of middle/high school teachers. In other words, 33.3 percent of middle/high school teachers are experienced in teaching from 6 to 10 years on average while 43.9 percent of college professors show more than 16 years of experience. 2) Examining the status of existing number of children cf the respondents, one boy and one daughter pattern is predominant, showing 28.5 percent in middle/high school teachers and 21.1 percent in college professors. As for the desired number of children of unmarried respondents, it is observed that 43.8 percent of middle/high school teachers desire to have one boy and one girl, and 31.3 percent of college professors want to have one child regardless of the sex. By assessing the degree of awareness of the population education through their students, it is observed that 53 percent of middle/high school teachers and 50 percent of college professors are aware of population education in some extent and that a majority of respondents took the positive attitudes toward an inclusion of family planning components into the formal school education. Another noteworthy to observe is that a total of 84.8 percent out of middle/high school teachers pointed that the population education currently conducted at schools as a part of home economics are less sufficient than it should be. 3) Analyzing the tendency as to whether the respondents were experienced in receiving population education during the time when they were students, 75 percent of college professors and 59 percent of middle/high school teachers responded negative answers in the survey. In the mean time, a total of 50 percent of the respondents replied that they began to acknowledge the importance of population education mainly through the participation of some sort of population-education orientend seminars, experienced by 40 percent of college professors and 80 percent of middle/high school teachers. 4) What it calls attention in this study was to find that 96.5 percent of middle/high school teachers and 72 percent of college professors conduct population education to some extent during their lecture hours and that more than 80 percent of them are never experienced in teaching population and family planning contents in their regular classes. It is, on the other hand, found that no more than once was the response of those who believe themselves that they are experienced in teaching these relevant components to their students. Analyzing the contents of the subjects being taught in the class, a large percent of them are found to be consisted of population and family planning contents. According to this study, the current population education through the formal school is quite inactive. Analyzing the facts, 44.9 percent of the college professors responded that the population and family planning components are quite apart from their specialization which eventually generates lack of interest in the field. 5) It is also noticed through the study that the degree of frequency of commenting on population and family planning contents during the classes was depending significantly on their specializations which means that the degree of frequency varies from a major to another. Those who majored in home managerial science was the first one, as compared to others who majored in different specializations. Glancing over the status of correlations between ages of the respondents and numbers of seminar paticipation, it is quite clear that the aged group participated more than the younger group did, and that the most highest number of participations made by college professors were those who are in 50s. In addition, it is also found that those who are aged 20s and 60s of the respondents were the group who comments least on the contents of population and family planning at their classes. The suggestions and recommendation made through this survey research are as follows. 1) No one denies that the rapid increase of population, as compared to the limited size of land and resources, will certainly affect adversly to an enhancement of individual life quality which will, eventually, bring forth the poverty of the nation. This is the reasson why we are insisting that the world population be controlled up to an optimum level with a matter of global concerns. It is our understading that the primary aim for reducing number of population is believed to be attained only by conducting the systematic and comprehensive population education through the formal schools. Therefore, the role of home economists in the field of population/family planning education is considered very importment due to the fact that an ultimate goal of population education is placed in elevating the quality of family life by having optimum number of children through family planning program. 2) It is quite clear that home economists as teachers of formal school in all level are invited to pay their attention on redefining the ultimate goal of education and that of population education. We also understant that the primary objective of population education is to change the norm and value of the clients by replenishing the students with pertinent knowledge and attitudes on population and its related problems through a sort of education in order to attain the ultimate goal for enhancing the quality of life. There is no exception in the theory of home economics. An altimate goal of home economics is to elevate the general quality of life through an establishment of value existed in daily life. Considering the relations between population education and home economics, it is quite indespensable to bandle population components as an integral part in the field of home economics. We believe, therefore, that the senior home economists positive participation in the effort population control is more needed than it has been. 3) It is also strongly urged that population education should be a part of instructor training course for home economics. In other words, the teacher of home economics should be well aware of population and its problems by teaching interrelationship between population education and home economics, needs, contents and methods of population education during the instructor training courese for home economics. In addition, the senior home economists should be encouraged through positive participation on the short term training by types of domestic and international seminar, workshop, etc. 4) We certainly believe that the population education can not sustain itself without any backing-up of information and findings' of various and comprehensive researches of natural and social sciences. Accordingly, every senior home economist is invited to exert their maximum effort to conduct systematic study with an aim to utilize these findings and information at best in population education in the field of home economics. Therefore, we consider that the development of training material is imminent in order to provide effective and efficient population education through the for training of home economies. It should be noted that these training materials must be carefully designed, tailored and developed to meet the different classes of trainees under the considerations as to whether it is easily adaptable and infusable into the curricula of every field of home economics, and it is acceptable in the degree of difficulty and quality in its contents. 5) It is true that there are many domestic and international research rapers, reports and findings in the field of population education and family planning. However, there is a tendency that the most of research papers are heavily relying on the authors intension and preferences in its expression and publication. Under these circumstances, it is urged that the home economists should aware of the growing need of the technical training in order to keep these available information and research findings reprocessed and redesigned to insure the practical application into the population education in the field of home economics in Korea.